The association of FRAX with predictors of falls in the assessment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Turkey: the fracture study of Turkey (FRACT study).

Although FRAX is used for fracture risk evaluation, this tool does not include balance and fall risk. The association between the predictors of falls and high FRAX scores we found in this study suggests that risk indicators for falls may add substantial value to FRAX by improving fracture risk prediction. PURPOSE: This observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study aimed to assess the fall risk predictors and explore their association with FRAX in Turkish patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: Two hundred and nine (209) women with postmenopausal osteoporosis referred to the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) at Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa were enrolled in the FRACT study (The Fracture Study of Turkey). Clinical risk factors were assessed using the FRAX tool. Tandem stance, Tandem walking, Timed up and go (TUG), and Chair stand tests were performed to assess balance and fall risk. RESULTS: Among patients with a mean age of 67.6 (± 9.7) years, 66 patients (31.6%) had osteoporosis without fractures and 143 patients (68.4%) had fragility fractures. The proportion of patients with poor performance of fall prediction tests was significantly higher in patients with a fragility fracture than those with osteoporosis alone. There was an inverse relationship between dynamic balance tests and the reported number of prior falls in the past year. FRAX score was higher in patients with impaired Tandem stance, Tandem walking, and TUG tests (p = 0.008, p = 0.035, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Assessment of fall risk predictors should be one of the major pillars in the physical evaluation of osteoporotic patients in the FLS setting. FRAX is a useful tool to determine the fracture risk of patients with both static and dynamic balance impairments. Combining balance assessment with FRAX may be an important step to optimize osteoporosis risk assessment.

Association of pain and clinical factors on disability and quality of life in systemic sclerosis: A cross-sectional study from Turkish League Against Rheumatism Network.

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the factors associated with disability and quality of life (QoL) in Turkish patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Patients and methods: Between January 2018 and January 2019, a total of 256 SSc patients (20 males, 236 females; mean age: 50.9±12.4 years; range, 19 to 87 years) who were diagnosed with SSc were included in the study. Disability and health-related QoL (HRQoL) were evaluated by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), scleroderma HAQ (SHAQ), Duruöz Hand Index (DHI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Linear regression analysis methods were used to describe factors associated with disability and QoL of the patients. Results: All disability scores were higher and HRQoL scores were lower in diffuse cutaneous SSc patients compared limited cutaneous SSc, and differentiations were significant (p=0.001 and p=0.007). In multiple regression, pain (VAS) was the strongest predictor for high disability and low QoL scores (p<0.001) as HAQ (ß=0.397, 0.386, 0.452), SHAQ (ß=0.397, 0.448, 0.372), DHI (ß=0.446, 0.536, 0.389), PCS (ß=-0.417,-0.499, -0.408) and MCS (ß=-0.478, -0.441, -0.370) in combined, lcSSc and dcSSc patients respectively. The factors associated with high disability and low QoL scores were forced vital capacity for HAQ (ß=-0.172, p=0.002) and SF-36 PCS (ß=0.187, p=0.001); disease duration for HAQ (ß=0.208, p<0.001), DHI (ß=0.147, p=0.006), and SF-36 PCS (ß=-0.134, p=0.014); 6-minute walk test for HAQ (ß=-0.161, p=0.005) and SF-36 PCS (ß=0.153, p=0.009); and modified Rodnan skin score for SHAQ (ß=0.250, p<0.001) and DHI (ß=0.233, p<0.001) in SSc patients. Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide for HAQ (ß=-0.189, p=0.010) and SHAQ (ß=-0.247, p=0.002); erythrocyte sedimentation rate for DHI (ß=0.322, p<0.001); age for SF-36 PCS (ß=-0.221, p=0.003) and body mass index for SF-36 PCS (ß=-0.200, p=0.008) and MCS (ß=-0.175, p=0.034) were the other variables associated with high disability or low QoL scores in SSc subsets. Conclusion: Clinicians should consider the management of the pain and its sources as a key to improve better functional state and quality of daily life in SSc.

Psoriatic arthritis impact of disease questionnaire: validity, reliability and its clinical potential.

