Consistency of ablations with trainee and increasing independence during fellowship training-Analysis of ablation data by CARTONET.

INTRODUCTION: Training in clinical cardiac electrophysiology (CCEP) involves the development of catheter handling skills to safely deliver effective treatment. Objective data from analysis of ablation data for evaluating trainee of CCEP procedures has not previously been possible. Using the artificial intelligence cloud-based system (CARTONET), we assessed the impact of trainee progress through ablation procedural quality. METHODS: Lesion- and procedure-level data from all de novo atrial fibrillation (AF) and cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablations involving first-year (Y1) or second-year (Y2) fellows across a full year of fellowship was curated within Cartonet. Lesions were automatically assigned to anatomic locations. RESULTS: Lesion characteristics, including contact force, catheter stability, impedance drop, ablation index value, and interlesion time/distance were similar over each training year. Anatomic location and supervising operator significantly affected catheter stability. The proportion of lesion sets delivered independently and of lesions delivered by the trainee increased steadily from the first quartile of Y1 to the last quartile of Y2. Trainee perception of difficult regions did not correspond to objective measures. CONCLUSION: Objective ablation data from Cartonet showed that the progression of trainees through CCEP training does not impact lesion-level measures of treatment efficacy (i.e., catheter stability, impedance drop). Data demonstrates increasing independence over a training fellowship. Analyses like these could be useful to inform individualized training programs and to track trainee's progress. It may also be a useful quality assurance tool for ensuring ongoing consistency of treatment delivered within training institutions.

Left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute ischaemic stroke despite anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) while using oral anticoagulants (OAC) is an increasingly recognised problem among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. We aimed to elucidate the potential role of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) for stroke prevention in patients with AIS despite OAC use (AIS-despite-OAC). METHODS: We retrospectively collected baseline and follow-up data from consecutive NVAF patients who had AIS-despite-OAC and subsequently underwent endovascular LAAC, between January 2015 and October 2021. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of AIS after LAAC, and the safety outcome was symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). RESULTS: 29 patients had LAAC specifically because of AIS-despite-OAC. The mean age at the time of the procedure was 73.4±8.7, 13 were female (44.82%). The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 5.96±1.32, with an expected AIS risk of 8.44 per 100 patient-years. 14 patients (48%) had two or more past AIS-despite-OAC. After LAAC, 27 patients (93.10%) were discharged on OAC which was discontinued in 17 (58.62%) after transoesophageal echocardiogram at 6 weeks. Over a mean of 1.75±1.0 years follow-up after LAAC, one patient had an AIS (incidence rate (IR) 1.97 per 100 patient-years). One patient with severe cerebral microangiopathy had a small ICH while on direct OAC and antiplatelet 647 days after LAAC. CONCLUSIONS: LAAC in AIS-despite-OAC patients demonstrated a low annual AIS recurrence rate in our cohort (1.97%) compared with the expected IR based on their CHA2DS2-VASc scores (8.44%) and to recent large series of AIS-despite-OAC patients treated with OAC/aspirin only (5.3%-8.9%). These hypothesis-generating findings support randomised trials of LAAC in AIS-despite-OAC patients.

The Impact of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on the Risk of Repeat Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been associated with increased incidence/recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the impact of GERD and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy on outcomes of AF catheter ablation remains unclear. We aimed to assess the association between the presence of GERD and risk of repeat AF ablation, stratified by PPI therapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF undergoing initial ablation in January 2011-September 2015. GERD was defined by endoscopic findings, objective reflux testing, or clinical symptoms. The association between GERD/PPI use and time to repeat ablation was evaluated by time-to-event analysis with censoring at the last clinic follow-up within 1 year. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-one subjects were included. Patients with GERD (n = 80) had a higher 1-year repeat ablation rate compared with those with no GERD (25% vs 11.3%, P = 0.0034). Stratifying by PPI use, patients with untreated GERD (37.5%) more likely needed repeat ablation compared with reflux-free (11.3%, P = 0.0003) and treated GERD (16.7%, P = 0.035) subjects. On multivariable Cox regression analyses, GERD was an independent risk factor of repeat ablation (hazard ratio [HR] 3.30, confidence interval [CI] 1.79-6.08, P = 0.0001). Specifically, untreated GERD was associated with earlier repeat ablation compared with no GERD (HR 4.02, CI 1.62-12.05, P = 0.0013). However, no significant difference in repeat ablation risk was noted between reflux-free and PPI-treated GERD groups. DISCUSSION: GERD was an independent predictor for risk of repeat AF ablation within 1 year, even after controlling for major cardiovascular comorbidities and confounders. PPI therapy modulated this risk, as repeat ablation-free survival for PPI-treated GERD was noninferior to reflux-free patients.

