Effectiveness of manual lymphatic drainage in intensive phase I therapy of breast cancer-related lymphedema-a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The standard therapy for lymphedema of any origin is complex physical decongestive therapy (CDT). It comprises manual lymph drainage (MLD), compression therapy (CT), exercise therapy (ET), skincare, and patient education. Additionally, intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) can be applied. However, the contribution of MLD to decongestion is repeatedly questioned. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study re-analyzes a previous study during a 3-week decongestion period, comparing two different types of compression bandaging at the weekend. Sixty-one patients with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema were included. The patients received the same therapy (CDT + IPC) except for the different weekend compression bandaging. MLD was performed twice a day on weekdays. The volume of the affected arm was measured on days 1, 5, 8, 12, 15, 19, and 22. For the analysis, the data of both study groups were pooled. RESULTS: During the week, the patients showed a significant volume reduction (- 155.23 mL (week 1), - 101.02 mL (week 2), - 61.69 mL (week 3), respectively; p < 0.001 each) with a high effect size. On the weekends without MLD, they showed a slight, but also significant increase (12.08 mL (weekend 1), 8.36 mL (weekend 2), 4.33 mL (weekend 3), respectively; p < 0.001 each) with a medium effect size. CONCLUSIONS: We showed a strong effect of MLD on volume reduction. Differences from other studies are the larger study population and the more intensive application of MLD. If applied intensively, MLD is strongly decongestive during a 3-week decongestion therapy for breast cancer-related lymphedema.

A prospective randomised study of alginate-drenched low stretch bandages as an alternative to conventional lymphologic compression bandaging.

BACKGROUND: Breast-cancer-related lymphoedema, either caused by the tumour itself or its therapy, can be found in approximately 24% of all patients. It results in disabilities, psychological distress and reduced quality of life. Therefore, proper therapy for this entity is very important. Guidelines recommend a therapy in two phases, an intensive phase I for 3 weeks for volume reduction and, between the cycles of phase I, a reduced phase II to maintain the result. During phase I therapy, manual lymphatic drainage often cannot be administered on weekends or holidays; only a reduced therapy, mainly by application of a more or less passive compression by bandaging, is administered. For this, conventional low-stretch bandages are hitherto being used. Several attempts have been made to overcome this disadvantage by either impregnating or covering the bandage with sticky or adhesive substances such as india rubber, elastomeres, polyacrylates, etc. Recently, new bandages are available, which are drenched with alginate that becomes semi-rigid after drying for approximately 6 h. It was the aim of this study to compare alginate bandaging to a conventional lymphologic-multilayered low-stretch bandaging with individual supportive lining as to their effect concerning their congestive capacity in exactly delimited time periods of reduced decongestive therapy as well as the patients' tolerance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December 2007 until May 2008, 61 female patients with a one-sided lymphoedema of the axillary tributary region after axillar dissection who underwent a phase I complex decongestive therapy were prospectively selected for our investigation. On weekends, group A got the conventional low-stretch compressive bandaging, whereas group B got an alginate semi-rigid bandage. Arm volumes were measured before and after these bandages were applied. Additionally, the subjective sensations of the skin caused by the compression were measured by means of a five-level Likert scale. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The initial volumes (V (0)) of the two groups (A, 2,939.0 ml +/- 569.182; B, 3,062.6 ml +/- 539.161) varied within the same magnitude, with somewhat smaller values in group A. The same was true for the final volumes (V (6)), measured at day 22 (A, 2,674.5 ml +/- 480.427; B, 2,740.1 ml +/- 503.593). During the weekends, the arm volumes re-increased (first weekend: A, 16.4 ml vs. B, 4.7 ml; second weekend: A, 14.2 ml vs. B, 2.7 ml; third weekend: A, 7.5 ml vs. B, 1.1 ml). A significantly smaller volume increase appeared in the alginate group during the weekends. There were no serious side effects in both groups. Concerning the patients' comfort, the values of the alginate group were clearly better than those of the conventionally bandaged group. Additionally, the volume changes in the alginate group revealed fewer fluctuations. As a summary, one can state that a good alternative to the conventional bandaging is available with the alginate bandages, bringing distinct advantages for the patients when administered properly.