The Role of External Fixation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures.

There are numerous internal fixation (IF) options available for distal radius fractures (DRFs). The choice of fixation method depends on factors such as fracture morphology, soft tissue integrity, the patient's clinical status, and the surgeon's training. While volar plate fixation has become the primary approach for addressing these fractures, alternative IF methods like K-wire fixation, fragment-specific fixation, and dorsal bridge plating continue to be effective. Despite the versatility of IF, there are certain clinical situations where prompt and conclusive management through open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is not suitable. These instances include the treatment of polytraumatized patients, individuals with compromised soft tissues, or those medically unstable to tolerate lengthy anesthesia. In such cases, proficiency in closed reduction and external fixation (EF) proves invaluable. Being able to identify these clinical scenarios and comprehend the efficacy and safety of EF in addressing DRFs is valuable for any surgeon handling such injuries.

ChatGPT's Performance on the Hand Surgery Self-Assessment Exam: A Critical Analysis.

Purpose: To assess the performance of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) when answering self-assessment exam questions in hand surgery and to compare correct results for text-only questions to those for questions that included images. Methods: This study used 10 self-assessment exams from 2004 to 2013 provided by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH). ChatGPT's performance on text-only questions and image-based questions was compared. The primary outcomes were ChatGPT's total score, score on text-only questions, and score on image-based questions. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of questions for which ChatGPT provided additional explanations, the length of those elaborations, and the number of questions for which ChatGPT provided answers with certainty. Results: Out of 1,583 questions, ChatGPT answered 573 (36.2%) correct. ChatGPT performed better on text-only questions than image-based questions. Out of 1,127 text-only questions, ChatGPT answered 442 (39.2%) correctly. Out of the 456 image-based questions, it answered 131 (28.7%) correctly. There was no difference between the proportion of elaborations among text-only and image-based questions. Although there was no difference between the length of elaborations for questions ChatGPT got correct and incorrect, the length of elaborations provided for image-based questions were longer than those provided for text-only questions. Out of 1,441 confident answers, 548 (38.0%) were correct; out of 142 unconfident answers, 25 (17.6%) were correct. Conclusions: ChatGPT performed poorly on the ASSH self-assessment exams from 2004 to 2013. It performed better on text-only questions. Even with its highest score of 42% for the year 2012, the AI platform would not have received continuing medical education credit from ASSH or the American Board of Surgery. Even when only considering questions without images, ChatGPT's high score of 44% correct would not have "passed" the examination. Clinical relevance: At this time, medical professionals, trainees, and patients should use ChatGPT with caution as the program has not yet developed proficiency with hand subspecialty knowledge.

Capitate Fracture Subsequent to Capitolunate Staple Fusion: A Case Report.

We report a case of a 71-year-old man who underwent capitolunate fusion for scapholunate advanced collapse. At the patient's 4-month follow-up, there was evidence of a fracture at the distal staple tine. He subsequently underwent removal of staple hardware with revision open reduction internal fixation using headless compression screw fixation and bone grafting. The literature review aimed to identify possible mechanisms and analyze similar cases of this complication. We presume that the fracture resulted from increased stress on the bone from both drill holes and the orientation of the staples. Placing the tines in different planes may decrease the risk of this complication.

Effects of Postoperative Splinting on Outcomes following Digital Mucous Cyst Excision: A Retrospective Review.

Background: Digital mucous cysts (DMCs) are masses on the fingers that can be definitively managed with surgical excision. Though uncommon, surgical site infections can develop into septic arthritis. We sought to determine whether postoperative splinting decreases rates of postoperative infection and the need for postoperative antibiotics. We also explored the effect of age, gender, obesity, and preoperative antibiotic administration on infectious complications. Methods: Patients who underwent DMC excision between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze the complication rates including documented infection, postoperative antibiotic administration, mass recurrence, and return to operating room. Associations were analyzed between both preoperative antibiotic administration and postoperative splinting with respect to postsurgical complications. Results: The database search identified 373 patients who underwent 394 DMC excisions. Postoperative antibiotics were given in splinted patients at lower rates than their nonsplinted counterparts with a small-to-moderate effect size, but the difference was not statistically significant (2.7 vs. 7.5%). Preoperative antibiotic administration was not found to significantly affect the prescription of postoperative antibiotics. Splinting did not reduce rates of DMC recurrence. Patients who were splinted were more likely to have also received preoperative antibiotics. Males were given postoperative antibiotics more frequently than females (12.6 vs. 4.0%). Conclusions: Though not statistically significant, splinted patients were prescribed postoperative antibiotics less frequently. Postoperative antibiotics were utilized more frequently than the rate of infections typically reported following this procedure, possibly indicating overcautious prescription habits or underreported suspected infections.

