Expanded Combined Loading Injury Criterion for the Human Lumbar Spine Under Dynamic Compression.

Contemporary injury tolerance of the lumbar spine for under-body blast references axial compression and bending moments in a limited range. Since injuries often occur in a wider range of flexion and extension with increased moment contribution, this study expands a previously proposed combined loading injury criterion for the lumbar spine. Fifteen cadaveric lumbar spine failure tests with greater magnitudes of eccentric loading were incorporated into an existing injury criterion to augment its applicability and a combined loading injury risk model was proposed by means of survival analysis. A loglogistic distribution was the most representative of injury risk, resulting in optimized critical values of Fr,crit = 6011 N, and My,crit = 904 Nm for the proposed combined loading metric. The 50% probability of injury resulted in a combined loading metric value of 1, with 0.59 and 1.7 corresponding to 5 and 95% injury risk, respectively. The inclusion of eccentric loaded specimens resulted in an increased contribution of the bending moment relative to the previously investigated flexion/extension range (previous My,crit = 1155 Nm), with the contribution of the resultant sagittal force reduced by nearly 200 N (previous Fr,crit = 5824 N). The new critical values reflect an expanded flexion/extension range of applicability of the previously proposed combined loading injury criterion for the human lumbar spine during dynamic compression.

Cyclic Mechanism Affects Lumbar Spine Creep Response.

PURPOSE: This study aims to explore how cyclic loading influences creep response in the lumbar spine under combined flexion-compression loading. METHODS: Ten porcine functional spinal units (FSUs) were mechanically tested in cyclic or static combined flexion-compression loading. Creep response between loading regimes was compared using strain-time histories and linear regression. High-resolution computed tomography (µCT) visualized damage to FSUs. Statistical methods, ANCOVA and ANOVA, assessed differences in behavior between loading regimes. RESULTS: Cyclic and static loading regimes exhibited distinct creep response patterns and biphasic response. ANCOVA and ANOVA analyses revealed significant differences in slopes of creep behavior in both linear phases. Cyclic tests consistently showed endplate fractures in µCT imaging. CONCLUSION: The study reveals statistically significant differences in creep response between cyclic and static loading regimes in porcine lumbar spinal units under combined flexion-compression loading. The observed biphasic behavior suggests distinct phases of tissue response, indicating potential shifts in load transfer mechanisms. Endplate fractures in cyclic tests suggest increased injury risk compared to static loading. These findings underscore the importance of considering loading conditions in computational models and designing preventive measures for occupations involving repetitive spinal loading.

Primary Creep Characterization in Porcine Lumbar Spine Subject to Repeated Loading.

Low back pain (LBP) is a common medical condition worldwide, though the etiology of injuries causing most LBP is unknown. Flexion and repeated compression increase lumbar injury risk, yet the complex viscoelastic behavior of the lumbar spine has not been characterized under this loading scheme. Characterizing the non-injurious primary creep behavior in the lumbar spine is necessary for understanding the biomechanical response preceding injury. Fifteen porcine lumbar spinal units were loaded in repeated flexion-compression with peak compressive stresses ranging from 1.41 to 4.68 MPa. Applied loading simulated real loading exposures experienced by high-speed watercraft occupants. The strain response in the primary creep region was modeled for all tests using a generalized Kelvin-Voigt model. A quasilinear viscoelastic (QLV) approach was used to separate time-dependent (creep) and stress-dependent (elastic) responses. Optimizations between the models and experimental data determined creep time constants, creep coefficients, and elastic constants associated with this tissue under repeated flexion-compression loading. Average R2 for all fifteen models was 0.997. Creep time constants optimized across all fifteen models were 24 s and 580 s and contributed to 20 ± 3% and 30 ± 3% of the overall strain response, respectively. The non-transient behavior contributed to 50 ± 0% of the overall response. Elastic behavior for this porcine population had an average standard deviation of 24.5% strain across the applied stress range. The presented primary creep characterization provides the response precursor to injurious behavior in the lumbar spine. Results from this study can further inform lumbar injury prediction and kinematic models.

Accuracy of Instrumented Mouthguards During Direct Jaw Impacts Seen in Boxing.

