Innovative technologies in thoracolumbar and lumbar spine surgery failing to reach standard of care: state-of-art review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate previously popular technologies in the field of spine surgery, and to better understand their advantages and limitations to the current standards of care. Spine surgery is an ever-evolving field that serves to resolve various spinal pathologies in patients of all ages. While there are established treatments for various conditions, such as lumbar spinal stenosis, idiopathic scoliosis, and degenerative lumbar disease, there is always further research and development in these areas to produce innovative technologies that can lead to better outcomes. As this process progresses, we must remind ourselves of previously tried and tested inventions and their outcomes that have fallen short of becoming a standard to ensure we are able to learn lessons from the past. METHODS: A thorough literature review was conducted with the aim of compiling literature of previously utilized technologies in spine surgery. Biomedical databases were utilized to gather relevant articles including PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Emphasis was placed on gathering articles with technologies or therapeutics aimed at treating common spinal pathologies including lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and other degenerative lumbar spine diseases. The keywords used were: "failed technologies", "historical technologies", "spine surgery", "spinal stenosis", "adolescent idiopathic scoliosis", and "degenerative lumbar spine disease". A total of 47 articles were gathered after initial review. RESULTS: Different technologies pertaining to spine surgery were identified and critically evaluated. Some of these technologies included X-STOP, Vertiflex, Vertebral Body Stapling, and Dynesys. These technologies were evaluated for their strengths and limitations across their spinal pathology applications. While each type of technology had their benefits, the data tended to be mixed with various limitations across studies. CONCLUSION: These technologies have been trialed in the field of spine surgery across various spinal pathologies, but still prove of limited efficacy and shortcomings to the current standards of care.

Preoperative rehabilitation optimization for spinal surgery: a narrative review of assessment, interventions, and feasibility.

PURPOSE: Postoperative physical therapy (PT) is a cornerstone of orthopedic and musculoskeletal rehabilitation, proven to provide various positive clinical benefits. However, there is a paucity of literature evaluating the utility of preoperative rehabilitation specific to spine surgery. Thus, this review article aims to provide an overview of previously published studies discussing the efficacy of preoperative rehabilitation programs and its role in spinal surgery. Special emphasis was given to preoperative frailty assessments, physical performance tests, interventional strategies, feasibility, and future directions. METHODS: We performed a literature review using PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and PubMed Central (PMC) using directed search terms. Articles that examined preoperative rehabilitation in adult spine surgery were compiled for this review. Prehabilitation programs focused on exercise, flexibility, and behavioral modifications have been shown to significantly improve pain levels and functional strength assessments in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. In addition, studies suggest that these programs may also decrease hospital stays, return to work time, and overall direct health care expenditure costs. Screening tools such as the FRAIL scale can be used to assess frailty while physical function tests like the timed-up-and go (TUGT), 5 repetition sit-to-stand test (5R-STST), and hand grip strength (HGS) can help identify patients who would most benefit from prehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: This review illustrates that prehabilitation programs have the potential to increase quality of life, improve physical function and activity levels, and decrease pain, hospital stays, return to work time, and overall direct costs. However, there is a paucity of literature in this field that requires further study and investigation.

Characteristics of Spinal Morphology According to the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score in a Diverse, Asymptomatic Cohort: Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) cohort: prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the distribution of GAP scores in the MEANS cohort and compare the spinal shape via stratification by GAP alignment category, age, and country. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The GAP score has been used to categorize spinal morphology and prognosticate adult spinal deformity surgical outcomes and mechanical complications. We analyzed a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort to assess the distribution of GAP scores. METHODS: Four hundred sixty-seven healthy volunteers without spinal disorders were recruited in five countries. Sagittal radiographic parameters were measured via the EOS imaging system. The GAP total and constituent factor scores were calculated for each patient. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was performed to compare variables across groups, followed by the post hoc Games-Howell test. Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables. The significance level was set to P <0.05. RESULTS: In the MEANS cohort, 13.7% (64/467) of volunteers were ≥60 years old, and 86.3% (403/467) were <60 years old. 76.9% (359/467) was proportioned, 19.5% (91/467) was moderately disproportioned, and 3.6% (17/467) was severely disproportioned. There was no significant difference in the frequency of proportioned, moderately, or severely disproportioned GAP between subjects from different countries ( P =0.060). Those with severely disproportioned GAP alignment were on average 14.5 years older ( P =0.016), had 23.1° lower magnitude lumbar lordosis (LL) ( P <0.001), 14.2° higher pelvic tilt ( P <0.001), 13.3° lower sacral slope ( P <0.001), and 24.1° higher pelvic-incidence (PI)-LL mismatch ( P <0.001), 18.2° higher global tilt ( P <0.001) than those with proportioned GAP; thoracic kyphosis and PI were not significantly different ( P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The GAP system applies to a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort. Spinal alignment should be considered on a spectrum, as 19.5% of the asymptomatic volunteers were classified as moderately disproportioned and 3.6% severely disproportioned. Radiographic malalignment does not always indicate symptoms or pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Characteristics of Spinal Morphology According to the "Current" and "Theoretical" Roussouly Classification Systems in a Diverse, Asymptomatic Cohort: Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS).

