Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Perinatol ; 32(5): 344-8, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21818064

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: It remains unclear whether indomethacin (INDO) and/or surgical ligation (LIGATE) are necessary to improve outcomes in premature infants with a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). We have adopted a conservative approach to PDA management that emphasizes waiting for spontaneous closure unless certain cardiorespiratory distress criteria are met. STUDY DESIGN: This was a before-after observational study in infants born 501 to 1,500 g in two distinct epochs. Era 1 (January 2005 to December 2007) featured traditional management with INDO and LIGATE used early to close all moderate and large PDAs in infants receiving any respiratory support. Era 2 (January 2008 to June 2009) emphasized modest fluid restriction, watchful waiting and limited INDO and LIGATE to only those infants with large PDAs who met certain cardiorespiratory distress criteria. RESULT: Era 1 included 139 infants with a PDA, mean (s.d.) gestational age 27.5 (2) weeks; Era 2 72 infants, mean (s.d.) gestational age 27.5 (2) weeks. In Era 2, INDO use significantly decreased (79% of infants to 26%, P<0.001), and 28 day total fluids decreased (140 vs. 130 ml kg(-1) day(-1), P<0.001). LIGATE rate was 45% in Era 1, 33% in Era 2 (P=0.11). There were no significant differences in supplemental oxygen, nasal continuous positive airway pressure, or mechanical ventilation days. There were no significant differences in mortality or individual morbidities. The combined outcome of chronic lung disease (CLD) or mortality after Day 7 significantly increased (Era 1, 40%, Era 2, 54%, P=0.04). More infants were discharged home with a PDA in Era 2, but most resolved spontaneously and the need for closure therapy after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) did not increase. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated Era 2 management did not predict an increased risk of one or more interlinked morbidities. CONCLUSION: Tolerance of the PDA with watchful waiting for spontaneous closure, modest fluid reduction, and less INDO use is a reasonable treatment strategy that is not associated with significant changes in NICU mortality or individual morbidities. We did note an increase in the combined outcome of CLD or mortality after Day 7, thus our investigation supports the urgency of a randomized controlled trial comparing traditional PDA management with a true control group similar to our Era 2 management to answer important questions of short and long-term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Conducto Arterioso Permeable/tratamiento farmacológico , Conducto Arterioso Permeable/cirugía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Indometacina/uso terapéutico , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa/uso terapéutico , Conducto Arterioso Permeable/diagnóstico por imagen , Conducto Arterioso Permeable/mortalidad , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Indometacina/efectos adversos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Ligadura/métodos , Ligadura/mortalidad , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Distribución de Poisson , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Ultrasonografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...