[Smoking Behaviour after Partial Resection of the Larynx: The Role of Causal Attribution]. / Rauchverhalten von Krebspatienten nach Kehlkopfteilresektion: Welche Bedeutung hat die Kausalattribution?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to examine how different causal attributions in patients with laryngeal cancer are associated with smoking behaviours (smoking cessation rates and amount of cigarettes per day) after partial resection of the larynx. METHODS: Multicentre prospective cohort study including 4 interviews: between diagnosis and partial resection of larynx (t1), one week (t2), 3 months (t3) and 12 months (t4) after surgery. Presented in this study are t1 and t4. A total of 134 patients (mean age 62 years, 93% male) were interviewed at t1 and t4 between 2007 and 2013. Key items were causal attribution as well as previous and current smoking behaviour. Patients were grouped according to the subjectively stated causal attribution. Results were analysed descriptively and group as well as mean value comparisons were conducted. RESULTS: Smoking was the most commonly stated causal attribution (43.3%). The quantity of cigarettes decreased significantly by about 6 cigarettes from 17 (range 3-40) to 11 (range 2-30) cigarettes per day in this group (p=0.001). 25% of patients did not recognize a reason for their illness. In longitudinal analyses of all groups of different causal attributions, there was a non-significant decrease in the percentage of smokers. CONCLUSION: We show that causal attribution does not affect smoking cessation rate significantly in a positive way. But active smokers after PRL reduce their quantity of cigarettes per day significantly. This impact is more noticeable in patients who were able to define a causal attribution. Psycho-oncological care, information services and smoking cessation programs could contribute to this effect by making the causal attribution a subject of discussion.

Effects of Finding the Speech-Language Pathologist Likeable on Postlaryngectomy Speech Intelligibility Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) work with patients after total laryngectomy (TL) to regain verbal communication. The influence of the quality of the therapeutic relationship on the success of TL voice rehabilitation in terms of speech intelligibility is not known. Finding each other likeable is an important factor in establishing and maintaining interpersonal relationships in everyday life. The fit of therapist and client is relevant to the therapeutic relationship. The purpose of this study therefore was to assess the association between the degree of SLPs' likeability ratings and postlaryngectomy speech intelligibility. METHODS: In a multicentre prospective cohort study, participants rated their SLPs' likeability after finishing TL rehabilitation. Speech intelligibility was measured objectively with the Post-Laryngectomy Telephone Intelligibility Test and subjectively with the Questionnaire for Adjustment after Laryngectomy. The association of SLPs' likeability with speech intelligibility was analysed using hierarchical logistic regression, expressed with odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Altogether 124 patients from 13 institutions participated. The degree of finding the SLP likeable was not significantly associated with objective speech intelligibility (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.78-2.18; p = 0.32) or subjective speech intelligibility (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.60-1.72; p = 0.96) after controlling for age, sex and education factors. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: In this patient cohort, there was no evidence for an association between ratings of SLPs' likeability and speech intelligibility outcomes after rehabilitation. Future studies could consider the use of alternative instruments for measuring likeability.

[Speech Intelligibility and Marital Quality in Couples after Total Laryngectomy - Partners' View]. / Sprechverständlichkeit und Partnerschaftsqualität bei Paaren nach einer Laryngektomie ­ Die Sicht der Partner.

BACKGROUND: Following the total removal of the larynx (TL) as a result of laryngeal cancer, both, patients and partners face significant challenges caused by altered speech intelligibility. We analysed effects of the altered speech intelligibility on dyadic communication and marital quality from the partners' point of view. METHODS: 70 partners of cancer patients with laryngectomy from 13 hospitals in Central Germany were interviewed 2 (t1) and 3 (t2) years after laryngectomy. Partners were administered a battery of questionnaires to assess speech intelligibility, coping with altered speech intelligibility and post-laryngectomy dyadic communication pattern. Hahlwegs Partnership Questionnaire (PFB) was used to analyse martial quality. Patients with laryngectomy completed Post-Laryngektomie-Telefonverständlichkeits-Test (PLTT) to measure speech intelligibility. RESULTS: Speech intelligibility was classified by partners as 'good' in 37% (t1) and 57% (t2). Female partners did not generally indicate an increased dispute behavior, compared with woman in general. However, dyadic communication and mutual activities were less satisfactory. Partners of aphonic patients argued more frequently, coped less adequately with the altered dyadic communication and perceived more frequently a decline in marital quality since the onset of the disease. CONCLUSION: Results indicate need and importance of logopaedic support also with respect to marital quality. Further, interventions which emphasize the improvement of dyadic communication and enhancement of mutual activities should be stimulated.

Multicenter prospective study on the use and outcome of rehabilitation after total laryngectomy in Germany.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the use and outcome of rehabilitation after total laryngectomy in Germany. METHODS: We enrolled patients who were scheduled for total laryngectomy, approached them again after surgery, after 3 months and 1 year. Patients completed questionnaires and were interviewed. RESULTS: Of 309 participants, 14% had not received any rehabilitation. Reasons for nonuse were primarily ongoing treatment and poor health. Users of rehabilitation had 4 times the odds of attaining any ability to speak compared to nonusers (odds ratio 3.8, P = .02). The main aim of rehabilitation from the perspective of the users was speech rehabilitation, mentioned by 71% before starting rehabilitation. This was also what most users (27%) found the most helpful part of rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients are interested in attending rehabilitation. They especially want to improve their speech capacity, which indeed is better among users of rehabilitation than in those without.

