Comparison of effectiveness of methotrexate in patients with late-onset versus younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis: Real-world data from an inception cohort in Japan (NICER-J).

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of methotrexate (MTX) as initial therapy in patients with late-onset and younger-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA and YORA). METHODS: Of 114 patients with YORA and 96 patients with LORA, defined as RA occurring at ≥65 years of age, enrolled in a multicentre RA inception cohort study, 71 and 66 patients who had been followed up to 6 months after starting MTX treatment were included in this study. RESULTS: Proportions of patients on MTX treatment at 6 months were 96% and 92% in the YORA and LORA groups, respectively. Despite lower doses of MTX in the LORA group compared with the YORA group, no significant difference was observed in clinical disease activity index scores between the two groups throughout the follow-up period. The proportion of patients in clinical disease activity index remission at 6 months was 35% in both groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that knee joint involvement and high Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index were significant negative predictors of achieving clinical disease activity index remission at 6 months in the LORA group. CONCLUSION: Observations up to 6 months revealed that the effectiveness of MTX administered based on rheumatologist discretion in patients with LORA is comparable to that in patients with YORA in clinical settings.

Choice of and response to treatment in patients with early-diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: Real-world data from an inception cohort in Japan (NICER-J).

OBJECTIVE: Various guidelines recommend that patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) try to achieve clinical remission within 6 months, and early therapeutic intervention is important to this end. This study aimed to investigate short-term treatment outcomes of patients with early-diagnosed RA in clinical practice and to examine predictive factors for achieving remission. METHODS: Of the 210 patients enrolled in the multicenter RA inception cohort, 172 patients who were followed up to 6 months after treatment initiation (baseline) were included. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the impact of baseline characteristics on achievement of Boolean remission at 6 months. RESULTS: Participants (mean age, 62 years) initiated treatment after a mean of 19 days from RA diagnosis. At baseline and 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation, proportions of patients using methotrexate (MTX) were 87.8%, 89.0%, and 88.3%, respectively, and rates of Boolean remission were 1.8%, 27.8%, and 34.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that physician global assessment (PhGA) (Odds ratio (OR): 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.99) and glucocorticoid use (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10-0.65) at baseline were independent factors that predicted Boolean remission at 6 months. CONCLUSION: After a diagnosis of RA, satisfactory therapeutic effects were achieved at 6 months after the initiation of treatment centered on MTX according to the treat to target strategy. PhGA and glucocorticoid use at treatment initiation are useful for predicting the achievement of treatment goals.

Comparison of the effects of baricitinib and tocilizumab on disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a propensity score matching analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effects of baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, and tocilizumab, a monoclonal anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, on disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to investigate the influence of inflammation on improvement in patient global assessment (PGA) of disease activity. METHODS: This study was performed based on data from a multicenter registry, and included 284 and 113 patients treated with tocilizumab and baricitinib, respectively, who were observed for longer than 24 weeks. Propensity score matching was performed to address potential treatment-selection bias. To assess the influence of inflammation on PGA, patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not they achieved improvement in C-reactive protein (CRP, an objective marker of inflammation) at 24 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 48 matched pairs of patients were identified. Compared to treatment with tocilizumab, baricitinib showed a similar improvement in tender and swollen joint count and serum CRP levels, and a significantly greater improvement in PGA at 24 weeks. As a result, the baricitinib group had a significantly higher proportion of patients who achieved Boolean remission at 24 weeks. In subgroups of patients who did not achieve 50% or 70% CRP improvement, significant decreases from baseline to 24 weeks were observed in PGA in patients treated with baricitinib, but not in those treated with tocilizumab. CONCLUSION: Compared to tocilizumab, baricitinib significantly improved PGA despite similar effects on inflammation in patients with RA. Moreover, the influence of inflammation on PGA improvement differed between baricitinib and tocilizumab. Key-points • Baricitinib and tocilizumab had similar effects on inflammation in RA patients. • Baricitinib improved patient global assessment (PGA) more than tocilizumab. • Baricitinib had a higher Boolean remission rate than tocilizumab at 24 weeks. • Influence of inflammation on PGA improvement differed between the two drugs.

