Effects of Lumbosacral Arthrodesis on the Biomechanics of the Sacroiliac Joint.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the sacroiliac joint is vulnerable to adjacent segment disease. Clinical studies have suggested that many patients who have undergone lumbar arthrodesis will develop adjacent segment disease, which may contribute to sacroiliac joint degeneration. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether arthrodesis in the lumbar spine results in altered biomechanics at the sacroiliac joint that could contribute to adjacent segment disease within the joint. METHODS: With use of human cadavers in a biomechanical laboratory study, the effects of lower-lumbar arthrodesis and sacroiliac screws on the biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint were assessed. Human cadaveric pelves with lumbar spines were biomechanically tested in flexion-extension, rotation about the vertical axis, and compression along the vertical axis with single and double-leg support. Four conditions were compared: (1) intact, (2) L4-L5 arthrodesis, (3) L4-S1 arthrodesis, and (4) left sacroiliac screw. Construct vertical and horizontal motions at the anterior and posterior surfaces of the sacroiliac joint were measured. RESULTS: Significant measurable increases in motion of the sacroiliac joint related to arthrodesis of the lumbar spine occurred with flexion-extension loading (p < 0.05). No significant changes were observed for rotation about the vertical axis or compression along the vertical axis with single and double-leg support. CONCLUSIONS: After 360°, 1 or 2-level lumbosacral spine arthrodesis, the sacroiliac joint showed a significant increase in rotational motion with flexion-extension loading. Increases in horizontal translation with axial rotation loading and vertical translation with axial compression loading were not significant. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The risk of significant alteration of normal sacroiliac kinematics should be considered in all patients undergoing 360° lumbosacral arthrodesis.

Comparison of Biomechanical Properties of a Synthetic L3-S1 Spine Model and Cadaveric Human Samples.

Human cadavers currently represent the gold standard for spine biomechanical testing, but limitations such as costs, storage, handling, and high interspecimen variance motivate the development of alternatives. A commercially available synthetic surrogate for the human spine, the Sawbones spine model (SBSM), has been developed. The equivalence of SBSM to a human cadaver in terms of biomechanical behavior has not been fully assessed. The objective of this study is to compare the biomechanics of a lumbar tract of SBSM to that of a cadaver under physiologically relevant mechanical loads. An L3-S1 SBSM and 39 comparable human cadaver lumbar spine tracts were used. Each sample was loaded in pure flexion-extension or torsion. Gravity and follower loads were also included. The movement of each vertebral body was tracked via motion capture. The range of motion (ROM) of each spine segment was recorded, as well as the overall stiffness of each L3-S1 sample. The ROM of SBSM L3-L4 was larger than that found in cadavers in flexion-extension and torsion. For the other spine levels, the ROMs of SBSM were within one standard deviation from the mean values measured in cadavers. The values of structural stiffness for L3-S1 of SBSM were comparable to those of cadaveric specimens for both flexion and torsion. In extension, SBSM was more compliant than cadavers. In conclusion, most of the biomechanical properties of an L3-S1 SBSM model were comparable to those of human cadaveric specimens, supporting the use of this synthetic surrogate for testing applications.

Biomechanical Comparison between Volar Plate Fixator and Nonbridge External Wrist Fixator.

