RESUMEN
Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has been used in multimodal pain management regimens to improve postsurgical analgesia. This retrospective cohort analysis assessed clinical and economic outcomes of LB vs non-LB analgesia in minimally invasive colorectal resection surgery using real-world patient data from the IQVIA linkage claims databases. Patients who received LB were 1:1 matched to patients who did not receive LB (non-LB) via propensity scores. Outcomes included opioid use during the perioperative (2 weeks before surgery to 2 weeks after discharge), continued (>2 weeks to 3 months after discharge), and persistent (>3 months to 6 months after discharge) periods and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) during the first 3 months after discharge. Mean opioid consumption was lower in the LB (n = 4397) versus non-LB (n = 4397) cohort perioperatively (483 vs 538 morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]; P = 0.001) and after discharge within â¼3 months (222 vs 328 MMEs; P < 0.0001) and 3-6 months (245 vs 384 MMEs; P < 0.0001). The LB cohort had shorter mean length of stay (5.2 vs 5.7 days; P < 0.0001) and fewer inpatient readmissions (odds ratio [OR], 0.71; P < 0.0001), emergency department visits (OR, 0.78; P < 0.0001), and outpatient/office visits (OR, 0.91; P = 0.028) than the non-LB cohort 3 months after discharge. These data suggest use of LB in minimally invasive colorectal resection surgery may reduce perioperative and postdischarge opioid use as well as HRU. Although additional studies are needed to confirm these findings, this analysis provides valuable real-world data from large claims databases to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes that complement other types of retrospective and prospective studies.
RESUMEN
Background: Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) can be used for postsurgical analgesia after breast reconstruction. We examined real-world clinical and economic benefits of LB versus bupivacaine after deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the IQVIA claims databases to identify patients undergoing primary DIEP flap breast reconstruction in 2016-2019. Patients receiving LB and those receiving bupivacaine were compared to assess opioid utilization in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and healthcare resource utilization during perioperative (2 weeks before surgery to 2 weeks after discharge) and 6-month postdischarge periods. A generalized linear mixed-effects model and inverse probability of treatment weighting method were performed. Results: Weighted baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts (LB, nâ =â 669; bupivacaine, nâ =â 348). The LB cohort received significantly fewer mean MMEs versus the bupivacaine cohort during the perioperative (395 versus 512 MMEs; rate ratio [RR], 0.771 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.677-0.879]; P = 0.0001), 72 hours after surgery (63 versus 140 MMEs; RR, 0.449 [95% CI, 0.347-0.581]; P < 0.0001), and inpatient (154 versus 303 MMEs; RR, 0.508 [95% CI, 0.411-0.629]; P < 0.0001) periods; postdischarge filled opioid prescriptions were comparable. The LB cohort was less likely to have all-cause inpatient readmission (odds ratio, 0.670 [95% CI, 0.452-0.993]; P = 0.046) and outpatient clinic/office visits (odds ratio, 0.885 [95% CI, 0.785-0.999]; P = 0.048) 3 months after discharge than the bupivacaine cohort; other all-cause healthcare resource utilization outcomes were not different. Conclusions: LB was associated with fewer perioperative MMEs and all-cause 3-month inpatient readmissions and outpatient clinic/office visits than bupivacaine in patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Perioperative pain management affects cost and outcomes in elective spine surgery. PURPOSE: This study investigated the association between liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and outpatient spine surgery outcomes, including perioperative, postoperative, and postdischarge opioid use and healthcare resource utilization. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective comparative study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Eligibility criteria included adults with ≥6 months of continuous data before and after outpatient spine procedures including discectomy, laminectomy, or lumbar fusion. Patients receiving LB were matched 1:3 to patients receiving non-LB analgesia by propensity scores. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes included (1) opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) during the perioperative and postdischarge periods and (2) postdischarge readmission and emergency department (ED) visits up to 3 months after surgery. Generalized linear mixed-effects modeling with appropriate distributions was used for analysis. METHODS: Deidentified data from the IQVIA linkage claims databases (2016-2019) were used for the analysis. This study was funded by Pacira BioSciences, Inc. RESULTS: In total, 381 patients received LB and 1143 patients received non-LB analgesia. Baseline characteristics were well balanced after propensity score matching. The LB cohort used fewer MMEs versus the non-LB cohort before discharge (80 vs 132 MMEs [mean difference, -52 MMEs; p=.0041]). Following discharge, there was a nonsignificant reduction in opioid use in the LB cohort versus the non-LB cohort within 90 days (429 vs 480 MMEs [mean difference, -50 MMEs; p=.289]) and from >90 days to 180 days (349 vs 381 MMEs [mean difference, -31 MMEs; p=.507]). The LB cohort had significantly lower rates of ED visits at 2 months after discharge versus the non-LB cohort (3.9% vs 7.6% [odds ratio, 0.50; p=.015]). Postdischarge readmission rates did not differ between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Use of LB for outpatient spine surgery was associated with reduced opioid use at the hospital and nonsignificant reduction in opioid use at all postoperative timepoints examined through 90 days after surgery versus non-LB analgesia. ED visit rates were significantly lower at 60 days after discharge. These findings support reduced cost and improved quality metrics in patients treated with LB versus non-LB analgesia for outpatient spine surgery.