Efficacy of add-on iguratimod in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who inadequately respond to either tocilizumab or tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of add-on iguratimod (IGU) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA patients) who inadequately respond to either tocilizumab (TCZ) or tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFi). METHODS: Twenty-three RA patients treated with TCZ (the TCZ group) and 23 RA patients treated with TNFi (the TNFi group) were enrolled in this 24-week retrospective study from our multicenter registry. All inadequate responders to either TCZ or TNFi received add-on IGU. Baseline demographics and disease activity at 24 weeks after initiating add-on IGU were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Baseline clinical disease activity index (CDAI) values in the TCZ group and TNFi group were 14.1 and 11.8 (p = .24 between the two groups). At 24 weeks, CDAI values in the TCZ group and TNFi group were 5.1 and 7.5 (p = .002 and .002 compared to baseline, respectively) and ΔCDAI values were -9.0 and -4.3 (p = .007 between the two groups). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that add-on IGU in the TCZ group was associated with greater improvement in CDAI relative to the TNFi group. CONCLUSION: Add-on IGU was more effective in inadequate responders to TCZ than in inadequate responders to TNFi.

Predictors for clinical effectiveness of baricitinib in rheumatoid arthritis patients in routine clinical practice: data from a Japanese multicenter registry.

This study aimed to evaluate the short-term effectiveness and safety profiles of baricitinib and explore factors associated with improved short-term effectiveness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical settings. A total of 113 consecutive RA patients who had been treated with baricitinib were registered in a Japanese multicenter registry and followed for at least 24 weeks. Mean age was 66.1 years, mean RA disease duration was 14.0 years, 71.1% had a history of use of biologics or JAK inhibitors (targeted DMARDs), and 48.3% and 40.0% were receiving concomitant methotrexate and oral prednisone, respectively. Mean DAS28-CRP significantly decreased from 3.55 at baseline to 2.32 at 24 weeks. At 24 weeks, 68.2% and 64.1% of patients achieved low disease activity (LDA) and moderate or good response, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that no previous targeted DMARD use and lower DAS28-CRP score at baseline were independently associated with achievement of LDA at 24 weeks. While the effectiveness of baricitinib was similar regardless of whether patients had a history of only one or multiple targeted DMARDs use, patients with previous use of non-TNF inhibitors or JAK inhibitors showed lower rates of improvement in DAS28-CRP. The overall retention rate for baricitinib was 86.5% at 24 weeks, as estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was 6.5% at 24 weeks. Baricitinib significantly improved RA disease activity in clinical practice. Baricitinib was significantly more effective when used as a first-line targeted DMARDs.

A retrospective analysis of the relationship between anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and the effectiveness of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) by anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (ACPA) status on disease activity as well as radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical settings. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from a multicenter registry. Data from a total of 553 consecutive RA patients treated with intravenous ABA were included. We primarily compared the status of disease activity (SDAI) and radiographic progression (van der Heijde modified total Sharp score: mTSS) between the ACPA-negative (N = 107) and ACPA-positive (N = 446) groups. 'ACPA positive' was defined as ≥ 13.5 U/mL of anti-CCP antibody. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar. The proportion of patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA; SDAI ≤ 11) at 52 weeks was significantly higher in the ACPA-positive group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified ACPA positivity as an independent predictor for achievement of LDA at 52 weeks. Drug retention rate at 52 weeks estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curve was significantly higher in the ACPA-positive group. Achievement rate of structural remission (ΔmTSS ≤ 0.5) at 52 weeks was similar between groups. ABA treatment demonstrated a significantly higher clinical response and higher drug retention rate in ACPA-positive patients. Progression of joint destruction was similar between the ACPA-negative and ACPA-positive groups. Close attention should be paid to joint destruction even in patients showing a favorable response to ABA, especially when the ACPA status is positive.

Predictors of disease flare after discontinuation of concomitant methotrexate in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate predictors of disease flare after methotrexate discontinuation in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with sustained low disease activity undergoing tocilizumab plus methotrexate combination therapy. METHODS: Participants of this multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled, prospective study were RA patients maintaining low disease activity (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI]≤10) for≥12weeks with tocilizumab plus methotrexate. Methotrexate was discontinued after 12weeks of biweekly administration while continuing tocilizumab therapy. Disease flare was defined as either a CDAI score>10 or intervention with rescue treatments for any reason even if the CDAI score was≤10. The impact of baseline characteristics on disease flare at week 64 (52weeks after methotrexate discontinuation) was assessed with logistic regression models. RESULTS: Efficacy analyses were performed in 49 patients, of whom 15 had a disease flare by week 64. The proportion (95% confidence interval [CI]) of patients who maintained low disease activity without a flare at week 64 was 69.4% (54.6-81.8%). The dosing interval of tocilizumab was longer than that described on the drug label in Japan (i.e., intravenously every 4weeks, or subcutaneously every 2weeks) in 27% and 6% of patients with and without a flare, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex (odds ratio [OR]: 18.00, 95% CI: 2.80-115.56) and extended dosing interval of tocilizumab (OR: 12.00, 95% CI: 1.72-83.80) were independent predictors of disease flare. CONCLUSION: Male patients and those receiving tocilizumab at an extended dosing interval are at high risk of disease flare after discontinuation of concomitant methotrexate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs041180071, UMIN000021247.

