RESUMEN
<b>Introduction:</b> Computer-based interactive techniques are becoming an important tool in medical education. One of the important benefits of the use of telemedicine in surgical training is the reduction of the number of people in the operating room. As shown in the studies, this can lead i.a. to the reduction in the risk of surgical site infections.<b>Aim:</b> The aim of this survey as held among fifth-year medical students at three academic centers was to assess the usefulness and effectiveness of telemedicine as a surgery-teaching tool.<b>Material and methods:</b> A transmission of a surgical procedure was carried out by each of the three participating centers according to a previously prepared schedule. Each transmission was preceded by the diagnostics, indications, and the course of the surgical procedure being discussed by the facilitator physician who also coordinated the transmission throughout the procedure. After the class, students received anonymous surveys consisting of fourteen questions as per the attached protocol so as to evaluate the class using the rating scale of 1 (the lowest rating) through 5 (the highest rating). The survey assessed the educational value (the knowledge acquired from the class), the form (interactivity, facilitator complicity), and the usefulness of the class for overall surgical education.<b>Results:</b> The survey was completed by 232 students, with 95% of respondents rating the usefulness of telemedicine classes in surgical education as very good or good. As many as 97% of students declared that the transmission had been a good or a very good tool in terms of delivery or adding to their knowledge of topographical anatomy and basic aspects of surgical technique. Higher ratings were given to the usefulness of comments and remarks by the facilitating physician (96% of very good or good ratings) who had been watching the procedure along with the students as compared to those provided by the operating physician (81%).<b>Discussion:</b> The use of telemedicine-based teaching models in surgical education facilitates a better view of the operating field for the students, greater accessibility of educational content delivered simultaneously to multiple groups of students, increased safety of the surgical procedure by reducing the number of people in the operating room as well as reduced burden on the operating physician (thanks to the introduction of class facilitator).<b>Conclusions:</b> In our opinion, the advantages of the presented teaching model are: better view (particularly in case of open procedures), ability to pinpoint surgical field structures (on the participants' and operator's monitors), absence of additional people (students) in the operating room (increasing the safety of the procedure and reducing the risk of surgical site infections) and the ability to go back to recorded operations and perform various types of educational analyses.
Asunto(s)
Estudiantes de Medicina , Telemedicina , Humanos , Polonia , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Masculino , Femenino , Cirugía General/educación , Competencia Clínica , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , AdultoRESUMEN
<b><br>Introduction:</b> Increasing numbers of older patients will require laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Physicians may have doubts when qualifying these patients for elective surgeries since older age is considered a risk factor for complications. Determining biological age, using a Geriatric Assessment (GA), should be the key factor in the preoperative assessment.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to determine which GA components and frailty alone are most useful for predicting postoperative outcomes in both short- and long-term follow-up.</br> <b><br>Materials and methods:</b> 219 consecutive patients aged ≥70 years underwent surgery and were followed up prospectively for 12 months. The preoperative GA consisted of functionality, physical activity, comorbidity, polypharmacotherapy, nutrition, cognition, mood, and social support domains. Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the predictive ability of GA.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> GA, frailty, and chronological age were not predictive of major 30-day morbidity. There were significantly more overall postoperative complications in the frail group than in the fit group (21% vs 4%), with mainly minor (Clavien-Dindo I, II) and medical (16 patients; 72.7%) complications. There were no significant differences in the rate of major and surgical complications (8 patients; 36.4%) between frail and fit patients. Only frailty was a predictor of 1-year mortality odd ratio 12.17 (2.47-59.94) P = 0.002.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> Performing GA before elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies seems unnecessary for the evaluation of short-term outcomes but helpful for the assessment of long-term outcomes. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed also in older frail patients.</br>.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/normas , Cuidados Preoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Colecistectomía/métodos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The scoping review was performed to identify methods of comorbidity assessment and to evaluate their significance in predicting the results of treatment of older patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries for cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and European Trials Register were searched for eligible studies investigating the impact of comorbidity on various postoperative outcomes of patients aged ≥65. Findings were narratively reported. RESULTS: The review identified 40 studies with a total population of 59,612 patients, using eight different methods of comorbidity assessment. The most used was Charlson Comorbidity Index (60â¯% of studies) and presence of specific comorbid conditions (38â¯%). No study provided rationale for the choice of specific comorbidity measure. Most of the included studies reported short-term results (75â¯%), such as postoperative complications (43â¯%) and mortality (18â¯%) as main clinical endpoint. The results were inconsistent across the studies. DISCUSSION: There is still no consensus regarding the choice of comorbidity measures and their role in postoperative outcome prediction. Further efforts are needed to develop new, well-designed, more effective comorbidity assessments tools.
