Single-Port Extraperitoneal vs. Multiport Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

(1) Background: Since the introduction of the purpose-built Single Port (SP) robotic platform, there has been an ongoing debate regarding its advantages compared to the established multi-port (MP) system. The goal of this present study is to compare the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of SP Extraperitoneal robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) versus that of MP Transperitoneal RARP approach at a high-volume tertiary center. (2) Methods: Based on a retrospective review of the prospectively maintained IRB-approved database, 925 patients successfully underwent RARP by a single experienced robotic surgeon. A 4:1 propensity-matched analysis based on the baseline prostate cancer International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group, clinical stage, and preoperative Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was performed, which yielded a cohort of 606 patients-485 in the SP EP and 121 in the MP TP approaches. Of note, the SP EP approach also included the traditional Extraperitoneal (n = 259, 53.4%) and the novel Transvesical (TV) approaches (n = 226, 46.6%). (3) Results: The overall operative time was slightly longer in the SP cohort, with a mean of 198.9 min compared to 181.5 min for the MP group (p < 0.001). There were no intraoperative complications with the MP approach and only one during the SP approach. The SP EP technique demonstrated significant benefits, encompassing reduced intraoperative blood loss (SP 125.1 vs. MP 215.9 mL), shorter length of hospital stay (SP 12.6 vs. MP 31.9 h), reduced opioid use at the time of discharge (SP 14.4% vs. MP 85.1%), and an earlier Foley catheter removal (SP 6 vs. MP 8 days). From an oncological perspective, the rate of positive surgical margins remained comparable across both groups (p = 0.84). Regarding functional outcomes, the mean continence rates and Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) scores were identical between the two groups at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months respectively. (4) Conclusion: SP EP RARP demonstrates similar performance to MP TP RARP in terms of oncologic and functional outcomes. However, SP EP RARP offers several advantages in reducing the overall hospital stay, decreasing postoperative pain and hence the overall opioid use, as well as shortening the time to catheter removal, all of which translates to reduced morbidity and facilitates the transition to outpatient surgery.

Pathologic and Short-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Patients Following Transvesical Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To study the pathologic and short-term oncological and survival outcomes following Transvesical Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on prospectively collected data on 169 patients with low and intermediate-risks prostate cancer, who either underwent Single-Port Transvesical or Multi-Port Transperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2022. Preoperative clinicopathologic characteristics, as well as final histopathology outcomes, were compared. Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to evaluate the impact of the surgical approach on biochemical recurrence-free survival within 12 months. RESULTS: Single-Port Transvesical and Multi-Port Transperitoneal Robotic Radical Prostatectomy were completed in 85 and 84 patients, respectively. Preoperative clinicopathologic features were similar between the 2 groups. In terms of histopathology outcomes, the 2 groups had identical final Gleason Grades, T stage, as well as the rates of adverse pathological features and positive surgical margins (P = >0.05). Despite the lower median number of nodes in the single-port cohort of 2 (0-5) compared to 6 (4-9) in the multi-port cohort (P = <0.001), there remained no statistically significant difference in the rates of lymph node invasion (P = 0.08). At a median follow-up of 12 months, there were no differences in the biochemical recurrence-free survival rates among both groups (P = 0.38). Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis did not consider surgical approach to be an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.13-2.23, P = 0.39). CONCLUSION: In well-selected patients, single-port transvesical robotic radical prostatectomy provided a similar short-term oncologic control as the multi-port approach with similar surgical margin status and 1-year biochemical recurrence rates.