PURPOSE: Measuring head kinematics data is important to understand and develop methods and standards to mitigate head injuries in contact sports. Instrumented mouthguards (iMGs) have been developed to address coupling issues with previous sensors. Although validated with anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs), there is limited post-mortem human subjects (PMHS) data which provides more accurate soft tissue responses. This study evaluated two iMGs (Prevent Biometrics (PRE) and Diversified Technical Systems (DTS) in response to direct jaw impacts. METHODS: Three unembalmed male cadaver heads were properly fitted with two different boil-and-bite iMGs and impacted with hook (4 m/s) and uppercut (3 m/s) punches. A reference sensor (REF) was rigidly attached to the base of the skull, impact kinematics were transformed to the head center of gravity and linear and angular kinematic data were compared to the iMGs including Peak Linear Acceleration, Peak Angular Acceleration, Peak Angular Velocity, Head Injury Criterion (HIC), HIC duration, and Brain Injury Criterion. RESULTS: Compared to the REF sensor, the PRE iMG underpredicted most of the kinematic data with slopes of the validation regression line between 0.72 and 1.04 and the DTS overpredicted all the kinematic data with slopes of the regression line between 1.4 and 8.7. CONCLUSION: While the PRE iMG was closer to the REF sensor compared to the DTS iMG, the results did not support the previous findings reported with use of ATDs. Hence, our study highlights the benefits of using PMHS for validating the accuracy of iMGs since they closely mimic the human body compared to any ATD's mandible.

Hydration State Throughout Porcine Lumbar Intervertebral Discs: Comparing Fresh and Frozen-Thawed Specimens.

Water content in intervertebral discs (IVDs) is essential for physiological and mechanical function. Freezing post-mortem tissue prior to biomechanical testing is a common practice to prevent tissue degradation, but this process has been theorized to alter hydration within IVDs. The hydration state throughout porcine lumbar IVDs, a common lumbar surrogate, is unknown as are the effects of freezing on porcine IVD hydration. Nineteen porcine lumbar spines were stored in one of the three conditions: frozen (- 20 °C) wrapped in saline-soaked gauze, frozen (- 20 °C) without saline, or fresh. Water content was measured in four disc regions within each of 89 discs: nucleus pulposus (NP), inner (AF-A), intermediate (AF-B), and outer (AF-C) annulus fibrosus. A three-factor, repeated measure analysis of variance was conducted for storage condition, spinal level, and repeated measure disc region. No significant differences were observed in spinal level or storage condition as a main effect. Mean hydration was significantly different in each disc region with mass percentage of water found to be 88.8 ± 1.7% in NP, 79.6 ± 3.8% in AF-A, 71.9 ± 3.7% in AF-B, and 62.3 ± 3.3% in AF-C. No significant differences were shown in NP and AF-C regions between storage conditions. Two significant differences in storage condition were observed in AF-A and AF-B regions, but there is likely no biological difference in these populations. Water content throughout porcine lumbar IVD was determined and results suggest one freeze-thaw cycle at - 20 °C does not alter the overall hydration within the porcine lumbar IVD.

Biofidelity and Limitations of Instrumented Mouthguard Systems for Assessment of Rigid Body Head Kinematics.

Instrumented mouthguard systems (iMGs) are commonly used to study rigid body head kinematics across a variety of athletic environments. Previous work has found good fidelity for iMGs rigidly fixed to anthropomorphic test device (ATD) headforms when compared to reference systems, but few validation studies have focused on iMG performance in human cadaver heads. Here, we examine the performance of two boil-and-bite style iMGs in helmeted cadaver heads. Three unembalmed human cadaver heads were fitted with two instrumented boil-and-bite mouthguards [Prevent Biometrics and Diversified Technical Systems (DTS)] per manufacturer instructions. Reference sensors were rigidly fixed to each specimen. Specimens were fitted with a Riddell SpeedFlex American football helmet and impacted with a rigid impactor at three velocities and locations. All impact kinematics were compared at the head center of gravity. The Prevent iMG performed comparably to the reference system up to ~ 60 g in linear acceleration, but overall had poor correlation (CCC = 0.39). Prevent iMG angular velocity and BrIC generally well correlated with the reference, while underestimating HIC and overestimating HIC duration. The DTS iMG consistently overestimated the reference across all measures, with linear acceleration error ranging from 10 to 66%, and angular acceleration errors greater than 300%. Neither iMG demonstrated consistent agreement with the reference system. While iMG validation efforts have utilized ATD testing, this study highlights the need for cadaver testing and validation of devices intended for use in-vivo, particularly when considering realistic (non-idealized) sensor-skull coupling, when accounting for interactions with the mandible and when subject-specific anatomy may affect device performance.

Investigating the Impact of Blunt Force Trauma: A Probabilistic Study of Behind Armor Blunt Trauma Risk.

