Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 711, 2023 01 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36639405

RESUMEN

The impact of the adherence to the adjunctive use criteria (AUC) for intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and clinical outcomes in low IVUS volume countries are limited. The current study compared the procedural success and complication rates between used and not used IVUS catheter in the patients who were met (C +) and were not met (C-) the AUC for IVUS-guided PCI. From June 2018 through June 2019, a total of 21,066 patients were included in the Thai PCI registry. Among the study population, 15,966 patients (75.8%) have met the IVUS-AUC. The IVUS-guided PCI rates were 14.5% and 11.3% in the C + and C - groups, respectively. After adjusting for covariables by propensity model, IVUS-guided PCI was identified as an independent predictor of the procedural success rate regardless of whether the AUC were met with the relative risk [RR (95% confidence interval (CI)] of 1.033(1.026-1.040) and 1.012(1.002-1.021) in C + and C- groups, respectively. IVUS-guided PCI increased the procedural complication risks in both groups but were not significant with corresponding RRs of 1.171(0.915-1.426) and 1.693(0.959-2.426). Procedural success was achieved with IVUS-guided PCI regardless of whether the AUC were met. IVUS-guided PCI did not lead to an increase in procedural complications.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Factores de Tiempo
3.
J Interv Cardiol ; 2022: 5839834, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35935123

RESUMEN

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice and outcomes vary substantially in different parts of the world. The contemporary data of PCI in Asia are limited and only available from developed Asian countries. Objectives: To explore the pattern of practice and results of PCI procedures in Thailand as well as a temporal change of PCI practice over time compared with the registry from other countries. Methods: Thai PCI Registry is a prospective nationwide registry that was an initiative of the Cardiac Intervention Association of Thailand (CIAT). All cardiac catheterization laboratories in Thailand were invited to participate during 2018-2019, and consecutive PCI patients were enrolled and followed up for 1 year. Patient baseline characteristics, procedural details, equipment and medication use, outcomes, and complications were recorded. Results: Among the 39 hospitals participated, there were 22,741 patients included in this registry. Their mean age (standard deviation) was 64.2 (11.7) years and about 70% were males. The most common presentation was acute coronary syndrome (57%) with a high proportion of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (28%). Nearly two-thirds of patients had multivessel disease and significant left main stenosis was reported in 11%. The transradial approach was used in 44.2%. The procedural success rate was very high (95.2%) despite the high complexity of the lesions (56.9% type C lesion). The incidence of procedural complications was 5.3% and in-hospital mortality was 2.8%. Conclusion: Thai PCI Registry provides further insights into the current practice and outcomes of PCI in Southeast Asia. The success rate was very high, and the complications were very low despite the high complexity of the treated lesions.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Tailandia/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Clin Cardiol ; 45(8): 882-891, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35758306

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk prediction of various degrees of impaired renal function on all-cause mortality in patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk of all-cause mortality after PCI. However, there are less data of various degrees of impaired renal function to predict those risks. METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of nationwide PCI registry of 22 045 patients. Patients were classified into six CKD stages according to preprocedure estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (ml/min/1.73 m2 ): I (≥90), II (60-89), III (30-59), IV (15-29), or V (<15) without or with dialysis. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were compared among patients in each stage. One-year all-cause mortality was reported with risk prediction based on CKD stages and other risk factors. RESULTS: Patients with CKD stage I-V without and with on dialysis were found in 26.9%, 40.8%, 23.2%, 3.9%, 1.5%, and 3.7%, respectively. PCI procedural success and complication rates ranged from 94.0% to 96.2% and 2.8% to 6.1%, respectively. One-year overall survival among CKD stages I-V was 96.3%, 93.1%, 84.4%, 65.2%, 68.0%, and 69.4%, respectively (p < .001 by log-rank test). After adjusting covariables, the hazard ratios of all-cause mortality for CKD stages II-V as compared to stage I by multivariate Cox regression analysis were 1.5, 2.6, 5.3, 5.9, and 7.0, respectively, (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing PCI, lower preprocedure eGFR is associated in a dose-dependent effect with decreased 1-year survival. This finding may be useful for risk classification and to guide decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Riñón/fisiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 97(10): 1064-76, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25632623

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify mismatches in the significance ofcoronary artery stenosis determined by physician 's visual estimation (VE) vs. quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), by VE vs. fractional flow reserve (FFR), and independent predictors for mismatch between VE and FFR. Second objective was to evaluate the clinical outcomes ofpatients receiving FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Two hundreds eighty consecutive patients (338 coronary lesions including non-left main (non-LM) 316 lesions and left main (LM) 22 lesions) underwent coronary angiography, offline edge detection QCA, and FFR measurement between August 2011 and December 2013 were included in the present study. Baseline patient data, lesion characteristics, and clinical outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Coronary lesions were then divided into four groups according to FFR results and treatment (FFR <0.75 and PCI, FFR 0.75-0.80 and PCI, FFR 0.75-0.80 and defer PCI, FFR >0.80 and defer PCI). Mismatches in the significance of coronary artery stenosis determined by VE vs. QCA, VE vs. FFR, independent predictors of VE-FFR mismatch, and clinical outcomes after FFR-guided treatment were reported. RESULTS: Lesions with VE-QCA mismatch were seen in 64% of non-LM lesions and in 87% of the LM lesions. Conversely, lesions with VE-QCA reverse mismatch were seen in 13% of non-LM lesions and in 0% of the LM lesions. Lesions with VE-FFR mismatch were seen in 42% of non-LM lesions and in 53% of the LM lesions. Lesions with VE-FFR reverse mismatch were seen in 15% of non-LM lesions and in 14% of the LM lesions. The independent predictors for VE-FFR mismatch in non-LM lesions were shorter lesion and greater minimal lumen diameter. After FFR guided-treatment and dividing coronary lesions into four groups, all patients were followed-up for a median period of 11.6 (IQR; 7.3, 17.6) months. Major adverse cardiovascular events (excluded one death) of 338 lesions were not significantly different in the four groups (1.7% vs. 5.1% vs. 5.3% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.717). The median cost ofprocedure of lesions undergone FFR plus additional PCI was significantly higher than lesions undergone FFR only (140,000 vs. 137,000 vs. 45,000 vs. 45,000 Baht, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Mismatches between visually-estimated significance of angiographic coronary stenosis and QCA or FFR are frequently encountered. Visual estimation of coronary angiography alone cannot entirely predict functional significance of coronary stenosis. FFR measurement provides a helpful strategy for decision making before further revascularization.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/patología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tailandia , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 92(4): 466-70, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19374295

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare between adult patients with heart failure after hospital discharge in a heart failure clinic and daily practice in terms of survival, readmission rate, and quality of life. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The authors followed 100 patients who received care in the heart failure clinic (n = 50) or the usual care (n = 50) for twelve months. RESULTS: During follow-up, patients in the heart failure clinic group had fewer readmissions (12 vs. 23; p = 0.04). There were eight deaths in the control group and seven deaths in the heart failure clinic group (p = 0.45). At the end of the present study mean left ventricular ejection fraction, mean distance of 6-minute walk test, and mean quality of life scores in the treatment group improved more than in the control group (p = 0.038; 0.032; 0.048, respectively). CONCLUSION: The heart failure clinic reduces hospital readmission and improves cardiac function and quality of life for heart failure patients.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/mortalidad , Adulto , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Volumen Sistólico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...