Strength: a relevant link to functional performance in the neurodegenerative disease of adrenomyeloneuropathy.

BACKGROUND: With progressive abnormalities in leg strength, tone, and sensation, adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN) is a differential diagnosis for multiple sclerosis and hereditary spastic paraparesis. AMN pathology has been linked to weakness, making it a relevant model to evaluate the relationship between neurodegeneration and disability. Quantifying symptom severity in AMN is essential for treatment development in rehabilitative management. OBJECTIVE: To identify deficits in body functions, activity, and participation of people with AMN and provide a practical framework for evaluating the severity of disability. METHODS: Cohort analysis of 142 participants with AMN. MEASURES: of body functions (leg strength, vibration sensation, range of motion, and spasticity), activity (walk velocity, standing balance, Timed Up and Go, and Sit-to-Stand Time), and participation (6-Minute Walk) are evaluated. Regression analyses identify relationships between the measures. A staging framework (mild, moderate, and severe) reflects the continuum of disability. Finally, an analysis of variance/Kruskal-Wallis was used for between-stage and sex differences among the variables. RESULTS: Strength is the strongest correlate for the 5 measures of activity and participation. Staging based on weakness distinguishes 3 levels of severity along a continuum of disability. Differences between the sexes are more prevalent earlier in the continuum but show equally severe deficits in the last stage. CONCLUSIONS: In AMN, staging based on degrees of weakness provides a practical means to characterize the severity of common deficits in body functions as well as activity and participation at each stage, to direct the evaluation. Such information could help clinicians develop more effective rehabilitative techniques.

Quantitative measures detect sensory and motor impairments in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Sensory and motor dysfunction in multiple sclerosis (MS) is often assessed with rating scales which rely heavily on clinical judgment. Quantitative devices may be more precise than rating scales. OBJECTIVE: To quantify lower extremity sensorimotor measures in individuals with MS, evaluate the extent to which they can detect functional systems impairments, and determine their relationship to global disability measures. METHODS: We tested 145 MS subjects and 58 controls. Vibration thresholds were quantified using a Vibratron-II device. Strength was quantified by a hand-held dynamometer. We also recorded Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW). t-tests and Wilcoxon-rank sum were used to compare group data. Spearman correlations were used to assess relationships between each measure. We also used a step-wise linear regression model to determine how much the quantitative measures explain the variance in the respective functional systems scores (FSS). RESULTS: EDSS scores ranged from 0-7.5, mean disease duration was 10.4 ± 9.6 years, and 66% were female. In relapsing-remitting MS, but not progressive MS, poorer vibration sensation correlated with a worse EDSS score, whereas progressive groups' ankle/hip strength changed significantly with EDSS progression. Interestingly, not only did sensorimotor measures significantly correlate with global disability measures (i.e., EDSS), but they had improved sensitivity, as they detected impairments in up to 32% of MS subjects with normal sensory and pyramidal FSS. CONCLUSIONS: Sensory and motor deficits in MS can be quantified using clinically accessible tools and distinguish differences among MS subtypes. We show that quantitative sensorimotor measures are more sensitive than FSS from the EDSS. These tools have the potential to be used as clinical outcome measures in practice and for future MS clinical trials of neurorehabilitative and neuroreparative interventions.