Microbiota restoration for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection.

Since the publication of the recent North American and European guidelines on management of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), new evidence describing the epidemiology, testing and treatment of CDI has emerged. Despite all advances in infection control and antibiotic stewardship, the incidence and burden of CDI in the hospitals and the community remains at a stable high. Coupled with the incidence of primary CDI, there is a stable high incidence of recurrent CDI. Testing for primary and recurrent CDI remains a clinical challenge owing to high sensitivity of the PCR (leading to false positives) and somewhat limited sensitivity of EIA for toxin. The pathophysiology of recurrent CDI involves an ongoing disruption of the microbiota owing to the infection and the treatment of CDI employed. Broad spectrum antibiotics such as vancomycin leads to further disruption of microbiota compared to fidaxomicin which has a lower disruption of the microbiota and leads to fewer recurrences. Owing to these data fidaxomicin is considered as the first line antibiotic for recurrent CDI. Intravenous bezlotoxumab is a monoclonal antibody that reduces the risk of recurrence in high-risk patients but does not restore the microbiota. Experimental fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been available for more than a decade. Owing to the success of FMT, two new non-invasive donor dependent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved therapies have been available since late 2022. This review summarizes all these conundrums regarding CDI and provides clinical pearls to use in day-to-day practice.

Safety and Tolerability of CP101, a Full-Spectrum, Oral Microbiome Therapeutic for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) remain common. While novel microbiome therapeutics gain approval, the efficacy of a full-spectrum, oral microbiome therapeutic is unknown. This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of CP101, an orally administered microbiome therapeutic, to restore a diverse microbiome and prevent recurrent CDI in a broad population. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in adults with recurrent CDI. Participants with one or more CDI recurrences and diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction or toxin enzyme immunoassay for the qualifying episode were included. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive a single oral dose of either CP101 (∼6 × 1011 colony-forming units of lyophilized microbial cells) or placebo after standard-of-care antibiotics. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants without CDI recurrence through week 8. Safety, efficacy, and microbiome endpoints were evaluated through weeks 8 and 24. RESULTS: A total of 198 participants were analyzed: CP101 (n = 102) and placebo (n = 96). Overall, 27.5% had a first recurrence, and 62.7% were diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction-based testing. The proportion without CDI recurrence through week 8 was significantly higher in the CP101 group compared to the placebo group (74.5% [76 of 102] vs 61.5% [59 of 96], respectively; P = .0488), with durable efficacy observed through week 24 (73.5% [75 of 102] vs 59.4% [57 of 96], respectively; P = .0347). Similar efficacy was observed regardless of diagnostic modality or number of CDI recurrences. Rapid and durable increase in microbiome diversity was observed in the CP101 group compared to the placebo group. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: CP101 was superior to placebo in reducing recurrent CDI with a safety profile similar to placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number NCT03110133).

Fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk (VOWST™/VOS) for prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a health crisis comprising a majority of healthcare-associated infections and is now being seen in the community. Persistent dysbiosis despite treatment with standard-of-care antibiotics increases risk of recurrent infections. Fecal microbiota transplantation has been an effective way of addressing dysbiosis, but the studies have lacked standardization, which makes outcome and safety data difficult to interpret. Standardized microbiome therapies have demonstrated efficacy and safety for recurrent CDI and have been approved to prevent recurrent infection. In this review, we discuss the data behind and the practice use of fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk (VOWST™ / VOS), a US FDA approved live biotherapeutic for the prevention of recurrent CDI.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a serious infection of the gut. It often happens in hospitals and can come back after treatment. Antibiotics are usually used to treat CDI, but they do not always stop it from returning. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), where healthy bacteria from the stool of a healthy donor are transferred to a patient, can work better than antibiotics alone. FMT is not yet approved for use because of the differences in donor screening, fecal material preparation and storage. Because of this, new treatments called standardized microbiome therapies are being developed. One such treatment, VOS, comes as an ingestible capsule containing live bacteria to colonize the gut with healthy bacteria that stop Clostridioides difficile from growing. It is a simple and easy treatment, though may have some mild side effects like gas or stomach pain. This treatment offers a new way to prevent CDI, especially for people at high risk. More research is needed to see how safe VOS is for pregnant women and people with weakened immune systems.

