RESUMEN
AIM: To assess the clinical and radiographic success rates of regenerative pulpotomy compared to devitalising or preservative pulpotomy in treating vital pulp exposure in primary teeth. METHODS: Comprehensive search with PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Open Grey databases was done and two reviewers extracted the data after assessing the studies for eligibility criteria. The Cochrane Collaboration Tool and Minors Checklist assessed the quality of the selected studies. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that MTA seemed to be the better alternative to FC and FS, showing a lower risk of failure and can be recommended for pulpotomy in primary teeth. BD also demonstrated promising results as a pulpotomy medicament.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate maxillary molars' root and root canal morphology among the Saudi population using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography scanning (CBCT). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, the CBCT scans of 483 Saudi nationals were evaluated to identify the number of roots and root canals in maxillary first and second molars. The records were tabulated and classified according to Vertucci and a new system for root and canal classification given by Ahmed and Dummer. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the data statistically. To check for symmetry, comparisons were made between all the maxillary first molars (MFM's) and maxillary second molars (MSM's) on opposing quadrants. Inter Observer variability was seen using Cohen's Kappa test. RESULTS: MFM's presented with three roots with Type II Vertucci canal configuration (VC) commonly seen among them. MSM's had more variations in the number of roots and canals, although three roots and Type I VC were predominantly seen. When comparing the two genders statistically significant difference was observed in both maxillary molars at a 5% level using Fisher's exact test. Three roots with four canals (3R4C) were predominantly observed in the MFM's (85.6%) and three roots with three canals (3R3C) identified in 51.95% were more common than 3R4C (43.55%) in MSM's. Both the maxillary molars bilaterally, exhibited a high percentage of symmetry in root and canal configurations. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of root canal morphology of molars would reduce the chances of root canal failures by making sure all canals are obturated. This study provides supplemental information about the root canals of maxillary molars in a Saudi Arabian subpopulation.
