Predictors of 30-Day Readmission After Inpatient Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Single-Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: The 30-day hospital readmission rate is a nationally recognized quality measure. Nearly one-fifth of medicare beneficiaries are hospitalized within 30 days of discharge, resulting in a cost of over $26 billion dollars annually. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains the endoscopic procedure with the highest risk of morbidity and mortality. We set out to analyze the clinical characteristics predictive of 30-day readmission after an inpatient ERCP. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all inpatient ERCPs performed at our institution between 12/1/2014 and 9/30/2018. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of these patients were compared to determine predictors of 30-day readmission. RESULTS: A total of 497 inpatient ERCP procedures done for biliary or pancreatic indications, constituting 483 patients, were identified. There were 52 readmissions that occurred among 48 patients within 30 days of discharge. Basic demographic characteristics were similar between both groups. Comorbidities were significantly higher in those who were readmitted. Multivariate analysis revealed significantly greater odds of readmission with prior liver transplantation (OR = 4.15), cirrhosis (OR = 3.20), and pancreatic duct stent placement (OR = 2.56). Subgroup analysis for biliary indications revealed cholecystectomy before discharge and early ERCP to be protective against readmission. CONCLUSION: A history of liver transplantation and cirrhosis are predictive of increased 30-day readmission rates after an inpatient ERCP. Pancreatic duct stent placement is associated with readmission; however, this phenomenon is likely related to stenting for pancreatic endotherapy. Cholecystectomy before discharge and early ERCP are predictive of decreased need for readmission in procedures done for biliary indications.

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication in the same day surgery setting with a trained team and an enhanced recovery protocol.

BACKGROUND: The length of stay after Heller myotomy is 1-5 days. The aim was to report feasibility of the procedure as same day surgery (SDS). METHODS: Three steps of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol: preoperatively, clear liquid diet for 24 hours, in preoperative area: antiemetics as dermal patch/IV form, 2: Intraoperatively, intubation in semi upright position, IV analgesics and antiemetics. 3: Postoperatively, clear liquid diet and discharge instructions. Patients were followed using a phone questionnaire. Values are median (interquartile range). RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients, 32 M (56%)/25F (44%), age 48 (35-59). First 45 were inpatient with LOS of 1 day. Last 12 were planned as same day surgery, 1/12 was discharged on POD#2, 11/12 (92%) were performed as same day surgery. The duration of operation: 139.5 min (114-163) inpatient: vs 123 (107-139) same day surgery, P < .01. Questionnaires were obtained in 78% inpatient at 40 months (25.6-67) vs 82% same day surgery at 8 (4-12). All were satisfied with the operation with no difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Heller myotomy can be planned as same day surgery and performed successfully in majority of patients with a trained team and an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol focused on prevention of nausea, and pain control in perioperative period.

Laparoscopic Repair of Large Hiatal Hernia Without the Need for Esophageal Lengthening With Low Morbidity and Rare Symptomatic Recurrence.

The aim of this study was to assess symptomatic recurrence in patients who underwent a laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia without an esophageal lengthening procedure. Patients who underwent a laparoscopic repair of a large hiatal hernia from September 2009 to September 2015 by a single surgeon were identified in the retrospective review. The patients were followed up prospectively by the operating surgeon using a structured questionnaire, administered by telephone, to assess the symptoms. Symptomatic recurrence was defined as the requirement for a reoperative procedure for symptomatic recurrent hiatal hernia. There were 215 laparoscopic repairs. Reoperations (n = 35) and type I hernias of <4 cm (n = 49) were excluded. The study population included 131 patients: 36 had type I hernia, 4 had type II hernia, 37 had type III hernia, and 54 had type IV hernia. There were 102 women and 29 men, aged 63 (56-74) years. For repair, 102 Toupet, 28 Nissen, and 1 Dor fundoplications were performed. The duration of the operation was 138 (119-172) minutes. Adequate esophageal length was obtained by mediastinal esophageal mobilization in all patients, without Collis gastroplasty. A mesh was used in 106 patients. There was 1 conversion and 2 delayed esophageal leaks. The length of stay was 2 (1-3) days. Perioperative complications included atrial fibrillation in 5 patients, gastric distension or ileus in 5 patients, reintubation in 3 patients, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in 1 patient, and temporary dialysis in 1 patient. There was no 30-day or in-hospital mortality. The questionnaire was completed by 99 out of 131 patients (76%) at 24 (9-38) months; of the 99 patients, 85 (86%) were free of preoperative symptoms; 91 (92%) were satisfied with the operation; and 73 (74%) were off proton pump inhibitors. Reoperation for symptomatic recurrent hiatal hernia occurred in 8 of the 99 patients (8%), 2 in the perioperative period and 6 at 25 (8-31) months. Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia can be performed with low morbidity and results in excellent patient satisfaction. Tension-free, intra-abdominal esophageal length can be achieved laparoscopically without Collis gastroplasty. Reoperation for symptomatic recurrence is rare.