PUNCH CD3-OLS: a phase 3 prospective observational cohort study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota, live-jslm (REBYOTA) in adults with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota, live-jslm (RBL; REBYOTA) - the first single-dose, broad consortia microbiota-based live biotherapeutic approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration for preventing recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) in adults following standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotic treatment. DESIGN: PUNCH CD3-OLS was a prospective, phase 3, open-label study, conducted across the US and Canada. Participants were aged ≥18 years with documented rCDI and confirmed use of SOC antibiotics. Participants with comorbidities including inflammatory bowel disease and mild-to-moderate immunocompromising conditions could be enrolled. A single dose of RBL was rectally administered within 24-72h of antibiotic completion. The primary endpoint was the number of participants with RBL- or administration-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary endpoints included treatment success and sustained clinical response, at 8 weeks and 6 months after RBL administration, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, 793 participants were enrolled, of whom 697 received RBL. TEAEs through 8 weeks after administration were reported by 47.3% of participants; most events were mild or moderate gastrointestinal disorders. Serious TEAEs were reported by 3.9% of participants. The treatment success rate at 8 weeks was 73.8%; in participants who achieved treatment success, the sustained clinical response rate at 6 months was 91.0%. Safety and efficacy rates were similar across demographic and baseline characteristic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: RBL was safe and efficacious in participants with rCDI and common comorbidities. This is the largest microbiota-based live biotherapeutic study to date and findings support use of RBL to prevent rCDI in a broad patient population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03931941).

Fecal microbiota live - jslm (Rebyota™/RBL) for management of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection.

There is an unmet need for effective treatments of Clostridioides difficile infection, an emerging health crisis in the United States. The management of C. difficile infection should include treatment of active infection and a strategy to prevent recurrence. Current gold standard therapy includes oral antibiotics which predispose patients to gut dysbiosis and increase the risk of recurrent infection. Addressing dysbiosis via fecal microbiota transplantation is an active and promising area of research, but studies have lacked standardization which makes outcome and safety data difficult to interpret. Rebyota™, formerly known as RBX2660, is a live biotherapeutic product designed using a standardized protocol and manufacturing process that has been shown to be effective for preventing recurrent C. difficile infection.

Clostridioides difficile infection is becoming more common in the USA and causes profuse diarrhea that can be deadly. Treatment with antibiotics causes dysregulation of the bacteria in the gut putting patients at a higher risk of reinfection. Fecal microbiota live ­ jslm is a new therapy approved by the US FDA that uses stool from healthy donors to return gut bacteria levels to normal after treatment for a C. diff infection.

Integrated Safety and Efficacy Analyses of Phase 3 Trials of a Microbiome Therapeutic for Recurrent CDI.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) often occurs after standard-of-care antibiotics. VOWST oral spores (VOS, previously SER-109), an FDA-approved orally administered microbiome therapeutic, is indicated to prevent rCDI following antibiotics for rCDI. OBJECTIVE, DESIGN, AND PATIENTS: To evaluate safety and efficacy of VOS from two phase 3 trials, (randomized, placebo-controlled [ECOSPOR III: NCT03183128] and open-label, single arm [ECOSPOR IV: NCT03183141]) of 349 adults with rCDI and prevalent comorbidities. METHODS: VOS or placebo [ECOSPOR III only] (4 capsules once daily for 3 days). Integrated analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) collected through week 8; serious TEAEs and TEAEs of special interest collected through week 24; and rates of rCDI (toxin-positive diarrhea requiring treatment) evaluated through weeks 8 and 24. RESULTS: TEAEs were mostly mild or moderate and gastrointestinal. Most common treatment-related TEAEs were flatulence, abdominal pain and distension, fatigue, and diarrhea. There were 11 deaths (3.2%) and 48 patients (13.8%) with serious TEAEs, none treatment-related. The rCDI rate through week 8 was 9.5% (95% CI 6.6-13.0) and remained low through 24 weeks (15.2%; 95% CI 11.6-19.4). Safety and rCDI rates were consistent across subgroups including age, renal impairment/failure, diabetes, and immunocompromise/immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: VOS was well tolerated and rates of rCDI remained low through week 24 including in those with comorbidities. These data support the potential benefit of VOS following antibiotics to prevent recurrence in high-risk patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03183128 and NCT03183141.