The psoriatic arthritis impact of disease (PSAID) questionnaire has been developed to measure disease impact on patients with psoriatic arthritis. It was aimed to evaluate its validity and reliability in association with sociodemographic and clinical factors and compare it with disease activity and patient-reported outcome measures in a Turkish psoriatic arthritis population. A prospective observational study was conducted to validate the Turkish version of the PSAID. All consecutive patients with psoriatic arthritis were evaluated between January 2019 and October 2019. Demographic and clinical features were recorded. The PSAID and patient-reported outcome measures were applied to all patients. Interclass and intra-class correlation analyses were performed. Convergent validity and correlation coefficients were used for validity analyses. There were 80 patients with a mean age of 50.2 ± 9.9 years. Cronbach's α value of the PSAID and intra-class correlation were 0.799 and 0.984, respectively. The total median PSAID score was 4.7. Pain, fatigue, ability to work, functional capacity and feeling of discomfort were the five highest-scoring subscales. There was satisfactory internal consistency for each subscale of the PSAID. As disease severity increased from low to high, the PSAID scores significantly increased. There were acceptable correlations between the PSAID and other patient-reported outcome measures. The PSAID is shown to be a reliable and valid questionnaire in Turkish patients with psoriatic arthritis. Good correlation with disease activity and patient-reported outcome measures represent an opportunity to use the PSAID in clinical practice to tailor individualized treatment choices.

High-Voltage Electrical Stimulation Versus Ultrasound in the Treatment of Pressure Ulcers.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of high-voltage electrical stimulation (HVES) with ultrasound (US) in treating Stage II through Stage IV pressure ulcers (PrUs)* of hospitalized patients. DESIGN: This study was designed as a prospective, controlled trial in which patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS: A total of 27 patients (22 male, 5 female) hospitalized for neurologic rehabilitation in the Clinic of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation with Stage II through Stage IV PrUs were included in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to either HVES or US treatment group, and all patients underwent standard wound care. Over 4 to 12 weeks, HVES was applied for 60 minutes 3 times per week, and US was applied 3 times per week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Properties of the PrUs were noted during pre- and posttreatment. RESULTS: The PrUs of patients in the HVES and US groups healed at a mean rate of 43% and 63%, respectively. There was no statistically significant intergroup difference in healing found after treatment. Regression analysis was performed for the factors that could influence the wound surface areas, and significant effects were detected among the level of ambulation, pretreatment stage, and smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Both HVES and US are promising methods for wound healing, and both electrotherapy modalities have been demonstrated to support the healing of PrUs.

Comparison of Short-Term Clinical and Electrophysiological Outcomes of Local Steroid Injection and Surgical Decompression in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

AIM: To investigate the effectiveness of local steroid injection and surgical decompression in the treatment of patients with severe carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and also to compare short-term outcomes using clinical and electrophysiological criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patients diagnosed as severe CTS were divided into two groups. Group 1 received local steroid injection and Group 2 underwent surgical decompression. The Boston Questionnaire that consists of two sections as the Boston Symptom Severity Scale (BSS) and the Functional Status Scale (FSS) was completed by the patients. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients completed the study. Since two patients had bilateral severe CTS, a total of 35 hands were evaluated in the study. In Group 1, a significant difference was recorded between some pre- and post-treatment clinical parameters (BSS and FSS scores) and all electrophysiological parameters excluding motor conduction velocities. In Group 2, a statistically significant difference was found between pre- and post-treatment BSS scores and all electrophysiological parameters excluding motor conduction velocity and distal latency. However intergroup differences were not statistically significant as for all clinical and electrophysiological parameters (BSS, FSS, sensory amplitude, sensory conduction velocity, distal latency, motor amplitude, motor conduction velocity). CONCLUSION: In the treatment of severe CTS, steroid injection and surgical decompression achieved favourable improvements in clinical and electrophysiological parameters within a short-term without superiority of one treatment over other. Therefore, in patients in whom surgical decompression can not be applied, local steroid injection can be recommended as a less invasive and a promising treatment alternative.

Sensory disturbance and polyneuropathy in rheumatoid arthritis patients with foot deformity.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim in this study was to present the results of sensory evaluation tests and electrophysiological evaluations in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with foot deformity and to determine their relation with general health status and lower extremity functionality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with RA diagnosis and foot deformity were included in the study. Demographic and disease characteristics of the patients were recorded, and a detailed neurological examination was performed. Superficial sensation, pain, heat, vibration, and two-point discrimination sensation were evaluated in each foot, and their sum was used to determine the sensory deficits index (SDI) of 0-10. The presence of polyneuropathy was evaluated with electrophysiological methods. The Health Assessment Questionnaire and mobility and walking subscales of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales-2 were used to assess general health status and lower extremity functionality, respectively. According to the sensory examination and electromyography results, patients were compared in terms of their general health status and lower extremity functional status. RESULTS: Sensory disturbance was detected in 39 patients (74%) during the examination; however, 27 patients (52.9%) had polyneuropathy determined electrophysiologically. In patients with sensory deficits, statistically significant deterioration was detected in general health and foot functionality, including mobility and walking, when compared to patients with a normal sensory evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Even in the presence of normal electrophysiological tests, sensory dysfunction alone seems to be associated with severe disability in general health status and foot functionality when compared to patients with a normal sensory examination.

