Dynamic Manugraphy as a Promising Tool to Assess the Outcome of Limited Aponeurectomy in Patients With Dupuytren's Contracture.

Background: Dupuytren's contractures interfere with physiological gripping. While limited aponeurectomy is an accepted treatment modality to restore finger mobility, methods to objectify functional outcome beyond determination of the range of motion are scarce. Methods: Patients with Dupuytren's contracture being scheduled for unilateral limited aponeurectomy were invited to participate. Clinical data were gathered prospectively by chart review and interview. The DASH-score and flexion contracture for fingers were registered prior to surgery, 3 and 6 months afterwards. At the same time, dynamic manugraphy for simultaneous recording of the grip pattern and forces generated by the affected hand and anatomic areas (i.e., thumb, index finger, middle finger, ring finger, little finger and palm) were performed. All findings obtained during the follow-up period were compared to the situation at baseline. Comparison between paired samples was done using Wilcoxon rank test. All p-values are two-sided and p < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Results: Out of 23 consecutively enrolled patients, 19 (15 men, 4 women) completed follow-up examinations. Manugraphy confirmed the impairment of physiological gripping with concomitant pathological load distribution at base line. Limited aponeurectomy significantly reduced flexion contractures. However, the DASH-score remained at an excellent level in one patient, indicated improvement in 11 and worsening in seven patients. Six patients had lower grip force at t6 compared to the preoperative condition, although the preoperative flexion contracture (≥110°) was considerably improved in all of them. In four of those, the DASH-score improved while it turned worse in two of them. The force of surgically treated fingers remained unchanged in three patients while it was improved and worsened in half of the remaining patients, respectively. Manugraphy revealed physiological gripping by enlargement of contact area and higher force transmission by the fingertips in 10 of 12 patients with constant or even improved DASH-score and in three of seven patients with a worsened DASH-score. Conclusions: Assessing the reduction of flexion contracture and grip force alone is not sufficient to comprehensively reflect the functional outcome of aponeurectomy for Dupuytren's disease. Visualizing physiological grip pattern provides an additional tool to objectify the success of surgical treatment.

Grip force monitoring on the hand: Manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer.

INTRODUCTION: For clinical grip force assessment, the Jamar dynamometer is a wide accepted tool. Users have to be aware that this method does not represent all grip efforts applied. The Manugraphy system is a tool that measure total grip force as well as identify load distribution patterns of the hand while gripping cylinders wrapped with calibrated capacitive matrix sensor mats. The aim of this study was to validate an assessment setting of the Manugraphy system for clinical use. Further, the relationship and difference between the Manugraphy system and the Jamar dynamometer were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At two study centers, 152 healthy volunteers performed grip force tests with a digital Jamar dynamometer using handle positions 3 and 4 and the novel(®) Manugraphy system using two cylinders with circumferences of 150 and 200 mm. The subjects performed grip force testing with both devices on three different days. The intra- and inter-day variability for both methods was evaluated. To compare the values of both systems, the Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: The force values, as measured by the sensor matrix, were higher than those of the Jamar dynamometer. Analyses showed significant positive correlations between values obtained by the two measurement methods (p < 0.001). There was no significant inter-day variation for the 200-mm cylinder of the Manugraphy system. For the 150-mm cylinder, a significant variation was observed at center B, but not at A. Nevertheless, the fluctuation of the grip force values obtained with the Manugraphy system was equal or better than those obtained with the Jamar dynamometer. CONCLUSIONS: The force values, obtained using the two systems, have a high correlation but are not directly comparable. Both systems allow valid and constant grip force measurement. As the sensor mat detects all forces applied perpendicularly to the cylinder surface, it characterizes grip force better than the Jamar dynamometer. In addition, information about load distribution of the hand is gained.

Research and development at novel GmbH, Germany for prosthetics and paraplegics. Interview by Sarah A. Curran.

Pressure distribution measurement offers an objective and quantifiable method of determining the loads applied to the human body during static and dynamic situations such as walking and the more demanding tasks associated with sporting activities. While there are various systems available on the market, the technology and developments offered by novel (novel.de) a company based in Munich, Germany are regarded as innovative. The intent of this article is to outline the development of novel's pressure measurement technology and explore how the pliance® system can assist in determining an optimal fit of a prosthesis in an athlete. The discussion also focuses on the introduction of a new Elastisens® technology of the novel sensor pads to enable analysis of very contoured surfaces. Key pressure parameters for determining optimal performance are also explored; however, clinicians and researchers are guided to acknowledging the need to direct and perform their analysis within context - in other words, the analysis must be hypothesis driven.