A current comprehensive role of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to review the efficacy, safety, and evidence for current use and potential future uses of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). DATA SOURCES: A literature review was carried out through PubMed to identify completed and ongoing clinical trials evaluating the use, efficacy, and safety of ICIs in the management of resectable NSCLC. DATA SUMMARY: To date, four phase 3 trials have emerged that have changed our treatment practice concerning the utilization of ICIs during the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. The IMpower010 and KEYNOTE-091 trials examined the application of adjuvant atezolizumab and pembrolizumab, respectively, following surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. In the CheckMate 816 trial, the combination of nivolumab and chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant therapy received approval for patients with resectable NSCLC. Also, for patients with resectable NSCLC, the use of a pembrolizumab and chemotherapy combination as a perioperative therapy received approval based on the results of the KEYNOTE-671 trial. Apart from these trials, there are numerous phase 2 and phase 3 trials, some of which have been published while others are still in progress. CONCLUSION: Despite the promising outcomes from these trials there remain several unanswered questions. In this review, we will assess clinical trials involving adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and perioperative ICIs, aiming to address the unresolved questions related to these therapeutic approaches.

Comparison of anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free regimens in neoadjuvant HER-2 positive breast cancer treatment.

While some clinics have adopted abbreviated neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, there remains a shortage of comprehensive clinical data to support this practice. This is a retrospective, multicenter study. A total of 142 patients were included in the study who are HER2-positive breast cancer, aged ≤ 65 years, with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50%, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent surgery at 10 different oncology centers in Türkiye between October 2016 and December 2022. The treatment arms were divided into 4-6 cycles of docetaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab for arm A, 4 cycles of adriamycin/cyclophosphamide followed by 4 cycles of taxane/TP for arm B. There were 50 patients (35.2%) in arm A and 92 patients (64.8%) in arm B. The median follow-up of all of the patients was 19.9 months (95% CI 17.5-22.3). The 3-year DFS rates for treatment arms A and B were 90.0% and 83.8%, respectively, and the survival outcomes between the groups were similar (p = 0.34). Furthermore, the pathologic complete response rates were similar in both treatment arms, at 50.0% and 51.1%, respectively (p = 0.90). This study supports shortened neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, a common practice in some clinics.

Evaluation of clinical and prognostic factors for primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Single-center experience.

Objective: Primary gastric lymphomas, which make up the vast majority of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma, are rare and the most common subtype is primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PG-DLBCL). In our study, we investigated the clinical and prognostic factors of this lymphoma type as a single-center experience. Materials and Methods: Between January 2001 and February 2021, 91 patients aged ≥18 years, registered with the diagnosis of primary gastric DLBCL, diagnosed histopathologically, and whose evaluation parameters were reached, were retrospectively scanned. Results: The median age of 91 patients with a diagnosis of PG-DLBCL was 58 (20-81, minimum-maximum) years. Of the patients, 64.8% were men and 35.2% were women. While the number of patients with an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of 0-2 (low-low-intermediate risk) was 54 (59.4%), the number of patients with an IPI score of 3 (high intermediate) was 19 (20.9%), and the number of patients with an IPI score of 4-5 (high risk) was 18 (19.8%). While 52.7% of the patients had a complete response, 20.9% had a partial response, 3.3% had stable disease, and 23.1% had progressive disease. The 10-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for all patients, respectively, were 52.1% and 53.2%. We found factors affecting survival in univariate analysis; age groups (≤60/>60), ECOG groups (0-1/≥2), Lugano stage (I-II/III-IV), LDH level (normal/high), IPI risk groups (low/low-intermediate/high-intermediate/high) and radiotherapy (yes/no). In multivariate analysis, only; age groups (≤60/>60) and IPI risk groups (low/low-intermediate/high-intermediate/high) were found to be independent factors affecting survival. In addition, in our study, we determined that the division of the IPI intermediate risk group into low intermediate and high intermediate is one of the factors predicting prognosis. Conclusions: Few studies of PG-DLBCL have investigated the long-term survival rates of patients and primarily examined small patient groups because of the low incidence of the disease. In our study, we think that detailed evaluation of age and especially IPI risk groups play a role in predicting survival.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of 3 Months of CAPOX Followed by 3 Months of Capecitabine and 6 Months of CAPOX/FOLFOX in the Adjuvant Treatment of Low-Risk Stage III Colon Cancer Treated Surgically.

INTRODUCTION: In the adjuvant treatment of low-risk stage III colon cancer treated surgically, 3 months of CAPOX followed by 3 months of capecitabine is not a common clinical practice. Since there are no data on this practice in the literature, we have no idea how often it is used. However, it should be noted that this application is used in some centers due to the cumulative neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin but there are insufficient data in the literature on its efficacy. METHODS: The data of patients with colon cancer treated surgically who were followed up in 12 different oncology centers in Turkey between November 2004 and June 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The study included 194 patients. The treatment arms were as follows: 3 months of CAPOX followed by 3 months of capecitabine = arm A and CAPOX/FOLFOX (6 months) = arm B. There were 78 patients (40.2%) in arm A and 116 patients (59.8%) in arm B. The median age and sex distribution were similar between the treatment arms. The median follow-up period of all patients was 34.4 months (95% confidence interval, 29.1-39.7). When arm A was compared with arm B, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 75.3% versus 88.4% and 5-year DFS was 75.3% versus 82.8%, respectively. There were similar DFS outcomes between the treatment arms (p = 0.09). Rates of any grade of neuropathy were numerically lower in arm A, but the difference between the treatment arms was not statistically significant (51.3% vs. 56.9%; p = 0.44). The frequency of neutropenia was similar between the treatment arms. CONCLUSION: In this study, the efficacy and safety of the 3 months of CAPOX followed by 3 months of capecitabine chemotherapy regimen in the adjuvant treatment of low-risk stage III colon cancer treated surgically were proven. This result may also support the discontinuation of oxaliplatin at 3 months while continuing fluoropyrimidines, which is a common clinical practice but lacks sufficient data.

The evaluation of thiol/disulphide homeostasis in diabetic nephropathy.

AIMS: Thiol/disulphide homeostasis plays a critical role in antioxidant defense, and detoxification in body. Although alteration of thiol/disulfide homeostasis had been shown in patients with diabetes, the thiol/disulfide balance in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy is not yet known. METHODS: Twenty-six healthy volunteers (group 1), and 17 normal albuminuric (group 2), 24 middle albuminuric (group 3), 20 severe proteinuric (group 4) patients with type 2 diabetes were included. Proteinuria was tested by measuring microalbumin/creatinine ratio in spot urine. Thiol/disulphide homeostasis concentrations were measured using method developed by Erel et al. RESULTS: Mean blood urea and creatinine levels were found to be significantly higher and GFR level was found to be significantly lower in group 4 than in the other groups. Native thiol levels are significantly lower in groups with diabetes than in healthy group and in groups 3 and 4, compared to group 2. Total thiol level was significantly lower in groups 3 and 4 than group 1 and 2. Disulphide/native thiol and disulfide/total thiol ratios were significantly higher in the groups with diabetes than in group 1 and in the group 4 than in the group 2. CONCLUSION: The level of native and total thiols were found to be decreased significantly with the grade of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes and the balance had been disrupted in favor of disulphide. We suggest that deteriorated thiol/disulphide balance may be one of the important factors in the development or progression of diabetes induced nephropathy.