Predictors for selection of outpatient single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the different perioperative variables that may serve as important clinical predictors when selecting patients for outpatient single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on the Institutional Review Board-approved, prospectively maintained database to identify 485 consecutive patients who underwent SP-RARP between 2018 and 2023. A comparison analysis was performed on patients who were managed as outpatients vs inpatients following their respective SP-RARP. A separate analysis was performed after excluding patients with pre-planned admissions to identify the risk factors for unplanned admissions. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed without any conversion or additional ports. After excluding patients with pre-planned admissions, outpatient SP-RARP was successfully achieved in 86.6% with a median (interquartile range) length of stay of 4.6 (3.8-6.1) hours. Our multivariate regression analysis identified cardiac comorbidity and preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) as predictors of outpatient SP-RARP. In addition, the absence of cardiac comorbidity, previous abdominal surgery, and lower postoperative pain score were protective against the risk of unplanned admission. Furthermore, both inpatient and outpatient encounters had comparable 90-day rates of postoperative complication (P = 0.136) and hospital re-admission (P = 0.942). CONCLUSION: Outpatient management models could be successfully achieved in most patients who underwent SP-RARP (86.6%) while maintaining similarly low perioperative morbidity profile. Nevertheless, appropriate patient selection based on the baseline clinicodemographic characteristics remains essential to ensure the safety and ongoing success of outpatient SP-RARP.

Body morphometry may predict parastomal hernia following radical cystectomy with ileal conduit.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether preoperative body morphometry analysis can identify patients at risk of parastomal hernia (PH), which is a common complication after radical cystectomy (RC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent RC between 2010 and 2020 with available cross-sectional imaging preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively were included. Skeletal muscle mass and total fat mass (FM) were determined from preoperative axial computed tomography images obtained at the level of the L3 vertebral body using Aquarius Intuition software. Sarcopenia and obesity were assigned based on consensus definitions of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and FM index (FMI). PH were graded using both the Moreno-Matias and European Hernia Society criteria. Binary logistic regression and recursive partitioning were used to identify patients at risk of PH. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank and Cox proportional hazards models included clinical and image-based parameters to identify predictors of PH-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 367 patients were included in the final analysis, with 159 (43%) developing a PH. When utilising binary logistic regression, high FMI (odds ratio [OR] 1.63, P < 0.001) and low SMI (OR 0.96, P = 0.039) were primary drivers of risk of PH. A simplified model that only relied upon FMI, SMI, and preoperative albumin improved the classification of patients at risk of PH. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients who were obese or obese and sarcopenic had significantly worse PH-free survival (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Body morphometry analysis identified FMI and SMI to be the most consistent predictors of PH after RC.

Managing prostate cancer after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: feasibility and outcomes of single-port transvesical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (PC-IPAA) face unique challenges in managing prostate cancer due to their hostile abdomens and heightened small bowel mucosa radiosensitivity. In such cases, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is contraindicated, and while brachytherapy provides a safer option, its oncologic effectiveness is limited. The Single-Port Transvesical Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (SP TV-RARP) offers promise by avoiding the peritoneal cavity. Our study aims to evaluate its feasibility and outcomes in patients with PC-IPAA. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was done on patients with PC-IPAA who had undergone SP TV-RARP from June 2020 to June 2023 at a high-volume center. Outcomes and clinicopathologic variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent SP TV-RARP without experiencing any complications. The median hospital stay was 5.7 h, with 89% of cases discharged without opioids. Foley catheters were removed in an average of 5.5 days. Immediate urinary continence was seen in 39% of the patients, rising to 76 and 86% at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Half of the cohort had non-organ confined disease on final pathology. Two patients with ISUP GG3 and GG4 exhibited detectable PSA post-surgery and required systemic therapy; both had SVI, multifocal ECE, and large cribriform pattern. Positive surgical margins were found in 44% of cases, mostly Gleason pattern 3, unifocal, and limited. After 11.1 months of follow-up, no pouch failure or additional BCR cases were found. CONCLUSION: Patients with PC-IPAA often exhibit aggressive prostate cancer features and may derive the greatest benefit from surgical interventions, particularly given that radiation therapy is contraindicated. SP TV-RARP is a safe option for this group, reducing the risk of bowel complications and promoting faster recovery.

