Noninvasive brain stimulation in autism: review and outlook for personalized interventions in adult patients.

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has been increasingly investigated during the last decade as a treatment option for persons with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Yet, previous studies did not reach a consensus on a superior treatment protocol or stimulation target. Persons with ASD often suffer from social isolation and high rates of unemployment, arising from difficulties in social interaction. ASD involves multiple neural systems involved in perception, language, and cognition, and the underlying brain networks of these functional domains have been well documented. Aiming to provide an overview of NIBS effects when targeting these neural systems in late adolescent and adult ASD, we conducted a systematic search of the literature starting at 631 non-duplicate publications, leading to six studies corresponding with inclusion and exclusion criteria. We discuss these studies regarding their treatment rationale and the accordingly chosen methodological setup. The results of these studies vary, while methodological advances may allow to explain some of the variability. Based on these insights, we discuss strategies for future clinical trials to personalize the selection of brain stimulation targets taking into account intersubject variability of brain anatomy as well as function.

[Providing Cognitive Remediation Therapy to People with Schizophrenia: Results of a Survey in Psychiatric Clinics in Germany]. / Die Versorgung von an Schizophrenie erkrankten Menschen mit Kognitiver Remediationstherapie ­ Ergebnisse einer Befragung in psychiatrischen Kliniken in Deutschland.

Schizophrenia is accompanied by significant cognitive impairments, which often persist to a relevant extent after remission of clinical symptoms and has a negative impact on psychosocial functioning. These impairments are often experienced as very stressful by those affected. Under the umbrella term of Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT), evidence-based therapy options are available that improve both the respective cognitive target functions and the psychosocial functioning. According to expert recommendations, at least 20 sessions should be carried out, accompanied by qualified therapeutic staff. The current edition of the S3 treatment guideline schizophrenia of the German Society for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Neurology recommends CRT with the highest level of recommendation. It is unclear to what extent CRT has become part of routine inpatient care. Between July 2021 and May 2022, 395 psychiatric university hospitals and non-university psychiatric specialist hospitals in Germany were invited to fill in a 14-item questionnaire. A total of 103 institutions took part in the survey; 56.3% of these hospitals used at least one evidence-based CRT programme. Among the CRT programmes used, Cogpack, Rehacom and the Integriertes Psychologisches Therapieprogramm (IPT) were named most frequently. In 87.5% of the participating facilities, fewer than half of the people with schizophrenia received CRT. With regard to the clinics which used evidence-based CRT, 64.3% carried out fewer than 11 therapy sessions, 28.6% between 11 and 20 sessions and 7.2% more than 20 sessions. It is thus clear that CRT is not yet offered in all of the participating psychiatric hospitals in Germany, not yet for all people with schizophrenia, and not yet with sufficient intensity, with clinics indicating the need for more technical and personnel resources and more extensive development of competencies for CRT application.The low response rate of 26.1% and possible selection effects for participation in the study are addressed and are to be seen as limitations.

Case report-Depression with psychotic features as an atypical presentation of neurosyphilis.

Recurrent depression with psychotic features is an atypical presentation of neurosyphilis. This case emphasizes the polymorphic clinical presentation of neurosyphilis and how it mimics affective disorders with psychotic symptoms.

The relationship between empathy, theory of mind and facial affect recognition in schizophrenia patients.

Although impairments in social cognition are a core feature in schizophrenia, the relationship between its subcomponents is less clear. Nineteen schizophrenia patients and 20 matched healthy controls were tested for emotion recognition, and for the cognitive and affective subcomponents of empathy and theory of mind (ToM). Patients scored significantly worse than controls on cognitive empathy and both subcomponents of ToM. Group differences disappeared for cognitive empathy and affective ToM when emotion recognition was included as a covariate. Our results indicate that emotion recognition is an important factor involved in the deficits on higher levels of social cognition in schizophrenia.

Theta burst stimulation add on to dialectical behavioral therapy in borderline-personality-disorder: methods and design of a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial.

