Understanding the Social Risk Factors That Avert Equitable Lung Cancer Care.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. There is an association between certain social determinants of health (SDOH) and adverse cancer outcomes. These include Black race and low-income, which are associated with poorer adherence to lung cancer screening and presentation at a later stage of disease. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer at a single urban, academic center from 2015 to 2021. Demographic data including race and clinical data including time taken to progress through various checkpoints (ie, concerning CT scan to diagnosis, diagnosis to treatment) were collected. Income data was approximated based on population medians at patient's home address zip code. RESULTS: A total of 550 patients were included in the final analysis. The study population was 57.4% Black and 61.2% of patients presenting with a household income of $40,000 US Dollars or lower based on approximated median household income. The time from CT scan to first treatment for the entire cohort was 121.3 days with no statistically significant variance by race. However, among patients presenting at stage IV, 72.7% were black and 76.0% resided in a zip code with a median income < $40,000. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated no significant delays in progressing through checkpoints of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment on the basis of race or income approximation. Black patients and patients in low-income households were diagnosed with lung cancer at a more advanced stage. Efforts to close the gap in lung cancer disparities should be focused on targeting screening and early identification toward social groups that may be at highest risk of late presentation. Institutional focus on patient navigation through these stages should be paramount. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: There were no delays in progression to lung cancer diagnostic and therapeutic milestones based on race or income approximation. Black race and residing in a low-income area are predictors for presenting at stage IV.

Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) and Pathologic Assessment of Electronic Cigarette or Vaping Product Use-associated Lung Injury (EVALI): The EVALI-BAL Study, A Multicenter Cohort.

BACKGROUND: E-cigarette or vaping-use related acute lung injury (EVALI) is a spectrum of radiographic and histologic patterns consistent with acute to subacute lung injury. However, limited data exist characterizing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) findings. The goal of this study is to further define the pathologic findings from BAL and biopsy samples of subjects with EVALI across 7 institutions. METHODS: A multicentered registry of patients admitted with EVALI who underwent flexible bronchoscopy with BAL+/-transbronchial biopsy from July 2019 to April 2021 was compiled for retrospective evaluation from 7 academic institutions throughout the United States. Radiographic and cytopathologic findings and frequencies were correlated with the substance vaped. RESULTS: Data from 21 subjects (42.9% women) who were predominantly White (76.2%) with a median age of 25 years (range, 16 to 68) with EVALI were included in this study. Sixteen patients (76.2%) reported use of tetrahydrocannabinol; the remainder used nicotine. BAL was performed in 19 of the 21 subjects, and transbronchial lung biopsy was performed in 7 subjects. BAL findings revealed neutrophilic predominance (median, 59.5%, range, 3.1 to 98) in most cases. Ten BAL samples demonstrated pulmonary eosinophilia ranging from 0.2% to 49.1% with one subject suggesting a diagnosis of acute eosinophilic pneumonia associated with the use of e-cigarettes. Lipid-laden macrophages were noted in 10 of 15 reports (66.7%). Transbronchial biopsy most frequently demonstrated patterns of organizing pneumonia (57.1%). CONCLUSION: EVALI-associated BAL findings typically demonstrate a spectrum of nonspecific inflammatory changes, including neutrophilia, lipid-laden macrophages, and in some cases eosinophilia.

Safety and Feasibility of a Sheath Cryoprobe for Bronchoscopic Transbronchial Biopsy: The FROSTBITE Trial.

BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopic lung biopsy is typically performed using transbronchial forceps. However, this method is limited by small sample size and presence of crush artifact. Cryobiopsy offers the potential to overcome these limitations with larger artifact-free samples but has not been widely adopted due to concerns over increased rates of bleeding and pneumothorax. A new, smaller 1.1-mm cryoprobe has been developed that operates in a similar fashion to forceps, though the safety profile of this cryoprobe has not yet been prospectively studied. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of transbronchial biopsy using a novel 1.1-mm cryoprobe. METHODS: This prospective, single-arm study enrolled patients referred for transbronchial biopsy. All procedures were performed using the 1.1-mm cryoprobe with oversheath. The primary outcome was the composite of significant complications related to the cryobiopsy procedure (bleeding Grade ≥3, pneumothorax Grade ≥2, and respiratory failure). Bleeding and pneumothorax were graded according to previously published scales. RESULTS: Fifty participants from two academic medical centers underwent transbronchial cryobiopsy. Indications for biopsy included evaluation of lung transplant allograft (50%), diffuse lung disease (44%), and pulmonary parenchymal lesion (6%). There were two pneumothoraces (4%), neither of which required aspiration or chest tube placement. There were no Grade 3 or 4 bleeding events. Mild bleeding (Grade ≤2) was observed in 25 cases (50%). No complications occurred that met the a priori primary outcome of bleeding Grade ≥3, pneumothorax Grade ≥2, and respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: Transbronchial cryobiopsy using a 1.1-mm cryoprobe is feasible with an acceptable safety profile.

Accuracy of Pulmonary Nodule Sampling Using Robotic Assisted Bronchoscopy with Shape Sensing, Fluoroscopy, and Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound (The ACCURACY Study).

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in guided bronchoscopy, the yield of bronchoscopic biopsy of a peripheral pulmonary nodule (PPN) remains highly variable. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate which features of robotic assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) contribute to a successful biopsy in a cadaver model. METHODS: A preclinical, prospective, single-blinded trial using a ventilated human cadaveric model assessed the successful puncture of implanted pulmonary nodules using various localization techniques with RAB. The different approaches included positioning the robotic catheter at predefined distances from the target nodule (<10 mm, 10-20 mm, 20-30 mm), bronchoscopist correction of divergence between the software virtual map and bronchoscopic view if observed, and impact of fluoroscopy and radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS). The primary endpoint was a central target hit (defined as an inner 2/3 target puncture) verified by cone-beam computed tomography. RESULTS: Thirty-eight RAB procedures were performed to target 16 PPNs. Median nodule size was 16.2 mm. All targets were located in the outer 1/3 of the lung with a bronchus sign in 31.3%. Central target hit rates were improved when the robotic catheter tip was closer to the nodule (<10 mm 68%, 10-20 mm 66%, 20-30 mm 11%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed the strongest predictor of a central target hit was robotic catheter distance to nodule (OR 0.89 per increase in 1 mm, p < 0.001), independent of the presence of a bronchus sign, divergence or concentric rEBUS view. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing a RAB platform, closer proximity of the robotic catheter to the target nodule results in an increase in peripheral nodule biopsy success.

Sedation and Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Tracheostomy in COVID-19, a Multi-Center Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with COVID-19 ARDS require significant amounts of sedation and analgesic medications which can lead to longer hospital/ICU length of stay, delirium, and has been associated with increased mortality. Tracheostomy has been shown to decrease the amount of sedative, anxiolytic and analgesic medications given to patients. The goal of this study was to assess whether tracheostomy decreased sedation and analgesic medication usage, improved markers of activity level and cognitive function, and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 ARDS. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective registry of patients with COVID-19 ARDS who underwent tracheostomy creation at the University of Pennsylvania Health System or the Johns Hopkins Hospital from 3/2020 to 12/2020. Patients were grouped into the early (≤14 days, n = 31) or late (15 + days, n = 97) tracheostomy groups and outcome data collected. RESULTS: 128 patients had tracheostomies performed at a mean of 19.4 days, with 66% performed percutaneously at bedside. Mean hourly dose of fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol were all significantly reduced 48-h after tracheostomy: fentanyl (48-h pre-tracheostomy: 94.0 mcg/h, 48-h post-tracheostomy: 64.9 mcg/h, P = .000), midazolam (1.9 mg/h pre vs. 1.2 mg/h post, P = .0012), and propofol (23.3 mcg/kg/h pre vs. 8.4 mcg/kg/h post, P = .0121). There was a significant improvement in mobility score and Glasgow Coma Scale in the 48-h pre- and post-tracheostomy. Comparing the early and late groups, the mean fentanyl dose in the 48-h pre-tracheostomy was significantly higher in the late group than the early group (116.1 mcg/h vs. 35.6 mcg/h, P = .03). ICU length of stay was also shorter in the early group (37.0 vs. 46.2 days, P = .012). INTERPRETATION: This data supports a reduction in sedative and analgesic medications administered and improvement in cognitive and physical activity in the 48-h period post-tracheostomy in COVID-19 ARDS. Further, early tracheostomy may lead to significant reductions in intravenous opiate medication administration, and ICU LOS.

