Are all fibrinogen concentrates the same? The effects of two fibrinogen therapies in an afibrinogenemic patient and in a fibrinogen deficient plasma model. A clinical and laboratory case report.

The choice of treatments for inherited, or acquired, fibrinogen deficient states is expanding and there are now several fibrinogen concentrate therapies commercially available. Patients with the rare inherited bleeding disorder, afibrinogenemia, commonly require life-long replacement therapy with fibrinogen concentrate to prevent hemorrhagic complications. Recent reports in the setting of acquired bleeding, namely trauma hemorrhage, have highlighted the potential importance of the different compositions of fibrinogen supplements, including cryoprecipitate and the various plasma- derived concentrates. Clot strength and the subsequent susceptibility of a clot to lysis is highly dependent on the amount of fibrinogen as well as its structural composition, the concentration of pro- and anti-coagulant factors, as well as fibrinolytic regulators, such as factor XIII (FXIII). This report details the effects of two commercially available fibrinogen concentrates (Riastap®, CSL Behring and Fibryga®, Octapharma) on important functional measures of clot formation and lysis in a patient with afibrinogenemia. Our report offers insights into the differential effects of these concentrates, at the clot level, according to the variable constituents of each product, thereby emphasizing that the choice of fibrinogen concentrate can influence the stability of a clot in vivo. Whether this alters clinical efficacy is yet to be understood.

Multiple myeloma and its treatment contribute to increased platelet reactivity.

Multiple myeloma (MM) and its precursor states, smoldering myeloma (SM) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) are associated with increased incidence of thrombosis, however the cause of this is unknown. Lenalidomide treatment of MM substantially improves patient survival, although significantly increases thrombotic risk by an unknown mechanism. This pilot study aimed to establish the impact of MM and its treatment with Lenalidomide on platelet function. We analyzed platelet function in MGUS, SM and MM compared to healthy controls. We report an increase in platelet reactivity in MGUS, SM, and MM where increases in fibrinogen binding, P-selectin exposure, altered receptor expression, elevated levels of aggregation and enhanced sensitivity to agonist stimulation were observed. We also demonstrate an increase in patient platelet reactivity post Lenalidomide treatment compared to pre-treatment. We show Lenalidomide treatment of platelets ex vivo increased reactivity that was associated with formation of larger thrombi at arterial shear rates but not venous shear rates. This study demonstrates a clear increase in platelet reactivity and prothrombotic potential in patients with MGUS, SM and MM which is elevated further upon treatment with Lenalidomide. Our observations suggest that more detailed studies are warranted to determine mechanisms of thrombotic complications to enable the development of new preventative strategies that specifically target platelets.

What is the context?Multiple myeloma is associated with increased risk of thrombosis, although the potential role of platelets in this has not been evaluated.What is new?We show in this pilot study that multiple myeloma and its precursor states of smoldering myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance are associated with increased levels of platelet responses. This is further exacerbated by treatment with the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide.What is the impact?This study suggests that more detailed studies are warranted to explore the mechanisms that cause these effects in a larger population of patients, since this may reveal new approaches to prevent myeloma-associated thrombotic complications.

A case of ChAdOx1 vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis syndrome leading to bilateral adrenal haemorrhage and adrenal insufficiency.

Summary: Vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia (VITT) after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with the adenoviral vector-based vaccines ChAdOx1 and Ad26.COV2.S has been associated with adrenal pathology, such as bilateral adrenal vein thrombosis, adrenal cortex haemorrhage and adrenal insufficiency in 6% of patients. We report the case of a 23-year-old woman who presented at 8 days after ChAdOx1 vaccination with a low platelet count of 43 × 109/L, raised d dimers >100 000 ng/mL and multiple lobar and segmental pulmonary emboli. Anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies were detected confirming definite VITT in accordance with the UK diagneostic criteria. At 16 days post-vaccine, further imaging showed bilateral adrenal haemorrhage, non-occlusive splenic vein thrombosis and right ventricular thrombosis. Her cortisol level was <25 nmol/L. She was treated with anticoagulation, plasmapheresis, immunosuppression and steroid replacement. She had high anti-spike titre and positive anti-nucleocapsid titres for SARS-CoV-2. She developed seizures secondary to posterior reversible encephalopathy, requiring intensive care. After 4 weeks in hospital, she was discharged on warfarin, hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone replacement. Short synacthen tests 3 and 9 months later showed no recovery of adrenal function, although magnetic resonance imaging of the adrenal glands showed resolving adrenal haemorrhage. Adrenal insufficiency secondary to bilateral adrenal vein thrombosis and adrenal haemorrhage should be suspected in patients with VITT and treated promptly. Adrenal vein thrombosis can occur either as the initial presentation of VITT or days to weeks after the development of thrombosis in other sites. Further studies are required to provide insight on adrenal function recovery after VITT. Learning points: Adrenal insufficiency secondary to bilateral adrenal vein thrombosis and adrenal cortex haemorrhage should be suspected in patients with vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia (VITT) and treated promptly. Adrenal vein thrombosis can occur as the initial presentation of VITT or even days to weeks later after the development of thrombosis in other more classic sites (e.g. pulmonary or cerebral vasculature). Completion of vaccination schedule against SARS-CoV-2 post-VITT using an mRNA-based vaccine should be recommended to patients post-VITT as mRNA-based vaccines have not been associated with VITT but confer protection against SARS-CoV-2. There is paucity of data regarding the potential for recovery of adrenal function after bilateral adrenal haemorrhage in the context of VITT, and thus, more studies are needed to inform clinical practice. The need for disease registries for rare conditions, such as VITT, is crucial as direct cooperation and sharing of information by clinicians might enable quicker identification of disease patterns than would have been possible via established reporting tools of adverse events.