Evaluating Behind Armor Blunt Trauma (BABT) is a critical step in preventing non-penetrating injuries in military personnel, which can result from the transfer of kinetic energy from projectiles impacting body armor. While the current NIJ Standard-0101.06 standard focuses on preventing excessive armor backface deformation, this standard does not account for the variability in impact location, thorax organ and tissue material properties, and injury thresholds in order to assess potential injury. To address this gap, Finite Element (FE) human body models (HBMs) have been employed to investigate variability in BABT impact conditions by recreating specific cases from survivor databases and generating injury risk curves. However, these deterministic analyses predominantly use models representing the 50th percentile male and do not investigate the uncertainty and variability inherent within the system, thus limiting the generalizability of investigating injury risk over a diverse military population. The DoD-funded I-PREDICT Future Naval Capability (FNC) introduces a probabilistic HBM, which considers uncertainty and variability in tissue material and failure properties, anthropometry, and external loading conditions. This study utilizes the I-PREDICT HBM for BABT simulations for three thoracic impact locations-liver, heart, and lower abdomen. A probabilistic analysis of tissue-level strains resulting from a BABT event is used to determine the probability of achieving a Military Combat Incapacitation Scale (MCIS) for organ-level injuries and the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) is employed for whole-body injury risk evaluations. Organ-level MCIS metrics show that impact at the heart can cause severe injuries to the heart and spleen, whereas impact to the liver can cause rib fractures and major lacerations in the liver. Impact at the lower abdomen can cause lacerations in the spleen. Simulation results indicate that, under current protection standards, the whole-body risk of injury varies between 6 and 98% based on impact location, with the impact at the heart being the most severe, followed by impact at the liver and the lower abdomen. These results suggest that the current body armor protection standards might result in severe injuries in specific locations, but no injuries in others.

Human and Porcine Lumbar Endplate Injury Risk in Repeated Flexion-Compression.

Low back pain (LBP) affects 50-80% of adults at some point in their lifetime, yet the etiology of injury is not well understood. Those exposed to repeated flexion-compression are at a higher risk for LBP, such as helicopter pilots and motor vehicle operators. Animal injury models offer insight into in vivo injury mechanisms, but interspecies scaling is needed to relate animal results to human. Human (n = 16) and porcine (n = 20) lumbar functional spinal units (FSUs) were loaded in repeated flexion-compression (1 Hz) to determine endplate fracture risk over long loading exposures. Flexion oscillated from 0 to 6° and peak applied compressive stress ranged from 0.65 to 2.38 MPa for human and 0.64 to 4.68 MPa for porcine specimens. Five human and twelve porcine injuries were observed. The confidence intervals for human and porcine 50% injury risk curves in terms of stress and cycles overlapped, indicating similar failure behavior for this loading configuration. However, porcine specimens were more tolerant to the applied loading compared to human, demonstrated by a longer time-to-failure for the same applied stress. Optimization revealed that time-to-failure in human specimens was approximately 25% that of porcine specimens at a given applied stress within 0.65-2.38 MPa. This study determined human and porcine lumbar endplate fracture risks in long-duration repeated flexion-compression that can be directly used for future equipment and vehicle design, injury prediction models, and safety standards. The interspecies scale factor produced in this study can be used for previous and future porcine lumbar injury studies to scale results to relevant human injury.

Shear shock wave injury in vivo: High frame-rate ultrasound observation and histological assessment.

Using high frame-rate ultrasound and ¡1µm sensitive motion tracking we previously showed that shear waves at the surface of ex vivo and in situ brains develop into shear shock waves deep inside the brain, with destructive local accelerations. However post-mortem tissue cannot develop injuries and has different viscoelastodynamic behavior from in vivo tissue. Here we present the ultrasonic measurement of the high-rate shear shock biomechanics in the in vivo porcine brain, and histological assessment of the resulting axonal pathology. A new biomechanical model of brain injury was developed consisting of a perforated mylar surface attached to the brain and vibrated using an electromechanical shaker. Using a custom sequence with 8 interleaved wide beam emissions, brain imaging and motion tracking were performed at 2900 images/s. Shear shock waves were observed for the first time in vivo wherein the shock acceleration was measured to be 2.6 times larger than the surface acceleration ( 95g vs. 36g). Histopathology showed axonal damage in the impacted side of the brain from the brain surface, accompanied by a local shock-front acceleration of >70g. This shows that axonal injury occurs deep in the brain even though the shear excitation was at the brain surface, and the acceleration measurements support the hypothesis that shear shock waves are responsible for deep traumatic brain injuries.

The Human Lumbar Spine During High-Rate Under Seat Loading: A Combined Metric Injury Criteria.

