Safety and patient-reported outcomes of atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (IMpower133): a randomized phase I/III trial.

BACKGROUND: The addition of atezolizumab to carboplatin and etoposide (CP/ET) significantly improved progression-free and overall survival for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in the IMpower133 study (NCT02763579). We have evaluated adverse events (AEs) and patient-reported outcomes in IMpower133 to assess the benefit-risk profile of this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received four 21-day cycles of CP/ET plus intravenous atezolizumab 1200 mg or placebo (induction phase), followed by atezolizumab or placebo (maintenance phase) until progression or loss of benefit. AEs were assessed and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated every 3 weeks during treatment using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and QLQ-LC13. RESULTS: Overall, 394 patients were assessable for safety in the induction phase and 318 in the maintenance phase. The frequency of AEs, grade 3-4 AEs, and serious AEs was similar between arms in both phases. Immune-related AEs were more frequent in the atezolizumab arm during both induction (28% versus 17%; leading to atezolizumab/placebo interruption 9% versus 5%, leading to withdrawal 4% versus 0%) and maintenance (26% versus 15%; leading to atezolizumab/placebo interruption, 3% versus 2%, leading to withdrawal 1% versus 1%), most commonly rash (induction 11% versus 9%, maintenance 14% versus 4%), and hypothyroidism (induction 4.0% versus 0%, maintenance 10% versus 1%). Changes in patient-reported treatment-related symptoms commonly associated with quality of life impairment were generally similar during induction and most of the maintenance phase. Patient-reported function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) improved in both arms after initiating treatment, with more pronounced and persistent HRQoL improvements in the atezolizumab arm. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ES-SCLC, atezolizumab plus CP/ET has a comparable safety profile to placebo plus CP/ET, and the addition of atezolizumab did not adversely impact patient-reported HRQoL. These data demonstrate the positive benefit-risk profile of first-line atezolizumab plus CP/ET in ES-SCLC and further support this regimen as a new standard of care in this setting. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT02763579.

Safety and clinical activity of atezolizumab in head and neck cancer: results from a phase I trial.

Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) has a poor prognosis at advanced stages. Given the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in HNC, inhibition of the programmed death-ligand 1/programmed death-1 (PD-L1/PD-1) signaling pathway represents a promising therapeutic approach. Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) is efficacious against many tumor types. Here we report the clinical safety and activity from the HNC cohort of the phase Ia PCD4989g clinical trial. Patients and methods: Patients with previously treated, advanced HNC received atezolizumab i.v. every 3 weeks for 16 cycles, up to 1 year or until loss of clinical benefit. Patients were monitored for safety and tolerability and evaluated for response at least every 6 weeks. Baseline PD-L1 expression level and human papillomavirus (HPV) status were evaluated. Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled; 7 patients (22%) had a primary tumor in the oral cavity, 18 (56%) in the oropharynx, 1 (3%) in the hypopharynx, 2 (6%) in the larynx, and 4 (13%) in the nasopharynx. Seventeen patients (53%) had ≥2 prior lines of therapy. Twenty-one patients (66%) experienced a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), with three experiencing grade 3 TRAEs and one experiencing a grade 4 TRAE (per CTCAE v4.0). No grade 5 TRAEs were reported. Objective responses by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) occurred in 22% of patients, with a median duration of response of 7.4 months (range 2.8-45.8 months). Median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (range 0.5-48.4 months), and median overall survival was 6.0 months (range 0.5-51.6+ months). Responses showed no association with HPV status or PD-L1 expression level. Conclusions: In this heavily pre-treated advanced HNC cohort, atezolizumab had a tolerable safety profile and encouraging activity, with responses observed regardless of HPV status and PD-L1 expression level. These findings warrant further investigation of atezolizumab in HNC. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01375842.