Early Exposure to Orthopaedic Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Disparities in early orthopaedic experiences among medical students prompt a critical examination of factors influencing the availability and nature of these exposures. While the current body of literature underscores the significance of early surgical exposure and mentorship in medical education, a notable gap exists in investigating early orthopaedic exposure and its specific impact on students from diverse backgrounds. METHODS: A 16-item questionnaire, approved by our institutional review board, was administered to fourth-year medical students (MS4) and first-year orthopaedic residents (PGY-1) across U.S. orthopaedic surgery programs during the 2022-2023 application cycle. The questionnaire assessed participants' initial orthopaedic exposures and factors influencing interest in the field. Two-proportion Z-test analyses were conducted to analyze the data, and thematic analysis was used to assess qualitative data involving free-response questions. RESULTS: Out of 72 total respondents, the study revealed that 83% of respondents encountered orthopaedics before medical school, with initial exposures stemming from various sources such as familial connections (28%), athletics (17%), and high school or college exposures (15%), including shadowing, athletics participation, and occupation-related exposure. Disparities were observed in the availability of orthopaedic mentors and early exposure opportunities between demographic groups. Statistical analyses highlighted significant differences in access to mentors who reflected students' identities between male and non-male participants (70% vs. 39%, p=0.02) and between white and non-white participants (69% vs. 36%, p=0.02). White participants were also more likely to first interact with a surgeon who treated them or their family members than non-white participants (35% vs 7%, p=0.04). Non-white participants were more likely than white participants to come by their first orthopaedic opportunity by searching for it independently (21% vs. 4%, p=0.03). Family and friend connections in orthopaedics were found to be influential in motivating students to pursue orthopaedics, with 40% of respondents indicating personal connections in medicine and 12% reporting family members who are orthopaedic surgeons. Research experiences were identified as important contributors to students' initial interest and motivation to ultimately pursue orthopaedics, especially those with diverse backgrounds. CONCLUSION: The findings underscore the importance of early orthopaedic exposures in shaping students' interest in the field, highlighting the need for more immersive pre-clinical year opportunities and enhanced mentorship programs. Addressing disparities in mentorship access and early exposure opportunities requires systemic changes and increased support for underrepresented minorities in orthopaedics. Initiatives like mentorship programs and research opportunities can help bridge gaps in access to early orthopaedic experiences. Medical schools should prioritise targeted early access to orthopaedic exposures for all students, regardless of background. This initiative aims to promote inclusivity and cultivate a more diverse orthopaedic workforce capable of meeting the evolving healthcare needs of society.

Evaluation of Patient Expectations and Outcomes after Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Patient expectations influence patient-reported outcomes after musculoskeletal injuries. The goal of this study is to determine how pretreatment expectations correlate with outcomes in patients with distal radius fractures. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with an isolated distal radius fracture were prospectively enrolled into nonoperative and operative cohorts. The Trauma Expectation Factor-Trauma Outcome Measure (TEF-TOM) score was the primary outcome measure. Trauma Expectation Factor scores were recorded at the time of enrollment, and TOM scores were recorded at 3, 6, and 12 months. Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores were also recorded. RESULTS: Trauma Outcome Measure scores at all time points were worse than expected (P < .01). Expectations were higher for patients younger than 65 years than for the 65+ group (P = .02). In patients aged 65+ years, mean TOM at 3 months was not significantly different than expected (P = .11) but decreased by 6 (P = .04) and 12 months (P < .01). Baseline TEF and TEF-TOM scores were not significantly different between operative and nonoperative groups (P = .37). Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and PRWE scores were not significantly different between age or treatment groups at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The overall treatment of distal radial injuries in our study did not meet patient expectations. Patients aged 65 years or older had lower expectations but were not able to predict their outcomes better than patients aged <65 years. There were no differences in TEF or TOM by treatment method. Patients demonstrated improved functional outcomes (qDASH/PRWE) at all time points regardless of age and treatment method.

Understanding Variations in the Management of Displaced Distal Radius Fractures With Satisfactory Reduction.

BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has set forth Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) to help guide management of closed, displaced distal radius fractures (DRFs). There still exists variation in practice regarding operative vs nonoperative decision-making. This study aims to identify which factors influence the decision to treat DRFs not indicated for surgery by the CPGs after initial closed reduction. METHODS: Fifteen sets of DRFs and clinical vignettes were distributed via email to over 75 orthopedic residency programs, Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and New York Society for Surgery of the Hand membership. A Qualtrics survey collected respondent demographics, choice of treatment, and rationale. RESULTS: Responses were received from 106 surgeons and resident trainees. The odds of selecting operative management for fractures with 5 or more radiographic instability signs versus 3 or 4 was 3.11 (P < .05). Age over 65, higher patient activity level, and dominant-hand injury were associated with greater odds of operative management (3.4, 30.28, and 2.54, respectively). In addition, surgeons with more years in practice and high-volume surgeons had greater odds of selecting operative management (2.43 and 2.11, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of instability at the time of injury, patient age and activity level, as well as surgeon volume and time in practice independently affect the decision to manage well-reduced DRF with surgical or nonsurgical treatment. The source of heterogeneity in the treatment of these fractures is borne at least in part from a lack of formal direction on the importance of prereduction instability from the CPGs.

Long-term Efficacy of Corticosteroid Injection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a debilitating condition that can cause significant morbidity. Corticosteroid injection (CI) is a popular treatment for CTS. Short-term benefits of CI for CTS have been reported, but there is little evidence on long-term outcomes. We performed a systematic review in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies which reported outcomes of CI for CTS with at least 1-year follow-up. We identified 20 total studies and extracted data on outcomes such as number of patients needing eventual surgery or reinjection, complications, and functional scores. In included studies, 41.6% of patients underwent eventual carpal tunnel release surgery (CTRS), 29% underwent reinjection, there were no major and approximately 34/1133 (3.0%) minor complications, and median/mean time from CI to eventual CTRS ranged from 128 to 446 days. There was disparity on the long-term efficacy of CI for functional outcomes. The evidence indicates that CI is a very low risk procedure that has potential to improve symptoms enough to either prevent or, in most cases, delay the need for further reintervention. However, our conclusions are limited by the heterogeneity of available studies. There is a need for further, high-quality research on this topic.

Clinical Outcomes Following Open Olecranon Bursa Excision for Septic and Aseptic Olecranon Bursitis: An Observational Study.

Background and objective Olecranon bursitis (aseptic or septic) is caused by inflammation in the bursal tissue. While it is typically managed with conservative measures, refractory cases may indicate surgical intervention. There is currently limited research about outcomes following bursal excision for both septic and aseptic etiologies. In light of this, the purpose of this study was to determine if patients experienced improvement following surgical olecranon bursa excision and to compare outcomes between septic and aseptic forms. Materials and methods A retrospective review was performed involving patients who underwent olecranon bursa excision from 2014 to 2021. Demographic data, patient characteristics, surgical data, and outcome-related data were collected from the medical records. Patients were classified into subgroups based on the type of olecranon bursitis (septic or aseptic). Preoperative and one-year postoperative 12-item short-form survey (SF-12) results and range of motion (ROM) outcomes were evaluated for the entire cohort as well as the subgroups. Results We included 61 patients in our study and found significant improvement in the Physical Component Scale 12 (PCS-12) score for all patients (42.0 vs. 45.5, p=0.010) following surgery. However, based on subgroup analysis, the aseptic group improved in PCS-12 following surgery (41.5 vs. 46.8, p<0.001), but the septic group did not (43.6 vs. 40.5, p=0.277). No improvements were found in the Mental Component Scale 12 (MCS-12) scores following surgery in either group. Eighteen of the 61 patients experienced postoperative complications (29.5%), but only 6.5% required a second surgical procedure. Specifically, 14 of the 18 complications occurred in the aseptic group while two septic and two aseptic patients required additional surgeries. Elbow ROM did not change significantly after surgery but more patients were found to have full ROM postoperatively (83.0% to 91.8%, p=0.228). Conclusion Our findings suggest that patients with refractory olecranon bursitis, particularly if aseptic, tend to gain significant physical health benefits from open bursectomy.

