Can N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein help to predict short and long term mortality?

BACKGROUND: There is limited data about ICU, short and long-term mortality prediction of severe CAP with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR): N-terminal proB- type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP): C-reactive protein (CRP). AIM: Besides the known severity indexes of ICU, can NLR, NT-proBNP, CRP predict ICU, short and long term mortality? METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in a level III ICU of a tertiary training hospital for chest diseases and thoracic surgery. RESULTS: Over the study period, a total of 143 patients were enrolled in the study. The APACHE II scoring showed a significantly higher predicting performance for ICU mortality (p = 0.002). The performance for predicting short term mortality NLR (p = 0.039) and long term mortality NTproBNP (p = 0.002) had a significantly higher performance. The survival analysis revealed that mortality was significantly higher in patients with CURB65 score ≥ 4 (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: NLR, NTproBNP > 2000pg/mL can be used to predict pneumonia severity in ICU alike CURB65 and PSI. Higher NLR, APACHE II and atrial fibrillation can cause an important mortality factor in long term. Consequently, clinicians should take an attention for good cardiac evaluation and cardiac follow-up of patients with CAP (Tab. 4, Fig. 3, Ref. 36).

What is the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in sarcoidosis?

AIM: Information regarding the Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in sarcoidosis and the data from studies recommending its use as an indicator of inflammation and in the differential diagnosis and prognosis, are limited. With this study, it was aimed to obtain data regarding the NLR level in the patients at the time of presentation to the hospital and to determine the characteristics of patients in whom the NLR value was > 2. RESULTS: During the study period, of the 3434 patients with the sub-diagnosis of D86, 1300 cases whose complete blood count values had been recorded at the time of presentation were included in the study. Of the cases, 40 % were pulmonary sarcoidosis, 7 % were pulmonary sarcoidosis with sarcoidosis of the lymph nodes, 8 % were lymph node sarcoidosis, 1 % were sarcoidosis, of other combined areas, and 40 % of the cases were sarcoidosis that were unspecified. The F/M of the cases were 947/353, and the average age of the cases was 44. When the sarcoidosis groups were grouped into NLR < 2 (Group 1) and NLR ≥ 2 (Gorup 2), 27 % were Group 1, 73 % were Group 2, and a significant correlation was found between the two groups. When the inflammatory indicators were compared with NLR, the PLT/MPV was found to be statistically insignificant, and the ACE, ESR and CRP were found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio in the complete blood count, which is an easy and cheap test, can be used as an indicator of inflammation in Sarcoidosis. In clinical practice, wide-based studies comprising the activity and the staging in the prognosis of sarcoidosis are required (Tab. 2, Fig. 2, Ref. 26).

Bronchoscopy as an indicator of tracheobronchial fungal infection in non-neutropenic intensive-care unit patients.

We aimed to establish that a bronchoscopic view can be as reliable as microbiology, and support an empirical tracheobronchial fungal infection (TBFI) treatment decision. We retrospectively studied 95 respiratory failure patients with suspected TBFI admitted to the intensive-care unit (ICU) in 2008 with sticky secretions, hyperaemic mucosa, and whitish plaques on bronchoscopic view. Patients not suspected of having TBFI were chosen as a control group (n = 151). Broncheoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was cultured, and biopsy samples were taken from the lesions. Biopsy samples positive for fungi were defined as 'proven', only BAL-positive (+ fungi) cases were 'probable TBFI', and BAL-negative (- fungi) cases were 'possible TBFI'. BAL (+ fungi) and BAL (- fungi) in the control group were defined as 'colonization' and 'no TBFI', respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of BAL (+ fungi) were 85.1% (63/74), 81.4% (140/172), 66.3% (63/95), and 92.7% (140/151), respectively. Biopsies were performed in 78 of 95 patients, and 28 were proven TBFI with fungal elements, and 100% were BAL (+ fungi). Probable TBFI was seen in 30 of 95 patients with BAL (+ fungi), and possible TBFI (BAL(- fungi)) in 25 of 95. Among the 95 patients, microbiology revealed fungi (90.5% Candida species; 9.5% Aspergillus) in 63 (66.3%). In the controls, the colonization and no TBFI rates were 11 of 151 and 140 of 151, respectively. Observing sticky secretions, hyperaemic mucosa and whitish plaques by bronchoscopy is faster than and may be as reliable as microbiology for diagnosing TBFI. These findings are relevant for empirical antifungal therapy in suspected TBFI patients in the ICU.