Preoperative Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Anatomical Predictors of Early Urinary Continence Following Single-port Transvesical Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The introduction of the single-port (SP) robotic system has led to new approaches in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), such as the transvesical (TV) approach, offering high rates of early urinary continence. While previous studies of SP TV RARP have identified perioperative factors influencing continence outcomes, the impact of anatomical factors remains unexplored. This study aims to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based anatomical predictors of urinary continence after SP TV RARP. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive SP TV RARP cases (November 2020 to June 2023) with preoperative prostate MRI was performed. Two urogenital radiologists independently evaluated ten anatomical parameters to distinguish patients achieving urinary continence within 1 wk and 3 mo. Nonparametric methods estimated receiver operating characteristic curves (area under the curve [AUC]) and inter-reader agreement. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: In 120 cases, 40% achieved continence within 1 wk, rising to 71.7% by 3 mo. Membranous urethra length (MUL) alone was significantly associated with continence at 3 mo (AUC: 0.67, p = 0.003). At 1 wk, several parameters, including anteroposterior diameter of the prostate, coronal membranous urethra length, prostate volume, and transverse diameter of the prostate, showed promise in predicting continence. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: A longer preoperative MUL was significantly associated with better odds of an early return to urinary continence after SP TV RARP. Each 1-mm increase in coronal MUL was associated with a 27% increase in the odds of continence at 3 mo. This information can aid in patient counseling and expectations preoperatively. PATIENT SUMMARY: Urinary incontinence is a common outcome after prostate cancer surgery, particularly in the early months. Recently, the single-port (SP) robotic system has emerged, localizing surgery to the diseased area. With the SP robot, accessing the prostate via the bladder leads to high rates of early continence. Our study reveals that the longer the urethral portion beneath the prostate, the higher the likelihood of regaining continence within 3 mo after surgery.

Clinical Upstaging After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Impacting Eligibility for Vaginal-sparing Cystectomy: Identifying Bladder Cancer Patients Who May Benefit From Interim Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: Limited data exist on the frequency with which clinical progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) impacts eligibility for a vaginal-sparing surgical approach or on the utility of interim imaging assessment. We sought to evaluate the incidence of clinical upstaging following NAC that would render a patient ineligible for a vaginal-sparing cystectomy. METHODS: Eighty-nine female patients with non-metastatic MIBC treated with NAC and radical cystectomy (RC) (2012-2023) were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor location(s) was determined from transurethral resection of bladder tumor operative reports. Pre- and post-NAC clinical staging was determined from imaging. Outcomes of interest included clinical upstaging and upstaging to vaginal invasion after NAC. RESULTS: 75/89 patients had pre- and post-NAC imaging. Fifty-five had no change in clinical staging, 6 patients were upstaged (4 cT2→cT3, 2 cT3→cT4), and 14 patients were downstaged (13 cT3→cT2, 1 cT4→cT2). Of the 75 patients with pre- and post-NAC imaging, 39 had trigone tumors. Of these, 28 had no change in clinical staging, 2 were upstaged (1 cT2→cT3, 1 cT3→cT4) and 9 were downstaged (8 cT3→cT2, 1 cT4→cT2). Overall, 6/75 (8%) of patients demonstrated clinical upstaging after NAC. 2/39 (5%) of patients with trigone tumors clinically progressed after NAC and both had vaginal invasion (pT4) on final pathology. CONCLUSION: Although clinical upstaging after NAC was infrequent, 5% of patients with trigonal MIBC were rendered ineligible for vaginal-sparing cystectomy following NAC due to progression. Interim imaging assessment may identify non-responders and preserve eligibility for vaginal-sparing RC.

Assessing Functional Outcomes of Partial Versus Radical Nephrectomy for T1b-T2 Renal Masses: Results from a Multi-institutional Collaboration.

