Prognosis of Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Cirrhosis and Acute Kidney Injury Who Initiate Renal Replacement Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Data to guide dialysis decision-making for transplant-ineligible patients with cirrhosis are lacking. AIMS: We aimed to describe the processes, predictors, and outcomes of renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation for transplant-ineligible patients with cirrhosis at a single liver transplantation center. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study of a retrospective cohort of 372 transplant-ineligible inpatients with cirrhosis with acute kidney injury (AKI) due to hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI) or acute tubular necrosis (ATN) between 2008 and 2015. We performed survival analyses to evaluate 6-month survival and renal recovery and examined end-of-life care outcomes. We used a consensus-driven medical record review to characterize processes leading to RRT initiation. RESULTS: We identified 266 (71.5%) patients who received RRT and 106 (28.5%) who did not receive RRT (non-RRT). Median survival was 12.5 days (RRT) vs. 2.0 days (non-RRT) (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.28-0.46); 6-month survival was 15% (RRT) vs. 0% (non-RRT). RRT patients were more likely to die in the intensive care unit (88% vs. 32%, p < 0.001). HRS-AKI patients were more likely to be RRT dependent at 6 months than ATN patients (86% vs. 27%, p = 0.007). The most common reasons for RRT initiation were unclear etiology of AKI on presentation (32%) and belief of likely reversibility of ATN (82%). CONCLUSION: Most transplant-ineligible patients who were initiated on RRT experienced very short-term mortality and received intensive end-of-life care. However, approximately 1 in 6 were alive at 6 months. Our findings underscore the critical need for structured clinical processes to support high-quality serious illness communication and RRT decision-making for this population.

Hospital-Level Care at Home for Patients with Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis have a 30-day readmission rate of over 30%. Novel care delivery models are needed to reduce healthcare costs and utilization associated with cirrhosis care. One such model is Home Hospital (HH), which provides inpatient-level care at home. Limited evidence currently exists supporting HH for cirrhosis patients. AIMS: The aims of this study were to characterize patients with cirrhosis who received hospital-level care at home in a two-site clinical trial and to describe the care they received. Secondary aims included describing their outcomes, including adverse events, readmissions and mortality. METHODS: We identified all patients with cirrhosis who enrolled in HH as part of a two-site clinical trial between 2017 and 2022. HH services include daily clinician visits, intravenous and oral medications, continuous vital sign monitoring, and telehealth specialist consultation. We collected sociodemographic data and analyzed HH stays, including interventions, outcomes, adverse events, and follow-up. RESULTS: 22 patients with cirrhosis (45% Hispanic; 50% limited English proficiency, median MELD-Na 12) enrolled in HH during the study period. Interventions included lab chemistries (82%), intravenous medications (77%), specialist consultation (23%), and advanced diagnostics/procedures (23%). The median length of stay was 7 days (IQR 4-12); 186 bed-days were saved. Two patients (9%) experienced adverse events (AKI). No patients required escalation of care; 9% were readmitted within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: In this two-site study, HH was feasible for patients with cirrhosis, holding promise as a hepatology delivery model. Future randomized trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of HH for patients with cirrhosis.

A Narrative Review of Financial Burden, Distress, and Toxicity of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) affect >3 million Americans and are associated with tremendous economic burden. Direct patient-level financial impacts, financial distress, and financial toxicity are less well understood. We aimed to summarize the literature on patient-level financial burden, distress, and toxicity associated with IBD in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a literature search of US studies from 2002 to 2022 focused on direct/indirect costs, financial distress, and toxicity for patients with IBD. We abstracted study objectives, design, population characteristics, setting, and results. RESULTS: Of 2,586 abstracts screened, 18 articles were included. The studies comprised 638,664 patients with IBD from ages 9 to 93 years. Estimates for direct annual costs incurred by patients ranged from $7,824 to $41,829. Outpatient costs ranged from 19% to 45% of direct costs, inpatient costs ranged from 27% to 36%, and pharmacy costs ranged from 7% to 51% of costs. Crohn's disease was associated with higher costs than ulcerative colitis. Estimates for indirect costs varied widely; presenteeism accounted for most indirect costs. Severe and active disease was associated with greater direct and indirect costs. Financial distress was highly prevalent; associated factors included lower education level, lower household income, public insurance, comorbid illnesses, severity of IBD, and food insecurity. Higher degrees of financial distress were associated with greater delays in medical care, cost-related medication nonadherence, and lower health-related quality of life. DISCUSSION: Financial distress is prevalent among patients with IBD; financial toxicity is not well characterized. Definitions and measures varied widely. Better quantification of patient-level costs and associated impacts is needed to determine avenues for intervention.