Progression of infantile scoliosis after thoracotomy and sternotomy for the treatment of congenital cardiac abnormalities.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the rate of progression of scoliosis is higher following thoracotomies and sternotomies in children. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective review of 1744 patients from a tertiary paediatric referral unit who had sternotomies or thoracotomies from 2005 to 2010 to identify those with scoliosis and to determine where possible, the pre- and post-operative rate of scoliosis progression. A secondary objective was to assess the risk factors for progression after surgery through Chi-square analysis. RESULTS: 1419/1744 (81.4%) patients (55% M, 45% F) had post-op chest X-rays. 25% had a thoracotomy, and 75% had a sternotomy. 5.8% had scoliosis at their most recent chest X-ray (mean Cobb angle 20° (range 11-63°)). There was no significant difference for rates of scoliosis for those who had sternotomies vs thoracotomies (6.3% vs. 4.6% P = 0.258) but a significant difference for those who had primary vs revision sternotomies (5.1% vs. 9.9% P = 0.008). Pre- and post-op progression calculations were possible in 30 patients. The mean time from surgery to the start of the progression was 12 months (range 0-93 months). There was no significant difference between the rates of progression pre-op vs post-op: 1.0 vs. 0.5 deg/month, P = 0.228. There was no significant difference between the rates of post-op progression for those who had a sternotomy versus a thoracotomy (0.5 vs. 0.5 deg/month P = 0.503). CONCLUSION: Thoracotomies and sternotomies do not appear to increase the rate of progression of scoliosis in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Radiographs illustrating scoliosis progression.

Biomechanical comparison of 3 types of transdiscal fixation implants for fixing high-grade L5/S1 spine spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There are several options for the stabilization of high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis including transdiscal screws, the Bohlman technique (transdiscal fibular strut) and the modified Bohlman technique (transdiscal titanium mesh cage). The choice of an optimum construct remains controversial; therefore, we endeavoured to study and compare the biomechanical performance of these 3 techniques. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare 3 types of transdiscal fixation biomechanically in an in vitro porcine lumbar-sacral spine model. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Porcine cadaveric biomechanical study. METHODS: 18 complete lumbar-sacral porcine spines were split into 3 repair groups, transdiscal screws (TS), Bohlman technique, and a modified Bohlman technique (MBT). Range of motion (L3 - S1) was measured in an intact and repaired state for flexion, extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right torsion. To recreate a high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis a bilateral L5/S1 facetectomy, removing the intervertebral disc completely, and the L5 body was displaced 50%-60% over the sacral promontory. Results were analyzed and compared to intact baseline measurements. Standard quasi-static moments (5 Nm) were applied in all modes. RESULTS: All range of motion (ROM) were in reference to intact baseline values. TS had the lowest ROM in all modes (p=.006-.495). Statistical difference was found only in extension for TS vs. BT (p=.011) and TS vs. MBT (p=.014). No bone or implant failures occurred. CONCLUSION: TS provided the lowest ROM in all modes of loading compared to Bohlman technique and MBT. Our study indicates that TS results in the most biomechanically stable construct. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Knowledge of the biomechanical attributes of various constructs could aid physicians in choosing a surgical construct for their patients.

Injection versus Decompression for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome-Pilot trial (INDICATE-P)-protocol for a randomised feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the commonest peripheral nerve disorder in the UK, with over 52,996 carpal tunnel decompressions performed in 2011. By 2030, this figure is estimated to double. Whilst evidence supports conservative measures for mild symptoms, and early surgery for severe symptoms, controversy remains over the most appropriate management for patients that present with moderate disease, with regard to early surgery or late surgery following steroid injection. Injection versus Decompression for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome-Pilot trial (INDICATE-P) is a feasibility study for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (INDICATE) to determine whether patients over the age of 18 with moderate CTS should undergo early surgical decompression of the median nerve or a single steroid injection (followed by later surgery if required). METHODS/DESIGN: INDICATE-P is a feasibility study for an open (non-blinded) randomised controlled pilot trial. Eligible participants will be adults with a clinical diagnosis of moderate CTS. This is defined as symptoms disturbing sleep or restricting activities of daily living or work, despite a 2-week trial of night splints. Participants will be randomised to one of two possible interventions: surgical decompression or a single steroid injection (followed by surgery later if required). Clinical outcome measures will be captured by postal questionnaire at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-randomisation. In order to improve the study design for the main INDICATE trial, feasibility data will also be collected to identify difficulties in recruitment and retention, to gain patient feedback on questionnaires and to confirm the suitability of the proposed outcome measures. DISCUSSION: The INDICATE-P feasibility study will contribute to the design and execution of the INDICATE trial, which will seek to assess the safety and effectiveness of two approaches to treatment for patients over 18 years of age with moderate CTS: early carpal tunnel decompression or a single steroid injection (followed by later surgery).

