Effectiveness and Safety of a Dermocosmetic Cream as an Adjunct to Adapalene for Mild and Moderate Acne in Indonesia: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study.

Purpose: Acne is a chronic inflammatory skin condition affecting mainly teenagers and adults as well. Guidelines recommend retinoids as a first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate acne. However, dermocosmetics in adjunct could potentially improve efficacy and tolerability. This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness and safety of a dermocosmetic cream containing salicylic acid, lipohydroxy acid, niacinamide, Aqua posae filiformis, procerad and zinc salt in the treatment of mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris in adjunct to different regimens of adapalene compared to adapalene only. Patients and Methods: This randomized, controlled, parallel-group, evaluator-blind study was conducted over 8 weeks on male and female acne subjects at five teaching hospitals in Indonesia. A total of 291 participants were enrolled and divided into three treatment groups: Group A adapalene 0.1% cream nightly - Group B dermocosmetic cream daily + adapalene 0.1% cream every two nights - Group C dermocosmetic cream daily + adapalene 0.1% cream nightly. Clinical evaluations of treatment included scoring on Global Evaluation of Acne (GEA) scale, lesion count (Indonesian Acne Expert Meeting scale), treatment tolerability and treatment satisfaction. Evaluations were performed on Day 28 and Day 56 of treatment. Results: After 28 and 56 days of treatment, all groups exhibited improvements across the various measures. Data analysis, utilizing Anova for repeated measurements, revealed a statistically significant difference between Groups C and A for reduction of GEA scores (p = 0.038) in favor of Group C. On Day 56, percentages of subjects with GEA Scale improvements of at least 1 grade in comparison with baseline were in Group C (61.7%) followed by Group A (47.9%) and Group B (45.3%). Better treatment tolerance and satisfaction scores were noted in Groups B and C. Conclusion: Combination of the dermocosmetic cream with adapalene showed higher efficacy, tolerability and satisfaction in comparison to adapalene alone.

Is Acne the Same Around the World?

Acne is a common skin disease associated with a range of sequelae. These include scarring and dyspigmentation, emotional and psychosocial disturbances, and occupational problems, in part because acne often manifests on the face, in addition to other body areas, and is highly visible. Worldwide, the prevalence of acne is estimated at 9.4 percent; it is most common in adolescents but also affects a relatively high proportion of adults. Early studies of acne epidemiology were conducted primarily in the United States and the United Kingdom. In more recent decades, data have been increasing for other areas of the world. There has also been more attention devoted to how acne may present and be managed in individuals with skin of color (i.e., the broad and diverse range of populations that self-identify as belonging to a non-White racial/ethnic group and share characteristics such as higher skin phototypes and propensity toward hyperpigmentation). This review seeks to highlight aspects of acne that may be unique to skin of color.

Evaluating the Frequency of Mole Checks by a Dermatologist and Correlated Variables in a Global Survey across 17 Countries: HELIOS Project.

Secondary prevention of skin cancer consists in early detection of malignant lesions through patients' mole self-examination and medical examination. The objective of this study was to assess the self-reported  frequency of mole examination in a large, representative sample of the adult general population of 17 countries from all continents. Of a total of 17,001 participants, 4.8% had their moles checked by a dermatologist more than once a year, 11.3% once a year, 8.4% every 2-3 years, 12.4% once in a while, 10.3% once in lifetime, and 52.6% of participants had never performed a mole examination. Egypt was the country with the highest prevalence of people who performed a moles check more than once a year (15.9%), followed by Brazil and the USA. A higher frequency of mole checks was associated with sex (man vs woman), higher education, higher income, fair phototype, history of skin cancer, medical insurance, and sun-protective behaviours. Despite recommendations by health providers, it appears that the frequency of mole checks in the general population is still low. It is necessary for dermatologists to keep informing at-risk populations about the importance of moles check, with particular care regarding categories that less frequently adhere to secondary prevention measures.

Evaluation of anticancer therapy-related dermatologic adverse events: Insights from Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System dataset.