Intra-articular distal radius fractures are difficult to reduce and maintain by nonoperative means. ORIF leaves implants in the patient long after the fracture is healed. External fixation can stabilize the reduced fracture and leaves no long-term implants. The nonbridging fixator (NBX) will provide better reduction and comparable rigidity of fixation to a volar plate for a 5-fragment, OTA 23 C3.2 distal radius fracture. A 5-part distal radius fracture was created in 5 pairs of cadaver arms. One arm was randomly fixed with the NBX fixator; the matched pair was fixed with a volar plate (VPS). Fluoroscopic images recorded the extremes of passive volar-dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and radial-ulnar deviation ROM. Each arm was loaded with an axial force at a constant displacement rate until failure. The average reduction of radial tilt achieved for the NBX group was 13.8 ± 4.8° and 6.3 ± 4.7° for VPS; radial length: 3.4 ± 3.7 mm for NBX and 1.9 ± 1.0 mm for VPS; volar tilt: 26.3 ± 12.4° for NBX and 14.0 ± 13.5° for VPS. For NBX, ROM was slightly less after fixation than before fracture. ROM with volar plating was greater after fracture. The peak axial load for NBX was 925 ± 445 N; for VPS, 2,152 ± 1023 N. NBX had minimal effect on ROM and provided adequate strength and restoration of alignment at least as good as VPS for this 5-part fracture model.

Effects of gamma irradiation on the biomechanical properties of peroneus tendons.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate the biomechanical properties of nonirradiated (NI) and irradiated (IR) peroneus tendons to determine if they would be suitable allografts, in regards to biomechanical properties, for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after a dose of 1.5-2.5 Mrad. METHODS: Seven pairs of peroneus longus (PL) and ten pairs of peroneus brevis (PB) tendons were procured from human cadavers. The diameter of each allograft was measured. The left side of each allograft was IR at 1.5-2.5 Mrad, whereas the right side was kept aseptic and NI. The allografts were thawed, kept wet with saline, and attached in a single-strand fashion to custom freeze grips using liquid nitrogen. A preload of 10 N was then applied and, after it had reached steady state, the allografts were pulled at 4 cm/sec. The parameters recorded were the displacement and force. RESULTS: The elongation at the peak load was 10.3±2.3 mm for the PB NI side and 13.5±3.3 mm for the PB IR side. The elongation at the peak load was 17.4±5.3 mm for the PL NI side and 16.3±2.0 mm for the PL IR side. For PL, the ultimate load was 2,091.6±148.7 N for NI and 2,122.8±380.0 N for IR. The ultimate load for the PB tendons was 1,485.7±209.3 N for NI and 1,318.4±296.9 N for the IR group. The ultimate stress calculations for PL were 90.3±11.3 MPa for NI and 94.8±21.0 MPa for IR. For the PB, the ultimate stress was 82.4±19.0 MPa for NI and 72.5±16.6 MPa for the IR group. The structural stiffness was 216.1±59.0 N/mm for the NI PL and 195.7±51.4 N/mm for the IR side. None of these measures were significantly different between the NI and IR groups. The structural stiffness was 232.1±45.7 N/mm for the NI PB and 161.9±74.0 N/mm for the IR side, and this was the only statistically significant difference found in this study (P=0.034). CONCLUSION: Our statistical comparisons found no significant differences in terms of elongation, ultimate load, or ultimate stress between IR and NI PB and PL tendons. Only the PB structural stiffness was affected by irradiation. Thus, sterilizing allografts at 1.5-2.5 Mrad of gamma irradiation does not cause major alterations in the tendons' biomechanical properties while still providing a suitable amount of sterilization for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

The effect of viscosity on cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty, an application of the squeeze film effect.

The authors present a prospective randomized blinded cadaver study designed to evaluate the engineering concept of a squeeze film effect and the effect of cement viscosity on cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty. This was done in response to an earlier clinical study demonstrating inferior tibial cement penetration using early, often liquid, phase cement. Paired cadaver tibias were implanted with the tibial component using either liquid or dough phase cement. Based on an AP fluoroscopic image, the dough phase cement penetrated deeper than liquid in all four zones. This was statistically significant in zones 1, 2 and 3. Deeper cement penetration has been shown to provide a stronger cement-bone interphase. As a result dough phase cement is recommended to obtain optimal cement penetration.