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To classify spinal morphology using the "current" and "theoretical" Roussouly systems and assess sagittal alignment in an asymptomatic cohort. METHODS: 467 asymptomatic volunteers were recruited from 5 countries. Radiographic parameters were measured via the EOS imaging system. "Current" and "theoretical" Roussouly classification was assigned with sagittal whole spine imaging using sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and the lumbar apex. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare subject characteristics across Roussouly types, followed by post hoc Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Volunteers were categorized into 4 groups (Types 1-4) and 1 subgroup (Type 3 AP) using the "current" and "theoretical" Roussouly systems. The mean PI in "current" Roussouly groups was 40.8° (Type 1), 43.6° (Type 2), 52.4° (Type 3), 62.4° (Type 4), and 43.7° (Type 3AP). The mean PI in "theoretical" Roussouly groups was 36.5° (Type 1), 39.1°(Type 2), 52.5° (Type 3), 67.3° (Type 4), and 51.0° (Type 3AP). The difference in PI between "current" and "theoretical" Roussouly types was significant for Type 1 (P = .02), Type 2 (P < .001), Type 4 (P < .001), and Type 3AP (P < .001). 34.7% of subjects had a "current" Roussouly type different from the "theoretical" type. Type 3 theoretical shape had the most frequent mismatch, constituting 61.1% of the mismatched subjects. 51.5% of mismatched Type 3 become "current" Type 4. CONCLUSION: The distribution of Roussouly types differs depending on whether the "current" or "theoretical" classification are employed. A sizeable proportion of volunteers exhibited current and theoretical type mismatch, highlighting the need to interpret sagittal alignment cautiously when utilizing the Roussouly system.

Preoperative Optimization for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to identify modifiable risk factors in patients undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery and compile literature recommendations for the preoperative optimization of these risk factors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Optimization of modifiable risk factors not only benefits the patient but also lessens resource and cost burdens on the health care system, allowing for better quality and value-based care. There is limited but applicable literature discussing preoperative optimization in adult spinal deformity surgery patients specifically. METHODS: We searched PubMed for studies that looked at one of the variables of interest (eg, osteoporosis, prehabilitation and functional status, multidisciplinary preoperative screening, infection, obesity, nutrition, smoking, diabetes, blood loss, chronic opioid use, and psychosocial factors) in adult patients with spinal deformity according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyse guidelines. RESULTS: Seventy studies were included in the final review and synthesis of information. Guidelines and recommendations from these studies were compared and compiled into evidence-based action items for preoperative optimization of modifiable risk factors before adult spinal deformity surgery. CONCLUSIONS: While the approach of preoperative optimization of modifiable risk factors may incur additional planning efforts and patient care time, it has the potential to significantly reduce perioperative complications and reduce morbidity and mortality during surgery, thus allowing for improved outcomes, increased quality of life, and satisfaction from this patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Three-Dimensional Printing Applications in Pediatric Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review. OBJECTIVE: 3DP technology use has become increasingly more common in the field of medicine and is notable for its growing utility in spine surgery applications. Many studies have evaluated the use of pedicle screw placement guides and spine models in adult spine patients, but there is little evidence assessing its efficacy in pediatric spine patient populations. This systematic review identifies and evaluates the current applications and surgical outcomes of 3-Dimensional Printing (3DP) technology in pediatric spinal surgery. METHODS: A search of publications was conducted using literature databases and relevant keywords in concordance with PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria consisted of original studies, and studies focusing on the use of 3DP technology in pediatric spinal surgery. Studies with a focus on adult populations, non-deformity surgery, animal subjects, systematic or literature reviews, editorials, or non-English studies were excluded from further analysis. RESULTS: After application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, we identified 25 studies with 3DP applications in pediatric spinal surgery. Overall, the studies found significantly improved screw placement accuracy using 3DP pedicle screw placement guides but did not identify significant differences in operative time or blood loss. All studies that utilized 3D spine models in preoperative planning found it helpful and noted an increased screw placement accuracy rate of 89.9%. CONCLUSIONS: 3DP applications and techniques are currently used in pre-operative planning using pedicle screw drill guides and spine models to improve patient outcomes in pediatric spinal deformity patients.