Vascularized Bone Grafting Versus the 2-Stage Masquelet Technique for Upper-Extremity Bone Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Vascularized bone grafting (VBG) has been described as the technique of choice for larger bone defects in bone reconstruction, yielding excellent results at the traditional threshold of 6 cm as described in the literature. However, we hypothesize that the 2-stage Masquelet technique provides equivalent union rates for upper-extremity bone defects regardless of size, while having no increase in the rate of patient complications. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus for outcomes after VBG and the Masquelet technique for upper-extremity bone defects of the humerus, radius, ulna, metacarpal, or phalanx (carpal defects were excluded). A meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes following VBG and the Masquelet technique at varying defect sizes. RESULTS: There were 77 VBG (295 patients) and 25 Masquelet (119 patients) studies that met inclusion criteria. Patients undergoing the Masquelet technique had defect sizes ranging from 0-15 cm (average 4.5 cm), while patients undergoing VBG had defect sizes ranging from 0-24 cm (average 5.9 cm). The union rate for Masquelet patients was 94.1% with an average time to union of 5.8 months, compared to 94.9% and 4.4 months, respectively, for VBG patients. We did not identify a defect size threshold at which VBG demonstrated a significantly higher union rate. No statistically significant difference was found in union rates between techniques when using multivariable logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in union rates between VBG and the Masquelet technique in upper-extremity bone defects regardless of defect size. Surgeons may consider the Masquelet technique as an alternative to VBG in large bone defects of the upper extremity. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Stener-Like Lesions in the Hand: A Qualitative Review.

A Stener-like lesion is defined as the interposition of the sagittal band between the torn collateral ligament of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of a finger and its origin or insertion. Owing to the rarity of this injury, standardized protocols on the diagnosis and care of these injuries are not currently available. PubMed Central and Google Scholar were searched for published studies from 1962 to 2022. Inclusion criteria admitted any injury of the MCP joints of any nonthumb fingers involving a torn collateral ligament with sagittal band injury that trapped the collateral ligament. Eight studies were ultimately included in our analysis and contained 11 cases of Stener-like lesions. Eight of the 11 cases presented radial collateral ligament injury to the ring and little fingers. All 11 cases presented showed that detailed physical examination was a primary step in diagnosis of these lesions. Metacarpophalangeal joint laxity was present in all cases reported. Imaging-aided diagnosis was used in majority of the cases presented and included arthrography, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging. All cases presented in this review were managed surgically. Following surgical repair, a majority of authors opted to use immobilization techniques immediately postoperatively. As awareness of this injury pattern increases, a standardized treatment algorithm may develop.

Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Women Older than 80 Years: A Preliminary Report of Functional and Radiographic Outcomes after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.

Background Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures seen in the elderly. The management of distal radius fractures in the elderly, especially patients older than 80 years, has not been well defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate operative treatment of distal radius fractures in patients older than 80 years to determine functional outcomes and complication rates. Materials and Methods A retrospective review was performed to identify patients 80 years or older who were treated for a distal radius fracture with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Medical records were reviewed for demographics, medical history, functional outcomes including quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH), radiographs, and postoperative complications. Results There were 40 patients included for review. Average age was 84 years. The preoperative qDASH score was 69. At 6 months follow-up, the postoperative qDASH score was 13 ( p < 0.001). There were five (12.5%) complications reported postoperatively. All fractures healed with adequate radiographic alignment and there were no hardware failures. Conclusion Distal radius fractures in patients older than 80 years treated with ORIF have good functional outcomes and low complication rates. Increased functionality and independence of the elderly, as well as updated implant design can lead to the effective surgical management of these patients. When indicated from a clinical perspective, operative fixation of distal radius fractures should be considered in patients older than 80 years.

Functional Outcomes of Cubital Tunnel Release in Patients with Negative Electrodiagnostic Studies.

BACKGROUND: Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common compression neuropathy of the upper extremity. Electrodiagnostic studies (EDSs) are often used to confirm diagnosis. However, negative EDSs can present a difficult clinical challenge. The purpose of this study was to determine the functional outcomes and symptom improvement for patients with a clinical diagnosis of CuTS, but with negative EDSs, who are treated surgically. METHODS: Patients who had EDSs before ulnar nerve surgery were identified by means of database search. Chart review was performed on 867 cases to identify those with negative EDSs. Twenty-five ulnar nerve operations in 23 patients were included in analysis. Chart review was performed to record preoperative and postoperative symptoms, physical examination findings, and outcome measures (ie, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and the Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation). RESULTS: At a mean follow-up period of 20.7 ± 14.9 months, 15 of 25 cases (60.0%) had complete resolution of all preoperative symptoms. All 10 patients who had residual symptoms endorsed improvement in their preoperative complaints. The median preoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 40.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 23.9 to 58.0], which significantly decreased to a median of 6.8 (IQR, 0 to 22.7) at final follow-up ( P < 0.01). The median postoperative Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation score was 9.5 (IQR, 1.5 to 19.5). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CuTS and normal EDSs treated surgically can be expected to have favorable outcomes with respect to symptoms and improvement in functional outcome scores. After ruling out confounding diagnoses, the authors continue to offer surgical intervention for these patients when nonoperative treatment has failed. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Distal Radioulnar Joint Osteoarthritis: An Update on Treatment Options.

