Phase III randomized trial of toremifene versus tamoxifen for Japanese postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Toremifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is used as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal patients with breast cancer in Japan. For Japanese patients, however, only limited data are available on the efficacy and safety profile of toremifene. To establish the long term efficacy and safety of toremifene for Japanese patients, we conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized phase III trial comparing toremifene and tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The subjects were postmenopausal Japanese patients who had undergone surgery for node-negative breast cancer. Toremifene or tamoxifen was administered for 2 years. The primary endpoint was demonstration of the non-inferiority of toremifene compared with tamoxifen in respect of 5-year survival. Secondary endpoints were cumulative overall survival, cumulative disease-free survival, effects on lipid profiles, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients were enrolled. The baseline characteristics of the two treatment groups were well-balanced. Median follow-up was 66.5 months. Five-year survival was similar for toremifene and tamoxifen (97.0 vs. 96.9 %; 90 % confidence interval -3.9 to 4.1), indicating that toremifene is not inferior to tamoxifen for postmenopausal Japanese patients with early breast cancer. Cumulative overall survival and cumulative disease-free survival were also very similar for toremifene and tamoxifen (97.5 vs. 97.3 %, log-rank test P = 0.9458; 88.4 vs. 90.6 %, log-rank test P = 0.3359, respectively). Adverse events in both groups were similar and mostly mild or moderate. Thus, both are equally effective and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the efficacy and safety of toremifene and tamoxifen are equivalent for postmenopausal Japanese patients with early breast cancer.

An osteogenesis imperfecta case with breast cancer.

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare connective tissue disease characterized by abnormalities of type 1 collagen and an increased risk of bone fractures. Several OI cases with malignancies have been reported. Herein, we describe an OI case with breast cancer. A 36-year-old premenopausal woman with OI was admitted to our hospital for evaluation of a right breast lump. We diagnosed right breast cancer with axillary and parasternal lymph node metastasis (T2N3M0 stage IIIC). The tumor had increased in size and tumor markers were elevated after 10 months of hormone therapy. We performed a right mastectomy and axillary dissection. She subsequently received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. She is currently taking trastuzumab and tamoxifen. Anesthesia is challenging in OI patients because of difficulty with airway control and intubation. We performed the mastectomy in this case without difficulty by working in cooperation with experienced anesthesiologists, orthopedists, and other medical personnel. Some OI patients reportedly have severe 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicity related to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency. DPD is the main enzyme involved in the catabolism of 5-FU. Our present case also had low DPD activity and we thus chose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide for chemotherapy. Our search of the literature yielded only two OI cases with breast cancer as of April 2011. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported in Japan.

Aberrant expression of tumor suppressors CADM1 and 4.1B in invasive lesions of primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The tumor suppressor genes CADM1/TSLC1 and DAL-1/4.1B are frequently inactivated by promoter methylation in non-small cell lung cancer. The proteins they encode, CADM1 and 4.1B, form a complex in human epithelial cells and are involved in cell-cell adhesion. METHODS: Expression of CADM1 and 4.1B proteins was examined by immunohistochemistry in 67 primary breast cancer and adjacent noncancerous tissues. CADM1 and 4.1B messenger RNA (mRNA) was detected by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The methylation status of the CADM1 and 4.1B promoters was determined quantitatively by bisulfite treatment followed by pyrosequencing. RESULTS: CADM1 and 4.1B protein signals were detected along the cell membrane in normal mammary epithelia. By contrast, 47 (70%) and 49 (73%) of 67 primary breast cancers showed aberrant CADM1 and 4.1B staining, respectively. Aberrant CADM1 staining was more frequently observed in pT2 and pT3 tumors and for stages II and III (P = 0.045 and P = 0.020, respectively), while aberrant 4.1B staining was more often observed in tumors with lymph node metastasis, for pT2 and pT3 tumors, and for stages II and III (P = 0.0058, P = 0.0098, and P = 0.0007, respectively). Furthermore, aberrant CADM1 and 4.1B expression was preferentially observed in invasive relative to noninvasive lesions from the same specimen (P = 0.036 and P = 0.0009, respectively). Finally, hypermethylation of CADM1 and 4.1B genes was detected in 46% and 42% of primary breast cancers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that aberrant CADM1 and 4.1B expression is involved in progression of breast cancer, especially in invasion into the stroma and metastasis.