BACKGROUND: Deterioration of renal function is associated with increased all-cause mortality. In renal masses larger than 4 cm, whether partial versus radical nephrectomy (PN vs. RN) might affect long-term functional outcomes is unknown. This study tested the association between PN versus RN and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), recovery of at least 90% of the preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year, upstaging of chronic kidney disease (CKD) one stage or more at 1 year, and eGFR decline of 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less at 1 year. METHODS: Data from 23 high-volume institutions were used. The study included only surgically treated patients with single, unilateral, localized, clinical T1b-2 renal masses. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 968 PN patients and 325 RN patients were identified. The rate of AKI was lower in the PN versus the RN patients (17% vs. 58%; p < 0.001). At 1 year after surgery, for the PN versus the RN patients, the rate for recovery of at least 90% of baseline eGFR was 51% versus 16%, the rate of CKD progression of ≥ 1 stage was 38% versus 65%, and the rate of eGFR decline of 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less was 10% versus 23% (all p < 0.001). Radical nephrectomy independently predicted AKI (odds ratio [OR], 7.61), 1-year ≥ 90% eGFR recovery (OR, 0.30), 1-year CKD upstaging (OR, 1.78), and 1-year eGFR decline of 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less (OR, 2.36) (all p ≤ 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: For cT1b-2 masses, RN portends worse immediate and 1-year functional outcomes. When technically feasible and oncologically safe, efforts should be made to spare the kidney in case of large renal masses to avoid the hazard of glomerular function loss-related mortality.

Parenchymal obliteration by renal masses: Functional and oncologic implications.

OBJECTIVES: Most renal tumors merely displace nephrons while others can obliterate parenchyma in an invasive manner. Substantial parenchymal volume replacement (PVR) by renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may have oncologic implications; however, studies regarding PVR remain limited. Our objective was to evaluate the oncologic implications associated with PVR using improved methodology including more accurate and objective tools. PATIENTS/METHODS: A total of 1,222 patients with non-metastatic renal tumors managed with partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) at Cleveland Clinic (2011-2014) with necessary studies were retrospectively evaluated. Parenchymal volume analysis via semiautomated software was used to estimate split renal function and preoperative parenchymal volumes. Using the contralateral kidney as a control, %PVR was defined: (parenchymal volumecontralateral-parenchymal volumeipsilateral) normalized by parenchymal volumecontralateral x100%. PVR was determined preoperatively and not altered by management. Patients were grouped by degree of PVR: minimal (<5%, N = 566), modest (5%-25%, N = 414), and prominent (≥25%, N = 142). Kaplan-Meier was used to evaluate survival outcomes relative to degree of PVR. Multivariable Cox-regression models evaluated predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Of 1,122 patients, 801 (71%) were selected for PN and 321 (29%) for RN. Overall, median tumor size was 3.1 cm and 6.8 cm for PN and RN, respectively, and median follow-up was 8.6 years. Median %PVR was 15% (IQR = 6%-29%) for patients selected for RN and negligible for those selected for PN. %PVR correlated inversely with preoperative ipsilateral GFR (r = -0.49, P < 0.01) and directly with advanced pathologic stage, high tumor grade, clear cell histology, and sarcomatoid features (all P < 0.01). PVR≥25% associated with shortened recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival (all P < 0.01). Male sex, ≥pT3a, tumor grade 4, positive surgical margins, and PVR≥25% independently associated with reduced RFS (all P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Obliteration of normal parenchyma by RCC substantially impacts preoperative renal function and patient selection. Our data suggests that increased PVR is primarily driven by aggressive tumor characteristics and independently associates with reduced RFS, although further studies will be needed to substantiate our findings.

Predictors of Same-day Discharge After Single-Port Transvesical Enucleation of the Prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of outpatient cases and identify predictors for same-day discharge (SDD) after single-port transvesical enucleation of the prostate (STEP). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive STEP cases performed at a single center by 3 surgeons from February 2019 to October 2023. The cohort was categorized into SDD cases (<8 hours until discharge) and inpatient cases. Group comparisons were made and logistic regression was used to identify predictors of SDD. RESULTS: A total of 152 STEP cases were performed successfully without additional ports or conversions. Fifty-two patients were pre-planned admissions, leaving 100 planned outpatient cases, of which 86% were discharged on the same day (median length of stay of 4.7 hours). Comparing the groups, inpatient cases were older, had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores, higher estimated blood loss (EBL) during surgery, and more intraoperative complications than SDD patients. Univariate logistic regression identified age and CCI as the predictors associated with SDD after STEP. Notably, there were no major postoperative complications or readmissions in either group. CONCLUSION: In our 4-year experience with STEP, lower age and CCI score were significant predictors of SDD. The comprehensive evaluation criteria for discharge foster a safe recovery at home, coupled with a 0% rate of major postoperative complications and readmissions. These findings underscore the safety and efficacy of STEP, guiding patient counseling and surgeon expectations.

Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive update on the different techniques and outcomes of contemporary Single-Port (SP) Robotic Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) approaches. METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify cohort studies that have utilized the purpose-built SP robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, California) for RARP. All published approaches of SP-RARP were included in our review. Baseline clinical, perioperative, and postoperative oncological and functional outcomes were collected from the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies involving 1159 patients were identified. To date, five approaches of SP-RARP have been described, namely Transperitoneal, Extraperitoneal, Retzius-Sparing, Transperineal, and Transvesical. The surgical steps and clinical outcomes of the aforementioned approaches were discussed. While operating times were still faster in the Transperitoneal and Extraperitoneal cohorts, the novel and more regionalized Transvesical approach allowed for radical prostatectomy to be pursued in more patients with previous abdominal surgeries and contributed to significantly improved postoperative outcomes, including the earlier return of urinary continence and with most patients being discharged on the same day without any opioids. CONCLUSION: Based on the existing literature, the introduction of SP-RARP not only enriched the repertoire of minimally-invasive surgical treatment options for prostate cancer but also provided the opportunity for urologists to develop new techniques that can improve perioperative outcomes and postoperative quality of life. Given the limited number of patients and heterogeneity in the patient selection and reporting of postoperative outcomes, further research remains necessary to better understand the different benefits and improve patient selection algorithms for the different techniques.

Long-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Following Robotic Partial and Radical Nephrectomy: A Report from a Single Institution with up to 15 Years of Follow-Up.

Objective: To evaluate the long-term functional and oncologic outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and radical nephrectomy (RARN). Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 1816 patients who underwent RAPN and RARN at our institution between January 2006 and January 2018. Patients with long-term follow-ups of at least 5 years were selected. Exclusion criteria included patients with a previous history of partial or radical nephrectomy, known genetic mutations, and whose procedures were performed for benign indications. Statistical analysis was performed with results as presented. Results: A total of 769 and 142 patients who underwent RAPN and RARN, respectively, met our inclusion criteria. The duration of follow-up was similar after the two procedures with a median of ∼100 months. The 5- and 10-year chronic kidney disease (CKD) upstaging-free survivals were 74.5% and 65.9% after RAPN and 53% and 46.4% after RARN, respectively. Older age was identified as a potential predictor for CKD progression after RARN, whereas older age, higher body mass index, baseline renal function, and ischemia time were shown to predict CKD progression after RAPN. Renal cell carcinoma-related mortality rates for RAPN and RARN were equally 1.1%. No statistically significant differences were identified in the local recurrence, metastatic, and disease-specific survival between the two procedures. Conclusion: Compared with RARN, RAPN conferred a better CKD progression-free survival. Several factors were identified as potential predictors for clinically significant CKD progression both in the early and late postoperative phase. Long-term oncologic outcomes between the two procedures remained similarly favorable.

Low anterolateral incision for single-port extraperitoneal robot-assisted pyeloplasty: description of technique and initial experience.

PURPOSE: This study aims to describe the surgical steps for the single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal approach to pyeloplasty, report its feasibility, and share the initial outcomes of our experience. METHODS: We analyzed all consecutive patients who underwent single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal pyeloplasty due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). The surgical steps included a pure single-port approach through a 3.5 cm low anterolateral incision two fingerbreadths above the superior pubic ramus. The ureter was localized and followed cranially, a dismembered pyeloplasty was performed, and a running ureteropelvic anastomosis was completed. No drains were placed. The urinary catheter was removed upon discharge, and the ureteral stent after 3-5 weeks. RESULTS: A total of eight cases (two adults and six children) were completed successfully, without complications or conversions. Median operative time, console time, and estimated blood loss were 208.5 min, 114.5 min, and 10.0 ml, respectively. All patients were discharged within 24 h, except for one that required urinary output observation due to retention. There were no major postoperative complications. The median pain score at discharge was 0/10. Only one patient was prescribed PRN opioids at discharge. The readmission rate was 0.0%. All patients were asymptomatic on their last follow-up with no definitive obstruction on imaging, and no requirement for additional procedures or stents. CONCLUSION: Single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal pyeloplasty is a feasible alternative for surgical treatment of UPJO in adult and pediatric patients with improved recovery outcomes.

