Efficacy and tolerability of an individualized dosing regimen for adult growth hormone replacement therapy in comparison with fixed body weight-based dosing.

To determine whether an individualized dose titration regimen (ID) for adult GH replacement therapy would have similar efficacy and better tolerability than a fixed body weight-based dosing regimen (FD), 387 adults with GH deficiency were randomized to FD (n = 200) or ID (n = 187) for 32 wk. In FD, subjects received sequentially 4, 8, and 12 microg/kg.d GH. ID was started at 0.2 mg/d and increased by 0.2-mg/d increments, based on clinical and serum IGF-I responses, to a maximum of 0.8 mg/d. Increases (mean +/- sd) in serum IGF-I were similar in both groups (FD, 110.2 +/- 87.8 vs. ID, 99.6 +/- 77.7 microg/liter, P = 0.20) despite higher final GH doses in FD (0.70 +/- 0.32 vs. 0.54 +/- 0.22 mg/d, P < 0.001). Favorable changes in several efficacy measures were observed with no significant differences between the FD and ID groups: lean body mass increased; health-related quality of life improved; and abdominal fat mass, hip circumference, sum of skinfolds, and total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased. The decrease in fat mass was greater with FD than ID for men (-2.7 +/- 2.7 kg vs. -1.8 +/- 2.5 kg, P = 0.04) but not for women (-2.1 +/- 2.4 vs. -2.0 +/- 3.8 kg). The change in waist circumference was greater with FD than ID for women but not for men. There was a significant reduction of systolic blood pressure in ID but not in FD. The adverse event profile was similar between FD and ID except that ID had a lower occurrence of peripheral edema (9.1% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.03) and rash (1.1% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.02) than FD. In summary, the use of ID resulted in improved tolerability and similar efficacy compared with FD. We conclude that GH replacement therapy should be initiated at a low dose and titrated to a dose producing maximal benefits without adverse side effects and an IGF-I level within the age- and sex-adjusted normal range.

Short-term safety and efficacy of human GH replacement therapy in 595 adults with GH deficiency: a comparison of two dosage algorithms.

The aim of GH replacement therapy in GH-deficient adults is to optimize response with minimum incidence of adverse reactions, but optimal therapy regimens are still to be established. This two-arm parallel study examined effects of two GH dose algorithms in adults with GH deficiency of adult or childhood onset. Patients on low dose (LD; n = 302) received GH at 3 microg/kg per day for 3 months increasing to 6 microg/kg per day for 3 months, and those on conventional dose (CD; n = 293) started on 6 microg/kg per day for 3 months increasing to 12 microg/kg per day for 3 months. The proportion of patients completing therapy was greater for the LD group than the CD group for the first 3 months (93.0% vs. 88.1%; P = 0.037) and overall for the 6 months (90.7% vs. 84.0%; P = 0.013). Both dose groups showed significant increases in lean body mass and decreases in fat mass for all time points. Percent increase in lean body mass was less with LD than CD over the first 3 months (2.43 +/- 4.33 vs. 3.58 +/- 4.69%; P = 0.006) but not overall for the 6-month period (4.38% +/- 5.34% vs. 5.21% +/- 5.99%; P = 0.141). Percent decrease in fat mass was less with LD than CD for the first 3 months (-2.81% +/- 7.81% vs. -5.53% +/- 8.64%; P < 0.001) and overall for the 6-month period (-6.35% +/- 9.42% vs. -9.45% +/- 12.07%; P = 0.006). IGF-I SD score increased less with LD than CD for 0 to 3 and 0 to 6 months, although for IGF-binding protein-3 SD score, there was no significant difference between doses at any time. Arthralgia was the only adverse event that occurred significantly less frequently with LD than with CD. Calculated changes based on gender and onset indicated greater changes in males than females for body composition, but there was little difference in GH-related adverse events between males and females. The lower starting dose with dose titration appeared more favorable, but differences in response between genders and onset of GH deficiency need to be taken into account when setting an individual dose regimen.