Asunto(s)
Comorbilidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Anciano , Neoplasias/cirugía , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Abdomen/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The GOSAFE study evaluates risk factors for failing to achieve good quality of life (QoL) and functional recovery (FR) in older patients undergoing surgery for colon and rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients age 70 years and older undergoing major elective colorectal surgery were prospectively enrolled. Frailty assessment was performed and outcomes, including QoL (EQ-5D-3L) recorded (3/6 months postoperatively). Postoperative FR was defined as a combination of Activity of Daily Living ≥5 + Timed Up & Go test <20 seconds + MiniCog >2. RESULTS: Prospective complete data were available for 625/646 consecutive patients (96.9%; 435 colon and 190 rectal cancer), 52.6% men, and median age was 79.0 years (IQR, 74.6-82.9 years). Surgery was minimally invasive in 73% of patients (321/435 colon; 135/190 rectum). At 3-6 months, 68.9%-70.3% patients experienced equal/better QoL (72.8%-72.9% colon, 60.1%-63.9% rectal cancer). At logistic regression analysis, preoperative Flemish Triage Risk Screening Tool ≥2 (3-month odds ratio [OR], 1.68; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.73; P = .034, 6-month OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.75; P = .027) and postoperative complications (3-month OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.20 to 3.42; P = .008, 6-month OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.15 to 5.68; P = .02) are associated with decreased QoL after colectomy. Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2 is a strong predictor of postoperative QoL decline in the rectal cancer subgroup (OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.45 to 9.92; P = .006). FR was reported by 254/323 (78.6%) patients with colon and 94/133 (70.6%) with rectal cancer. Charlson Age Comorbidity Index ≥7 (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.26 to 5.32; P = .009), ECOG ≥2 (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.36 to 7.20; P = .007 colon; OR, 4.61; 95% CI, 1.45 to 14.63; P = .009 rectal surgery), severe complications (OR, 17.33; 95% CI, 7.30 to 40.8; P < .001), fTRST ≥2 (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.40 to 5.25; P = .003), and palliative surgery (OR, 4.11; 95% CI, 1.29 to 13.07; P = .017) are risk factors for not achieving FR. CONCLUSION: The majority of older patients experience good QoL and stay independent after colorectal cancer surgery. Predictors for failing to achieve these essential outcomes are now defined to guide patients' and families' preoperative counseling.
Asunto(s)
Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias del Recto , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Recuperación de la Función , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
Introduction: The group of elderly urological patients is growing. A majority of urological operations is performed in this group. The current model of preoperative assessment is developed to be effective in younger groups of patients but not in the elderly. Frailty syndrome has been confirmed to be an effective risk stratification tool in many surgical settings. It can be diagnosed using a variety of screening tools, but the only objective tool is comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). However it is time consuming, difficult and to our best knowledge, has not been attempted in Polish urological patients. Material and methods: We assessed the prevalence of frailty in elderly urological patients undergoing surgery due to malignancy using CGA and screening tests. A total of 68 patients over 65 years of age qualified to elective major urological surgery underwent the preoperative assessment including use of traditional tools (medical history, physical examination, ASA score), CGA and frailty-screening tests. The 30-day postoperative complications rate using the Clavien-Dindo scale was also evaluated. Results: The mean age of patients was 71 years. The most common procedures were radical prostatectomy (47.1%), radical nephrectomy (36.6%) and radical cystectomy (11.8%). The prevalence of frailty was 39.7% using CGA and 4.4-10.3% using screening tests. The complication rate was significantly higher in frail individuals when using CGA. Conclusions: Frailty is common in urological elderly patients. The CGA is a time-consuming but reliable tool to diagnose frailty syndrome and predict complications. Screening tests can be useful for selecting patients who should undergo CGA but their predictive value is low.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The pathological stage of the cancer and presence of postoperative complications are the most important predictors of survival in older oncologic patients. Therefore, determining biological age, and risks connected with it, should be the key factor in the preoperative assessment. It may be accomplished by using a Geriatric Assessment (GA). However, it is not established which components are most useful for predicting short- and long-term postoperative outcomes in cancer patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 334 consecutive cancer patients aged ≥70 years underwent elective abdominal surgery and were followed-up prospectively for 12 months. The preoperative GA consisted of eight domains: functional, physical activity, comorbidity, polypharmacotherapy, nutritional, cognition, mood, and social support. Logistic regression analyses were used to analyse the predictive ability. RESULTS: All components of GA were independent risk factors of 30-day major morbidity apart from ADL, BOMC, Polypharmacy (OR 0.6-1.3; p < 0.001). However, ADL, TUG, the polypharmacy and the MOS-SSS turned out to be significant predictors of 30-day mortality (OR 0.72-1.46; p < 0.001). In turn, only ADL, CDT and MOS-SSS were valid predictors of 12-months mortality (OR 0.46-0.85; p < 0.001). Frailty (surrogate of the biological age), not the chronological age, were also independent predictors of all outcomes (OR 4.71-8.56 p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Not the chronological age but components of GA and frailty are significant predictors of both 30-day postoperative outcome and 12-months mortality in older cancer patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery.
Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Neoplasias , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Neoplasias/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND This retrospective study included 103 patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma at a single center in Poland who underwent preoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and aimed to determine whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was an imaging marker for tumor invasion and regional lymph node involvement. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed primary staging magnetic resonance examinations of the rectum of 103 consecutive patients with histologically proven non-mucinous adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical treatment. In 85 patients, surgery was preceded by long-course chemoradiotherapy (n=18) or short-course radiotherapy (n=67). The following DWI parameters were measured: ADC mean, minimum, maximum, and standard deviation in the region of interest (ADC SD-in-ROI). Values were compared between subgroups based on histological parameters from the report: tumor stage, lymph node stage, differentiation grade, the presence of extranodal tumor deposits, angioinvasion, and perineural invasion. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the unilateral t test. RESULTS ADC mean values were lower for cases in which postoperative histopathological examination lymph node invasion (P=0.04) and tumor deposits were found (P=0.04). Minimal ADC value was higher in cases in which tumor deposits were not found (P=0.009). ADC SD-in-ROI values were lower in cases in which lymph nodes invasion was confirmed (P=0.014). There were no statistically significant differences for other parameters. CONCLUSIONS The ADC values in pre-treatment DWI in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma were correlated with tumor invasion and regional lymph node metastases. Therefore, ADC values from the pre-treatment MRI may help plan adjuvant therapy in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Recto/patología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Comorbidities may cause complications in perioperative care and affect treatment outcomes of older patients. The study aim was to analyse comorbidity burdens with respect to their predictive power in outcome prediction in elderly qualified for abdominal elective or emergency surgery. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing major abdominal surgery between 2010 and 2017 at a secondary referral hospital were included in the retrospective study, for a total of 1586 patients. To explain the relationship between the comorbidity types and 30-day mortality and morbidity logistic regression analysis was performed. Morbidity was assessed using the Clavien-Dindo Score. Major complications were defined as a C-D score ≥ 3. We also presented the data concerning need for reoperation and ICU admission. RESULTS: 85.9% of patients had at least one comorbidity. In the group of emergency patients age and number of comorbidities were independent risk factors of 30-day mortality and major morbidity. In elective patients age, dementia (OR:3.52; 95%CI:1.35-9.20) and kidney disease (OR:1.64; 95%CI:1.04-2.57) were found to be independent risk factors of 30-day postoperative mortality. Age (1.04; 95%CI:1.00-1.08) and heart disease (OR:1.30, 95%CI:1.04-1.63) were found to be independent risk factors of 30-day major morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing elective surgery 30-day mortality and morbidity was associated with age. 30-day mortality, but not morbidity was associated with kidney disease and dementia. 30-day morbidity, but not mortality, was associated with heart disease.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
<b>Introduction: </b>Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common disease that surgeons encounter in everyday clinical practice. It is most often easy to diagnose and treat. However, rare causes of bleeding can lead to delayed diagnosis and ineffective treatment. Dysfibrinogenemia is a qualitative fibrinogen disorder in which functional fibrinogen level is reduced with normal antigenic level. <br><b> Case report:</b> Herein we present the case of a 59-year-old female with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeds, that turned out to be an unusual manifestation of congenital dysfibrinogenemia. Detailed imaging and endoscopic diagnostics revealed portal hypertension with a non-bleeding 1-cm gastrointestinal stromal tumor and multiple angiodysplastic lesions in close proximity.