Phase Ib study of tivozanib (AV-951) in combination with temsirolimus in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Tivozanib is a potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR)-1, -2 and -3, with a long half-life. Tivozanib has demonstrated clinical activity and acceptable tolerability in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This phase Ib study determined the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and evaluated the safety and clinical activity of tivozanib plus temsirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced RCC were administered open-label tivozanib 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5mg/d orally (3 weeks on/1 week off) and temsirolimus 15 or 25 mg/week intravenously in a 3+3 dose-escalation design and subsequent expansion cohort. RESULTS: Of 27 patients treated, 20 patients had received ≥ 1 prior VEGF-targeted therapy. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred; the RP2D was determined to be tivozanib 1.5mg/d plus temsirolimus 25mg/week. Combination of tivozanib plus temsirolimus demonstrated acceptable tolerability and suggested no synergistic toxicity. The most common grade ≤ 3 adverse events were fatigue and thrombocytopenia (15% each). One patient each required dose reduction of tivozanib or temsirolimus due to an adverse event. Confirmed partial responses and stable disease were achieved at 23% and 68%, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analyses may suggest lack of an interaction between tivozanib and temsirolimus. CONCLUSIONS: In this small phase Ib study, tivozanib and temsirolimus were safely combined at the fully recommended dose and schedule of both agents. The observed clinical activity and manageable toxicity profile of this combination warrant further exploration in patients with RCC.

A phase II, multicenter, open-label randomized study of motesanib or bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study estimated the difference in objective response rate (ORR) among patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving paclitaxel-carboplatin (CP) plus motesanib or bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients (N = 186) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive CP plus motesanib 125 mg once daily (qd) (arm A), motesanib 75 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) 5 days on/2 days off (arm B), or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks (q3w) (arm C). The primary end point was ORR (per RECIST). Other end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), motesanib pharmacokinetics, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: ORRs in the three arms were as follows: arm A, 30% (95% confidence interval 18% to 43%); arm B, 23% (13% to 36%); and arm C, 37% (25% to 50%). Median PFS in arm A was 7.7 months, arm B 5.8 months, and arm C 8.3 months; median OS for arm A was 14.0 months, arm B 12.8 months, and arm C 14.0 months. Incidence of AEs was greater in arms A and B than in arm C. More grade 5 AEs not attributable to disease progression occurred in arm B (n = 10) than in arms A (n = 4) and C (n = 4). Motesanib plasma C(max) and C(min) values were consistent with its pharmacokinetic properties observed in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of 125 mg qd motesanib or bevacizumab plus CP was estimated to be comparable. Toxicity was higher but manageable in both motesanib arms. Efficacy and tolerability of motesanib 125 mg qd plus CP in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC are being further investigated in a phase III study.

Anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab (Avastin) with 5FU/LV as third line treatment for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the activity and safety of bevacizumab when given with standard 5FU/leukovorin (LV) regimens in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed irinotecan and oxaliplatin-based treatments. METHODS: Bevacizumab was given at 5 mg/kg as an IV infusion every 2 weeks. Patients received 5FU according to Roswell Park or the de Gramont regimen. RESULTS: Nineteen patients enrolled, median age 60, median PS: 1. Most common toxicity attributable to bevacizumab was mild hypertension, epistaxis and mild proteinuria; 1 patient had a CNS haemorrhage. The median number of cycles was 1 (8 weeks). Clinical benefit as disease stabilisation lasting 2-6 months was noted in 9 patients, whereas 10 progressed (median f/u: 5 months). TTP was 16 weeks, and the overall survival has not been reached (24+ weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab may result in growth arrest and clinical benefit in a substantial proportion of patients with colorectal cancer and no alternative treatment.

A multi-institutional phase ii study of SU101, a platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibitor, for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

In a multi-institutional Phase II trial, we evaluated the efficacy of a platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGF-r) inhibitor, SU101, in patients with hormonerefractory prostate cancer. The patients received a 4-day i.v. loading dose of SU101 at 400 mg/m(2) for 4 consecutive days, followed by 10 weekly infusions at 400 mg/m(2). The primary study end points were a decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and a decrease in measurable tumor. Secondary end points were time to progression and an effect on pain as measured by the Brief Pain Survey. Expression of PDGF-r was examined in both metastatic and archival primary prostate tumor samples. Forty-four patients were enrolled at four centers. The median age was 72 years, the median PSA was 223 ng/ml, and 21 patients had at least one prior chemotherapy. Thirty-nine patients are evaluable for PSA, and three patients demonstrated a PSA decline >50% from baseline (55-99.9% decrease). The median time to progression was 90 days. Of 19 patients evaluable for measurable disease, 1 patient had a partial response. Nine of 35 evaluable patients had significant improvement in pain. The most frequent adverse events were asthenia (75%), nausea (55%), anorexia (50%), and anemia (41%). PDGF-r expression was detected in 80% of the metastases and 88% of primary prostate cancers. The results of this trial may warrant further clinical studies with other PDGF-r inhibitors.

