Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
AIDS Behav ; 20(11): 2565-2577, 2016 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26204987

RESUMEN

A randomized, placebo-controlled, efficacy trial of Carraguard was unable to demonstrate a reduction in women's risk of HIV infection, which may have been due, in part, to low adherence (gel used in 42 % of vaginal sex acts, on average). A secondary analysis was undertaken to understand baseline factors associated with high adherence (gel used in ≥85 % of sex acts). Women who reported ≥1 vaginal sex act, returned ≥1 opened applicator, and had ≥1 conclusive post-enrollment HIV test (N = 5990) were included. Adherence was estimated as the ratio of average weekly applicator insertions (based on a dye stain assay indicating vaginal insertion)/average weekly sex acts (by self-report). Multivariate logistic regression modeling indicated that coital frequency, site, contraception, and partner age difference had a significant impact on adherence. Women reporting >1 and ≤2 vaginal sex acts per week, on average, were half as likely to be adherent as those reporting 1 vaginal sex act per week or less [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.48; 95 % CI 0.38-0.61]; women from the Western Cape had one-third the odds of being adherent compared to women from KZN (AOR: 0.31; 95 % CI 0.23-0.41); compared to women using injectable contraception, women using any other or no method were more likely to be adherent (AOR: 1.30; 95 % CI 1.04-1.63); and women who had a larger age gap from their partners were more likely to be adherent (AOR: 1.03; 95 % CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.001). Despite low adherence, overall, 13 % of participants achieved nearly perfect adherence, indicating a potential niche for a coitally dependent microbicide. More research is needed on the impact of sexual patterns and HIV risk perception on product acceptability and adherence to improve counseling in ongoing trials and when products are eventually introduced.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Conducta Sexual , Cremas, Espumas y Geles Vaginales/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Antiinfecciosos/efectos adversos , Coito , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Cremas, Espumas y Geles Vaginales/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
2.
PLoS Med ; 12(1): e1001778, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25612136

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Observational studies of a putative association between hormonal contraception (HC) and HIV acquisition have produced conflicting results. We conducted an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of studies from sub-Saharan Africa to compare the incidence of HIV infection in women using combined oral contraceptives (COCs) or the injectable progestins depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) with women not using HC. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Eligible studies measured HC exposure and incident HIV infection prospectively using standardized measures, enrolled women aged 15-49 y, recorded ≥15 incident HIV infections, and measured prespecified covariates. Our primary analysis estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) using two-stage random effects meta-analysis, controlling for region, marital status, age, number of sex partners, and condom use. We included 18 studies, including 37,124 women (43,613 woman-years) and 1,830 incident HIV infections. Relative to no HC use, the aHR for HIV acquisition was 1.50 (95% CI 1.24-1.83) for DMPA use, 1.24 (95% CI 0.84-1.82) for NET-EN use, and 1.03 (95% CI 0.88-1.20) for COC use. Between-study heterogeneity was mild (I(2) < 50%). DMPA use was associated with increased HIV acquisition compared with COC use (aHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.23-1.67) and NET-EN use (aHR 1.32, 95% CI 1.08-1.61). Effect estimates were attenuated for studies at lower risk of methodological bias (compared with no HC use, aHR for DMPA use 1.22, 95% CI 0.99-1.50; for NET-EN use 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.96; and for COC use 0.91, 95% CI 0.73-1.41) compared to those at higher risk of bias (p(interaction) = 0.003). Neither age nor herpes simplex virus type 2 infection status modified the HC-HIV relationship. CONCLUSIONS: This IPD meta-analysis found no evidence that COC or NET-EN use increases women's risk of HIV but adds to the evidence that DMPA may increase HIV risk, underscoring the need for additional safe and effective contraceptive options for women at high HIV risk. A randomized controlled trial would provide more definitive evidence about the effects of hormonal contraception, particularly DMPA, on HIV risk.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Femeninos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/administración & dosificación , Noretindrona/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Humanos , Incidencia , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noretindrona/administración & dosificación , Noretindrona/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
J Adolesc Health ; 54(6): 654-62, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24690188

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This article explores the ethics and feasibility of enrolling adolescent females in microbicide trials using data from 16- to 17-year-old participants of the Phase 3 trial of the candidate vaginal microbicide, Carraguard. METHODS: Secondary analysis was conducted to compare health, behavioral, and operational outcomes between 16- to 17-year-olds and 18- to 19-year-olds screened for and enrolled in the trial. Analytical approaches included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and generalized estimating equations for nonsurvival end points. RESULTS: Results reveal no significant differences between the two age groups for health (sexually transmitted infection, adverse event), risk behavior, or operational (adherence, follow-up) outcomes. However, data suggest that after 1 year of trial participation, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and pregnancy incidence were higher and increased more rapidly for the 16- to 17-year-olds than for 18- to 19-year-olds; this finding is entirely consistent with other incidence data for HIV infection among South African youth and cannot be attributed to study participation without a comparison outside the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the Carraguard trial provide no evidence that inclusion of 16- to 17-year-olds in the trial had any detrimental effect on trial participants or on the conduct of research. These data provide an argument motivating the inclusion of sexually active adolescents aged 16-17 years into future trials in order to avoid delaying access to an effective product for adolescents at high risk of HIV acquisition. Careful support for adolescent-inclusive protocols (including appropriate counseling) must be incorporated into study design.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Sujetos de Investigación/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Administración Intravaginal , Adolescente , Conducta del Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/ética , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Selección de Paciente/ética , Embarazo , Embarazo en Adolescencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Asunción de Riesgos , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
4.
AIDS ; 26(4): 497-504, 2012 Feb 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22156973

