Risk Factors for Adverse Events of Nanoliposomal Irinotecan Plus 5-Fluorouracil and L-leucovorin.

Background/Aim: The regimen with nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and L-leucovorin (nal-IRI/FL) is used for metastatic pancreatic cancer. A clinical study has indicated that the uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 polymorphism is associated with neutropenia during nal-IRI/FL treatment; however, no studies have reported risk factors for the occurrence of adverse events in the clinical setting. This study aimed to explore the risk factors for adverse events of nal-IRI/FL. Patients and Methods: This study included patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who started nal-IRI/FL treatment. Patient information, including laboratory data before nal-IRI/FL initiation and adverse events during nal-IRI/FL treatment, was retrospectively obtained from medical records. Results: This study consisted of 36 patients, including 16, 16, and 4 with UGT1A1*6 or *28 wild-type (-/-), heterozygous (+/-), and homozygous (+/+), respectively. Patients with UGT1A1*6 or *28 (+/+) exhibited significantly lower nadir counts of white blood cells (p=0.033) and neutrophils (p=0.043). Multiple regression analyses revealed that the decreased white blood cell count was significantly associated with the genotype of UGT1A1*6 or *28 (+/+) (p=0.009), high aspartate aminotransferase (AST) value before the therapy (p=0.019), and pancreatic head cancer (p=0.030). Also, the decreased neutrophil count was significantly related to the genotype of UGT1A1*6 or *28 (+/+) (p=0.017). Conclusion: Patients with UGT1A1*6 or *28 (+/+) should be especially concerned about neutropenia and leukopenia during nal-IRI/FL treatment. Additionally, high AST value and pancreatic head cancer may be risk factors for leukopenia during nal-IRI/FL treatment.

Oral mucositis associated with anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis impairs the quality of life. The difference in severity of oral mucositis between different anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies combined with cytotoxic drugs in colorectal cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in oral mucositis between panitumumab (Pmab) and cetuximab (Cmab) combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. A total of 75 colorectal cancer outpatients treated with an anti-EGFR antibody combined with FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or 5-FU/leucovorin as the first- to third-line treatment were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 2-3 oral mucositis. The secondary endpoint was the time to onset of oral mucositis. We also compared the incidence of toxicities of interest, skin toxicity, hypomagnesaemia and neutropenia, and time to treatment failure (TTF) between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients treated with Pmab and 43 patients treated with Cmab were evaluated. Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. The incidence of grade 2-3 oral mucositis was significantly higher with Pmab than with Cmab (31.3% vs 9.3%, P < 0.05). Moreover, the incidence of grade 3 oral mucositis was significantly higher in patients treated with Pmab (18.8% vs 0%, P < 0.01). The mean (SD) cycles to onset of the worst oral mucositis was 3.0 (2.9) in the Pmab group and 2.3 (1.7) in the Cmab group (P = 0.29). Oral mucositis was characterized by glossitis and cheilitis. The incidences of other toxicities were the following (Pmab vs Cmab): grade 2-3 skin toxicity: 68.8% vs 74.4% (P = 0.61), grade 2-3 hypomagnesaemia: 9.3% vs 7.0% (P = 1.00), grade 3-4 neutropenia: 28.1% vs 37.2% (P = 0.46). The median TTF was not significantly different, i.e., 223 days vs 200 days (P = 0.39) for Pmab vs Cmab. CONCLUSIONS: Pmab-based chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher grades of oral mucositis compared with Cmab-based chemotherapy. The oral condition should be monitored carefully and early supportive care should be provided for patients treated with Pmab-based chemotherapy.

Urocortin prevents indomethacin-induced small intestinal lesions in rats through activation of CRF2 receptors.

PURPOSE: The role of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in the pathogenesis of indomethacin-induced small intestinal lesions was examined in rats. METHODS: Animals were given indomethacin (10 mg/kg) subcutaneously and killed 24 h later. Urocortin I [a nonselective CRF receptor (CRFR) agonist], astressin (a nonselective CRFR antagonist), NBI-27914 (a CRFR1 antagonist), or astressin-2B (a CRFR2 antagonist) was given intravenously 10 min before the administration of indomethacin. RESULTS: Indomethacin caused hemorrhagic lesions in the small intestine, accompanied by intestinal hypermotility, mucosal invasion of enterobacteria, up-regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression, and an increase of mucosal myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity. Pretreatment of the animals with astressin, a non-selective CRFR antagonist, aggravated the lesions in a dose-dependent manner. Likewise, astressin-2B also exacerbated the intestinal ulcerogenic response induced by indomethacin, while NBI-27914 did not. Urocortin I prevented indomethacin-induced intestinal lesions, together with the suppression of bacterial invasion and an increase in mucosal MPO activity and iNOS expression; these effects were significantly reversed by co-administration of astressin-2B but not NBI-27914. Urocortin I suppressed the hypermotility response to indomethacin, and this effect was also abrogated by astressin-2B but not NBI-27914. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that urocortin 1 prevents indomethacin-induced small intestinal lesions, and that this action is mediated by the activation of CRFR2 and is functionally associated with the suppression of the intestinal hypermotility response caused by indomethacin. It is assumed that endogenous CRF contributes to the maintenance of the mucosal defensive ability of the small intestine against indomethacin through the activation of CRFR2.

Prophylactic effect of irsogladine maleate against indomethacin-induced small intestinal lesions in rats.

The effect of irsogladine maleate, a widely used antiulcer drug in Japan, on indomethacin-induced small intestinal lesions was examined in rats. Animals without fasting were given indomethacin (10 mg/kg, s.c.) and sacrificed 24 h later. Irsogladine (1-10 mg/kg) or 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 (dmPGE2 0.03 mg/kg) was given p.o. twice, 0.5 before and 6 h after indomethacin, while ampicillin (800 mg/kg) was given twice, 18 and 0.5 h before. Indomethacin caused severe lesions in the small intestine, mainly the jejunum and ileum, accompanied by intestinal hypermotility, the up-regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression, and an increase of myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity as well as enterobacterial invasion in the mucosa. These events were all prevented by both dmPGE2 and ampicillin, except the intestinal hypermotility which was only prevented by dmPGE2. Likewise, irsogladine also significantly and dose-dependently prevented these lesions at > 1 mg/kg. This agent alone increased mucus secretion and significantly suppressed the decreased mucus response to indomethacin, resulting in a suppression of the bacterial invasion as well as the increase in MPO activity and iNOS expression. The protective effect of irsogladine was mimicked by isobutylmethylxanthine, a nonselective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase (PDE), as well as rolipram, a selective PDE4 inhibitor. These results suggest that irsogladine protects the small intestine against indomethacin-induced lesions, and this effect may be associated with the increased mucus secretion, probably due to the inhibitory actions of PDE, resulting in suppression of enterobacterial invasion and iNOS expression.