Effects of SU101 in combination with cytotoxic agents on the growth of subcutaneous tumor xenografts.

SU101 (leflunomide, N-[4-(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl] 5-methylisoxazole-4-carboxamide), an inhibitor of platelet-derived growth factor receptor signaling, has shown promising clinical activity in Phase I and II studies. Currently, SU101 in combination with cytotoxic agents is in late-stage clinical development for the treatment of cancers. In previous reports, efficacy in vivo versus varied tumor xenografts was observed. As part of the preclinical development of SU101 as a cancer therapy, the combination of SU101 with cytotoxic agents was studied in athymic mice bearing small, established, s.c. human tumor cell xenografts of glioblastoma (SF763T cells), lung (Calu-6 cells), or head and neck (KB cells) origin. In the SF763T model, the combination of SU101 with carmustine resulted in a statistically significant growth inhibition of 74% compared with the vehicle control; this combination was more effective than either agent alone. In the Calu-6 model, the combination of SU101, cisplatin, and etoposide resulted in a growth inhibition of 75% that was statistically greater than that of the vehicle-treated control group and groups treated with one or two agents. In the KB model, the combination of SU101, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin resulted in a statistically significant growth inhibition of 69% compared with the vehicle control. Treatment with one or two agents did not significantly inhibit growth in this model. Importantly, in addition to enhanced efficacy resulting from combination therapies, the combination treatments tested were well tolerated, as evidenced by lack of mortality. These data suggest that SU101 in combination with cytotoxic agents may provide clinical benefit and warrant further clinical investigation.

Biologic effects of heregulin/neu differentiation factor on normal and malignant human breast and ovarian epithelial cells.

The heregulins are a family of ligands with ability to induce phosphorylation of the p185HER-2/neu receptor. Various investigators have reported a variety of responses of mouse and human breast and ovarian cells to this family of ligands including growth stimulation, growth inhibition, apoptosis and induction of differentiation in cells expressing the HER-2/neu receptor. Some of the disparity in the literature has been attributed to variations in the cell lines studied, ligand dose applied, methodologies utilized or model system evaluated (i.e. in vitro or in vivo). To evaluate the effects of heregulin on normal and malignant human breast and ovarian epithelial cells expressing known levels of the HER-2/neu receptor, this report presents the use of several different assays, performed both in vitro and in vivo, in vitro proliferation assays, direct cell counts, clonogenicity under anchorage-dependent and anchorage-independent conditions, as well as the in vivo effects of heregulin on human cells growing in nude mice to address heregulin activity. Using a total of five different biologic assays in nine different cell lines, across two different epithelia and over a one log heregulin dose range, we obtained results that clearly indicate a growth-stimulatory role for this ligand in human breast and ovarian epithelial cells. We find no evidence that heregulin has any growth-inhibitory effects in human epithelial cells. We also quantitated the amount of each member of the type I receptor tyrosine kinase family (RTK I, i.e. HER-1, HER-2, HER-3 and HER-4) in the cell lines employed and correlated this to their respective heregulin responses. These data demonstrate that HER-2/neu overexpression itself affects the expression of other RTK I members and that cells expressing the highest levels of HER-2/neu have the greatest response to HRG.

Inhibitory effects of combinations of HER-2/neu antibody and chemotherapeutic agents used for treatment of human breast cancers.