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of hormonal contraception including combined oral contraceptives (COCs), and the injectable progestins depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and norethisterone enanthate (Net-En) on the risk of HIV acquisition among women in South Africa. DESIGN/METHODS: We analyzed data from 5567 women aged 16-49 years participating in the Carraguard Phase 3 Efficacy Trial. Participants were interviewed about contraceptive use and sexual behaviors and underwent pelvic examinations and HIV testing quarterly. We used marginal structural Cox regression models to estimate the effect of hormonal contraception exposure on HIV acquisition risk among women overall and among young women (16-24 years) in particular. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy participants became HIV-infected (3.7 per 100 woman-years); HIV incidence was 2.8, 4.6, 3.5 and 3.4 per 100 woman-years in the COC, DMPA, Net-En and nonhormonal contraceptive groups, respectively (P = 0.09). The adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) were 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-1.39], 1.28 (95% CI 0.92-1.78) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.64-1.32) among COC, DMPA and Net-En users, respectively, compared with the nonhormonal group controlling for covariates. Age modified the effect of hormonal contraception on HIV acquisition risk; among young women, the AHRs were 1.02 (95% CI 0.46-2.28) for COCs, 1.68 (95% CI 0.96-2.94) for DMPA and 1.36 (95% CI0.78-2.35) for Net-En users. CONCLUSIONS: In this study conducted among South African women, hormonal contraception did not significantly increase the risk of HIV acquisition. However, the effect estimate does not rule out a moderate increase in HIV risk associated with DMPA use found in some other recent studies.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/administración & dosificación , Seropositividad para VIH/transmisión , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/administración & dosificación , Noretindrona/análogos & derivados , Conducta Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Cremas, Espumas y Geles Vaginales/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Seropositividad para VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noretindrona/administración & dosificación , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
AIDS Behav ; 15(2): 407-21, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20886278

RESUMEN

Misreporting of adherence undermines detection of an association between product use and HIV infection in microbicide trials. This study investigates whether, in a placebo trial, audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) produces more accurate reporting of adherence and sexual behavior than a face-to-face interview (FTFI). At three South African clinics, 849 women were enrolled and instructed to use applicators filled with placebo gel; participants were randomly assigned to FTFI or ACASI. Behavioral reports were validated through two biomarkers that detect product usage and unprotected sex. For most behaviors, ACASI generated significantly higher reporting, although differences by interview mode appeared to diminish over time. ACASI participants were more likely to report having had sex without gel, but reported and tested applicators did not indicate greater honesty about gel insertion with ACASI. While comparisons of reported unprotected sex with the validated biomarker revealed more agreement with ACASI than with FTFI, differences were small.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Entrevistas como Asunto , Autorrevelación , Conducta Sexual , Administración Intravaginal , Adolescente , Adulto , Biomarcadores/análisis , Computadores , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Asunción de Riesgos , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Factores Socioeconómicos , Sudáfrica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
6.
Lancet ; 372(9654): 1977-87, 2008 Dec 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19059048

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Female-initiated HIV-prevention options, such as microbicides, are urgently needed. We assessed Carraguard, a carrageenan-based compound developed by the Population Council, for its efficacy and long-term safety in prevention of HIV infection in women. METHODS: We undertook a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in three South African sites in sexually-active, HIV-negative women, aged 16 years and older. 6202 participants, who were randomly assigned by a block randomisation scheme to Carraguard (n=3103) or placebo (methylcellulose [n=3099]), were instructed to use one applicator of gel plus a condom during each vaginal sex act. Participants were followed up for up to 2 years. Visits every 3 months included testing for HIV presence and pregnancy, pelvic examinations, risk reduction counselling, and treatment for curable sexually transmitted infections and symptomatic vaginal infections. The primary outcome was time to HIV seroconversion. Analysis was in the efficacy population (a subset of the intention-to-treat population, excluding participants for whom efficacy could not be assessed). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00213083. FINDINGS: For the primary outcome (time to HIV seroconversion) we analysed 3011 women in the Carraguard group and 2994 in the placebo group. HIV incidence was 3.3 per 100 woman-years (95% CI 2.8-3.9) in the Carraguard group (134 events) and 3.8 per 100 woman-years (95% CI 3.2-4.4) in the placebo group (151 events), with no significant difference in the distribution of time to seroconversion (p=0.30). The covariate-adjusted hazard ratio was 0.87 (95% CI 0.69-1.09). Rates of self-reported gel use (96.2% Carraguard, 95.9% placebo) and condom use (64.1% in both groups) at last sex acts were similar in both groups. On the basis of applicator testing, however, gel was estimated to have been used in only 42.1% of sex acts, on average (41.1% Carraguard, 43.1% placebo). 1420 (23%) women in the intention-to-treat population had adverse events (713 Carraguard, 707 placebo), and 95 (2%) women had adverse events that were related to gel use (48 Carraguard, 47 placebo). Serious adverse events occurred in 72 (2%) women in the Carraguard group and 78 (3%) in the placebo group, only one of which was considered possibly related to gel use (placebo group). INTERPRETATION: This study did not show Carraguard's efficacy in prevention of vaginal transmission of HIV. No safety concerns were recorded.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Cremas, Espumas y Geles Vaginales/uso terapéutico , Salud de la Mujer , Adolescente , Adulto , Carragenina/química , Química Farmacéutica , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Conducta Sexual , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Cremas, Espumas y Geles Vaginales/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...