Asunto(s)
Afibrinogenemia/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Afibrinogenemia/complicaciones , Afibrinogenemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Fibrinógeno/análisis , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , HumanosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The population of older people is heterogeneous and constantly growing. Over 50% of urological operations are performed in elderly patients. Some elderly patients present with frailty syndrome - a state of increased vulnerability to external stressors resulting in increased risk of hospitalizations, adverse treatment outcomes and death. Currently, there is no widely accepted system of qualification and preparation for surgical treatment developed specifically for elderly patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched Medline/Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Libraries databases from 2000-2020 (week 5). The following medical subject headings (MeSH) terms were used to ensure the sensitivity of the searches: geriatric assessment, frailty, urology, and prehabilitation. Relevant articles were also identified through a manual search of the reference lists of potentially relevant articles. RESULTS: A total of 23 papers met the criteria and were included in the current study. Screening for frailty seems to be promising in predicting adverse outcomes, but frail patients should undergo detailed geriatric assessment (GA) which may indicate a need for preoperative intervention which can be unavailable during the hospitalization. The concept of prehabilitation is becoming increasingly discussed in thoracic and abdominal surgery, but only a few studies are available in the field of urology. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric assessment seems to be a valuable tool for urologists in daily clinical practice. A proper form of prehabilitation may provide enhanced recovery after surgery.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the ability of eight frailty screening scores to predict short- (30-day major morbidity and mortality), long-term outcomes (12-month mortality) and to compare their accuracy for predicting frailty among older patients with cancer undergoing elective abdominal surgery with curative intent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients aged ≥70 years were enrolled prospectively. The diagnostic performance of eight screening tests were evaluated: The Vulnerable Elderly Survey (VES-13), Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST), Geriatric 8 (G8), Groningen Frailty Index (GFI), abbreviated Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (aCGA), Rockwood, Balducci and Fried score. Frailty was defined based on the Geriatric Assessment (GA) with two (2ID) or three impaired domains (3ID). RESULTS: The study included 269 consecutive patients; median age 78 (range 70-94) years. The prevalence of frailty based on the reference GA was: 40.9% (2ID), 34.2% (3ID) and using screening tools 40-75.5%. The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting the postoperative outcome was: 0.58-0.75 (30-day morbidity), 0.54-0.71 (30-day mortality) and 0.59-0.74 (12-month mortality), respectively, being the highest for the G8. The AUC for the frailty screening tests was: 0.67-0.85 (at the 2ID) and 0.63-0.83 (at the 3ID), being the highest for the aCGA. CONCLUSION: The G8 was the best predictor of 30-day major morbidity, 30-day and 12-month mortality. It also had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value in frailty screening, in case of both frailty definitions. In turn, the aCGA had the highest discriminatory ability in terms of frailty screening.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , MortalidadRESUMEN
The elderly constitute the group of patients who most often undergo elective urological procedures, and they are at the highest risk of poor surgical outcomes because of comorbidity and frailty. The current model of qualification for surgery is often subjective and based on tools which do not address the characteristics of the elderly. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and screening tools can help in the evaluation of older, particularly frail patients. The aim of the study was to review the literature on the usefulness of preoperative geriatric evaluation in patients undergoing urological treatment. The review was based on MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library bibliographic databases from 2000-2017 for full-text, English-language publications meeting pre-defined criteria. Six prospective and 3 retrospective studies were selected for further analysis. The patient populations, methods of geriatric assessment, interventions, and outcome measures varied between the studies. None of the studies were randomized controlled trials. In 2 studies, the CGA was used; in other studies, rather basic screening tests were used. In only 2 studies, an intervention was performed after the CGA. In general, the variables of the CGA were both prospectively and retrospectively significant predictors of complications of urological surgery. Although the use of CGA is not a standard practice in everyday urological clinical practice, components of the CGA appear to be predictive of postoperative complications. Therefore, inclusion of geriatric assessment as part of routine preoperative care in geriatric urology patients should be considered. Because of the lack of randomized controlled trials on preoperative CGAs in urology patients, further studies are needed.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación Geriátrica , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos , Anciano , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Injury of the iliac vessels is a rare complication of lumbar spine surgery with potentially life-threatening consequences. We present 2 cases of iliac vessel injury that were treated with minimally invasive techniques. CASE DESCRIPTION: The first case was a laceration of the common iliac artery during a simple L4-L5 discectomy in which the injured artery was secured by stent implantation. The second case was an example of injury to the left iliac common vessel leading to acute lower limb ischemia and arteriovenous fistula formation after lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery. The patient was treated in 2 steps. First, a temporary femorofemoral bypass was implanted to revascularize the right lower limb. The second step involved stent implantation in the right common iliac artery to close the arteriovenous fistula. Both patients were treated without extensive laparotomy and had good clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This case series emphasizes the benefit of quick minimally invasive vascular repair available in multidisciplinary centers.