RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the response to nifedipine administration measured by changes in hepatic arterial (HA) flow on post-operative Doppler ultrasound (US) to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes in liver transplant (LT) patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent LT with post-operative Doppler US within 3 days between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015 were included in this retrospective single center study. The patients who received and did not receive nifedipine during the Doppler US comprised the study and control groups, respectively. A positive response to nifedipine was defined as the detection of HA flow when none was present initially or a reduction in HA resistive index (RI) ≥ 0.1 after nifedipine administration. The rates of re-transplantation, re-operation, percutaneous intervention (PCI), and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association of clinic-demographic variables and Doppler findings with the outcome measures. RESULTS: 444 LT patients (305 M/139F, mean age 51.7 ± 17.4 years, mean interval between LT-Doppler US 1.12 ± 0.9 days) are presented. 220 patients comprised the nifedipine study group [n = 157/220 (71.4%) responder, n = 63/220 (28.6%) nonresponder] and 224 patients comprised the control group. There was no difference in re-transplantation or PCI rates between the groups (all p-values ≥ 0.2 and ≥ 0.08, respectively). The responder group had a lower rate of re-operation vs. the control group (15.9% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.03) and nonresponder group (15.9% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.004). 1-year and 2-year OS were similar between the groups (all p-values > 0.37). CONCLUSION: Short-term complication rates and long-term outcomes for patients with liver transplant who responded to nifedipine administration on Doppler US are similar to those who did not require nifedipine administration. A lack of response to nifedipine was associated with a higher re-operation rate.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Lactante , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Nifedipino/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arteria Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía DopplerRESUMEN
PURPOSE: While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have had success with various malignancies, their efficacy in brain cancer is still unclear. Retrospective and prospective studies using PD-1 inhibitors for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) have not established survival benefit. This study evaluated if ICI may be effective for select patients with recurrent GBM. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of adult patients diagnosed with first recurrence GBM and received pembrolizumab or nivolumab with or without concurrent bevacizumab. Archival tissue was used for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and targeted DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. RESULTS: Median overall survival (mOS) from initial diagnosis was 24.5 months (range 10-42). mOS from onset of ICI was 10 months (range 1-31) with 75% surviving > 6 months and 46% > 12 months. Additional IHC analysis on tumors from eight patients demonstrated a trend of longer survival after ICI for those with elevated PD-L1 expression. NGS of samples from 15 patients identified EGFR amplification at initial diagnosis and at any time point to be associated with worse survival after ICI (HR 12.2, 95% CI 1.37-108, p = 0.025 and HR 3.92, 95% CI 1.03-14.9, p = 0.045, respectively). This significance was corroborated with previously tested EGFR amplification via in situ hybridization. CONCLUSION: ICI did not extend overall survival for recurrent GBM. However, molecular sequencing identified EGFR amplification as associated with worse survival. Prospective studies can validate if EGFR amplification is a biomarker of ICI resistance and determine if its use can stratify responders from non-responders.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos , Glioblastoma , Adulto , Humanos , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/genética , Glioblastoma/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores ErbB/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Physiologic changes quantified by diffusion and perfusion MRI have shown utility in predicting treatment response in glioblastoma (GBM) patients treated with cytotoxic therapies. We aimed to investigate whether quantitative changes in diffusion and perfusion after treatment by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) would determine 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) in patients with recurrent GBM. METHODS: Inclusion criteria for this retrospective study were: (i) diagnosis of recurrent GBM treated with ICIs and (ii) availability of diffusion and perfusion in pre and post ICI MRI (iii) at ≥6 months follow-up from treatment. After co-registration, mean values of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC), Ktrans (volume transfer constant), Ve (extravascular extracellular space volume) and Vp (plasma volume), and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) were calculated from a volume-of-interest of the enhancing tumor. Final assignment of stable/improved versus progressive disease was determined on 6-month follow-up using modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. RESULTS: Out of 19 patients who met inclusion criteria and follow-up (mean ± SD: 7.8 ± 1.4 mo), 12 were determined to have tumor progression, while 7 had treatment response after 6 months of ICI treatment. Only interval change of rADC was suggestive of treatment response. Patients with treatment response (6/7: 86%) had interval increased rADC, while 11/12 (92%) with tumor progression had decreased rADC (P = 0.001). Interval change in rCBV, Ktrans, Vp, and Ve were not indicative of treatment response within 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recurrent GBM, interval change in rADC is promising in assessing treatment response versus progression within the first 6 months following ICI treatment. KEY POINTS: ⢠In recurrent GBM treated with ICIs, interval change in rADC suggests early treatment response.⢠Interval change in rADC can be used as an imaging biomarker to determine PFS6.⢠Interval change in MR perfusion and permeability measures do not suggest ICI treatment response.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
A 15-month-old boy with established branchio-otic syndrome was evaluated for decreased red reflex in the left eye. Fundus examination of left eye revealed a gray epiretinal membrane with retinal traction and ill-defined macular thickening, found on ultrasonography as a dense flat region 1.7 mm in thickness. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography revealed an epiretinal membrane with macular thickening, retinal folding, and full-thickness retinal disorganization, consistent with combined hamartoma of the retina and retinal pigment epithelium. Over 5 years of follow-up, the branchio-otic syndrome was unchanged and the combined hamartoma remained stable.