Improvement in matrix metalloproteinase-3 independently predicts low disease activity at 52 weeks in bio-switch rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with abatacept.

OBJECTIVES: To explore predictive factors including MMP-3 for achievement of low disease activity (LDA) at 52 weeks in bio-switch rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with abatacept, for whom obtaining a good clinical response can be difficult. METHODS: Participants were 423 consecutive patients with RA treated with abatacept who were observed for longer than 52 weeks and registered in the TBCR, a Japanese multicentre registry system. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to study factors that predict the achievement of LDA at 52 weeks in bio-naïve (n=234) and bio-switch (n=189) groups. RESULTS: ROC analysis revealed that MMP-3 improvement rates at 12 weeks in bio-switch patients had the highest AUC with a cut-off value of 20.0% for predicting LDA achievement at 52 weeks. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, in addition to DAS28-CRP at baseline, achieving 20% improvement in MMP-3 levels at 12 weeks was an independent predictive factor (adjusted OR: 4.277, p=0.003) in the bio-switch group, whereas DAS28 was the only predictor in the bio-naïve group. Patients who achieved 20% improvement in MMP-3 levels at 12 weeks had significantly higher achievement rates of LDA at 52 weeks compared to those who did not achieve 20% improvement in the bio-switch group (60.0 vs. 33.3%, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that improvement in MMP-3 levels is key to predicting the clinical efficacy of abatacept. Closer attention paid not only to major clinical indices, but also changes in MMP-3 levels, could improve our ability to optimise clinical results when treating bio-switch patients.

Discontinuation of concomitant methotrexate in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab: An interventional study.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX) discontinuation in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with sustained low disease activity undergoing combination therapy with tocilizumab (TCZ) plus MTX.Methods: This multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled, prospective study included RA patients maintaining low disease activity (Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤10) for ≥12 weeks with TCZ plus MTX. Methotrexate was discontinued following 12 weeks of biweekly administration while continuing TCZ therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients maintaining low disease activity with no flare at week 36.Results: A total of 49 patients completed 36 weeks of therapy. The proportion of patients maintaining low disease activity at week 36 was 75.5%. The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval exceeded the assumed threshold response rate of 60%, demonstrating the clinical feasibility of MTX discontinuation. The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, defined as a Frequency Scale for Symptoms of Gastroesophageal reflux disease score ≥8, significantly decreased from week 0 to 12 (27.1-18.4%; p= .025).Conclusion: Discontinuation of concomitant MTX is clinically feasible for maintaining low disease activity, and may be beneficial from the perspective of reducing gastrointestinal symptoms in Japanese RA patients treated with TCZ. Trial registration number: UMIN000021247.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of additional administration of tacrolimus in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to abatacept: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Abatacept (ABT) demonstrates good clinical efficacy and retention in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, no rescue treatment option against inadequate response to ABT exists. Since tacrolimus (TAC) and ABT suppress T lymphocytes via different mechanisms and a combination of these agents could potentially be effective, this study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of add-on TAC therapy in RA patients with inadequate response to ABT. METHODS: Of 550 patients treated with ABT and registered in a Japanese multicenter registry, 25 consecutive patients who underwent add-on TAC therapy and were followed for longer than 24 weeks were included in this study. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 67.0 years, disease duration was 16.2 years, and duration of ABT treatment was 1.2 years at the initiation of add-on TAC therapy. Mean TAC dose was 1.2 mg/d at baseline and 1.6 mg/d at week 24. Mean Disease Activity Score of 28 joints - erythrocyte sedimentation rate was significantly improved at week 24 (3.35) relative to baseline (4.97). The proportion of patients who achieved low disease activity or remission was 40.0%, and the European League Against Rheumatism moderate or good response was 72.0%. ABT retention rate was 92.0% at week 24, as calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Only one patient discontinued add-on TAC therapy due to an adverse event (itching sensation). CONCLUSION: This is the first report describing the efficacy and safety profile of add-on TAC therapy with a focus on RA patients with inadequate response to ABT. Our findings suggest that add-on TAC therapy is a worthwhile complementary treatment option in daily clinical practice.