Estrogen receptor-α directly regulates sensitivity to paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become the standard treatment for advanced breast cancer. Several prognostic markers, including estrogen receptor-α (ERα), are used to predict the response to NAC. However, the molecular significance of ERα expression in the efficacy of chemotherapy is not yet fully understood. To examine this issue, we first evaluated ERα transcriptional activity in breast cancer cells derived from pre-NAC specimens using estrogen response element-green fluorescent protein (ERE-GFP) as a reporter gene, and found that, in the cases for which ERα activities determined by GFP expression were not detected or low, pCR (pathological complete response) could be achieved even though ERα protein was expressed. Next, we examined the effects of alterations in ERα expression levels on sensitivity to paclitaxel, a key drug in NAC, by stable expression of ERα in ER-negative SKBR3 cells and by siRNA-mediated down-regulation of ERα in ER-positive MCF-7 cells, and showed that ERα expression and sensitivity to paclitaxel showed an inverse correlation. We also established paclitaxel-resistant MCF-7 cell clones and found that they have higher estrogen-induced ER activity than parent cells. Paclitaxel is a microtubule-stabilizing agent, while HDAC6 (histone deacetylase 6), which we previously identified as an estrogen-regulated gene, enhances cell motility by destabilizing microtubules via deacetylation of α-tubulin. Finally, we demonstrate herein that ERα knockdown in MCF-7 cells prevents deacetylation of α-tubulin, thereby increasing sensitivity to paclitaxel. Taken together, these results suggest that ERα expression directly regulates sensitivity to paclitaxel in NAC for breast cancer via the effect on microtubule stability.

Predictive value of MGMT, hMLH1, hMSH2 and BRCA1 protein expression for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in basal-like breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the importance of biological markers to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced basal-like breast cancers (BLBCs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two BLBC patients receiving NACT with an anthracycline-based regimen plus taxane were included in this study. The immunoreactivities of MGMT, MLH1, MSH2 and BRCA1 before and after NACT were evaluated. RESULTS: A pCR was obtained in 10 of 32 cases (31%). Cancer-related (P = 0.013) and disease-free (P = 0.023) survival rates were significantly higher in the pCR group than in the non-pCR group. In biopsy samples before NACT, attenuated expression of MGMT, MLH1, MSH2 and BRCA1 was observed in 12/32 (38%), 0/32 (0%), 5/32 (16%) and 28/32 (88%) cases, respectively. On evaluation of pCR, patients' characteristics (patients' age, menopausal status, or clinical and pathological stages) and immunohistochemical patterns, attenuated expression of MGMT was only found to be significantly predictive of a pCR (P = 0.018). Paired biopsy sample before NACT and a surgical tumor material after NACT were available for 19 cases of non-pCR. In these cases, decrease in expression during NACT were more frequently observed for MGMT as compared to MLH1, MSH2 or BRCA1 (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: MGMT status is a predictive factor for pCR with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based plus taxane combination chemotherapy, which may be helpful in the selection of appropriate NACT for Japanese patients with BLBC.

Significance of HER2 protein examination in ductal carcinoma in situ.

BACKGROUND: HER2 expression is routinely checked in ductal carcinoma in situ, as in invasive ductal carcinoma. However, the effect of HER2 status in ductal carcinoma in situ on the development of malignancy and the significance of overexpression of HER2 are still not clear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We experienced 103 cases that were diagnosed as pure ductal carcinoma in situ from operative specimens in the 2-y period from 2006 to 2007. We examined their HER2 status and other markers. We added 38 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ with small invasive disease 5mm or less in diameter as subjects. We also examined how accurately HER2 status in biopsy specimens predicted the existence of an invasive component. RESULTS: In pure ductal carcinoma in situ, tumors that were comedo type, high grade, or ER negative showed a high frequency of HER2 overexpression. In cases with small invasion, HER2 expression was higher than that in pure ductal carcinoma in situ. Among cases that were diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ by biopsy, 28% had invasive disease in operative specimens. In tumors that were palpable, large, or expressed HER2 3+ in biopsy samples, invasive disease was frequently observed in operative specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Overexpression of HER2 in ductal carcinoma in situ might not always be necessary for progression to invasive ductal carcinoma. To clarify the significance of HER2 examination in DCIS, further investigations of the potential for invasive ductal carcinoma and the prognosis are still needed.