BACKGROUND: New anticancer therapies have improved patient outcomes but associated dermatologic adverse events (AEs) may cause morbidity and treatment discontinuation. A comprehensive estimation of associations between cancer drugs and skin AEs is lacking. METHODS: This study utilized the Food and Drug Administartion (FDA)'s Adverse Event Reporting System database (January 2013-September 2022), with 3,399,830 reports involving 3084 drugs and 16,348 AEs. A nearest neighbor matching model was employed to select 10 controls for each case report, utilizing the cosine similarity of demographic and AE severity factors to minimize false positives/negatives. RESULTS: There were 10,698 unique anticancer drugs (n = 212) to skin AE (n = 873) pairs, of which 676 had significant reporting odds ratios (ROR) > 1, comprising 113 drugs and 144 AEs. The minimum ROR was 1.25, and 50% of associations displayed a ROR >10. The most common were rash (51 agents) and dry skin (28 drugs). Methotrexate induced the most distinct AEs (34), then mechlorethamine (33), and vemurafenib (24). Targeted therapies accounted for 49% of pairs, cytotoxic chemotherapies for 35.9%, and immunotherapies for 11%. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 113 anticancer drugs were identified as significantly associated with skin AEs, most frequently rash and dry skin. Data are likely under-reported but enable quick postmarketing identification of skin toxicity signals.

Management of Skin Toxicities in Cancer Treatment: An Australian/New Zealand Perspective.

Cancer systemic therapeutics and radiotherapy are often associated with dermatological toxicities that may reduce patients' quality of life and impact their course of cancer treatment. These toxicities cover a wide range of conditions that can be complex to manage with increasing severity. This review provides details on twelve common dermatological toxicities encountered during cancer treatment and offers measures for their prevention and management, particularly in the Australian/New Zealand context where skincare requirements may differ to other regions due to higher cumulative sun damage caused by high ambient ultraviolet (UV) light exposure. Given the frequency of these dermatological toxicities, a proactive phase is envisaged where patients can actively try to prevent skin toxicities.

Randomised, split-face study of a dermocosmetic cream containing Sphingobioma xenophaga extract and Neurosensine® in subjects with rosacea associated with erythema and sensitive skin.

INTRODUCTION: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin condition associated with erythema, inflammation and skin sensitivity. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefit of a dermocosmetic cream (DC cream) containing Sphingobioma xenophaga extract and soothing agent in adult females with rosacea-associated erythema and sensitive skin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During phase 1, DC was applied twice daily on the randomized half-face and compared to usual-skincare (USC) for 28 days. During phase 2, DC was applied on the full face twice daily for 56 days. Clinical, instrumental and skin sensitivity assessments were performed at all visits; demodex density (standardized skin surface biopsy (SSSB) method) was performed at baseline and D28, quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the stigmatization questionnaire (SQ), Rosacea Quality of Life index (ROSAQoL) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at baseline and D84. RESULTS: At D28, a significant benefit of DC over USC was observed for erythema, tightness, burning and stinging (all p ≤ 0.05), erythema measured by chromameter (p < 0.01), corneometry and transepidermal water loss (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively), skin sensitivity (p < 0.001) and significant reduction of mean demodex density (p < 0.05) on the DC side. At D84, DC significantly (all p < 0.05) improved clinical signs and symptoms on both sides of the face compared to baseline; SQ, ROSAQoL and DLQI scores improved by 40.4%, 25.0% and 55.7%, respectively compared to baseline. Tolerance was excellent. CONCLUSION: DC significantly improved erythema, skin sensitivity, demodex count, QoL and feeling of stigmatization of subjects with rosacea and is very well tolerated.

Inferring skin-brain-skin connections from infodemiology data using dynamic Bayesian networks.