Concomitant methotrexate has little effect on clinical outcomes of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis: a propensity score matching analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of abatacept between rheumatoid arthritis patients with and without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment in daily clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from a multicentre registry. A total of 176 consecutive rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with abatacept were included. The propensity score based on multiple baseline characteristic variables was calculated, and 41 of 86 patients treated without MTX (MTX(-)) and 41 of 90 patients treated with concomitant MTX (MTX(+)) were statistically extracted and analysed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups over a 52-week period. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were statistically comparable. No significant differences were observed in the following clinical outcomes from baseline throughout the 52-week period: drug retention rate (MTX(-)/MTX(+) 79.1%/80.5%), mean change in disease activity score based on 28 joints (DAS28-CRP) from baseline (- 1.35/- 1.54), low disease activity rate (48.8%/43.9%), clinical remission rate (31.7%/36.6%), moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response rate (68.3%/68.3%), and good EULAR response rate (36.6%/41.1%) at 52 weeks. CONCLUSION: In rheumatoid arthritis patients with similar background characteristics undergoing abatacept treatment, concomitant MTX does not seem to affect clinical outcomes. Abatacept would be a suitable treatment option in daily clinical practice in patients with contraindications to MTX. KEY POINTS: • This is the first study to directly compare the clinical efficacy and safety of abatacept between patients with and without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment in 'real-world' settings using the propensity score matching method. • There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes of abatacept between patients with and without concomitant MTX treatment. • We used data from a large Japanese multicentre registry for biologics in rheumatoid arthritis, thereby decreasing selection bias based on the personal preferences of physicians.

Clinical effectiveness and long-term retention of abatacept in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients: Results from a multicenter registry system.

Objective: To study the clinical effectiveness and long-term retention rate of abatacept (ABA) in elderly rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in daily clinical practice.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from a multicenter registry. Our study population comprised 500 consecutive RA patients treated with ABA. We compared clinical effectiveness and ABA retention rates between the Young (≤62 years), Middle (62 to 72 years), and Elderly (≥72 years) groups. We also performed separate examinations to identify predictive factors for ABA discontinuation in those with versus those without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment.Results: Mean age was 52.7 years in the Young group, 67.7 years in the Middle group, and 78.1 years in the Elderly group. No significant group-dependent differences were found in mean DAS28 score, categorical distribution of DAS28, and EULAR response rate across the 52 weeks. The ABA retention rates at three years as determined by the Kaplan-Meier method were similar in all three groups. Patient age was not a significant predictor of ABA discontinuation due to adverse events in patients with concomitant MTX; however, it was found to be a significant predictor for those who did not use MTX (Cox hazard model).Conclusion: ABA would be a reasonable treatment option for elderly RA patients from the viewpoints of both clinical effectiveness and long-term retention. However, physicians should watch carefully for any serious adverse reactions in elderly RA patients with intolerance to MTX.

High rate of improvement in serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 levels at 4 weeks predicts remission at 52 weeks in RA patients treated with adalimumab.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) levels can predict remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with adalimumab (ADA). METHODS: Subjects were 114 RA patients continuously treated with ADA for 52 weeks. Predictive factors at baseline and 4 weeks after initiation of ADA therapy for the achievement of remission (28-point count Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP) < 2.3) at 52 weeks were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: DAS28-CRP at 4 weeks (odds ratio (OR) 0.614, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.382-0.988) and improvement in serum MMP-3 levels at 4 weeks (OR 1.057, 95% CI 1.002-1.032) were independent predictors of remission at 52 weeks. The best cut-off level of DAS28-CRP and improvement in serum MMP-3 levels at 4 weeks for predicting remission at 52 weeks was 3.73 (sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 50%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 62%) and 39.93% (sensitivity: 47%, specificity: 83%, AUC: 64%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a high rate of improvement in serum MMP-3 levels at 4 weeks after initiation of ADA therapy can predict remission at 52 weeks in RA patients.