Post-operative breast cancer patients diagnosed with skeletal metastasis without bone pain had fewer skeletal-related events and deaths than those with bone pain.

BACKGROUND: Skeletal metastases are often accompanied by bone pain. To investigate the clinical meaning of bone pain associated with skeletal metastasis in breast cancer patients after surgery, we explored whether the presence of bone pain was due to skeletal-related events (SREs) or survival (cause specific death, CSD), retrospectively. METHODS: Consecutive breast cancer patients undergoing surgery between 1988 and 1998 were examined for signs of skeletal metastasis until December 2006. Patients who were diagnosed as having skeletal metastasis were the subjects of this study. Bone scans were performed annually for 5, 7 or 10 years; they were also conducted if skeletal metastasis was suspected. Data concerning bone pain and tumor markers at the time of skeletal metastasis diagnosis, and data relating to various factors including tumors, lymph nodes and hormone receptors at the time of surgery, were investigated. The relationships between factors such as bone pain, SRE and CSD were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox's analysis. RESULTS: Skeletal metastasis occurred in 668 patients but the pain status of two patients was unknown, therefore 666 patients were included in the study. At the time of skeletal metastasis diagnosis 270 patients complained of pain; however, 396 patients did not. Analysis of data using Cox's and Kaplan-Meier methods demonstrated that patients without pain had fewer SREs and better survival rates than those with pain. Hazard ratios regarding SRE (base = patients without pain) were 2.331 in univariate analysis and 2.243 in multivariate analysis. Hazard ratios regarding CSD (base = patients without pain) were 1.441 in univariate analysis and 1.535 in multivariate analysis. Similar results were obtained when analyses were carried out using the date of surgery as the starting point. CONCLUSION: Bone pain at diagnosis of skeletal metastasis was an indicator of increased SRE and CSD. However, these data did not support recommendations of follow-up bone surveys in breast cancer patients.

An open cohort study of bone metastasis incidence following surgery in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To help design clinical trials of adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy for breast cancer, the temporal incidence of bone metastasis was investigated in a cohort of patients. We have tried to draw the criteria to use adjuvant bisphosphonate. METHODS: Consecutive breast cancer patients undergoing surgery between 1988 and 1998 (5459 patients) were followed up regarding bone metastasis until December 2006. Patients' characteristics at the time of surgery were analyzed by Cox's method, with bone metastasis as events. Patient groups were assigned according to Cox's analysis, and were judged either to require the adjuvant bisphosphonate or not, using the tentative criteria: high risk (>3% person-year), medium risk (1-3%), and low risk (<1%). RESULTS: Bone metastasis incidence was constant between 1.0 and 2.8% per person-year more than 10 years. Non-invasive cancer was associated with a very low incidence of bone metastasis (1/436). Multivariate Cox's analysis indicated important factors for bone metastasis were tumor grade (T), nodal grade (pN), and histology. Because T and pN were important factors for bone metastasis prediction, subgroups were made by pTNM stage. Patients at stages IIIA, IIIB and IV had an incidence of >3% per person-year, patients with stage I <1% per person-year, and those with stages II were between 1 and 3%. Further analysis with histology in stage II patients showed that stage IIB with high risk histology also had a high incidence (3% person year), whereas stage IIA with medium risk histology were <1%. CONCLUSIONS: Bone metastasis incidence remained constant for many years. Using pN, T, and histopathology, patients could be classified into high, medium, and low risk groups.

Effects of toremifene and tamoxifen on lipid profiles in post-menopausal patients with early breast cancer: interim results from a Japanese phase III trial.

