RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This scoping review aims to review cases of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) of the larynx to establish best management practices for this rare clinical entity. METHODS: In this paper, we report a case of laryngeal MZL, in accordance with CARE guidelines. We then performed a scoping review according to PRISMA-ScR criteria of published cases of MZL involving the larynx. The following data were collected for each case: age, sex, size, location(s) involved, stage, treatment, follow-up, and recurrence duration. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients with laryngeal MZL, first reported in 1990, were identified. Characterized by its low-grade histological appearance and indolent course, laryngeal MZL is generally confined to the larynx and has an excellent prognosis with radiation used as first-line therapy. CONCLUSIONS: It is imperative for clinicians to consider lymphoma in the differential diagnosis of a laryngeal tumor from any subsite, as certain pathologies may carry high risks of metastasis.
RESUMEN
Clinicians and patients seeking electronic health applications face challenges in selecting effective solutions due to a high market failure rate. Conversational agent applications ("chatbots") show promise in increasing healthcare user engagement by creating bonds between the applications and users. It is unclear if chatbots improve patient adherence or if past trends to include chatbots in electronic health applications were due to technology hype dynamics and competitive pressure to innovate. We conducted a systematic literature review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology on health chatbot randomized control trials. The goal of this review was to identify if user engagement indicators are published in eHealth chatbot studies. A meta-analysis examined patient clinical trial retention of chatbot apps. The results showed no chatbot arm patient retention effect. The small number of studies suggests a need for ongoing eHealth chatbot research, especially given the claims regarding their effectiveness made outside the scientific literatures.