Effectiveness of Bile Acid Sequestrants in Microscopic Colitis and Utility of Bile Acid Testing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) are an option for microscopic colitis (MC) refractory or intolerant to budesonide. There are inconsistent data on the prevalence of bile acid malabsorption (BAM) and utility of bile acid testing in MC. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate these outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of randomized control trials and observational studies of adults with MC treated with BAS was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus from inception to January 22, 2024. Data were extracted on (i) prevalence of BAM, (ii) clinical response and adverse events, and (iii) recurrence after BAS discontinuation. Data were pooled using random-effects models to determine weighted pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We included 23 studies (1 randomized control trial, 22 observational), with 1,011 patients with MC assessed for BAM and 771 treated with BAS. The pooled prevalence of BAM was 34% (95% CI 0.26-0.42, I2 = 81%). The pooled response rate with BAS induction for all patients with MC, irrespective of BAM, was 62% (95% CI 0.55-0.70, I2 = 71%). There was a higher pooled response rate in patients with BAM compared with those without BAM ( P < 0.0001). The pooled rate of BAS-related adverse effects was 9% (95% CI 0.05-0.14, I2 = 58%). DISCUSSION: One-third of patients with MC had BAM, and almost two-thirds of all patients responded to BAS with limited side effects. Patients with MC and BAM were more likely to respond to therapy, supporting the value of bile acid testing.

Rise to the Challenge: Master the Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a significant public health challenge in the developed world. Although previously CDI was primarily a health care-acquired infection, there are now rising numbers of community-acquired cases in patients without traditional risk factors, such as antibiotic exposure. The landscape for the treatment of CDI has changed significantly during the past decade, including newer diagnostic tests, novel antibiotic regimens, and strategies for microbiome restoration in the form of traditional fecal microbiota transplant and approved live biotherapeutics in an effort to address the underlying pathophysiologic process of gut microbial dysbiosis. We present a concise review for clinicians on the diagnosis and management of both primary and recurrent CDI.

The Progression of Microbiome Therapeutics for the Management of Gastrointestinal Diseases and Beyond.

There has been an increased ability to investigate the human microbiota through next-generation sequencing and functional assessment. This advancement has rapidly expanded our ability to study and manipulate the gastrointestinal microbiome to mitigate disease. Fecal microbiota transplantation, a therapy that broadly transfers the entire intestinal ecosystem, has been explored as a potential therapeutic in a variety of gastrointestinal, hepatic, and extraintestinal conditions. The field, however, continues to evolve, with a movement toward precision microbiome therapeutics, individualizing care for various disorders. This review will describe the use of fecal microbiota transplantation, microbiota restoration, and precision microbiome therapeutics, focusing on gastrointestinal and hepatic diseases.

Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Despite research efforts, predicting Clostridioides difficile incidence and its outcomes remains challenging. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) models in predicting C. difficile infection (CDI) incidence and complications using clinical data from electronic health records. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of databases (OVID, Embase, MEDLINE ALL, Web of Science, and Scopus) from inception up to September 2023. Studies employing ML techniques for predicting CDI or its complications were included. The primary outcome was the type and performance of ML models assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Twelve retrospective studies that evaluated CDI incidence and/or outcomes were included. The most commonly used ML models were random forest and gradient boosting. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.60 to 0.81 for predicting CDI incidence, 0.59 to 0.80 for recurrence, and 0.64 to 0.88 for predicting complications. Advanced ML models demonstrated similar performance to traditional logistic regression. However, there was notable heterogeneity in defining CDI and the different outcomes, including incidence, recurrence, and complications, and a lack of external validation in most studies. DISCUSSION: ML models show promise in predicting CDI incidence and outcomes. However, the observed heterogeneity in CDI definitions and the lack of real-world validation highlight challenges in clinical implementation. Future research should focus on external validation and the use of standardized definitions across studies.

Safety, feasibility, and impact on the gut microbiome of kefir administration in critically ill adults.

