RESUMEN
The aim of this study was to examine whether the heart rate response to adenosine differs after 12 hours [Good control (Good-C)] versus 24 hours [Excellent control (Exc-C)] of caffeine abstinence in adenosine stress thallium-201 (TL) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Patients (n=729) with suspected ischemic heart disease underwent adenosine TL-MPI after 12 (n=226) and 24 (n=503) hours of caffeine abstinence. There was not significant differences between the heart rate of Exc-C and Good-C in 0-2 min after adenosine infusion (0 min 63.7±9.5 versus 63.7±10.0, 1 min 66.4±10.6 versus 65.3±10.5, 2 min 72.3±11.2 versus 70.6±11.4). The heart rate of Exc-C was higher compared to Good-C in 3-6 min after adenosine infusion (3 min 75.6 ±11.7 versus 73.3±11.6 p=0.013, 4 min 79.2±12.9 versus 76.7±12.2 p=0.012, 5 min 79.4±12.6 versus 76.8±12.4 p=0.009, 6 min 79.4±12.5 versus 77.0±12.3 p=0.016). Therefore, the longer caffeine abstinence, namely 24 hours self-restraint, is effective in adenosine TL-MPI.
RESUMEN
Adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging was performed with an intravenous adenosine and radiopharmaceutical injection in the same line. A syringe containing 720 µg/kg of adenosine in 40 ml of saline was prepared and injected at the constant infusion rate of 400 ml/h. Adenosine was temporarily stopped by the stopcock when 1.5 ml of thallium was injected for 0.5 second from the three-way stopcock with two ways opened. Thereafter, the stopcock was returned to the original position in 0.5 second, and adenosine flow returned to the constant flow rate again. In this method, 0.75% of adenosine total dose was injected at a rate of 3.0 ml/s and adenosine was stopped for 3.6 second. There were no significant differences in either effects and adverse events of adenosine between this method and two intravenous injection line method. Adenosine stress in one venous line method would be an easy method maintaining the dose effect and safety.