The relationship between skin diseases and mental illnesses has been extensively studied using cross-sectional epidemiological data. Typically, such data can only measure association (rather than causation) and include only a subset of the diseases we may be interested in. In this paper, we complement the evidence from such analyses by learning an overarching causal network model over twelve health conditions from the Google Search Trends Symptoms public data set. We learned the causal network model using a dynamic Bayesian network, which can represent both cyclic and acyclic causal relationships, is easy to interpret and accounts for the spatio-temporal trends in the data in a probabilistically rigorous way. The causal network confirms a large number of cyclic relationships between the selected health conditions and the interplay between skin and mental diseases. For acne, we observe a cyclic relationship with anxiety and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and an indirect relationship with depression through sleep disorders. For dermatitis, we observe directed links to anxiety, depression and sleep disorders and a cyclic relationship with ADHD. We also observe a link between dermatitis and ADHD and a cyclic relationship between acne and ADHD. Furthermore, the network includes several direct connections between sleep disorders and other health conditions, highlighting the impact of the former on the overall health and well-being of the patient. The average R 2 for a condition given the values of all conditions in the previous week is 0.67: in particular, 0.42 for acne, 0.85 for asthma, 0.58 for ADHD, 0.87 for burn, 0.76 for erectile dysfunction, 0.88 for scars, 0.57 for alcohol disorders, 0.57 for anxiety, 0.53 for depression, 0.74 for dermatitis, 0.60 for sleep disorders and 0.66 for obesity. Mapping disease interplay, indirect relationships, and the key role of mediators, such as sleep disorders, will allow healthcare professionals to address disease management holistically and more effectively. Even if we consider all skin and mental diseases jointly, each disease subnetwork is unique, allowing for more targeted interventions.

INDIVIDUAL ARTICLE: Efficacy of a Prebiotic Skincare Regimen on Improving Mild Atopic Dermatitis and Severe Xerosis in Diverse Ethnically Patients.

Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease associated with a significant patient burden on quality-of-life. Given skin barrier including skin microbiome changes are linked to AD pathogenesis, prebiotic emollients are shown to improve disease symptoms and maintain skin barrier integrity, normalizing skin microbiota. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a prebiotic skincare routine in improving AD and xerosis, and ultimately quality-of-life in ethnically diverse patients. A total of 140 subjects from different racial/ethnic backgrounds, aged 3-80 years old with skin phototypes I-VI, and presenting with mild-AD or severe xerosis completed study. Expert grading, instrumentation, self-assessment questionnaires, plus clinical imaging demonstrated that a prebiotic cleanser and moisturizer routine significantly reduced skin conditions severity, strengthened skin barrier properties in both lesional and normal skin, and improved patients' quality-of-life while providing itch relief as soon as 4 weeks. The results of this research indicate that a prebiotic cleanser and moisturizer regimen offers benefits for diverse patient’s daily skincare routine by effectively managing AD and xerosis severity and symptoms, normalizing skin microbiota, plus preserving skin barrier integrity to prevent long-term sequelae. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23:3(Suppl 2):s12-22.

Efficacy and safety of a cream containing panthenol, prebiotics, and probiotic lysate for improving sensitive skin symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Sensitive skin is a common condition affecting a significant proportion of the population, and there is a growing demand for effective and safe management. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a cream containing panthenol, prebiotics, and probiotic lysate as an optimal care for facial sensitive skin. METHODS: A total of 110 participants (64 in group A and 46 in group B) with facial sensitive skin applied the cream twice daily for 28 days. Group A evaluated their sensitive skin, product efficacy, and product use experience at D0 (15 min), D1, D14, and D28. In group B, skin barrier function-related indicators were measured at baseline and on D1, D7, D14, and D28. Dermatologists evaluated tolerance for all participants. RESULTS: After 28 days of use, in group A, 100% of participants reported mildness and comfort with product use. Participants demonstrated significant improvements in skin barrier function-related indicators, including increased stratum corneum moisture content, reduced erythema index, elevated sebum content, decreased trans-epidermal water loss, and diminished skin redness parameter a* value (all p < 0.05). Dermatologist evaluations revealed excellent tolerance among all participants. CONCLUSION: The panthenol-enriched cream with prebiotics and probiotic lysate exhibited substantial clinical efficacy in ameliorating facial sensitive skin conditions, coupled with a high safety profile.

Awareness of sun exposure risks and photoprotection for preventing pigmentary disorders in Asian populations: Survey results from three Asian countries and expert panel recommendations.