Predictors of biologic discontinuation due to insufficient response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who achieved clinical remission with biologic treatment: A multicenter observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate predictors of biologic discontinuation due to insufficient response as a surrogate for relapse in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved clinical remission with biologic treatment. METHODS: This study was performed based on data from a multicenter registry, and included 404 patients who achieved clinical remission within the first year of treatment with their first biologic. Cumulative retention rate of the first biologic was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the impact of patient characteristics on biologic discontinuation was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: During follow-up, 50 patients discontinued their first biologic due to insufficient response. Overall discontinuation rates due to insufficient response after achieving remission were 6%, 11%, and 19% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that concomitant glucocorticoids at achieving remission [hazard ratio (HR): 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.89-7.64)] and a higher level of C-reactive protein (CRP) at achieving remission (HR: 1.47 per 1 mg/dL, 95% CI: 1.09-1.99) independently predict discontinuation due to insufficient response after achieving remission. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA who achieved remission with concomitant glucocorticoid treatment and a higher level of CRP are at high risk of subsequent biologic discontinuation due to insufficient response.

Longterm Retention Rate and Risk Factors for Adalimumab Discontinuation Due To Efficacy and Safety in Japanese Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Observational Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rates of retention and discontinuation of adalimumab (ADA) due to efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: All patients with RA (n = 476) who were treated with ADA in the Tsurumai Biologics Communication Registry were enrolled. RESULTS: The retention rate of ADA was 46% at 5 years. When focusing on insufficient efficacy, previous biologics use and high baseline disease activity were significant risk factors for up to 1 year. Methotrexate (MTX) use was a significantly low risk factor after 1 year of treatment. CONCLUSION: Concomitant MTX contributes to the longterm efficacy of ADA therapy.

Predictive factors for achieving low disease activity at 52 weeks after switching from tumor necrosis factor inhibitors to abatacept: results from a multicenter observational cohort study of Japanese patients.

This study aimed to identify predictive factors for achieving low disease activity (LDA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients switching from tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) to abatacept (ABT). Patients who were registered in the multicenter observational Tsurumai Biologics Communication Registry (TBCR) were enrolled in this study. Predictive factors for LDA achievement at each time point were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The cutoffs of 28-point count Disease Activity Score (DAS28)-C-reactive protein (CRP) and ΔDAS28-CRP from baseline up to 24 weeks for LDA achievement at 52 weeks were explored using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Of 2771 RA patients registered until 2013, 76 with moderate or high disease activity were selected. Twenty-six percent of the patients achieved LDA. Multivariate analysis confirmed that DAS28-CRP at 12 weeks and ΔDAS28-CRP from baseline to 12 weeks were independent factors for LDA achievement at 52 weeks [odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95% confident interval (CI) (0.12-0.56), OR 0.25, 95% CI (0.11-0.57), respectively]. The best cutoff values of DAS28-CRP at 12 weeks and ΔDAS28-CRP from baseline to 12 weeks for LDA at 52 weeks were 3.9 (sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.78) and -0.97 (sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.70), respectively. Seventy-one percent of patients who achieved both of these cutoff values at 12 weeks achieved LDA at 52 weeks. Our findings suggest that the clinical course up to 12 weeks is important for predicting long-term outcomes when switching from TNFis to ABT.

Disease activity early in treatment as a predictor of future low disease activity in RA patients treated with iguratimod.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective observational study aimed to examine the efficacy of iguratimod with and without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) and to estimate the adequate observational period for predicting low disease activity (LDA) achievement at 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: All patients treated with iguratimod were registered in a Japanese multicenter registry. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictive factors for LDA achievement at 24 weeks. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to estimate the association of 28-joint disease activity score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at each time point with achievement of LDA at 24 weeks and determine a cut-off for DAS28-ESR. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were treated with iguratimod with (n = 65) or without (n = 58) MTX. Iguratimod therapy resulted in significant clinical improvement in both groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that DAS28-ESR at each time point was an independent significant predictor of LDA achievement at 24 weeks. Cut-off values of DAS28-ESR at 12 weeks based on ROC curves were 3.2 and 3.6 in patients with and without MTX, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Iguratimod was effective in RA patients in clinical practice. Our results suggest that 12 weeks may be a sufficient period to judge the medium-term efficacy of iguratimod in patients treated with and without MTX.

Concomitant methotrexate and tacrolimus augment the clinical response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with a prior history of biological DMARD use.