Quality of life during the first year after partial laryngectomy: Longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study was conducted to assess changes in quality of life (QOL) of patients who undergo a partial laryngectomy. METHODS: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires Core and Head and Neck (EORTC-QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35) were used preprocedure (n = 218), 1 week (n = 159), 3 months (n = 122), and 1 year after partial laryngectomy (n = 88). Changes over time were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Holm-Bonferroni method, and interpreted regarding clinical relevance. RESULTS: Most subscales worsened 1 week postprocedure, but many recovered to baseline level after 1 year. Dyspnea and cognitive functioning deteriorated over time, with worst scores recorded after 1 year. Financial difficulties and fatigue increased after surgery and maintained that level throughout the follow-up period; sticky saliva remained worse than at baseline, despite some improvements over time. CONCLUSION: The discovered limitations of QOL should be observed more closely during follow-up treatment, and patients should be informed about these potential effects before partial laryngectomy.

Tobacco and alcohol consumption after total laryngectomy and survival: A German multicenter prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We examined the relation of tobacco and alcohol consumption after total laryngectomy with overall survival (OS). METHODS: Tobacco and alcohol consumption was assessed at 5 time points after total laryngectomy. Patients were followed up for survival until December 31, 2014. A multivariate Cox regression was fitted to test for differences in OS. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-nine patients were included in this study. Compared to former smokers, never smokers had hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.88 (95% confidence intervals [CIs] = 0.50-1.59), and continuous smokers 1.31 (95% CI = 0.87-1.96). Constantly high alcohol consumption after total laryngectomy had an HR of 2.19 (95% CI = 1.30-3.67). Duration of smoking (HR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.99-1.01) and last known status of alcohol consumption (HR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.76-1.33) was not related to OS. CONCLUSION: Patients who smoke after total laryngectomy have a 30% higher risk of dying than people who gave up smoking, and constant high alcohol consumption is also a strong risk factor for dying. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1324-1329, 2016.

Performance of the EORTC questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients EORTC QLQ-H&N35: a methodological review.

PURPOSE: The EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (H&N35) is widely used to measure quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. The aims of this study were to obtain insight into a) the languages in which the H&N35 has been used and the psychometric properties in those languages, b) the study designs, and c) its acceptance by patients and investigators. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed searching for all original papers that had used at least one item of the H&N35. Identified papers were read and the information about methodological issues abstracted statistically analysed. RESULTS: A total of 136 papers were identified. The H&N35 was administered in 19 different languages in 27 countries. The study design was cross-sectional in the majority of studies (53 %), prospective cohort studies (31 %), phase-II-trials (7 %), phase-III-trials (6 %) and case-control studies (1 %). The scales with the highest percentages of missing values were Sexuality (11.5 %) and Speech (7 %). The median Cronbach's alpha of the multi-item scales ranged from 0.61 (Senses) to 0.93 (Sexuality). Construct validity was rarely investigated. On average, 12 scales (range 0-18) of the instrument were used by the investigators. The scale most often used was swallowing (in 85 % of studies) and least often used was Weight Gain (39 %). CONCLUSION: The H&N35 is widely used throughout the world, mainly in observational studies, and has demonstrated robust psychometric features in different languages. However, some methodological problems reported imply that the instrument can be improved in some areas.

Clinical relevance of quality-of-life data in laryngectomized patients.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Statistically significant differences in health-related quality of life (HRQL) are not always clinically relevant. It is also plausible that patients perceive other changes to be relevant than health professionals do. The objective of this study was to find thresholds for HRQL that laryngectomees consider to be clinically relevant 1 year after surgery, (i.e., the level of HRQL that patients rate as satisfactory). A second aim was to investigate how many laryngectomized patients reached those targets. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter cross-sectional study. METHODS: A total of 28 patients 1 year following laryngectomy and 24 healthcare professionals (HCPs) defined target values for the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35. In another sample of 157 laryngectomized patients 1 year following laryngectomy, we determined what percentage of patients reached these thresholds. RESULTS: Patients are the most accepting of sensory impairments (56.5), coughing (53.6), and dyspnea (44.0), whereas constipation (9.1) and nausea/vomiting (10.7) were rated as being the most troublesome symptoms. HCPs assessed more of the studied complaints as being tolerable than patients did, especially in psychosocial domains. Between 34.5% (senses) and 86.5% (constipation) of the reference group hit the predefined targets at different scales. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms caused by disease are easier for patients to live with than more general nonspecific symptoms. Taking into account that some adverse effects of disease or therapy are partially irreversible, target values additional to changes of HRQL can be helpful when interpreting data.

Predictors of emotional distress in patients with head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with head and neck cancer are known to be more commonly emotionally distressed than patients with other tumors. This study investigates reasons for this difference. METHODS: Patients in this prospective cohort study included those with head and neck cancer (n = 113) and those with other cancers (n = 1690). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, measuring emotional distress, along with additional questions regarding emotional support wished and provided were administered. RESULTS: Patients with head and neck tumors were 1.5-fold (at the time of admission), 1.2-fold (before discharge), and 2.7-fold (half a year after admission) more frequently distressed than the other patients with cancer. This association was confounded by perceived social support and sociodemographic factors. Patients with head and neck cancer expressed less frequently the wish for and received less support by psycho-oncologists. CONCLUSIONS: Emotional distress is more common in patients with head and neck tumors; this is largely a result of the psychosocial context the patients live in, especially the amount of social support received.