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Adulto , Fístula Arteriovenosa/diagnóstico , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Arteria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/irrigación sanguínea , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several postoperative outcome scoring systems have been developed and validated, combining both pre- and intraoperative factors. Among others are the Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM), the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Stress (E-PASS) and the Surgical Apgar Score combined with the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (SASA). The aim of this study was to compare the above scoring systems in the prediction of 30-day postoperative outcome in older patients with cancer undergoing abdominal surgery. METHODS: Consecutive patients ≥70 years were prospectively enrolled. Pre- and intraoperative variables were used to calculate the scores, the ROC and perform logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 201 patients with a median age of 77 (range 70-93) years. The most common surgical procedure was for colorectal (75%), followed by gastric (10.4%) pancreas (7.0%), gall bladder (3.5%), small bowel (2.5%), and other (1.5%) types of cancer. All scores were independent predictors of 30-day postoperative mortality. In case of 30-day morbidity only SASA turned to be significant. The ROC curves were highly valid and area under the curve showed fair to good discriminatory ability (0.60-0.77) for 30-day postoperative mortality and fair (AUC 0.6) in case of SASA for the 30-day postoperative. CONCLUSION: The SASA, E-PASS, and P-POSSUM were confirmed to be predictive of 30-day postoperative mortality in older patients undergoing abdominal elective cancer surgery. Only SASA demonstrated as independent factor predicting postoperative 30-day major morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Indicadores de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
Background: In general, the three main options for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy are clips, endoscopic staplers and endoloops. However, there is no gold standard, especially regarding complicated acute appendicitis which is generally associated with worse outcomes.Objectives: We aimed to assess the outcomes of different stump closure techniques during laparoscopic appendectomies for complicated appendicitisMethods: Our multicenter observational study of 18 surgical units assessed the outcomes of 1269 laparoscopic appendectomies for complicated appendicitis that used the three main stump closure techniques: clips, staplers and endoloops. Groups were compared in terms of peri- and postoperative outcomes.Results: Staplers were superior in terms of overall morbidity (9.79 vs. 3.29% vs. 7.41%, p = .017) and length of stay (4 vs. 3 vs. 4 days, p < .001) respectively for clips, staplers and endoloops. However, no differences in major complication rates, postoperative intraabdominal abscess formation, reintervention rates and readmission rates were found.Conclusion: Although our results show some clinical benefits of staplers for appendix stump closure, they are based on a non-randomized group of patients and are therefore prone to selection bias. Further well-designed trials taking into consideration not only the clinical benefits, but also, the economic aspects of the surgical treatment of complicated acute appendicitis are needed to confirm our results.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas , Adulto , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polonia , Engrapadoras Quirúrgicas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
RESUMEN
Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for treatment of acute appendicitis has gained acceptance with its considerable benefits over open appendectomy. LA, however, can involve some adverse outcomes: morbidity, prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS) and hospital readmission. Identification of predictive factors may help to identify and tailor treatment for patients with higher risk of these adverse events. Our aim was to identify risk factors for serious morbidity, prolonged LOS and hospital readmission after LA. A database compiled information of patients admitted for acute appendicitis from eighteen Polish and German surgical centers. It included factors related to the patient characteristics, peri- and postoperative period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for serious perioperative complications, prolonged LOS, and hospital readmissions in acute appendicitis cases. 4618 laparoscopic appendectomy patients were included. First, although several risk factors for serious perioperative complications (C-D III-V) were found in the univariate analysis, in the multivariate model only the presence of intraoperative adverse events (OR 4.09, 95% CI 1.32-12.65, p = 0.014) and complicated appendicitis (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.74-7.61, p = 0.001) was statistically significant. Second, prolonged LOS was associated with the presence of complicated appendicitis (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.53-5.12, p = 0.001), postoperative morbidity (OR 5.01, 95% CI: 2.33-10.75, p < 0.001), conversions (OR 6.48, 95% CI: 3.48-12.08, p < 0.001) and reinterventions after primary procedure (OR 8.79, 95% CI: 3.2-24.14, p < 0.001) in the multivariate model. Third, although several risk factors for hospital readmissions were found in univariate analysis, in the multivariate model only the presence of postoperative complications (OR 10.33, 95% CI: 4.27-25.00), reintervention after primary procedure (OR 5.62, 95% CI: 2.17-14.54), and LA performed by resident (OR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.03-3.70) remained significant. Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure associated with low rates of complications, prolonged LOS, and readmissions. Risk factors for these adverse events include complicated appendicitis, postoperative morbidity, conversion, and re-intervention after the primary procedure. Any occurrence of these factors during treatment should alert the healthcare team to identify the patients that require more customized treatment to minimize the risk for adverse outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/efectos adversos , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Polonia/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Preoperative classification of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis (AA) is challenging. However, the differences in surgical outcomes necessitate the establishment of risk factors in developing, complicated AA. This study was an analysis of the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomies (LA), as well as preoperative risk factors for the development of complicated AA. METHODS: The data of 618 patients who underwent LA in 18 surgical units across Poland and Germany were collected in an online web-based database created by the Polish Videosurgery Society. The surgical outcomes of patients with complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis were compared. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression models were used to establish risk factors for the development of complicated appendicitis. RESULTS: In all, 1269 (27.5%) patients underwent LA for complicated appendicitis (Group 1) and 3349 (72.5%) for uncomplicated appendicitis (Group 2). The conversion rate, number of intra-operative adverse events, re-intervention rate, postoperative complications, and readmission rate was greater in Group 1. The preoperative risk factors associated with complicated appendicitis were: female sex (Odds ratio [OR]: 1.58), obesity (OR: 1.51), age >50 years (OR: 1.51), symptoms >48 hours (OR: 2.18), high Alvarado score (OR: 1.29 with every point), and C-reactive protein level >100 mg/L (OR: 3.92). CONCLUSION: Several demographic and clinical risk factors for complicated AA were identified. LA for complicated appendicitis was associated with poorer outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía , Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Apendicitis/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Polonia/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common surgical emergency and can occur at any age. Nearly all of the studies comparing outcomes of appendectomy between younger and older patients set cut-off point at 65 years. In this multicenter observational study, we aimed to compare laparoscopic appendectomy for AA in various groups of patients with particular interest in the elderly and very elderly in comparison to younger adults.Our multicenter observational study of 18 surgical units assessed the outcomes of 4618 laparoscopic appendectomies for AA. Patients were divided in 4 groups according to their age: Group 1-<40 years old; Group 2-between 40 and 64 years old; Group 3-between 65 and 74 years old; and Group 4-75 years old or older. Groups were compared in terms of peri- and postoperative outcomes.The ratio of complicated appendicitis grew with age (20.97% vs 37.50% vs 43.97% vs 56.84%, Pâ<â.001). Similarly, elderly patients more frequently suffered from perioperative complications (5.06% vs 9.3% vs 10.88% vs 13.68%, Pâ<â.001) and had the longest median length of stay (3 [Interquartile Range (IQR) 2-4] vs 3 [IQR 3-5], vs 4 [IQR 3-5], vs 5 [IQR 3-6], Pâ<â.001) as well as the rate of patients with prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS) >8 days. Logistic regression models comparing perioperative results of each of the 3 oldest groups compared with the youngest one showed significant differences in odds ratios of symptoms lasting >48âhours, presence of complicated appendicitis, perioperative morbidity, conversion rate, prolonged LOS (>8 days).The findings of this study confirm that the outcomes of laparoscopic approach to AA in different age groups are not the same regarding outcomes and the clinical picture. Older patients are at high risk both in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative period. The differences are visible already at the age of 40 years old. Since delayed diagnosis and postponed surgery result in the development of complicated appendicitis, more effort should be placed in improving treatment patterns for the elderly and their clinical outcome.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Apendicitis/cirugía , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Polonia/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The older population is very heterogeneous with regard to the co-morbidityand the physical reserve. This can result in unacceptably high postoperative complications rates. Therefore, the aim of the study was to review the literature regarding the outcomes of older patients treated for pancreatic cancer, including the usage of minimal invasive techniques. METHODOLOGY: A review of the literature was carried out including studies on pancreatic cancer in older patients published between 2011 and 2016. RESULTS: Seventeen retrospective studies were included. The total number of patients was 9981 with the age range of 65 years and more. Studies on surgical treatment alone (1.4%), neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment with or without surgery (89.4%) and palliative therapy (9.2%) were assessed separately. Appropriate comparison was diffcult due to the retrospective character and heterogeneity of the study population. Mortality was low, yet there was a great difference in morbidity ranging from some percent to even 100% of the study population. Long-term results were poor. CONCLUSIONS: The functional status, not the chronological age alone, is the factor limiting therapeutic options in older patients with pancreatic cancer.