Previous studies have demonstrated a synergistic interaction between rhuMAb HER2 and the cytotoxic drug cisplatin in human breast and ovarian cancer cells. To define the nature of the interaction between rhuMAb HER2 and other classes of cytotoxic drugs, we applied multiple drug effect/combination index (CI) isobologram analysis to a variety of chemotherapeutic drug/rhuMAb HER2 combinations in vitro. Synergistic interactions at clinically relevant drug concentrations were observed for rhuMAb HER2 in combination with cisplatin (CI=0.48, P=0.003), thiotepa (CI=0.67, P=0.0008), and etoposide (CI=0.54, P=0.0003). Additive cytotoxic effects were observed with rhuMAb HER2 plus doxorubicin (CI=1.16, P=0.13), paclitaxel (CI=0.91, P=0.21), methotrexate (CI=1.15, P=0.28), and vinblastine (CI=1.09, P=0.26). One drug, 5-fluorouracil, was found to be antagonistic with rhuMAb HER2 in vitro (CI=2.87, P=0.0001). In vivo drug/rhuMAb HER2 studies were conducted with HER-2/neu-transfected, MCF7 human breast cancer xenografts in athymic mice. Combinations of rhuMAb HER2 plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, paclitaxel, methotrexate, etoposide, and vinblastine in vivo resulted in a significant reduction in xenograft volume compared to chemotherapy alone (P<0.05). Xenografts treated with rhuMAb HER2 plus 5-fluorouracil were not significantly different from 5-fluorouracil alone controls consistent with the subadditive effects observed with this combination in vitro. The synergistic interaction of rhuMAb HER2 with alkylating agents, platinum analogs and topoisomerase II inhibitors, as well as the additive interaction with taxanes, anthracyclines and some antimetabolites in HER-2/neu-overexpressing breast cancer cells demonstrates that these are rational combinations to test in human clinical trials.

Intra-arterial Cereport (RMP-7) and carboplatin: a dose escalation study for recurrent malignant gliomas.

OBJECTIVE: Animal and human studies have shown increased delivery of radiolabeled compounds across the blood-brain-tumor barrier using intra-arterial (IA) Cereport (RMP-7; Alkermes Inc., Cambridge, MA) with a radiolabeled tracer. This present study assesses the safety, tolerance, and preliminary efficacy of the IA administration of carboplatin with Cereport. METHODS: An open-label dose escalation study of IA Cereport (10-300 ng/kg) with 100 mg of IA carboplatin was conducted in 11 patients with recurrent malignant gliomas and 1 patient treated adjuvantly after radiation therapy. Tumor size and laboratory and clinical statuses were assessed. RESULTS: Adverse events were mainly neurological in nature and corresponded to the anatomic location of the tumor. Karnofsky performance scale scores did not decline, overall, for those patients who had tumor response. Tumor shrinkage was observed in three of six evaluable patients who received a dose of 300 ng/kg with durable responses of 60, 64, and 106+ weeks. CONCLUSION: Previous studies have demonstrated increased permeability in human gliomas using IA Cereport. This study demonstrates durable imaging responses using 100 mg of IA carboplatin in combination with Cereport. The drug combination in this patient population seems to be safe and acceptable, providing a novel means of antitumor dose intensification.

Intra-arterial carboplatin chemotherapy for brain tumors: a dose escalation study based on cerebral blood flow.

PURPOSE: To perform in intra-arterial dose escalation study of carboplatin based on hemispheric blood-flow estimation in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. The primary purpose was to determine the maximally tolerated intra-arterial dose. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Methods included: 1) selective intra-arterial delivery performed with modern microcatheters, 2) pulsatile infusion, and 3) dosage based on local cerebral blood-flow estimation (middle cerebral artery 60%, anterior cerebral artery 20%, posterior cerebral artery 15%, and anterior choroidal artery 5% of the hemispheric blood-flow). The deliveries were performed above the ophthalmic artery in the anterior circulation, or above the anterior inferior cerebellar arteries in the posterior circulation. The doses were escalated from 200 mg/hemisphere at 50 mg increments. Twenty-one patients were studied (14 with glioblastoma multiforme, five anaplastic astrocytoma, one aggressive low-grade glioma, one metastasis). Patients had recurrent glioma limited to one hemisphere and Karnofsky score of 50 or greater. Concomitant therapies were allowed. RESULTS: Carboplatin was escalated to a dose of 1400 mg/hemisphere. One patient had a permanent neuromotor decline. The predominant toxicity was hematopoietic. The median time to tumor progression was 22 weeks, median survival 39 weeks, and the response rate 70% (50% SD and 20% PR) of 19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hemispheric blood-flow estimation allowed us to escalate the dose of intra-arterial carboplatin to twice what was previously considered safe. Responses compared favorably to previous studies. Further studies are needed to determine if this method will provide improved and durable responses.