OBJECTIVE: Toremifene and tamoxifen have been used for adjuvant therapy in post-menopausal patients with breast cancer in Japan. Dyslipidemias are common in post-menopausal women. However, limited data are available on the effects of these agents on lipid profiles in Japanese patients. The Japan Toremifene Cooperative Study Group has been conducting a Phase III randomized trial of post-menopausal patients with breast cancer. One of its secondary endpoints is to confirm the effects of these agents on serum lipid profiles. METHODS: The subjects were post-menopausal Japanese patients who had undergone surgery for early breast cancer. Toremifene or tamoxifen was administered for 2 years. Lipid levels were measured before and up to 24 months after initiation. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, at 24 months, the toremifene group (n = 123) showed significantly decreased total cholesterol (P < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (P < 0.001), and significantly increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (P < 0.001). Their triglyceride levels were not affected (P = 0.677). The tamoxifen group (n = 120) also showed significantly decreased total cholesterol (P < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (P < 0.001); no significant changes occurred in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.297) or triglyceride levels (P = 0.120). CONCLUSIONS: Distinct differences between two selective estrogen receptor modulators on lipids were observed. Toremifene improved lipid profiles, particularly as an enhancer of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. To a large extent, tamoxifen improved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The impact of these improved lipid profiles on the risk of cardiovascular diseases needs further confirmation.

Arthralgia in 329 Patients Taking Aromatase Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Arthralgia is common in post-menopausal women taking aromatase inhibitors. However, the underlying mechanism remains unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined the records of outpatients taking aromatase inhibitors to ascertain the frequency and severity of arthralgia. RESULTS: Among 329 patients taking aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole in 239 and exemestane in 90 patients), 27% had arthralgia. There were 51 patients (16%) who switched from one aromatase inhibitor to another or quit aromatase inhibitor treatment. Arthralgia was the second most common reason for treatment changes in these 51 cases. In most cases, symptoms resolved after switching to a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM). We examined the relationships of arthralgia with other factors such as age, type of medication, prior treatments, and bone density. The arthralgia rate was significantly lower (p < 0.05) in patients with preceding endocrine therapy. No significant difference was detected between patients with versus patients without chemotherapy. Furthermore, there was no relationship between bone density and arthralgia. CONCLUSION: Our observations suggest SERM treatment combined with an aromatase inhibitor to be perhaps the most practical clinical solution to the problem of arthralgia.

HINTERGRUND: Arthralgie ist verbreitet bei Frauen in der Postmenopause, die mit Aromatasehemmern behandelt werden. Die Ursache dafür ist jedoch noch ungeklärt. PATIENTEN UND METHODEN: Wir werteten Krankengeschichten von Aromatasehemmer-Patienten aus, um eine signifikante Korrelation zwischen der Einnahme von Aromatasehemmern und dem Auftreten von Arthralgien zu bestätigen. ERGEBNISSE: Von 329 Patienten, die Aromatasehemmer (239 Anastrozol und 90 Exemestan) einnahmen, litten 27% unter Arthralgie. Darunter waren 51 Patienten (16%), die den Aromatasehemmer wechselten oder die Behandlung abgebrochen haben. Arthralgie war der zweithäufigste Grund für den Therapiewechsel in den 51 Fällen. In den meisten Fällen wurden die Symptome dadurch behoben, dass die Therapie mit selektiven Östrogenrezeptormodulatoren (SERM) fortgesetzt wurde. Wir untersuchten die Zusammenhänge von Arthralgie mit Faktoren wie Alter, Art der Behandlung, frühere Behandlung sowie Knochendichte. Das Auftreten von Arthralgien war wesentlich geringer (p < 0.05) bei Patienten mit vorheriger Hormontherapie; Chemotherapie hatte jedoch keinen Einfluss. Es wurde kein Zusammenhang zwischen Knochendichte und Arthralgien festgestellt. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNG: Unsere Beobachtungen deuten darauf hin, dass eine SERM-Therapie mit anschließender Aromatasehemmer-Behandlung die vielversprechendste Behandlungsmethode für Arthralgien ist.

Cross-sectional analysis of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Japanese patients suspected to have hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

The prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in Japanese patients suspected to have hereditary breast/ovarian cancer was examined by a multi-institutional study, aiming at the clinical application of total sequencing analysis and validation of assay sensitivity in Japanese people using a cross-sectional approach based on genetic factors estimated from personal and family histories. One hundred and thirty-five subjects were referred to the genetic counseling clinics and enrolled in the study. Full sequencing analysis of the BRCA1/2 gene showed 28 types of deleterious mutations in 36 subjects (26.7%), including 13 types of BRCA1 mutations in 17 subjects (12.6%) and 15 types of BRCA2 mutations in 19 subjects (14.1%). Subjects were classified into five groups and 22 subgroups according to their personal and family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, and the prevalence of deleterious mutations was compared with previously reported data in non-Ashkenazi individuals. Statistical analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel test for groups I through IV revealed that the prevalence of Japanese subjects was significantly higher than that of non-Ashkenazi individuals (P = 0.005, odds ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.22-2.88). Family history of the probands suffering from breast cancer indicated risk factors for the presence of deleterious mutations of BRCA1/2 as follows: (1) families with breast cancer before age 40 within second degree relatives (P = 0.0265, odds ratio 2.833, 95% confidence interval 1.165-7.136) and (2) families with bilateral breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer within second degree relatives (P = 0.0151, odds ratio 2.88, 95% confidence interval 1.25-6.64).