Sensory disturbance and polyneuropathy in rheumatoid arthritis patients with foot deformity / Perturbações sensitivas e polineuropatia em pacientes com artrite reumatoide com deformidade do pé

Abstract Introduction Our aim in this study was to present the results of sensory evaluation tests and electrophysiological evaluations in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with foot deformity and to determine their relation with general health status and lower extremity functionality. Materials and methods Fifty-one patients with RA diagnosis and foot deformity were included in the study. Demographic and disease characteristics of the patients were recorded, and a detailed neurological examination was performed. Superficial sensation, pain, heat, vibration, and two-point discrimination sensation were evaluated in each foot, and their sum was used to determine the sensory deficits index (SDI) of 0–10. The presence of polyneuropathy was evaluated with electrophysiological methods. The Health Assessment Questionnaire and mobility and walking subscales of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales-2 were used to assess general health status and lower extremity functionality, respectively. According to the sensory examination and electromyography results, patients were compared in terms of their general health status and lower extremity functional status. Results Sensory disturbance was detected in 39 patients (74%) during the examination; however, 27 patients (52.9%) had polyneuropathy determined electrophysiologically. In patients with sensory deficits, statistically significant deterioration was detected in general health and foot functionality, including mobility and walking, when compared to patients with a normal sensory evaluation. Conclusions Even in the presence of normal electrophysiological tests, sensory dysfunction alone seems to be associated with severe disability in general health status and foot functionality when compared to patients with a normal sensory examination.

Resumo Introdução O objetivo deste estudo foi apresentar os resultados dos testes de avaliação sensitiva e do exame eletrofisiológico em pacientes com artrite reumatoide (AR) com deformidade do pé e determinar a sua relação com o estado geral de saúde e o aspecto funcional dos membros inferiores. Materiais e métodos Foram incluídos no estudo 51 pacientes com diagnóstico de AR e deformidade do pé. Foram registradas as características demográficas e da doença de cada indivíduo e foi feito um exame neurológico detalhado. Foi avaliada a sensibilidade superficial, dolorosa, térmica e vibratória e aplicado o teste de discriminação de dois pontos em cada um dos pés. A soma dos escores foi usada para determinar o índice de déficits sensitivos (IDS) de 0‐10. A presença de polineuropatia foi avaliada com métodos eletrofisiológicos. Foram usados o Health Assessment Questionnaire e as subescalas mobilidade e deambulação da Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales‐2 para avaliar o estado geral de saúde e o aspecto funcional de membros inferiores, respectivamente. De acordo com os resultados dos exames de eletromiografia e de sensibilidade, os pacientes foram comparados em relação ao seu estado geral de saúde e estado funcional de membros inferiores. Resultados Foram detectados distúrbios sensitivos em 39 pacientes (74%) durante o exame; contudo, 27 (52,9%) tinham polineuropatia determinada eletrofisiologicamente. Em pacientes com déficits sensitivos, foi detectada deterioração estatisticamente significativa no estado geral de saúde e no aspecto funcional do pé, inclusive na mobilidade e deambulação, quando comparados com os pacientes com uma avaliação sensitiva normal. Conclusão Mesmo na presença de testes eletrofisiológicos normais, a disfunção sensitiva isolada parece estar associada a incapacidade grave no estado geral de saúde e ao aspecto funcional do pé em comparação com pacientes com um exame sensitivo normal.

Hemiplegic shoulder pain: associated factors and rehabilitation outcomes of hemiplegic patients with and without shoulder pain.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the incidence of and the factors associated with shoulder pain in people with hemiplegia and to understand the effect of rehabilitation programs on the parameters of motor function and activity limitations in patients with and without hemiplegic shoulder pain. METHODS: Patients in the initial 6-month period after stroke who were hospitalized in the physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic were included in the study. Patients were considered early rehabilitation entrants if they were admitted in the first 0 to 30 days after a stroke and late rehabilitation entrants if they were admitted 30 to 120 days after a stroke. Demographic and clinical features, complications, and medical histories of the patients were recorded. Upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA), Frenchay Arm Test (FAT), and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were applied to the patients on admission, at discharge, and after 1 month of follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-one (38%) patients did not have shoulder pain, and 34 (62%) patients had decreased shoulder pain. Immobilization, duration of disease, and late rehabilitation were shown to be effective treatments for shoulder pain. The major risk factors were disease duration and poor initial motor function. In both groups, the FMA, FAT, and FIM scores showed significant changes. This improvement did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Duration of disease and low motor functional capacities have the most important impact on shoulder pain. In patients with and without shoulder pain, a systematic rehabilitation program is beneficial with respect to motor function and daily living activities.