Specialized psychotherapeutic treatments like dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) are recommended as first treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD). In recent years, studies have emerged that focus on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in BPD. Both have independently demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of BPD. Intermitted theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a modified design of rTMS, is thought to increase the excitability of neurons and could be a supplement to psychotherapy in addition to being a standalone treatment. However, no studies to date have investigated the combination of DBT and rTMS/iTBS. This study protocol describes the methods and design of a randomized, single-blinded, sham-controlled clinical pilot study in which BPD patients will be randomly assigned to either iTBS or sham during four consecutive weeks (20 sessions in total) in addition to standardized DBT treatment. The stimulation will focus on the unilateral stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), which plays an important role in the control of impulsivity and risk-taking. Primary outcome is the difference in borderline symptomatology, while secondary target criteria are depressive symptoms, general functional level, impulsivity and self-compassion. Statistical analysis of therapy response will be conducted by Mixed Model Repeated Measurement using a 2 × 2-factorial between-subjects design with the between-subject factor stimulation (TMS vs. Sham) and the within-subject factor time (T0 vs. T1). Furthermore, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be conducted and analyzed. The study will provide evidence and insight on whether iTBS has an enhancing effect as add-on to DBT in BPD.Trial registration: drks.de (DRKS00020413) registered 13/01/2020.

Lithium Therapy in Old Age: Recommendations from a Delphi Survey.

INTRODUCTION: While lithium (Li) has been well established for the treatment of bipolar disorder, geriatric patients require special attention when it comes to issues of drug safety. Declining renal function, amongst other medical conditions, and polypharmacy may pose increased risks. Only a few previous studies have addressed the management of Li in geriatric patients. METHODS: Twenty-four German medical experts on geriatric medicine and Li treatment participated in a Delphi survey, consisting of two rounds of questionnaires and a final formulation of treatment recommendations. Three major issues of Li therapy were outlined: initiation of treatment, monitoring of ongoing therapy, and withdrawal due to medical reasons. Final recommendations were consented to at a threshold of at least 80% expert agreement. RESULTS: Final consensus was achieved on 21 clinical recommendations. The approved recommendations covered aspects of necessary laboratory checks, concomitant medication, and target Li serum concentration in geriatric patients. Concerning the termination of Li therapy, an agreement was reached on the appropriate time span for tapering and on potential alternatives to Li. No consensus was achieved on whether concomitant dementia or frailty should be considered contraindications for Li treatment and the appropriate threshold of the estimated glomerular function rate for withdrawing Li. CONCLUSION: According to the view of German experts, Li may be used in geriatric patients, but it should be monitored carefully. However, the lack of consent in several specific treatment situations underlines the need for research on specific issues of Li therapy.

Transcranial direct current stimulation as an additional treatment to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in adults with major depressive disorder in Germany (DepressionDC): a triple-blind, randomised, sham-controlled, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a feasible treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, meta-analytic evidence is heterogenous and data from multicentre trials are scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy of tDCS versus sham stimulation as an additional treatment to a stable dose of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in adults with MDD. METHODS: The DepressionDC trial was triple-blind, randomised, and sham-controlled and conducted at eight hospitals in Germany. Patients being treated at a participating hospital aged 18-65 years were eligible if they had a diagnosis of MDD, a score of at least 15 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (21-item version), no response to at least one antidepressant trial in their current depressive episode, and treatment with an SSRI at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks before inclusion; the SSRI was continued at the same dose during stimulation. Patients were allocated (1:1) by fixed-blocked randomisation to receive either 30 min of 2 mA bifrontal tDCS every weekday for 4 weeks, then two tDCS sessions per week for 2 weeks, or sham stimulation at the same intervals. Randomisation was stratified by site and baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score (ie, <31 or ≥31). Participants, raters, and operators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was change on the MADRS at week 6, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one treatment session. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02530164). FINDINGS: Between Jan 19, 2016, and June 15, 2020, 3601 individuals were assessed for eligibility. 160 patients were included and randomly assigned to receive either active tDCS (n=83) or sham tDCS (n=77). Six patients withdrew consent and four patients were found to have been wrongly included, so data from 150 patients were analysed (89 [59%] were female and 61 [41%] were male). No intergroup difference was found in mean improvement on the MADRS at week 6 between the active tDCS group (n=77; -8·2, SD 7·2) and the sham tDCS group (n=73; -8·0, 9·3; difference 0·3 [95% CI -2·4 to 2·9]). Significantly more participants had one or more mild adverse events in the active tDCS group (50 [60%] of 83) than in the sham tDCS group (33 [43%] of 77; p=0·028). INTERPRETATION: Active tDCS was not superior to sham stimulation during a 6-week period. Our trial does not support the efficacy of tDCS as an additional treatment to SSRIs in adults with MDD. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.