Favourable long-term results after surgical removal of lung metastases of breast cancer.

We retrospectively evaluated whether a surgical strategy benefits patients with operable lung metastasis of breast cancer. Between 1960 and 2000, 90 patients (mean age 55.1; range 32-77) with lung metastasis (79 solitary, 11 multiple) underwent surgery as follows: wedge resection (n = 10), segmental resection (n = 11), lobectomy (n = 68) and pneumonectomy (n = 1). The metastases were completely resected in 89% of them. One patient died due to surgical complications. The overall 5- and 10-year cumulative overall survival rates were 54% and 40%, respectively (median, 6.3 years). Fifteen patients survived without relapse for over 10 years. They were 24% of those who progressed for 10 years or more after lung surgery. The most significant prognostic factor was disease-free interval (DFI) and stage at breast surgery. The 10-year survival rates of those with >==3 and <3 years of DFI were 47% and 26%, respectively (P = 0.014). Survival times were significantly longer for patients with clinical stage I at breast surgery than those with stage II-IV (P = 0.013). Our data, although limited and highly selective, suggest that surgical approach to lung metastasis from breast cancer may prolong survival in certain subgroups of patients to a greater extent than systemic chemotherapy alone. Surgical approach to lung metastasis of breast cancer, if possible, should be a treatment of choice to a great extent.

Bilateral Nonsynchronous Male Breast Cancer: Two Case Reports.

SUMMARY: BACKGROUND: Bilateral male breast cancer (MBC) is relatively rare. CASE REPORTS: We report 2 bilateral nonsynchronous MBC cases. Second cancers developed during endocrine therapy with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM) after the initial surgeries. Since their second surgeries, both patients continued treatment with another SERM, because their second cancers were also hormone receptor-positive. We discuss the endocrine therapy in men based on a review of the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate treatments for early MBC are still controversial. Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are not as effective in men as in women. We consider the higher androgen levels in men to be a major reason for AI not being as effective as expected, i.e. the hormonal environment is very different from that in women. Thus, different approaches are needed for MBC. With further investigation, it is hoped that methods of achieving maximal AI efficacy for MBC will be established.

Diagnostic mammography and ultrasonography for palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between the tumor size of breast cancer by palpation and the sensitivity of mammography (MMG) and ultrasonography (US), and which modality can detect nonpalpable breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the tumor size by palpation, breast density, and the sensitivity of MMG and US in 165 patients aged 30 to 39 years. Palpation, US, and MMG were performed with prior knowledge of the results of other modalities. The tumor size on palpation were classified into Tnp; nonpalpable, T1p; 2 cm or less, T2p; more than 2 cm, but not more than 5 cm, and T3p; more than 5 cm. RESULTS: Of 165 patients, 147 patients (89%) showed mammographically dense breasts. Of 165 cancers, 14 (8%) were Tnp, 40 (24%) were T1p, 82 (50%) were T2p, and 29 (18%) were T3p. The sensitivity of MMG was 57% (8 of 14) for Tnp, 78% (31 of 40) for T1p, 90% (74 of 82) for T2p, and 97% (28 of 29) for T3p. The sensitivity of US was 43% (6 of 14) for Tnp and 100% for palpable cancers. Of 14 nonpalpable cancers, 4 (29%), 4 (29%), and 2 (14%) could be detected by only MMG, bloody nipple discharge, and US. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of MMG depends on the tumor size on palpation in this age range. MMG fails to detect relatively large palpable cancers. On the other hand, US can detect all palpable cancers. However, the sensitivity of US declines for nonpalpable cancers. For the detection of nonpalpable cancers, MMG, US, and nipple discharge are complementary modalities.