BACKGROUND: Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is frequent in the intensive care unit (ICU), potentially leading to a heightened risk of nosocomial infections. Enhancing the gut microbiome has been proposed as a strategic approach to mitigate potential adverse outcomes. While prior research on select probiotic supplements has not successfully shown to improve gut microbial diversity, fermented foods offer a promising alternative. In this open-label phase I safety and feasibility study, we examined the safety and feasibility of kefir as an initial step towards utilizing fermented foods to mitigate gut dysbiosis in critically ill patients. METHODS: We administered kefir in escalating doses (60 mL, followed by 120 mL after 12 h, then 240 mL daily) to 54 critically ill patients with an intact gastrointestinal tract. To evaluate kefir's safety, we monitored for gastrointestinal symptoms. Feasibility was determined by whether patients received a minimum of 75% of their assigned kefir doses. To assess changes in the gut microbiome composition following kefir administration, we collected two stool samples from 13 patients: one within 72 h of admission to the ICU and another at least 72 h after the first stool sample. RESULTS: After administering kefir, none of the 54 critically ill patients exhibited signs of kefir-related bacteremia. No side effects like bloating, vomiting, or aspiration were noted, except for diarrhea in two patients concurrently on laxatives. Out of the 393 kefir doses prescribed for all participants, 359 (91%) were successfully administered. We were able to collect an initial stool sample from 29 (54%) patients and a follow-up sample from 13 (24%) patients. Analysis of the 26 paired samples revealed no increase in gut microbial α-diversity between the two timepoints. However, there was a significant improvement in the Gut Microbiome Wellness Index (GMWI) by the second timepoint (P = 0.034, one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test); this finding supports our hypothesis that kefir administration can improve gut health in critically ill patients. Additionally, the known microbial species in kefir were found to exhibit varying levels of engraftment in patients' guts. CONCLUSIONS: Providing kefir to critically ill individuals is safe and feasible. Our findings warrant a larger evaluation of kefir's safety, tolerability, and impact on gut microbiome dysbiosis in patients admitted to the ICU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05416814; trial registered on June 13, 2022.

Efficacy and Health-Related Quality of Life Impact of Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm: A Post Hoc Analysis of PUNCH CD3 Patients at First Recurrence of Clostridioides difficile Infection.

INTRODUCTION: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) causes symptoms of varying severity and negatively impacts patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL). Despite antibiotic treatment, recurrence of CDI (rCDI) is common and imposes clinical and economic burdens on patients. Fecal microbiota, live-jslm (REBYOTA [RBL]) is newly approved in the USA for prevention of rCDI following antibiotic treatments. We analyzed efficacy and HRQL impact of RBL vs. placebo in patients at first rCDI using data from the phase 3 randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, PUNCH CD3. METHODS: This post hoc analysis included patients at first rCDI fromPUNCH CD3. Treatment success (i.e., absence of diarrhea within 8 weeks post-treatment) was analyzed adjusting for baseline patient characteristics. HRQL was measured using the Clostridioides difficile Quality of Life Survey (Cdiff32); absolute scores and change from baseline in total and domain (physical, mental, and social) scores were summarized and compared between arms. Analyses were conducted for the trial's blinded phase only. RESULTS: Among 86 eligible patients (32.8% of the overall trial population, RBL 53 [61.6%], placebo 33 [38.4%]), RBL-treated patients had significantly lower odds of recurrence (i.e., greater probability of treatment success) at week 8 vs. placebo (odds ratio 0.35 [95% confidence interval 0.13, 0.98]). Probability of treatment success at week 8 was 81% for RBL and 60% for placebo, representing 21% absolute and 35% relative increases for RBL (crude proportions 79.2% vs. 60.6%; relative risk 0.53, p = 0.06). Additionally, RBL was associated with significantly higher Cdiff32 total (change score difference 13.5 [standard deviation 5.7], p < 0.05) and mental domain (16.2 [6.0], p < 0.01) scores vs. placebo from baseline to week 8. CONCLUSION: Compared to placebo, RBL demonstrated a significantly higher treatment success in preventing further rCDI and enhanced HRQL among patients at first recurrence, establishing RBL as an effective treatment to prevent further recurrences in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03244644.