This observational retrospective study examined whether abatacept efficacy could be augmented with concomitant methotrexate (MTX) or tacrolimus (TAC) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who experienced failure with prior biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and in whom favorable therapeutic efficacy is difficult to achieve. All patients with a prior biological DMARD history who were treated with abatacept for 52 weeks and registered in a Japanese multicentre registry were included. Clinical efficacy and safety of abatacept according to the concomitant drug used, i.e., none (ABT-mono), MTX (ABT-MTX), and TAC (ABT-TAC), were compared. A greater mean percent change of DAS28-ESR was observed in the ABT-TAC group compared with the ABT-mono group at weeks 12 (-20.5 vs. -5.4 %, p = 0.035) and 24 (-25.0 vs. -11.0 %, p = 0.036). ABT-MTX and ABT-TAC groups had a significantly higher proportion of patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA) within 52 weeks compared with the respective baselines, while no significant change was observed in the ABT-mono group. A higher proportion of patients in the ABT-TAC group achieved EULAR moderate response compared with the ABT-mono group at week 52 (66.7 vs. 35.0 %, p = 0.025). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that concomitant TAC use was independently associated with the achievement of LDA and EULAR response at 52 weeks, while concomitant MTX use was not. Concomitant TAC use may offer a suitable option for RA patients treated with abatacept after prior biological DMARD failure, likely because both abatacept and TAC affect T cell activation.

Longterm efficacy and safety of abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated in routine clinical practice: effect of concomitant methotrexate after 24 weeks.

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to evaluate the longterm efficacy and safety of abatacept (ABA), and to explore factors that increase its longterm efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated in routine clinical practice. METHODS: There were 231 participants with RA treated with ABA who were prospectively registered in a Japanese multicenter registry. They were followed up for at least 52 weeks. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 64.3 years, mean disease duration was 12.1 years, mean 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28)-C-reactive protein was 4.49, and 48.5% of patients were concomitantly treated with methotrexate (MTX). Overall retention rate of ABA was 77.1% at 52 weeks; 14.8% of patients discontinued because of inadequate response and 3.5% because of adverse events. The proportion of patients achieving DAS28-defined low disease activity (LDA) significantly increased from baseline to 52 weeks (7.3% to 43.8%, p < 0.01); 40.9% of patients who did not achieve LDA at 24 weeks had more than 1 categorical improvement in DAS28-defined disease activity at 52 weeks. Multivariate logistic regression revealed concomitant MTX use to be an independent predictor of the categorical improvement in DAS28-defined disease activity from 24 to 52 weeks (adjusted OR 3.124, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: In routine clinical practice, ABA demonstrated satisfactory clinical efficacy and safety in patients with established RA for 52 weeks. The clinical efficacy of ABA increased with time even after 24 weeks, and this was strongly influenced by concomitant MTX use. Our study provides valuable real-world findings on the longterm management of RA with ABA.

Use of a 12-week observational period for predicting low disease activity at 52 weeks in RA patients treated with abatacept: a retrospective observational study based on data from a Japanese multicentre registry study.

OBJECTIVE: Only a few studies have assessed predictive factors for the long-term efficacy of abatacept. This study aimed to provide clinical evidence of an adequate observational period for predicting low disease activity (LDA) achievement at 52 weeks in RA patients treated with abatacept. METHODS: Participants were all patients registered in a Japanese multicentre registry who were treated with abatacept and had at least 52 weeks of follow-up (n = 254). RESULTS: Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the 28-joint count with CRP (DAS28-CRP) at each time point for LDA achievement at 52 weeks were: 0.686 (cut-off score: 4.6) at baseline, 0.780 (3.8) at 4 weeks, 0.875 (3.3) at 12 weeks, and 0.900 (3.0) at 24 weeks. Although patients with a DAS28-CRP score < 3.0 at 24 weeks had the highest proportion of LDA achievement at 52 weeks (79.3%), the proportion for those with a score < 3.3 at 12 weeks was comparable (77.2%, P = 0.697). Proportions were significantly lower in patients with a score < 3.8 at 4 weeks or < 4.6 at baseline. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that a DAS28 score of < 3.3 at 12 weeks was an independent strong predictor for LDA at 52 weeks (adjusted odds ratio: 15.2, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Twelve weeks is an adequate observational period to judge the long-term clinical efficacy of abatacept, and is about as early as the period for assessing TNF blockade therapy.