Diagnostic ultrasonography and mammography for invasive and noninvasive breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years.

PURPOSE: To confirm which modality, ultrasonography (US) or mammography (MMG), is useful to detect breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years, and to compare the sensitivity and findings of these two modalities for invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the diagnostic setting. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the sensitivity and findings of these two modalities in 165 patients aged 30 to 39 years, who underwent surgery at the Cancer Institute Hospital between 2001 and 2003. US or MMG were performed after obtaining information on the other modalities previously used and physical examination. The abnormal findings of US were defined as mass lesions and focal hypoechoic areas due to breast cancer. The abnormal findings of MMG were defined as category 3 to 5 (Japanese Mammography Guidelines) masses, calcifications, and other findings due to cancer. RESULTS: Of 165 patients, 147 patients (89%) mammographically showed dense breasts. Histologically, 146 (88%) were invasive carcinomas and 19 (12%) were DCIS. In all carcinomas, the sensitivity of US (95%) was higher than that of MMG (85%). The sensitivity of US for invasive carcinoma (99%) was higher than that of MMG (85%). On the other hand, the sensitivity of MMG for DCIS (89%) was much higher than that of US (68%). CONCLUSIONS: US is more sensitive to detect breast cancers than MMG in this age range, especially for invasive carcinoma. On the other hand, MMG is useful for detecting DCIS, especially when it manifests with microcalcifications.

Efficacy and safety of combined trastuzumab and Paclitaxel therapy as a second-line treatment in women with metastatic breast cancer: a single institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: In breast cancer, HER-2 overexpression suggests s poor prognosis. Trastuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody with specificity to the HER-2 protein. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of combined trastuzumab and paclitaxel therapy in women with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Combination chemotherapy was given to patients with HER-2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. All patients had previously received one or more chemotherapy treatments. Patients received a loading trastuzumab dose of 4 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.), followed by 2 mg/kg maintenance dose at weekly intervals. A paclitaxel dose of 80 mg/m(2) was administered on the same day as the trastuzumab infusion. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were examined. Seventy percent received two or more prior chemotherapy treatments for metastatic breast cancer, and 66.0% of patients had two or more metastatic sites. The overall response rate to our approach was 37.7%. Median time to progression was 12.0 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in only 11.3% of patients. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 65.1% of patients after seven treatments, requiring us to change to biweekly paclitaxel administration in 16 patients. Most of them were able to continue the treatment. Other toxicities were mild and tolerable. CONCLUSION: Combined trastuzumab and paclitaxel therapy, administered as second-line or later treatment, produced lasting objective responses and was well tolerated by women with HER-2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. A major obstacle to continuing treatment was peripheral neuropathy. However, modifying the interval to every 2 weeks enabled us to continue the treatment. This combination chemotherapy was safely performed in our outpatient clinic.

Comparative study of monoclonal antibody B72.3 and gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 as markers of apocrine carcinoma of the breast.

Gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) is a commonly used apocrine marker; however, its expression was recently found to decrease in infiltrating, larger, or metastasizing apocrine carcinomas of the breast. In the breast, monoclonal antibody (MAb) B72.3 has been reported to be useful as an apocrine marker although it is used for that purpose much less frequently than GCDFP-15. In the search for a more consistent apocrine marker, immunoreactivity for MAb B72.3 was examined in apocrine carcinomas at different stages and compared with GCDFP-15. 47 of 51 apocrine carcinomas (92%) and 9 of 62 ordinary carcinomas (15%) were MAb B72.3 positive, while 39 of 51 apocrine carcinomas (76%) and 13 of 62 ordinary carcinomas (21%) were GCDFP-15 positive. Thus, both sensitivity and specificity were higher for MAb B72.3. Furthermore, unlike GCDFP-15, MAb B72.3 exhibited positivity irrespective of infiltrating status, tumor size, or metastatic status. There was no correlation between MAb B72.3-immunoreactivity and GCDFP-15-expression. The combined usage of MAb B72.3 with GCDFP-15 was useful to confirm the diagnosis of apocrine carcinoma, especially for advanced tumors, with only two cases being negative for both MAb B72.3 and GCDFP-15. Whether these two cases should be differentiated from ordinary apocrine carcinomas remains to be investigated.