Limitations of Parenchymal Volume Analysis for Estimating Split Renal Function and New Baseline Glomerular Filtration Rate After Radical Nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Accurately predicting new baseline glomerular filtration rate (NBGFR) after radical nephrectomy (RN) can improve counseling about RN vs partial nephrectomy. Split renal function (SRF)-based models are optimal, and differential parenchymal volume analysis (PVA) is more accurate than nuclear renal scans (NRS) for this purpose. However, there are minimal data regarding the limitations of PVA. Our objective was to identify patient-/tumor-related factors associated with PVA inaccuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred and ninety-eight RN patients (2006-2021) with preoperative CT/MRI were retrospectively analyzed, with 235 also having NRS. Our SRF-based model to predict NBGFR was: 1.25 × (GlobalGFRPre-RN × SRFContralateral), where GFR indicates glomerular filtration rate, with SRF determined by PVA or NRS, and with 1.25 representing the median renal functional compensation in adults. Accuracy of predicted NBGFR within 15% of observed was evaluated in various patient/tumor cohorts using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: PVA and NRS accuracy were 73%/52% overall, and 71%/52% in patients with both studies (n = 235, P < .001), respectively. PVA inaccuracy independently associated with pyelonephritis, hydronephrosis, renal vein thrombosis, and infiltrative features (all P < .03). Ipsilateral hydronephrosis and renal vein thrombosis associated with PVA underprediction, while contralateral hydronephrosis and increased age associated with PVA overprediction (all P < .01). NRS inaccuracy was more common and did not associate with any of these conditions. Even among cohorts where PVA inaccuracy was observed (22% of our patients), there was no significant difference in the accuracies of NRS- and PVA-based predictions. CONCLUSIONS: PVA was more accurate for predicting NBGFR after RN than NRS. Inaccuracy of PVA correlated with factors that distort the parenchymal volume/function relationship or alter renal functional compensation. NRS inaccuracy was more common and unpredictable, likely reflecting the inherent inaccuracy of NRS. Awareness of cohorts where PVA is less accurate can help guide clinical decision-making.

Parenchymal volume preservation during partial nephrectomy: improved methodology to assess impact and predictive factors.

OBJECTIVE: To rigorously evaluate the impact of the percentage of parenchymal volume preserved (PPVP) and how well the preserved parenchyma recovers from ischaemia (Recischaemia) on functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN) using an accurate and objective software-based methodology for estimating parenchymal volumes and split renal function (SRF). A secondary objective was to assess potential predictors of the PPVP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 894 PN patients with available studies (2011-2014) were evaluated. The PPVP was measured from cross-sectional imaging at ≤3 months before and 3-12 months after PN using semi-automated software. Pearson correlation evaluated relationships between continuous variables. Multivariable linear regression evaluated predictors of ipsilateral glomerular filtration rate (GFR) preserved and the PPVP. Relative-importance analysis was used to evaluate the impact of the PPVP on ipsilateral GFR preserved. Recischaemia was defined as the percentage of ipsilateral GFR preserved normalised by the PPVP. RESULTS: The median tumour size and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score were 3.4 cm and 7, respectively. In all, 49 patients (5.5%) had a solitary kidney. In all, 538 (60%)/251 (28%)/104 (12%) patients were managed with warm/cold/zero ischaemia, respectively. The median pre/post ipsilateral GFRs were 40/31 mL/min/1.73 m2, and the median (interquartile range [IQR]) percentage of ipsilateral GFR preserved was 80% (71-88%). The median pre/post ipsilateral parenchymal volumes were 181/149 mL, and the median (IQR) PPVP was 84% (76-92%). In all, 330 patients (37%) had a PPVP of <80%, while only 34 (4%) had a Recischaemia of <80%. The percentage of ipsilateral GFR preserved correlated strongly with the PPVP (r = 0.83, P < 0.01) and loss of parenchymal volume accounted for 80% of the loss of ipsilateral GFR. Multivariable analysis confirmed that the PPVP was the strongest predictor of ipsilateral GFR preserved. Greater tumour size and endophytic and nearness properties of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score were associated with a reduced PPVP (all P ≤ 0.01). Solitary kidney and cold ischaemia were associated with an increased PPVP (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A reduced PPVP predominates regarding functional decline after PN, although a low Recischaemia can also contribute. Tumour-related factors strongly influence the PPVP, while surgical efforts can improve the PPVP as observed for patients with solitary kidneys.

