RESUMEN
There are limited data on the use of steroids and antibiotics in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of these treatments on the outcome of IVF cycles in which Assisted Hatching (AH) was performed. We studied a retrospective cohort in a large university-affiliated infertility centre. Data from 1126 AH cycles performed between 2007 and 2009 were reviewed. Cycles were categorized as "treatment" (n = 640) and "no treatment" (n = 486), depending on whether they received steroids and antibiotics. The primary outcome was live birth. Secondary outcomes included implantation, spontaneous abortion, biochemical, clinical and ectopic pregnancy. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). OR were adjusted (AOR) for age, BMI, baseline FSH, peak estradiol, cycle number, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos that underwent AH, number of high-implantation potential embryos, number of embryos transferred and physician in charge. The AOR (95% CI) of live birth was 1.91 (1.08-3.38), of clinical pregnancy, 1.75 (1.08-2.83) and of biochemical pregnancy, 0.24 (0.07-0.85). Our study suggests that treatment with steroids and antibiotics during AH cycles significantly increases the odds of live birth.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Esteroides/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Implantación del Embrión , Transferencia de Embrión , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad/terapia , Nacimiento Vivo , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Oocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Oocitos/fisiología , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Review of the legal and ethical basis for reproductive endocrinologists to refuse ovulation induction to patients with diminished ovarian reserve. METHODS: The Lexis-Nexis search engine was used to perform a legal review pertaining to refusal of treatment. Ethical opinions of medical organizations were also reviewed. RESULTS: Federal antidiscrimination laws provide legal recourse for patients with diminished ovarian reserve who are denied ovulation induction. However, the same laws also permit refusal of care when there is bona fide medical justification to decline services. In addition, the codes of ethics for relevant professional organizations support physicians' decisions to refuse treatment when treatment is futile. CONCLUSION: Although it is ethically and legally permissible to deny ovulation induction to patients with diminished ovarian reserve when medically justified, refusal may invite retaliatory litigation. Counseling remains a cornerstone in directing these patients to options with more potential for success, such as donor eggs and adoption.
Asunto(s)
Endocrinología , Inducción de la Ovulación/ética , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/ética , Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adopción/legislación & jurisprudencia , Endocrinología/ética , Endocrinología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Análisis Ético , Femenino , Humanos , Donantes de Tejidos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
Cytokines modulate turnover of the endometrium during the menstrual cycle and contribute to the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Gene expression for cytokines is often regulated by proteins that bind to adenosine- and uridine-rich elements (AREs) in their transcripts to stabilize or destabilize bound messenger RNAs (mRNAs). HuR/ELAVL1 is an RNA-binding protein that stabilizes ARE-containing mRNAs. We hypothesized that HuR might play a role in regulating cytokine expression during the menstrual cycle and in endometriosis and characterized the expression and regulation of HuR in eutopic and ectopic human endometrium. Tissue sections obtained from normal (n = 23) and ectopic (n = 16) endometrium were immunostained for HuR, and staining intensity was evaluated by HSCORE. Cultured stromal cells isolated from normal endometrium were treated with vehicle, estradiol (E2), progesterone (P), E2 + P, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin 1ß (IL-1ß) for 24 hours, and HuR expression was determined by Western blot. HuR immunoreactivity was significantly lower in the early proliferative and late secretory phases (157.5 ± 11.08 and 190.0 ± 15.2, respectively), compared to the mid-late proliferative (270.0 ± 8.0) and early-mid secretory phases (256.6 ± 20.2; P < .01, analysis of variance [ANOVA]). Furthermore, HuR expression was significantly lower in ectopic endometrial cells compared to normal endometrium in mid-late proliferative and early-mid-secretory phases (P < .01). Estrogen, P, or cytokines did not alter HuR expression in cultured endometrial stromal cells. Increased HuR levels in the mid-menstrual phases are likely to contribute to reduced mid-cycle cytokine expression and enhanced cellular survival in eutopic endometrium. In ectopic endometrium, elevated cytokine levels associated with endometriosis likely reduce HuR expression.