BACKGROUND: In this article, we review and discuss the photoprotection behavior of Asians based on the literature, along with a subanalysis of an original online survey, and make recommendations to optimize photoprotection for Asian populations to prevent photoaging and pigmentary disorders. METHODS: An international panel of eight dermatologists from Asia (China, Korea, Japan, Singapore, Indonesia, and Vietnam) met to discuss sunscreen photoprotection for Asian patients. Additionally, a subanalysis of an online survey by 3000 respondents from three Asian countries (China, Indonesia, and Japan) investigated general public awareness and attitudes to sun exposure. RESULTS: A pre-meeting survey of the eight experts from Asia showed key concerns of Asian patients consulting dermatologists are pigmentary disorders, especially actinic/senile lentigo, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, melasma, vitiligo, and Hori's nevus. The survey subanalysis of participants from China, Indonesia, and Japan with predominantly Fitzpatrick skin types (FST) II to IV revealed that they are particularly concerned about sun exposure causing photoaging and pigmentary disorders. Most of the respondents indicated they have limited knowledge on sunlight radiation and appropriate sunscreen protection factors. Only 22%, 13%, and 3% for China, Indonesia, and Japan, respectively, systematically use multiple protective measures (using sunscreen, avoiding midday sun, staying in the shade, wearing a hat, protective clothing, and sunglasses) when exposed to the sun. CONCLUSIONS: Further education is needed for Asian populations on the importance of comprehensive daily photoprotection, including broad-spectrum sunscreen, with high UVA and visible light protection, to reduce and prevent photoaging and pigmentary disorders.

Efficacy of a multitargeted, salicylic acid-based dermocosmetic cream compared to benzoyl peroxide 5% in Acne vulgaris: Results from a randomized study.

INTRODUCTION: Acne vulgaris (acne) is characterized by both inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions. Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 5% is approved to treat acne but may cause skin irritation and/or contact allergy. OBJECTIVES: To compare the benefit in acne of a multitargeted dermocosmetic cream containing salicylic acid, lipohydroxy acid, niacinamide, 2-oleamido-1,3-octadecanediol, piroctone olamine, zinc, Aqua posae filiformis, and thermal spring water (DC-Eff) to BPO 5% gel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 150 Caucasian subjects (50% female) aged between 18 and 40 years, with mild to moderate acne according to the GEA (Global Evaluation of Acne) grading system were randomized into two parallel groups (DC-Eff or BPO to be applied twice daily for 56 days). IGA (investigator global assessment), GEA, lesion count, clinical signs and symptoms, and subject assessment were evaluated at baseline, and after 28 and 56 days (D28 and D56) of treatment. RESULTS: The responder analyses of the IGA and GEA scores showed that 62.2% and 47.3%, respectively, in the DC-Eff, compared with 50.0% and 36.5%, respectively, in the BPO, had improved by at least one point at D56. Inflammatory, non-inflammatory, and total lesion counts significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased with both products from baseline, with no between-group difference. Subjects considered that their skin was smoother and that DC-Eff was easy to apply. DC-Eff was better tolerated than BPO. CONCLUSIONS: DC-Eff applied twice daily is as beneficial as BPO in improving mild-to-moderate acne. DC-Eff was better tolerated than BPO and highly appreciated.

A dermocosmetic regimen is able to mitigate skin sensitivity induced by a retinoid-based fixed combination treatment for acne: Results of a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Topical retinoids cause retinoid-induced skin discomfort (RISD) mainly during the first weeks of use leading to noncompliance and premature treatment discontinuation. A dermocosmetic (DC) may help to reduce treatment-related signs and symptoms and improve adherence. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefit of a DC regimen compared to a routine skin care regimen (RC) by reducing RISD signs and symptoms induced by a retinoid/benzoyl peroxide fixed-drug combination in subjects with acne. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Double-blind, randomized, comparative study in subjects ≥16 years with mild to moderate acne candidates to a topical adapalene/BPO fixed drug combination (A/BPO). Evaluations took place at Day 0, 7, 14, 28, and 84 and included erythema, desquamation, burning, itching and stinging and RISD (SD, a composite score of local treatment-related signs and symptoms and acne severity. Subjects used daily the DC or RC together with the fixed combination for 84 days. RESULTS: Eighty-eight subjects were included, the mean age was 21 years; 84% were females. At Day 0 the SD score was 0.8 in both groups. A statistically significant difference in terms of skin sensitivity with DC compared to RC (1.6 points, vs. 2.4 points p < 0.05) was observed at Day 14. Clinical sign and symptom scores were more reduced with DC than with RC at all time points. Acne severity improved in both groups. CONCLUSION: DC significantly reduces A/BPO-related RISD compared to RC, especially during the first 14 days of treatment, without interfering with the clinical efficacy of the treatment, thus helping to maintain treatment adherence.