Practical Methods of Assessing Coronal Alignment and Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Comparative Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Asymptomatic cohort: prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter. Symptomatic: retrospective, multisurgeon, single-center. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between cranial coronal alignment and adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgical risk and outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASD leads to decreased quality of life. Studies have shown that coronal malignment (CM) is associated with worse surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 468 adult participants were prospectively enrolled in the asymptomatic cohort. Totally, 172 symptomatic ASD patients with 2-year follow-ups were retrospectively enrolled in the symptomatic cohort. Three cranial plumb line parameters: the positions of the plumb lines from the midpoint between the medial orbital rims (ORB-L5), the odontoid (OD-L5), and the C7 centroid (C7-L5) relative to the L5 pedicle, were measured. Each subject had plumb line medial (M), touching (T), or lateral (L) to either pedicle. The association between each group of patients and radiographic parameters, intraoperative variables, patient-reported outcomes, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: In the asymptomatic cohort, OD-L5 was medial to or touching the L5 pedicle in 98.3% of volunteers. In the symptomatic patients, preoperative OD-L5-L exhibited higher mean age (56.2±14.0), odontoid-coronal vertical axis (OD-CVA) (5.5±3.3 cm), Oswestry disability index (ODI) score (40.6±18.4), pelvic fixation rate (56/62, 90.3%), OR time (528.4±144.6 min), median estimated blood loss (1300 ml), and durotomy rate (24/62, 38.7%). A similar pattern of higher CVA, preoperative ODI, intraoperative pelvic fixation rate, OR time, estimated blood loss, and durotomy rate was observed in ORB-L5-L and C7-L5-L patients. Final follow-up postoperative OD-L5-L was associated with higher rates of proximal junctional kyphosis (13.0%) and pseudarthrosis (17.4%). CONCLUSION: Preoperative OD-L5, ORB-L5, and C7-L5 lateral to pedicles were associated with worse preoperative ODI and higher intraoperative complexity. Postoperative OD-L5-L was associated with higher rates of proximal junctional kyphosis and pseudarthrosis. Postoperative CM, approximated by the cranial plumb line lateral to the L5 pedicles, was associated with sagittal plane complications.

Preoperative nutritional optimization for adult spinal deformity: Review.

PURPOSE: The main objective of this review article is to examine the role that nutrition has on adult spinal deformity. The information presented in this review aims to provide spine surgeons with a broad overview of screening, assessment, and interventional strategies that may be used for presurgical nutritional optimization. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review utilizing three biomedical databases was performed to generate articles of interest. Published articles related to nutrition, adult spinal deformity, spine surgery and orthopaedics were reviewed for the composition of this article. Nutrition may play a role in optimizing postoperative outcomes following adult spinal deformity surgeries, such as limiting delirium, length of stay, blood transfusion, and other medical complications. The use of screening tools, such as the PNI and CONUT score can assess preoperative nutritional status and may provide some utility in evaluating nutrition status in patients undergoing deformity surgery. Balancing both macronutrients and micronutrients, notably, carbohydrates, protein, albumin, and vitamin D can play a role in preoperative optimization. CONCLUSION: Adult spinal deformity patients are at an increased risk for malnutrition. These patients should be assessed for nutrition status to prime them for surgery, minimize complications, and maximize their outcomes. However, further studies are needed to determine how nutrition ultimately affects adult spinal deformity patients in the postoperative period and to establish specific nutritional recommendations for this unique population.

