RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The most recommended treatment for stage IV EGFR-positive lung cancer is osimertinib monotherapy. The dosage of osimertinib is fixed at 80 mg/day regardless of body surface area (BSA), however some patients withdraw or reduce the dosage due to adverse events (AEs). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 98 patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who received 80 mg osimertinib as the initial treatment. We investigated the impact of BSA on efficacy and safety of osimertinib. RESULTS: The cut-off value of BSA was estimated using the receiver operating characteristics curve, and was determined to be 1.5 m2. There were 44 patients in the BSA < 1.5 group and 54 patients in the BSA ≥ 1.5 group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs (hematologic toxicity of ≥grade 3 or higher, and non-hematologic toxicity of ≥grade 3) between the two groups. However, the incidence of dose reduction due to AEs was significantly higher in the BSA < 1.5 group compared with the BSA ≥ 1.5 group (16 patients vs 5 patients, p = 0.003). The main reasons were fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, and liver disfunction. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different (16.9 months in the BSA < 1.5 group vs 18.1 months in the BSA ≥ 1.5 group, p = 0.869). CONCLUSION: Differences in BSA affected the optimal dose of osimertinib. However, the PFS with osimertinib treatment was not affected by BSA. Therefore, when using osimertinib as an initial treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, dose reduction to control AEs should be considered, especially in the BSA<1.5 group.
Asunto(s)
Acrilamidas , Compuestos de Anilina , Superficie Corporal , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Receptores ErbB , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mutación , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Compuestos de Anilina/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Anilina/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Anilina/administración & dosificación , Acrilamidas/uso terapéutico , Acrilamidas/farmacología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Receptores ErbB/genética , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Indoles , PirimidinasRESUMEN
Background and Aim: To investigate the outcomes in eight Japanese patients with cancer treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment-induced severe immune-related hepatitis (ir-hepatitis) and the efficacy and safety of MMF. Methods: We retrospectively examined patient background, treatment course, as well as examination and imaging data using electronic medical records. Results: The ratio of male to female patients was 7:1, and the median age was 60 years (27-72 years). There were five and two cases of kidney cancer and malignant melanoma, respectively, and one case of lung cancer. The median number of days until MMF administration in addition to systemic corticosteroid therapy after the onset of ir-hepatitis was 14.5 (2-42). The patients were categorized as four "good responders" who showed an improvement in the liver function tests following MMF treatment and four "poor responders" who did not. Furthermore, the time from the onset of ir-hepatitis to initial MMF administration was significantly shorter in good responders (median 3 days, range 2-15 days) than in poor responders (median 25.5 days, range 14-42 days) (P = 0.042). No significant intergroup difference was observed in other clinical factors. No serious adverse events caused by MMF were observed in any case. Conclusions: According to these findings, early recognition of corticosteroid refractoriness and the use of MMF may be beneficial in patients with ir-hepatitis.
RESUMEN
The present study investigated outcomes of infliximab (IFX) treatment among 8 Japanese patients with various types of cancer (4 with malignant melanoma, 3 with lung cancer and 1 with renal cancer) who developed severe steroid-resistant immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in association with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to determine its efficacy and safety. Information, including patient background, treatment progress, examination data and imaging data, was collected retrospectively from electronic medical records. Adverse reactions were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Specific ICIs used were anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibody preparations in 7, 2 and 5 patients, respectively. Specific irAEs included grade 3 diarrhea/colitis in 7 patients and disseminated intravascular coagulation and myocarditis attributed to autoimmune activation in 1 patient. The median duration between systemic steroid and IFX treatments was 9 (range, 2-39) days. A total of 3 patients responded to IFX, 1 of whom responded after one dose and 2 responded after two doses. Respective diseases improved to grade 0 after a median of 18 (range, 9-32) days. No AEs were attributable to IFX. Additionally, anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) and antibacterial agents were administered in parallel given the presence of CMV and Clostridium difficile (CD) infections in all patients, except in 1 exhibiting a marked IFX response after one dose. The combination of highly immunosuppressive IFX and high-dose systemic steroid administration over a long period presumably predisposed the patients to opportunistic enteric infections. Accordingly, early initiation of IFX treatment in conjunction with systemic steroid therapy should be considered for severe diarrhea/colitis and other irAEs. However, the possibility for CMV and CD infections should be recognized, and for these the treatment strategy may need to be modified at an early stage.
RESUMEN
The study subjects consisted of 54 patients with inoperable or recurrent breast cancer who were administered a combination of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy. We examined the onset of neutropenia during the first course of treatment and evaluated the influence that various risk factors had on treatment continuity. Patients with neutropenia Grade≥3 had significantly lower relative dose intensity(RDI) values during the first course of treatment than did patients with neutropenia Grade ≤2. Patients with neutropenia Grade≥3 showed significantly longer treatment to failure than did patients with neutropenia Grade≤2. These results suggest that the degree of neutropenia during the first course of treatment might contribute to treatment continuity and that it is important to improve the curative effect by maintaining appropriate RDI and by continuously administering palbociclib in patients with neutropenia Grade≥3.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neutropenia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Duración de la Terapia , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperazinas , Piridinas , Receptor ErbB-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We have been conducting liver disease education classes regularly in our hospital for the purpose of providing health information to patients and their families. METHODS: In order to evaluate the effectiveness of these classes, we conducted a questionnaire survey of patients and family members who attended the classes held three times in 2012. The cumulative total number of participants was 80 (49 patients, 26 family members, and five others). The classes focused on the following areas: 1) prevention of hepatic cancer; 2) treatment of hepatic cancer; 3) iron restriction diet for hepatitis C patients; and 4) importance of branched-chain amino acid preparations. Self-evaluation of knowledge in these areas was based on a four-point scale. RESULTS: A comparison of knowledge levels between the patients and their family members revealed no statistically significant differences. Therefore, subsequent analyses were performed by combining the patients and their families into one group. The knowledge level of the participants increased with the number of class attendances; that is, the more often they attended, the more they accumulated knowledge (Kruskal-Wallis test: P < 0.0001; P = 0.0368; P = 0.0021; and P < 0.0001). In addition, the results of the questionnaire administered immediately before and after the education class showed significant improvement in the knowledge level for each area. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate the liver disease education class to be effective for improving the knowledge of patients and their families. The importance of repeated information provision was also demonstrated.