Modern changes in warfare have shown an increased incidence of lumbar spine injuries caused by underbody blast events. The susceptibility of the lumbar spine during these scenarios could be exacerbated by coupled moments that act with the rapid compressive force depending on the occupant's seated posture. In this study, a combined loading lumbar spine vertebral body fracture injury criteria (Lic) across a range of postures was established from 75 tests performed on instrumented cadaveric lumbar spine specimens. The spines were predominantly exposed to axial compressive forces from an upward vertical thrust with 64 of the tests resulting in at least one vertebral body fracture and 11 in no vertebral body injury. The proposed Lic utilizes a recommended metric (κ), based on prismatic beam failure theory, resulting from the combination of the T12-L1 resultant sagittal force and the decorrelated bending moment with optimized critical values of Fr,crit = 5824 N and My,crit = 1155 Nm. The 50% risk of lumbar spine injury corresponded to a combined metric of 1, with the risk decreasing with the combined metric value. At 50% injury risk the Normalized Confidence Interval Size improved from 0.24 of a force-based injury reference curve to 0.17 for the combined loading metric.

Effect of the mandible on mouthguard measurements of head kinematics.

Wearable sensors are becoming increasingly popular for measuring head motions and detecting head impacts. Many sensors are worn on the skin or in headgear and can suffer from motion artifacts introduced by the compliance of soft tissue or decoupling of headgear from the skull. The instrumented mouthguard is designed to couple directly to the upper dentition, which is made of hard enamel and anchored in a bony socket by stiff ligaments. This gives the mouthguard superior coupling to the skull compared with other systems. However, multiple validation studies have yielded conflicting results with respect to the mouthguard׳s head kinematics measurement accuracy. Here, we demonstrate that imposing different constraints on the mandible (lower jaw) can alter mouthguard kinematic accuracy in dummy headform testing. In addition, post mortem human surrogate tests utilizing the worst-case unconstrained mandible condition yield 40% and 80% normalized root mean square error in angular velocity and angular acceleration respectively. These errors can be modeled using a simple spring-mass system in which the soft mouthguard material near the sensors acts as a spring and the mandible as a mass. However, the mouthguard can be designed to mitigate these disturbances by isolating sensors from mandible loads, improving accuracy to below 15% normalized root mean square error in all kinematic measures. Thus, while current mouthguards would suffer from measurement errors in the worst-case unconstrained mandible condition, future mouthguards should be designed to account for these disturbances and future validation testing should include unconstrained mandibles to ensure proper accuracy.

Tensile failure properties of the perinatal, neonatal, and pediatric cadaveric cervical spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical tensile testing of perinatal, neonatal, and pediatric cadaveric cervical spines to failure. OBJECTIVE: To assess the tensile failure properties of the cervical spine from birth to adulthood. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pediatric cervical spine biomechanical studies have been few due to the limited availability of pediatric cadavers. Therefore, scaled data based on human adult and juvenile animal studies have been used to augment the limited pediatric cadaver data. Despite these efforts, substantial uncertainty remains in our understanding of pediatric cervical spine biomechanics. METHODS: A total of 24 cadaveric osteoligamentous head-neck complexes, 20 weeks gestation to 18 years, were sectioned into segments (occiput-C2 [O-C2], C4-C5, and C6-C7) and tested in tension to determine axial stiffness, displacement at failure, and load-to-failure. RESULTS: Tensile stiffness-to-failure (N/mm) increased by age (O-C2: 23-fold, neonate: 22 ± 7, 18 yr: 504; C4-C5: 7-fold, neonate: 71 ± 14, 18 yr: 509; C6-C7: 7-fold, neonate: 64 ± 17, 18 yr: 456). Load-to-failure (N) increased by age (O-C2: 13-fold, neonate: 228 ± 40, 18 yr: 2888; C4-C5: 9-fold, neonate: 207 ± 63, 18 yr: 1831; C6-C7: 10-fold, neonate: 174 ± 41, 18 yr: 1720). Normalized displacement at failure (mm/mm) decreased by age (O-C2: 6-fold, neonate: 0.34 ± 0.076, 18 yr: 0.059; C4-C5: 3-fold, neonate: 0.092 ± 0.015, 18 yr: 0.035; C6-C7: 2-fold, neonate: 0.088 ± 0.019, 18 yr: 0.037). CONCLUSION: Cervical spine tensile stiffness-to-failure and load-to-failure increased nonlinearly, whereas normalized displacement at failure decreased nonlinearly, from birth to adulthood. Pronounced ligamentous laxity observed at younger ages in the O-C2 segment quantitatively supports the prevalence of spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality in the pediatric population. This study provides important and previously unavailable data for validating pediatric cervical spine models, for evaluating current scaling techniques and animal surrogate models, and for the development of more biofidelic pediatric crash test dummies.