Perioperative Complications of Single-Port and Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institutional Comparison Analysis.

Background: Following its introduction in 2018, the Single-Port (SP) robotic platform has been increasingly utilized for various approaches of robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP). Despite the demonstrable benefits in enhancing postoperative outcomes, there has been limited evidence on its perioperative morbidity, especially when compared to the gold-standard multiport (MP). This study sought to compare the perioperative morbidity between SP and MP-RARP. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 911 patients who underwent RARP between January 2015 and May 2023. At our institution, SP-RARP has been performed since October 2018 with Extraperitoneal and Transvesical (TV) techniques. To reduce the risk of selection bias, only MP-RARP cases performed before October 2018 were included. Baseline clinicodemographic and perioperative parameters were collected. Perioperative complications were classified in accordance to the Clavien-Dindo system with postoperative complications and readmission reported within 90 days of surgery. Statistical analysis was performed with R Packages for Statistical Computing with descriptive statistics as presented. Results: Of the 484 SP and 322 MP-RARP cases included in our analysis, one intraoperative complication was reported, which pertained to a small enterotomy during TV SP-RARP. Postoperative complications were identified in 14.5% and 14.6% of SP and MP-RARP cases (p = 0.989), respectively. Major complication represents 4.1% of the SP and 3.4% of MP cohorts. The 90-day rates of hospital readmission following SP and MP-RARP were 5.6% and 4.9%, respectively (p = 0.717). Limitations of this study included the retrospective single surgeon, single institution nature of our series that also included the early learning curve experience associated with the novel SP platform. Conclusion: This comparative study provided evidence highlighting the low rates of perioperative complication and readmission following SP-RARP that were comparable to the Transperitoneal MP approach. The low morbidity associated with SP-RARP supports its wider application as an addition to the contemporary minimally invasive surgical armamentariums for prostate cancer.

Current Expectations and Opinions on Single-port Robotic Surgery: A Survey Among European Experts by the SPARC Collaborative Group.

Single-port (SP) robotic surgery is a relatively new technology that is expected to become available on the European market within a year. We investigated the current expectations of robotic surgery experts and opinion leaders practicing in Europe. A 17-item online questionnaire was sent to 120 participants identified as "experts" on the basis of their general contributions to the field of robotic surgery. Overall, 90 responses were registered, with a response rate of 75%. Italy (30%), France (15%), and the UK (12%) provided the most participants, who worked mainly in academic-either public (60%) or private (20%)-hospitals. Most respondents (79%) had no previous experience with "single site" surgery, and attendance at scientific meetings (79%) and perusal of the literature (65%) were the sources of SP knowledge most frequently reported. The perceived advantages of SP robotic surgery included lower invasiveness (61%), easier access to the retroperitoneal or extraperitoneal space (53%), better cosmetic results (44%), and lower postoperative pain (44%). The most "appealing" SP procedures were retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy via an anterior approach (43%) and transvesical simple prostatectomy (43%). Within the limitations of this type of analysis, our findings suggest high interest and a positive attitude towards SP technology overall. Patient summary: Technology for single-port (SP) robotic surgery, in which just one skin incision is made in the abdomen to perform the operation, will soon be available in Europe. We conducted a survey on SP surgery among European experts in urological robotic surgery. The results show that there is high interest in and a positive attitude to SP surgery. The SP approach could result in better cosmetic results and lower postoperative pain for patients.