Transvenous Lead Extraction in the Left Ventricular Assist Device Patient.

The population of patients with advanced heart failure continues to increase steadily as does the need for mechanical circulatory support. Combination therapy with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is unavoidable. CIED complications in patients with LVADs are common and often necessitate device system revision and transvenous lead extraction. Despite this, management recommendations are limited, and guidelines are lacking.

Left atrial appendage closure for patients with atrial fibrillation at high intracranial haemorrhagic risk.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is performed in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), outcome data are scarce. We assessed the detailed neurological indications for LAAC and outcomes after LAAC in high ICH risk patients. METHODS: Study population included consecutive patients with NVAF who underwent LAAC in a single hospital network between January 2015 and October 2021 because of prior ICH or the presence of high ICH risk imaging markers on brain MRI (cerebral microbleeds (CMBs)). Primary safety and efficacy outcome measures were the occurrence of ICH and thromboembolic events, respectively, after LAAC. RESULTS: Among 146 patients with NVAF who underwent LAAC for high ICH risk, 122 had a history of ICH, while 24 presented with high ICH risk imaging markers only. Mean age was 75.7±7.61, 42 (28.8%) were women. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 5.23±1.52. Of 122 patients with ICH history, 58 (47.5%) had intraparenchymal haemorrhage (IPH), 40 (32.8%) had traumatic ICH (T-ICH) and 18 (14.7%) had non-traumatic subdural haemorrhage. Of 85 patients with brain MRIs including necessary sequences, 43 (50.6%) were related to cerebral amyloid angiopathy and 37 (43.5%) to hypertensive microangiopathy. While 70% of patients were discharged on oral anticoagulants (OAC), 92% were not taking OAC at 1 year. Over 2.12 years mean follow-up, one patient had recurrent non-traumatic IPH (incidence rate (IR) 0.32 per 100 patient-years), five had T-ICH (IR 1.61 per 100 patient-years) and six had an ischaemic stroke (IR 1.94 per 100 patient-years). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with NVAF at high ICH risk, LAAC demonstrated a low risk of recurrent ICH or ischaemic stroke compared with previously published data. LAAC in high ICH risk populations should be considered in clinical practice per FDA approval and recent guidelines.

Improved all-cause mortality with left bundle branch area pacing compared to biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a physiological alternative pacing strategy to biventricular pacing (BIVP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We aimed to assess the impact of LBBAP vs. BIVP on all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF)-related hospitalization in patients undergoing CRT. METHODS: Studies comparing LBBAP and BIVP for CRT in patients with HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were included. The coprimary outcomes were all-cause mortality and HF-related hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included procedural and fluoroscopy time, change in QRS duration, and change in LVEF. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (12 observational and 1 RCT, n = 3239; LBBAP = 1338 and BIVP = 1901) with a mean follow-up duration of 25.8 months were included. Compared to BIVP, LBBAP was associated with a significant absolute risk reduction of 3.2% in all-cause mortality (9.3% vs 12.5%, RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.57-0.86, p < 0.001) and an 8.2% reduction in HF-related hospitalization (11.3% vs 19.5%, RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.71, p < 0.00001). LBBAP also resulted in reductions in procedural time (mean weighted difference- 23.2 min, 95% CI - 42.9 to - 3.6, p = 0.02) and fluoroscopy time (- 8.6 min, 95% CI - 12.5 to - 4.7, p < 0.001) as well as a significant reduction in QRS duration (mean weighted difference:- 25.3 ms, 95% CI - 30.9 to - 19.8, p < 0.00001) and a greater improvement in LVEF of 5.1% (95% CI 4.4-5.8, p < 0.001) compared to BIVP in the studies that reported these outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, LBBAP was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality as well as HF-related hospitalization when compared to BIVP. Additional data from large RCTs is warranted to corroborate these promising findings.

Cardioneuroablation for the management of patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope and symptomatic bradyarrhythmias: the CNA-FWRD Registry.

BACKGROUND: Cardioneuroablation has been emerging as a potential treatment alternative in appropriately selected patients with cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope (VVS) and functional AV block (AVB). However the majority of available evidence has been derived from retrospective cohort studies performed by experienced operators. METHODS: The Cardioneuroablation for the Management of Patients with Recurrent Vasovagal Syncope and Symptomatic Bradyarrhythmias (CNA-FWRD) Registry is a multicenter prospective registry with cross-over design evaluating acute and long-term outcomes of VVS and AVB patients treated by conservative therapy and CNA. RESULTS: The study is a prospective observational registry with cross-over design for analysis of outcomes between a control group (i.e., behavioral and medical therapy only) and intervention group (Cardioneuroablation). Primary and secondary outcomes will only be assessed after enrollment in the registry. The follow-up period will be 3 years after enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: There remains a lack of prospective multicentered data for long-term outcomes comparing conservative therapy to radiofrequency CNA procedures particularly for key outcomes including recurrence of syncope, AV block, durable impact of disruption of the autonomic nervous system, and long-term complications after CNA. The CNA-FWRD registry has the potential to help fill this information gap.