The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), the articulation between the sigmoid notch of the radius and the distal ulna, plays a pivotal role in stability and load bearing and allows for pronation and supination of the forearm. Osteoarthritis (OA) of the DRUJ commonly occurs due to distal radius trauma but may also be the result of conditions such as joint instability, septic arthritis, or primary OA. It is initially managed with conservative therapy, but surgery is often considered when nonoperative methods fail. The surgical approaches available to treat this pathology have grown over the years. The procedures have generally favorable outcomes, each with their own unique complications and considerations. This paper comprises a review of the outcomes and complications for the different procedures commonly used to surgically treat DRUJ OA.

How Are Radial Height and Radial Shortening Defined in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures? A Critical Review.

BACKGROUND: Radial height is a radiographic parameter used to guide the treatment of distal radius fractures. However, it is often used synonymously with other terms, and there are substantial discrepancies in its measurement/definition. These discrepancies can alter the measurement of radial height and affect treatment decisions. The purpose of this review is to identify the different definitions of radial height in the literature relevant to distal radius fractures. METHODS: A literature review was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE database from inception to 2022. Full-length, English-language studies that pertained to distal radius fractures and reported radial height as a recorded measurement were included. The method of radial height measurement (definition) was extracted from included studies. Level of evidence was determined by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence tool. RESULTS: A total of 385 studies were identified. Of these, 183 (47.5%) did not provide a definition for radial height. Of the studies that defined radial height, 50.9% (103/202) measured radial height from the radial styloid to the distal ulna, 10.9% (22/202) measured from the radial styloid to the distal radius, and 29.2% (59/202) were "other" definitions. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial discrepancy in the way that radial height is measured and reported. We advocate for a standardized measurement of radial height (synonymous with radial length) from the radial styloid to the distal ulnar articular surface. Radial shortening is a different measurement and requires comparison with a reference value.

The Effect of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Corticosteroid Injections on Outcomes Following Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest steroid injections may affect infection rates following thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) arthroplasty. However, it is unclear whether injections prior to CMCJ arthroplasty affect functional outcomes, primarily Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH). METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent thumb CMCJ arthroplasty from 2015 to 2019. Patients who had qDASH scores reported preoperatively, and at 5 and 11 months postoperatively were included. Charts were reviewed for the presence or absence of prior corticosteroid injection to the CMCJ and complications. Delta qDASH was calculated by subtracting the patients' postoperative qDASH scores from the preoperative qDASH scores. RESULTS: In all, 350 CMCJ arthroplasty patients were identified, 177 who had received at least 1 steroid injection and 173 who were steroid-naïve. No significant differences existed in delta qDASH scores postoperatively between the injection and naïve groups at 5 months (28.5 vs 28.6) or 11 months (31.2 vs 31.9). Whereas there were no significant differences in rates of major complications between the 2 groups, minor complications were higher in the injection group (16.4% vs 9.2%). Patients who received more than 3 injections did not have worse 5-month or 11-month delta qDASH scores or complication rates than those with fewer than 3. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative CMCJ steroid injection status does not affect major complication rates or functional outcomes following CMCJ arthroplasty. However, injections increase the rate of minor complications. The qDASH and complication rates following CMCJ arthroplasty are not affected by receiving greater than 3 injections preoperatively.