Biomechanical analysis of four- versus six-screw constructs for short-segment pedicle screw and rod instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar fractures.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Conventionally, short-segment fusion involves instrumentation of one healthy vertebra above and below the injured vertebra, skipping the injured level. This short-segment construct places less surgical burden on the patient compared with long-segment constructs, but is less stable biomechanically, and thus has resulted in clinical failures. The addition of two screws placed in the fractured vertebral body represents an attempt to improve the construct stiffness without sacrificing the benefits of short-segment fusion. PURPOSE: To determine the biomechanical differences between four- and six-screw short-segment constructs for the operative management of an unstable L1 fracture. STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical study of instrumentation in vertebral body cadaveric models simulating an L1 axial load injury pattern. METHODS: Thirteen intact spinal segments from T12 to L2 were prepared from fresh-frozen cadaver spines. An axial load fracture of at least 50% vertebral body height was produced at L1 and then instrumented with pedicle screws. Specimens were evaluated in terms of construct stiffness, motion, and rod strain. Two conditions were tested: a four-screw construct with no screws at the L1 fractured body (4S) and a six-screw construct with screws at all levels (6S). The two groups were compared statistically by paired Student t test. RESULTS: The mean stiffness in flexion-extension was increased 31% (p<.03) with the addition of the two pedicle screws in L1. Relative motion in terms of vertical and axial rotations was not significantly different between the two groups. The L1-L2 rod strain was significantly increased in the six-screw construct compared with the four-screw construct (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a cadaveric L1 axial load fracture model, a six-screw construct with screws in the fractured level is more rigid than a four-screw construct that skips the injured vertebral body.

Histologic, biomechanical, and biological evaluation of fan-folded iliotibial band allografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to thoroughly characterize the fan-folded iliotibial band (FITB) allograft and compare it with anterior tibialis tendons (ATs) and native anterior cruciate ligaments (ACLs) to determine whether it measures up to those tissues. METHODS: We compared the histologic structure, tensile strength to failure, creep, and stress-relaxation properties of FITBs with those of ATs and ACLs. In vitro cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of FITBs were also compared with ATs. RESULTS: No structural difference was observed between the tissues studied. FITB ultimate tensile strength (3,459 ± 939 N) was not significantly different (P > .9999) from ultimate tensile strength of ATs (3,357 ± 111 N) and was significantly greater (P = .0005) than that of ACLs (886 ± 254 N). No significant difference (P > .9999) was observed in the increase in length resulting from creep testing between FITBs (9.5 ± 3.0 mm) and ATs (9.7 ± 4.0 mm). During stress-relaxation testing, FITBs reached 181 ± 46 N, which was not significantly different (P > .9999) from ATs (166 ± 40 N). Finally, we showed that cytotoxicity of FITBs and ATs was negligible. In vitro biocompatibility of FITBs and ATs was very good, whereas FITBs had a higher propensity to favor the attachment and infiltration of cells that proliferated for at least 4 weeks on their contact. CONCLUSIONS: We found that FITBs, ACLs, and ATs shared a similar structure made of aligned collagen fibers. No significant difference was observed between FITB and AT ultimate tensile strength, creep, and stress-relaxation viscoelastic properties. Ultimate tensile strength to failure of ACLs was lower than that of FITBs and ATs, whereas ACLs were superior to both FITBs and ATs during creep and stress-relaxation testing. FITBs and ATs showed low cytotoxicity and excellent biocompatibility in vitro, with a somewhat higher propensity of FITBs to favor cell attachment and infiltration over time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that FITBs have the potential to perform as well as ATs for ACL reconstruction.

Building a biomechanical model.

This article is based on an invited presentation at the Biomechanics Session for the Basic Science Focus Forum held at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association meeting, 2010. It is not intended to be a scientific presentation of any specific investigation. It presented aspects of several types of investigations to illustrate the variety of biomechanical models that are used, and what value can be derived from those models. All models have limitations in what they try to portray. In order for any model to provide useful information, it must stand some type of validation of its ability to behave similar to real world experiences. The advantages and disadvantages of each model must be described to the best of the investigators ability-so that the readers can determine how the information may be used in the real world.