Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ther Adv Med Oncol ; 15: 17588359231163785, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37007632

RESUMEN

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare and heterogeneous malignant tumours including cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer. They are very aggressive, often refractory to chemotherapy and associated with an overall poor prognosis. Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment option but less than 35% present with resectable disease. Adjuvant treatments have been widely used but until recently, supportive data were limited to non-randomised, non-controlled retrospective studies. Recent evidence from the BILCAP trial has established adjuvant capecitabine as the standard of care. But there are still unanswered questions as to the role of adjuvant therapy. Further prospective data and translational research with reproducible evidence of clinical benefit are needed. In this review of adjuvant therapy in resectable BTCs, we will summarise the latest evidence setting current treatment standards and highlight future prospects.

2.
BMC Rheumatol ; 6(1): 10, 2022 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35130961

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive tumour with an overall poor prognosis. In October 2020, first line treatment with the PD-1 antagonist nivolumab and the CTLA-4 antagonist ipilimumab for unresectable disease was FDA approved-the first approved treatment regime since 2004. Interim analyses from the phase 3 CHECKMATE-743 study shows improvements in overall survival. Skin-related toxicities are the most commonly reported any-grade treatment-related adverse event from combined nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we report a case of a 35-year-old white male who developed digital ischaemia secondary to small vessel vasculitis after receiving PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade therapy for MPM. His progressive ischaemia became gangrenous, and he required multi-speciality input and treatment with prednisolone, prostacyclin, mycophenolate mofetil and hydroxychloroquine. CONCLUSIONS: Our case highlights the importance of early detection, intervention, and a multispecialty approach to managing such complications in order to minimise the associated morbidity and mortality.

3.
Br J Cancer ; 123(1): 3-4, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32303717

RESUMEN

In response to our current global pandemic, unprecedented healthcare changes may have significant consequences for cancer patients in the United Kingdom. We explore why cancer patients may be more susceptible to severe infection and complications, highlighting various interventions that may help to ensure continuity of care in this unique cohort.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Atención a la Salud/normas , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Humanos , Neoplasias/virología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/virología , SARS-CoV-2
5.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20162016 Oct 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27797878

RESUMEN

Intravenous thrombolysis is the mainstay medical treatment for acute ischaemic strokes, but has strict eligibility criteria. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) is the most adverse complication. A woman aged 76 years presented with signs of an acute stroke and despite not meeting the eligibility criteria, given her background use of warfarin, she received intravenous thrombolysis with an excellent outcome. This is the first fully documented case report of the contraindicated use of intravenous thrombolysis in a patient presenting with an acute ischaemic stroke on a background of concurrent use of warfarin with an international normalised ratio (INR) as high as 1.9. It has been perceived that the risk of thrombolysis with a raised INR outweighs the potential benefits. However, documenting its use outside of the current eligibility criteria is key to future developments.


Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Warfarina/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...