A Salicylic Acid-Based Dermocosmetic is Effective as an Adjunct to Benzoyl Peroxide for Mild to Moderate Acne and as Monotherapy in Maintenance Post Benzoyl Peroxide.

BACKGROUND: A dermocosmetic (DC) containing salicylic acid, niacinamide, and thermal spring water has been developed for the management of mild to moderate acne. AIM: To assess the efficacy of DC as an adjunct to benzoyl peroxide (BPO) every other day compared with BPO over 3 months, and its efficacy as maintenance post-BPO care compared with vehicle for another 3 months. METHODS: Single-center, randomized, double-blind study in 100 patients with mild to moderate facial acne according to the Global Acne Severity (GEA) Scale. During phase 1, subjects received either BPO + vehicle (vehicle group) or BPO + DC (DC group) for 12 weeks. During phase 2, patients were re-randomized to receive either the vehicle or the DC for 12 weeks. Assessments included inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count, acne severity using the GEA Scale, local tolerance, quality of life, and quantity of product used. RESULTS: During phase 1, both groups, DC and vehicle, reached the same level of efficacy at month 3, although the quantity of BPO used was significantly reduced in the DC group (P=0.0001). During phase 2, acne continued to significantly improve (all P<0.05) in the DC group, as did clinical signs and symptoms; while patients randomized to vehicle reported relapses of their acne and related symptoms. CONCLUSION: The use of DC significantly reduces the need for BPO with no impact on the efficacy of mild to moderate acne. The use of DC as a maintenance post-BPO allowed a significant reduction of acne relapse compared with vehicle after 3 months of follow-up, with a good tolerance. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):1172-1177. doi:10.36849/JDD.7449R1.

The role of dermocosmetics in the management of cancer-related skin toxicities: international expert consensus.

Skin toxicities are very common in patients undergoing cancer treatment and have been found to occur with all types of cancer therapeutic interventions (cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy). Further, skin toxicities can lead to interruption or even discontinuation of anticancer treatment in some patients, translating to suboptimal outcomes. Dermocosmetics (or cosmeceuticals)-defined as skincare solutions incorporating dermatologically active ingredients (beyond vehicle effects) that directly improve symptoms of various skin conditions-are increasingly being used in cancer care to prevent and manage skin toxicities. The active ingredients in these products have a measurable biological action in skin; they typically improve skin integrity (barrier function/hydration and other factors) while relieving skin symptoms. The Association Francophone des Soins Oncologiques de Support (AFSOS) and Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) partnered to select a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients with cancer and skin toxicities. The group reviewed existing literature and created a summary of recommendations for managing these toxicities through online meetings and communication. In this publication, the group (1) reviews new skin toxicities seen with oncology drugs and (2) evaluates the role of dermocosmetics in improving patient outcomes and minimizing cancer treatment interruptions. We provide general recommendations for initiation and selection of skin care in all oncology patients as well as recommendations for what factors should be considered when using dermocosmetics in specific types of skin toxicities.

Development of actinic lentigines due to multiple sub-erythemal exposure to UVA1 radiation in Asian skin.

The appearance of actinic lentigines mainly found on face, back of the hands, upper back and décolleté is associated with chronic sun exposure. However, there is no study looking at the role of long UVA specifically in the development of actinic lentigines. This study was conducted in 20 Japanese adult women exposed on the upper back area three times per week for 6 weeks to incremental sub-erythemal UVA1 doses (5 J/cm2 at weeks 1 and 2, 10 J/cm2 at weeks 3 and 4 and 15 J/cm2 at weeks 5 and 6). Clinical assessment, performed on day 0 (before any exposure), and on days 14, 28 and 42, included the evaluation of skin pigmentation (pigmented spots), chromametry of the pigmented skin lesions and measurement of dyschromy. The number of pigmented spots and uniformity of the skin's pigmentation were clearly increased in comparison with baseline, statistical significance of the difference (p < 0.05) being reached at D 28 and D 42 in both cases. In conclusion, repeated sub-erythemal UVA1 exposure induces the development of actinic lentigines. Thus, a suitable protection including long UVA coverage is also needed to prevent from the damages induced by low, sub-erythemal doses of UV exposure.