Laparoscopic Reoperative Antireflux Surgery Is More Cost-Effective than Open Approach.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported on the outcomes of laparoscopic and open reoperative antireflux surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the costs of these procedures. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective review. Financial and procedure coding data were obtained using a cost accounting system. There were 49 procedures in 46 patients (36 female and 10 male). There were 38 laparoscopic (including 4 conversions) and 11 open procedures (7 transabdominal repairs and 4 gastric-preserving Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy). Values are median and interquartile range (IQR) and mean costs. RESULTS: Median age was 54 years (IQR 49 to 67 years) for the laparoscopic group vs 56 years (IQR 50 to 65 years) for the open group (p = 0.675). Mean direct costs per case for the laparoscopic group vs open group were $12,655 vs $24,636 (p < 0.002); operating room costs: $3,788 vs $5,547 (p = 0.011); hospital room costs: $1,948 vs $6,438 (p < 0.005); and supply costs: $4,386 vs $5,386 (p = 0.077). Median duration of the operation for the laparoscopic group was 185 minutes (IQR 147 to 254 minutes) vs 308 minutes (IQR 259 to 416 minutes) for the open group (p < 0.002). Median length of stay for the laparoscopic group was 3 days (IQR 2 to 4 days) vs 9 days (IQR 8 to 14 days) for the open group (p < 0.001). There was no 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Excluding the 4 Roux-en-Y procedures, direct costs for the laparoscopic group (n = 38) were $12,655 vs $23,678 for the transabdominal group (n = 7) (p = 0.035); duration of operation: 185 minutes (IQR 147 to 254 minutes) vs 292 minutes (IQR 218 to 309 minutes) (p = 0.003); and length of stay: 3 days (IQR 2 to 4 days) vs 9 days (IQR 7 to 15 days) (p = 0.017). There were 3 recurrences in the laparoscopic group. Two were repaired laparoscopically and 1 required a gastric-preserving Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy because the patient had undergone 2 earlier failed repairs. Including the cumulative costs of 3 recurrent hiatal hernia repairs, the driving force to reduce costs remained length of stay, manifested by the costs of the hospital rooms. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic reoperative antireflux surgery is more cost-effective than open repair. The laparoscopic approach, when feasible, should be considered the surgical option for treatment of recurrent hiatal hernia in specialized esophageal centers with highly experienced surgical teams.

Laparoscopic reoperative antireflux surgery: A safe procedure with high patient satisfaction and low morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic reoperative antireflux surgery remains challenging and the advantages compared to an open approach remain unclear. METHODS: Retrospective chart review and follow-up questionnaire via phone. RESULTS: 50 reoperative hiatal hernia repairs were performed in 47 patients. VALUES: median and interquartile range (IQR). There were 10 males, 37 females, 55 (49-66) years. Reoperative procedures: 38 laparoscopic vs. 12 open transabdominal. Length of operation: 185 (147-254) vs. 325 (276-394) minutes (p < 0.0008). Length of stay: 3 (2-4) vs.10 (8-13) days (p < 0.0001). None required Collis gastroplasty. There was no 30-day mortality. Follow-up questionnaire was obtained in 36/45 (80%) at 21 (11-40) months (2 cancer related deaths). In all, 24/36 (67%) were free of preoperative symptoms and 33/36 (92%) were satisfied with the operation. There was no difference between the laparoscopic and open group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic reoperative antireflux surgery is a safe approach with high patient satisfaction and low morbidity. Tension-free esophageal length can be achieved laparoscopically without Collis gastroplasty. The duration of the operation and length of stay are less in the laparoscopic vs. open group. Symptomatic relief and patient satisfaction are similar in both approaches.