Impact of intracardiac echocardiography versus transesophageal echocardiography guidance on left atrial appendage occlusion procedures: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is increasingly used during left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of ICE versus TEE guidance during LAAO on procedural characteristics and acute outcomes, as well the presence of peri-device leaks and residual septal defects during follow-up. METHODS: All studies comparing ICE-guided versus TEE-guided LAAO were identified. The primary outcomes were procedural efficacy and occurrence of procedure-related complications. Secondary outcomes included lab efficiency (defined as a reduction in in-room time), procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and presence of peri-device leaks and residual interatrial septal defects (IASD) during follow-up. RESULTS: Twelve studies (n = 5637) were included. There were no differences in procedural success (98.3% vs. 97.8%; OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.42-1.27, p = .27; I2 = 0%) or adverse events (4.5% vs. 4.4%; OR 0.81 95% CI 0.56-1.16, p = .25; I2 = 0%) between the ICE-guided and TEE-guided groups. ICE guidance reduced in in-room time (mean-weighted 28.6-min reduction in in-room time) without differences in procedural time or fluoroscopy time. There were no differences in peri-device leak (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68-1.27, p = 0.64); however, an increased prevalence of residual IASD was observed with ICE-guided versus TEE-guided LAAO (46.3% vs. 34.2%; OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.05-4.75, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: ICE guidance is associated with similar procedural efficacy and safety, but could result in improved lab efficiency (as established by a significant reduction in in-room time). No differences in the rate of periprocedural leaks were found. A higher prevalence of residual interatrial septal defects was observed with ICE guidance.

Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Left Ventricular Septal Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) are considered to be acceptable as LBBAP strategies. Differences in clinical outcomes between LBBP and LVSP are yet to be determined. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of LBBP vs LVSP vs BIVP for CRT. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter observational study, LBBP was compared with LVSP and BIVP in patients undergoing CRT. The primary composite outcome was freedom from heart failure (HF)-related hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, postprocedural NYHA functional class, and electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters. RESULTS: A total of 415 patients were included (LBBP: n = 141; LVSP: n = 31; BIVP: n = 243), with a median follow-up of 399 days (Q1-Q3: 249.5-554.8 days). Freedom from the primary composite outcomes was 76.6% in the LBBP group and 48.4% in the LVSP group (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.143-1.649; P = 0.001), driven by a 31.4% absolute increase in freedom from HF-related hospitalizations (83% vs 51.6%; HR: 3.55; 95% CI: 1.856-6.791; P < 0.001) without differences in all-cause mortality. LBBP was also associated with a higher freedom from the primary composite outcome compared with BIVP (HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.175-1.730; P < 0.001), with no difference between LVSP and BIVP. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing CRT, LBBP was associated with improved outcomes compared with LVSP and BIVP, while outcomes between BIVP and LVSP are similar.

Sustained Apnea for Epicardial Access With Right Ventriculography: The SAFER Epicardial Approach.

BACKGROUND: Epicardial access (EA) has emerged as an increasingly important approach for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias and to perform other interventional cardiology procedures. EA is frequently underutilized because the current approach is challenging and carries a high risk of life-threatening complications. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the SAFER (Sustained Apnea for Epicardial Access With Right Ventriculography) epicardial approach. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent EA with the SAFER technique were included in this multicenter study. The primary efficacy outcome was the successful achievement of EA. The primary safety outcomes included right ventricular (RV) perforation, major hemorrhagic pericardial effusion (HPE), and bleeding requiring surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics and any complications. Our results were compared with those from previous studies describing other EA techniques to assess differences in outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients undergoing EA with the SAFER approach from June 2021 to February 2023 were included. EA was used for ventricular tachycardia ablation in 98 patients (93.4%), left atrial appendage closure in 6 patients (5.7%), and phrenic nerve displacement in 1 patient (0.9%). EA was successful in all subjects (100%). The median time to EA was 7 minutes (IQR: 5-14 minutes). No cases of RV perforation, HPE, or need of surgical intervention were observed in this cohort. Comparing our results with previous studies about EA, the SAFER epicardial approach resulted in a significant reduction in major pericardial bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The SAFER epicardial approach is a simple, efficient, effective, and low-cost technique easily reproducible across multiple centers. It is associated with lower complication rates than previously reported techniques for EA.