Malignant Pleural Effusions.

Malignant pleural effusions have a significant burden on patients and the health care system. Diagnosis is typically via thoracentesis, although other times more invasive procedures are required. Management centers around relief of dyspnea and patient quality of life and can be done via serial thoracentesis, indwelling pleural catheter, or pleurodesis. This article focuses on the diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusion.

Safety and Performance of Transbronchial Cryobiopsy for Parenchymal Lung Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in technology, the bronchoscopic diagnosis of parenchymal pulmonary lesions (PPLs) remains difficult to achieve. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TLCB) offers the potential for larger samples with improved diagnostic yield; however, a paucity of data exists describing its safety and usefulness for the diagnosis of PPL. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the safety profile of TLCB for PPL? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An observational, retrospective, multicenter cohort study enrolled patients without endobronchial disease undergoing TLCB of PPL from 2015 through 2019. All procedures were performed using both rigid and flexible bronchoscopy with a flexible cryoprobe. Complication rates, including bleeding and pneumothorax rates, were collected. Bleeding was graded on a scale from 0 (trace) to 4 (requiring surgical intervention) with a grade of ≥ 3 considered clinically significant. Pneumothorax, tube thoracostomy placement, diagnostic yield, and need for subsequent interventions were recorded. RESULTS: One thousand twenty-four patients underwent TLCB. One hundred eighty-eight patients (18%) experienced bleeding; in 36 patients (3.5%), the bleeding was clinically significant. Sixty-eight patients (6.6%) demonstrated a pneumothorax and 64 patients (6.3%) required drainage with tube thoracostomy. All chest drains were removed within 4 days, and no cases of prolonged air leak occurred. A definitive diagnosis was achieved in 932 patients (91%). Adenocarcinoma (46%) and metastatic disease (21%) were the most common diagnoses. INTERPRETATION: TLCB showed an acceptable safety profile and diagnostic yield for the evaluation of PPL in this large retrospective cohort. Prospective clinical trials are underway to validate these findings further.

Cognitive Load in Electromagnetic Navigational and Robotic Bronchoscopy for Pulmonary Nodules.

Background: Electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB) and robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RB) require a high degree of decision-making and psychomotor skill. Cognitive load theory is the overall effort expended by individuals in response to a task and is closely related to the usability of devices for medical procedures. High cognitive workload leads to poor surgical outcomes and represents a bottleneck for learning that affects performance.Objective: To analyze the cognitive load associated with ENB and RB in experienced ENB practitioners learning RB.Methods: Six experienced ENB bronchoscopists performed ENB and RB on a human cadaver model of peripheral pulmonary nodules. To assess cognitive load, we used the Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX) and biometric changes. The SURG-TLX questionnaire was given to the provider after every peripheral pulmonary nodule biopsy with ENB and RB. Pupillary dilation and screen changes were continuously measured throughout the procedure for each biopsy attempt to collect biometric measures of cognitive load. Procedural time and biopsy outcome were also recorded.Results: Forty procedures (ENB and RB) were analyzed. Task complexity (23%) and mental demand (21.4%) were the highest contributors to cognitive load in ENB and RB. The cumulative SURG-TLX was significantly lower for the RB (69.25 vs. 101.25; P < 0.01). Total procedure time was greater for ENB (6.7 min; SD 1.5) compared with RB (4.4 min; SD 1.5; P = 0.01). Pupillary diameter was similar across the modalities (RB vs. ENB), but the diameter was higher during the biopsy portion (4.25 mm) than the navigation portion (4.01 mm).Conclusion: The intrinsic cognitive load of RB was highly manageable by existing ENB practitioners, and in this study, RB appeared to be less mentally demanding. Future development and training should focus on task complexity and mental demand for RB. The biopsy portion, regardless of bronchoscopic modality, should be a focus for education and training.