Comparison of the Odontoid and Orbital-Coronal Vertical Axis Lines in Evaluating Coronal Alignment and Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Asymptomatic Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) cohort: cross-sectional, multi-center. Symptomatic cohort: retrospective, multi-surgeon, single-center. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of odontoid-coronal vertical axis (OD-CVA) and orbital-coronal vertical axis (ORB-CVA) with radiographic parameters, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and clinical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous literature studied the OD-CVA in an asymptomatic cohort and ORB-CVA in a symptomatic cohort, demonstrating their correlations with radiographic parameters and ORB-CVA with outcomes. METHODS: 468 asymptomatic adult participants were prospectively enrolled in the MEANS cohort. 174 symptomatic ASD patients with 6 fused levels and 2-year follow-ups were retrospectively enrolled in the symptomatic cohort. The association between OD-CVA and ORB-CVA, and radiographic parameters, perioperative variables, PROs, and outcomes were analyzed. Pearson's correlation was used to assess correlation and logistic regression odds of outcomes. RESULTS: In the MEANS cohort, the ORB-CVA correlated with C7-CVA (r=0.58) and OD-CVA (r=0.74). In the symptomatic cohort, preoperative ORB-CVA correlated better with leg length discrepancy (LLD) (r=0.17, P=0.029) while preoperative OD-CVA correlated better with C7-CVA (r=0.90, P<0.001). Postoperative ORB-CVA correlated with postoperative C7-CVA (r=0.66, P<0.001) and postoperative OD-CVA correlated stronger with postoperative C7-CVA (r=0.81, P<0.001). Both preoperative OD-CVA (r=0.199) and ORB-CVA (r=0.208) correlated with preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). ORB-CVA correlated better than OD-CVA in the preoperative SRS-22r pain category but worse in total and other subcategories. Preoperative ORB-CVA was associated with increased odds of intraoperative complication (OR=1.28, 1.01-1.22), like OD-CVA (OR=1.30, 1.12-1.53). Neither preoperative ORB-CVA nor OD-CVA was associated with reoperations and readmissions after multivariate analysis. Preoperative OD-ORB mismatch >1.5 cm was not associated with increased odds of intraoperative and postoperative complications, reoperations, or readmissions. CONCLUSION: ORB-CVA and OD-CVA correlated with radiographic parameters, PROs, and intraoperative complications. ORB-CVA and OD-CVA can be used interchangeably as cranial coronal parameters in ASD surgery.

Using Machine Learning (ML) Models to Predict Risk of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Following Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially high-risk complication for patients undergoing spine surgery. Although guidelines for assessing VTE risk in this population have been established, development of new techniques that target different aspects of the medical history may prove to be of further utility. The goal of this study was to develop a predictive machine learning (ML) model to identify nontraditional risk factors for predicting VTE in spine surgery patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A cohort of 63 patients was identified who had undergone spine surgery at a single center from 2015 to 2021. Thirty-one patients had a confirmed VTE, while 32 had no VTE. A total of 113 attributes were defined and collected via chart review. Attribute categories included demographics, medications, labs, past medical history, operative history, and VTE diagnosis. METHODS: The Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) software was used in creating and evaluating the ML models. Six classifier models were tested with 10-fold cross-validation and statistically evaluated using t tests. RESULTS: Comparing the predictive ML models to the control model (ZeroR), all predictive models were significantly better than the control model at predicting VTE risk, based on the 113 attributes ( P <0.001). The Random Forest model had the highest accuracy of 88.89% with a positive predictive value of 93.75%. The Simple Logistic algorithm had an accuracy of 84.13% and defined risk attributes to include calcium and phosphate laboratory values, history of cardiac comorbidity, history of previous VTE, anesthesia time, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use, antibiotic use, and antihistamine use. The J48 model had an accuracy of 80.95% and it defined hemoglobin laboratory values, anesthesia time, beta-blocker use, dopamine agonist use, history of cancer, and Medicare use as potential VTE risk factors. CONCLUSION: Further development of these tools may provide high diagnostic value and may guide chemoprophylaxis treatment in this setting of high-risk patients.