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing as Initial Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an alternative to biventricular pacing (BiVp). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes between LBBAP and BiVp as an initial implant strategy for CRT. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter, observational, nonrandomized study, first-time CRT implant recipients with LBBAP or BiVp were included. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of heart failure (HF)-related hospitalization and all-cause mortality. The primary safety outcomes were acute and long-term complications. Secondary outcomes included postprocedural New York Heart Association functional class and electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters. RESULTS: A total of 371 patients (median follow-up of 340 days [IQR: 206-477 days]) were included. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 24.2% in the LBBAP vs 42.4% in the BiVp (HR: 0.621 [95% CI: 0.415-0.93]; P = 0.021) group, driven by a reduction in HF-related hospitalizations (22.6% vs 39.5%; HR: 0.607 [95% CI: 0.397-0.927]; P = 0.021) without significant difference in all-cause mortality (5.5% vs 11.9%; P = 0.19) or differences in long-term complications (LBBAP: 9.4% vs BiVp: 15.2%; P = 0.146). LBBAP resulted in shorter procedural (95 minutes [IQR: 65-120 minutes] vs 129 minutes [IQR: 103-162 minutes]; P < 0.001) and fluoroscopy times (12 minutes [IQR: 7.4-21.1 minutes] vs 21.7 minutes [IQR: 14.3-30 minutes]; P < 0.001), shorter QRS duration (123.7 ± 18 milliseconds vs 149.3 ± 29.1 milliseconds; P < 0.001), and higher postprocedural left ventricular ejection fraction (34.1% ± 12.5% vs 31.4% ± 10.8%; P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: LBBAP as an initial CRT strategy resulted in a lower risk of HF-related hospitalizations compared to BiVp. A reduction in procedural and fluoroscopy times, shorter paced QRS duration, and improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction compared with BiVp were observed.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy as an Unexpected Mimic of Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction: The Case for Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Otolaryngology.

INTRODUCTION: Inducible laryngeal obstruction is a common and challenging cause of exertional dyspnea. We report a case of an unanticipated cardiac condition that presented with symptoms suggestive of inducible laryngeal obstruction. DISCUSSION: A 55-year-old man was evaluated for progressive exertional dyspnea and throat tightness, unexplained after multiple medical evaluations. Resting laryngeal examination was suspicious for laryngopharyngeal reflux and mild vocal fold adduction during quiet expiration. Given progressive and refractory symptoms, maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing with intermittent laryngeal examination was performed. This study excluded laryngeal causes of exercise limitation and led to an unexpected diagnosis of persistent atrial flutter and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSION: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing with laryngeal examination can identify unexpected and life-threatening mimics of inducible laryngeal obstruction that may be missed by unmonitored exercise challenges. Suspicion for inducible laryngeal obstruction at rest may not predict the true nature of exercise limitation on cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

10-year single center experience of catheter ablation of focal atrial tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Focal atrial tachycardias (ATs) represent 5-15% of sustained supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs). Characteristic distribution of sites of origin and detailed electrophysiologic characterization of AT from specific sites of origin (SOO) have been described. Acute success and recurrence are less favorable than for other SVTs. In this series, we present our experience of focal AT ablation over a 10-year period. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective review of an electronically maintained database of all patients undergoing AT ablation at our institution between January 2011 and December 2020. Demographic, procedural, and outcomes data were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 293 distinct atrial tachycardias were treated during 279 procedures in 256 patients, including 207 first AT ablations. Acutely successful AT suppression was achieved in 91% of first-time ablations. Acute success was dependent on SOO of AT with lowest rates of acute suppression in the para-Hisian region and the crista terminalis (CT). The most common reason for failure to acutely suppress the AT was proximity to a critical structure (phrenic nerve, sinus node, and AV node). 8.9% of patients in this series presented with a tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy (TCM). 48% of TCM patients underwent an ablation attempt during an acute medical admission. Among the TCM group, median LV ejection fraction increased from 25% (range 10-50%) to 55% (range 35-65%) with successful treatment of AT. Five patients undergoing a repeat procedure had planned pericardial access for displacement of the phrenic nerve to permit ablation of the AT, which was successful in all cases. Among patients without a pre-existing diagnosis of AF, peri-procedural AF was not associated with a higher incidence of a subsequent diagnosis of AF (odds ratio 1.169, 95% CI 0.4058-3.475, p = 0.7628). Median duration of follow-up was 832 days. By Kaplan-Meier estimate, recurrence-free survival was 78% (95% CI 67-88%). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, focal AT ablation is associated with good acute results and a low rate of complications, but outcomes remain less favorable than previously reported for other forms of SVT.