Postoperative Immobilization of Scaphoid Fractures: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

The optimal protocol for postoperative immobilization following operative treatment of scaphoid fractures remains controversial. Reports of successful management with brief postoperative immobilization suggest that earlier restoration of function may be achieved by limiting the duration of immobilization. However, the risk of nonunion and its associated complications suggest that a more conservative approach with extended immobilization could optimize fracture healing. This paper presents a thorough review of the relevant literature and summarizes the myriad postoperative immobilization protocols and their reported outcomes. Postoperative immobilization protocols and reported outcomes for displaced, comminuted, and proximal pole fractures are discussed separately. The literature is reviewed following different operative techniques, including open reduction internal fixation and percutaneous screw fixation. Vigilant postoperative care of scaphoid fractures managed surgically is warranted to monitor for signs of nonunion while attempting to regain motion and strength to the injured wrist.

Patient Comprehension of Operative Instructions With a Paper Handout Versus a Video: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a video versus that of a paper handout for explaining operative instructions for hand and upper extremity surgeries to patients. We aimed to compare patient performance using a knowledge-based questionnaire. In addition, we aimed to compare how helpful patients found their assigned operative instructions. METHODS: This was a randomized trial of 60 patients undergoing same-day hand and upper extremity surgeries. The patients were randomized to receive educational material outlining operative instructions, either in the form of a video link or a paper handout. At the first postoperative visit, the patients' comprehension of the content was evaluated using a questionnaire. The primary outcomes included the number of questions answered correctly and patient-reported evaluation of the provided instructions on a scale of 1-5. RESULTS: Patients who received video instructions scored higher in the questionnaire than those in the paper instructions group (paper: 58% correct; video: 76% correct). Moreover, patients in the video group were significantly more likely to answer questions pertaining to opioid use correctly. A higher proportion of patients in the video group than in the paper group found the information "extremely" or "very" helpful. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the patients demonstrated greater comprehension of the operative instructions when these were administered in a video format than when these were administered as a printed handout. In particular, the results suggest that video-based education specifically improves patients' comprehension of proper opioid use. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There appears to be utility in implementing videos for patient education purposes, particularly in the setting of operative instructions for same-day surgical procedures.

Patient Adherence With At-Home Hand and Wrist Exercises: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Video Versus Handout Format.

BACKGROUND: Patient adherence is important for maximizing patient outcomes. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine patient adherence and confidence in home therapy exercises of the hand and wrist at multiple time points when distributed by either paper handout or video. METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled and randomized in orthopedic clinics to either the handout or video exercise group. Exclusion criteria included patients less than 18 years old. Questionnaires were electronically distributed each week for 4 weeks following enrollment. Questionnaires assessed the frequency of exercise performance, percentage of exercises utilized, and confidence in performing the exercises correctly. The handout and video groups were compared via 2-sample t tests for continuous data and χ2 tests for categorical data. RESULTS: Of the 89 patients enrolled, 71 patients responded to the initial follow-up survey (80% of randomized patients), and 54 of these patients (76%) completed all surveys at each time point. The handout group (37 patients) and the video group (34 patients) had no differences in response rate or demographics. There were no differences in frequency, exercise utilization rate, or confidence in performing exercises between groups at week 1. However, the video group reported higher exercise utilization and confidence than the handout group at subsequent time points. CONCLUSIONS: Video-format distribution of home therapy exercises is superior to that of paper handout distribution for the distal upper extremity rehabilitation. Patients in the video group utilized more exercises and had higher confidence in completing them correctly following initiation of the exercise program.

Patient Comprehension of Trigger Finger Concepts Based on Distribution Format: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Handout Versus Video.

BACKGROUND: Patient comprehension is an essential part of optimizing medical outcomes. It is unknown which format is most effective in delivering this information. In addition to a face-to-face conversation, a paper handout is often given as an educational supplement at the conclusion of a visit. Secondary to advances in technology and the ubiquity of the Internet, medical videos have gained popularity. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine whether the educational material format (paper handout vs video) resulted in a difference in either comprehension of the condition or satisfaction with the delivery of the information. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of trigger finger were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either a paper handout or video link with information regarding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of trigger finger. Survey assessments were then distributed, consisting of 7 questions related to trigger finger and 1 question related to patient satisfaction. Continuous data were compared using 2-sample t tests, and categorical data were compared with χ2 tests. Alpha was 0.05. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were enrolled, and 60 completed their survey (response rate: 85%). The video group had significantly higher comprehension scores (82% vs 71%, P = .04) and significantly higher satisfaction scores (9.4 vs 8.6, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Those who received their educational material in a video format had greater comprehension of their condition and higher satisfaction compared with those receiving a paper handout. Medical providers should consider using video formats to provide supplemental educational materials to their patients.