Challenges to the orthopaedic arthroplasty enhanced recovery programme.

We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty on an enhanced recovery programme, to identify pre- and postoperative factors contributing to an increased length of hospital stay. Of 109 patients, only 61 (56%) were ready for discharge on the fifth postoperative day. The three most common reasons for delays were oozing wounds, postoperative medical problems and failure to reach physiotherapy goals.

Barriers to becoming a female surgeon and the influence of female surgical role models.

OBJECTIVES: We aim to investigate the reasons that medical students and junior doctors who are women are less likely to pursue a career in surgery compared with their male counterparts. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to female final year medical students and female junior doctors in two UK hospitals between August and September 2012. Topics included career choice, attitudes to surgery, recognition of female surgical role models and perceived sexual discrimination. RESULTS: 50 medical students and 50 junior doctors were given our survey. We received a 96% response rate; 46 medical students and 50 junior doctors. 6/50 (12%) junior doctors planned a career in surgery compared with 14/46 (30%) medical students. 'Work-life balance' was the main reason cited for not wishing to pursue surgery (29/46 (63%) medical students and 25/50 (50%) junior doctors). 28/46 (61%) medical students and 28/50 (56%) junior doctors had encountered a female surgical role model; only five students and two junior doctors felt that these were influential in their career decision. Of those who had not, approximately 40% in each group felt that if they had, they may have considered surgery. Approximately 30% in each group had encountered female surgeons that had dissuaded them from a surgical career. CONCLUSIONS: Work-life balance is still cited by female junior doctors as being the main deterrent to a surgical career. The paucity of female role models and some perceived sexual discrimination may cause female doctors to discount surgery as a career.

The role of arthroscopy in the treatment of functional instability of the ankle.

BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains are common, the majority resolving with functional rehabilitation. Some patients are left with symptoms of functional instability (FI). Ankle arthroscopy in those with symptoms of FI is not well covered in the literature. Our aim was to assess its role in FI of the ankle. METHODS: Retrospective case note analysis of patients with FI following an ankle sprain from 2005 to 2007. All underwent arthroscopy, provided mechanical instability was excluded (EUA and stress X-rays), and there were no signs of soft tissue impingement. These patients had exhausted all options of conservative therapy. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients with a mean age of 38.1: five had true mechanical instability and were excluded. 72 underwent arthroscopy: 67 (93.1%) had significant amounts of scar tissue needing debridement, most commonly in the antero-lateral corner (58.3%). 52 patients improved (72.2%) at a minimum of 6 months follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the role of ankle arthroscopy in the treatment of FI following trauma. It should be considered when conservative measures have failed.

Time delay between diagnosis and arthroscopic lavage in septic arthritis. Does it matter?

PURPOSE: Septic arthritis is a life-threatening emergency with high mortality of up to 11 %. We investigated if delay of arthroscopic lavage of infected major joints would have a bearing on the mortality and morbidity such as admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients presenting with septic arthritis to two regional hospitals over a period of seven years from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2011. We divided our sample of 82 patients into four groups based on the time delay between clinical diagnosis and arthroscopic lavage ranging from less than six hours to more than 24 hours. RESULTS: We determined that 35.4 % of patients had prosthetic joints. Knee joints were predominantly involved (74.4 %). Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated pathogen (41.5 %). There were ten (12.2 %) deaths and the same number of admissions to an ICU. Our study revealed there was no statistical significance between the time delay and mortality (P = 0.25) or ICU admission (P = 0.74) or the number of washouts (P = 0.08) in all four groups. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 48 hours delayed arthroscopic lavage for septic arthritis does not increase the risk of mortality. Further prospective large sample studies are recommended to investigate this and the risk of long-term morbidity.

Prospective outcome assessment of the therapeutic benefits of arthroscopy and arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint.

Patients who fail to respond to routine conservative measures to treat pain, restriction, and locking in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) may have therapeutic arthroscopy or arthrocentesis, both of which are associated with symptomatic improvement in 86% of patients. To our knowledge there are no current data on improvements in mouth opening and lateral deviations after these procedures. This prospective audit includes 244 patients treated between 2005 and 2010 from one surgeon's practice, who were followed up at least once at 6 weeks after arthroscopy or arthrocentesis. They had various conditions but all had tender joints. Measurements of interincisal opening, left and right lateral excursions, and protrusion were taken before and during operation with callipers (mm). Opening and pain scores were also recorded on 10 cm analogue scales before operation and at 6 weeks. Pain scores improved with intervention from a mean score of 37.1-16.1 (range 0-100). The improvement in mouth opening ranged from 0 to 78% (as some patients had locking or pain with normal opening before operation), and 86% had improved enough to be discharged at 6 weeks. Temporary forehead weakness in two patients resolved within the timescale of the study. The study shows improvements in mouth opening, and confirms that pain scores can be improved after arthroscopy or arthrocentesis when conservative approaches have failed. In the hands of a skilled practitioner, arthroscopy can be a useful diagnostic and therapeutic adjunct, which can be used repeatedly with low morbidity.