Risk of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination prior to the recognition of vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: A self-controlled case series study in England.

Background: Several studies have found increased risks of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) following the ChAdOx1 vaccination. However, case ascertainment is often incomplete in large electronic health record (EHR)-based studies. Objectives: To assess for an association between clinically validated TTS and COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We used the self-controlled case series method to assess the risks of clinically validated acute TTS after a first COVID-19 vaccine dose (BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1) or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Case ascertainment was performed uninformed of vaccination status via a retrospective clinical review of hospital EHR systems, including active ascertainment of thrombocytopenia. Results: One hundred seventy individuals were admitted to the hospital for a TTS event at the study sites between January 1 and March 31, 2021. A significant increased risk (relative incidence [RI], 5.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-31.38) of TTS 4 to 27 days after ChAdOx1 was observed in the youngest age group (18- to 39-year-olds). No other period had a significant increase, although for ChAdOx1 for all ages combined the RI was >1 in the 4- to 27- and 28- to 41-day periods (RI, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.88-2.63; and (RI, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.73-3.8, respectively). There was no significant increased risk of TTS after BNT162b2 in any period. Increased risks of TTS following a positive SARS-CoV-2 test occurred across all age groups and exposure periods. Conclusions: We demonstrate an increased risk of TTS in the 4 to 27 days following COVID-19 vaccination, particularly for ChAdOx1. These risks were lower than following SARS-CoV-2 infection. An alternative vaccine may be preferable in younger age groups in whom the risk of postvaccine TTS is greatest.

Regional outcomes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in hospitalised patients with haematological malignancy.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterise the outcomes of patients with haematological malignancy and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in hospital in our regional network of 7 hospitals. METHODS: Consecutive hospitalised patients with haematological malignancy and SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified from 01/03/2020 to 06/05/2020. Outcomes were categorised as death, resolved or ongoing. The primary outcome was preliminary case fatality rate (pCFR), defined as the number of cases resulting in death as a proportion of all diagnosed cases. Analysis was primarily descriptive. RESULTS: 66 Patients were included, overall pCFR was 51.5%. Patients ≥ 70 years accounted for the majority of hospitalised cases (42, 63%) and fatalities (25, 74%). Mortality was similar between females (52%) and males (51%). Immunosuppressive or cytotoxic treatment within 3 months of the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a significantly higher pCFR of 70%, compared with 28% in those not on active treatment (P = .0013, 2 proportions z test). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rates in patients with haematological malignancy and SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospital are high supporting measures to minimise the risk of infection in this population.

Efficiency of class III malocclusion treatment with 2-premolar extraction and molar distalization protocols.

INTRODUCTION: Different treatment protocols have been implemented for management of Class III malocclusion with aim of achieving ideal occlusal goals. The aim of current study was to compare the efficiency of Class III treatment with mandibular 2-premolar extraction and mandibular molar distalization protocol. METHODS: This retrospective cross sectional study was conducted on pre-treatment and post-treatment dental casts of 60 orthodontic patients who had Class III malocclusion and were treated with a mandibular dentition distalization and mandibular 2-premolars extraction protocol. The study was conducted at orthodontic departments of Dental Section, Faisalabad Medical University/Punjab Medical College and de'Montmorency College of Dentistry, Pakistan. The sample was classified into 2 groups. Group A consisted of 30 patients (20 females, 10 males) (mean age, 18.02years) treated with distalization protocol and Group B consisted of 30 patients (18 females, 12 males) (mean age, 18.97years) treated with mandibular 2-premolars extraction protocol. To compare the efficiency of the treatment protocol in each group, the initial and final occlusal results were assessed on dental models using PAR index while treatment efficiency was assessed using a treatment efficiency index (TX). The groups were compared with t and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the initial age, treatment time, treatment efficiency and any occlusal feature between the groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment efficiency of Class III malocclusions with mandibular 2-premolar extractions or mandibular dentition distalization protocol is similar.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma: current and future perspectives in adult and paediatric disease.

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a rare T-cell lymphoma seen in both adults and children. ALCL is associated with a characteristic chromosomal translocation, t(2;5)(p23;35) which fuses the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene on chromosome 2 with the nucleophosmin (NPM) gene on chromosome 5, resulting in a NPM-ALK fusion protein, ALK over-expression and constitutive tyrosine kinase activity. This aggressive lymphoma is more prevalent in males and can present with extranodal involvement (lung, skin and marrow infiltration) and haemophagocytic lymphohistocytosis. The long-term overall survival is approximately 70-90% in children and over 70% in adults. Staging systems and prognostic risk factors are different in both childhood and adult ALCL. Treatment in adults is typically anthracycline-based, with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) salvaging patients in relapsed disease. There is evidence for ALL-like therapy or intensive, pulsed anthracycline-based induction in children. ASCT, allogeneic SCT and vinblastine maintenance are all considered reasonable options in relapsed childhood disease. The anti-CD30 immunoconjugate Brentuximab Vedotin and the specific ALK inhibitor Crizotinib are changing the treatment paradigm in ALCL (ALK-positive or negative) and ALK-positive ALCL respectively. Both agents have shown encouraging responses in relapsed ALCL. It remains to be seen how these novel agents are used, but it is very possible that they may improve overall responses and survival in both children and adults. This review highlights the presentation, histopathological features, prognostic factors, and evidence-based treatment approaches in the first line and relapsed setting in ALK-positive ALCL. The review concludes by discussing the novel approaches using Brentuximab and Crizotinib which are being tested in clinical trials.