Claustrophobia: a proxy for psychological distress in patients with back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the levels of psychological distress in patients with back pain who expressed claustrophobia at the time of their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, compared with sex and age-matched normal controls who did not exhibit claustrophobia. The secondary aim was to document the level of disability and intervention rates in this group. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Psychosocial factors influence the outcomes of low back pain treatment with psychological distress being associated with poorer surgical outcomes in patients with low back pain. Up to 14% of patients experience claustrophobia during MRI scans requiring sedation to complete the scan. The effect of claustrophobia on back pain disability and outcomes has not been previously reported. METHODS: Twenty females and 13 males all requiring MRI scan under sedation for claustrophobia (group 1) were compared with an age and sex-matched cohort that had MRI scan without sedation (group 2). Both groups were drawn from a chronic back clinic. Average age in both groups was 54 years (range, 27 to 79 y). Both groups had standard conservative therapy, together with psychometric evaluation: Zung Depression Index and Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire. Disability was measured by Oswestry Disability Index. Primary outcome measures were intervention rates (surgery, injections, and physiotherapy sessions) and prevalence of psychological distress. RESULTS: Mean Zung Depression Index in group 1 was significantly higher than in group 2 (59.5 vs. 28.9, P<0.05) as was the mean Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire score (13.3 vs. 9.2, P<0.05.) Prevalence of psychological distress was higher in group 1 (75.8% vs. 18.2%, P<0.05). Oswestry Disability Index was the same in both groups (50% vs. 48%). Group 1 had 13 interventions (13 patients=39.4%) compared with 26 in group 2 (26 patients=78.8%) (P< 0.05). Twenty-two patients (66.7%) in group 1 were discharged after their MRI scan with no intervention compared with 7 patients (21.2%) in group 2 (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Claustrophobic patients with back pain showed higher levels of depression than nonclaustrophobic patients, with a higher rate of psychological distress. Disability, however, was not higher. The majority of claustrophobic patients did not require surgical intervention. The reasons for this are unclear and require further investigation. Claustrophobia requiring sedation for MRI scans may be a proxy for psychological distress in these patients and psychometric testing is advised during assessment to help with surgical decision making.

Scarf-Akin osteotomy correction for hallux valgus: short-term results from a district general hospital.

This study assessed the radiological measurements, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and patient satisfaction associated with performance of the scarf osteotomy, combined with an Akin osteotomy, for the treatment of hallux valgus in patients at a general hospital. Thirty-five patients were assessed before surgery, and at 6 months following performance of the scarf first metatarsal osteotomy plus Akin osteotomy. The mean first intermetatarsal and hallux abductus angles reduced from 14.1 degrees +/- 3.5 degrees to 10.0 degrees +/- 3.2 degrees and 32.1 degrees +/- 9.9 degrees to 16.4 degrees +/- 7.9 degrees , respectively, and these differences were statistically significant (P < .001). The mean first to second metatarsal sagittal plane length ratio was unchanged by the osteotomy (P > .05). The mean global AOFAS Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal score increased from 58.8 +/- 11.6 to 86.4 +/- 11.6, and this difference was statistically significant (P < .0001). Of the 35 patients (36 operated feet), 20 (57.1%) were extremely satisfied, 10 (28.6%) were satisfied, and 5 (14.3%) were unsatisfied with the results of the surgery. Based on these results, we concluded that the improved radiographic angles and AOFAS scores observed in this study were comparable to previously reported results, and our findings indicated that, in the setting of a general hospital, the scarf osteotomy combined with the Akin osteotomy is a safe, versatile and useful procedure for the treatment of hallux valgus.

Sharps injury reporting amongst surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of sharps injury reporting amongst surgeons. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 164 surgeons completed a questionnaire on the reporting of sharps injuries, on the reasons for not reporting and their practise of universal precautions. RESULTS: Out of 164 surgeons, only 25.8% had reported all their injuries, 22.5% had reported some and 51.7% had reported none. The top three reasons for not reporting their injuries included perception of low risk of transmission, not being concerned and no time. Of the respondents, 15.9% practised all three universal precautions of double-gloving, face shields and hands-free technique. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that despite local trust adherence to Department of Health policy, sharps injury reporting rates are inadequate. Further investment into healthcare worker education as well as a facilitation of the process of reporting may be necessary to improve reporting rates.