RESUMEN
Purpose: Fungal endophthalmitis is characterized by chronic inflammation leading to the partial or complete vision loss. Herein, we analyzed the transcriptomic landscape of Aspergillus flavus (A. flavus) endophthalmitis in C57BL/6 mice to understand the host-pathogen interactions. Methods: Endophthalmitis was induced by intravitreal injection of A. flavus spores in C57BL/6 mice and monitored for disease progression up to 72 hours. The enucleated eyeballs were subjected to histopathological analysis and mRNA sequencing using the Illumina Nextseq 2000. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed to further annotate the functions of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and validation of cytokines was performed in vitreous of patients with fungal endophthalmitis using multiplex ELISA. Results: Transcriptomic landscape of A. flavus endophthalmitis revealed upregulated T-cell receptor signaling, PI3K-AKT, MAPK, NF-κB, JAK-STAT, and NOD like receptor signaling pathways. We observed significant increase in the T-cells during infection especially at 72 hours infection along with elevated expression levels of IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-18, IL-19, IL-23, CCR3, and CCR7. Furthermore, host-immune response associated genes, such as T-cell interacting activating receptor, TNF receptor-associated factor 1, TLR1, TLR9, and bradykinin receptor beta 1, were enriched. Histopathological assessment validated the significant increase in inflammatory cells, especially T-cells at 72 hours post-infection along with increased disruption in the retinal architecture. Additionally, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, TNF-α, and IL-1ß were also significantly elevated, whereas IL-10 was downregulated in vitreous of patients with Aspergillus endophthalmitis. Conclusions: Regulating T-cell influx could be a potential strategy to modulate the excessive inflammation in the retina and potentially aid in better vision recovery in fungal endophthalmitis.
Asunto(s)
Inmunidad Adaptativa , Aspergilosis , Aspergillus flavus , Citocinas , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Endoftalmitis , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Inmunidad Innata , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Animales , Aspergillus flavus/genética , Ratones , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/microbiología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/genética , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/inmunología , Endoftalmitis/microbiología , Endoftalmitis/inmunología , Endoftalmitis/genética , Aspergilosis/microbiología , Aspergilosis/genética , Aspergilosis/inmunología , Inmunidad Adaptativa/genética , Inmunidad Innata/genética , Citocinas/metabolismo , Citocinas/genética , Transcriptoma , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Cuerpo Vítreo/microbiologíaRESUMEN
Purpose: Heparanase (HPSE) cleaves heparan sulfate proteoglycans during herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) infection, aiding in viral egress and disease progression. Its action has been well established in in vitro and in vivo models, but its relevance in human patients remains unclear. This study aimed to specifically evaluate tear HPSE levels of patients with herpes simplex keratitis (HSK) and to correlate these findings with a commonly used murine model. Methods: Tear samples from patient and mice samples were collected at LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India, and at the University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, respectively. Tears were collected from HSV-1 patients, bacterial/fungal keratitis cases, and healthy individuals. For in vivo study, C57BL/6 mice were infected with HSV-1 (McKrae strain) followed by tear fluid collection at various time points (0-10 days). Results: The HSV-1, bacterial keratitis, fungal keratitis, and healthy control groups each had 30 patients. There was a significant difference in HPSE expression in the HSV-1 infected eyes (1.55 ± 0.19 units/mL) compared to HSV-1 contralateral eyes (1.23 ± 0.13 units/mL; P = 0.82), bacterial keratitis eyes (0.87 ± 0.15 units/mL; P = 0.0078), fungal keratitis eyes (0.64 ± 0.09 units/mL; P < 0.00001), and normal controls (0.53 ± 0.06 units/mL; P < 0.00001). C57BL/6 mice tear HPSE expression in infected eyes was 0.66 to 5.57 ng heparan sulfate (HS) removed per minute when compared to non-infected eye (range, 0.70-3.67 ng HS removed per minute). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report elevated HPSE levels in the tears of patients with different forms of HSV-1 keratitis, and it confirms similar findings in a murine model, providing a valuable basis for future in vivo and clinical research on HSV-1 ocular infection.
Asunto(s)
Úlcera de la Córnea , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo , Glucuronidasa , Herpes Simple , Herpesvirus Humano 1 , Queratitis Herpética , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Heparitina SulfatoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To review the etiology and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of infectious endophthalmitis over 11 years in different age groups. METHODS: Microbiology records of culture-positive endophthalmitis cases from January 2011 and December 2021 were reviewed for the age groups 0-30, 31-60, and >60 years. Additionally, data was also analysed for trends in antibiotic susceptibility between different age groups. RESULTS: A total of 5590 patients were clinically diagnosed with endophthalmitis. Of these, 1316 (23.5%) patients were culture positive comprising of 1097 bacteria (83.3%) and 219 fungal (16.6%). Gram-positive bacteria predominated the culture-proven bacterial endophthalmitis group with 709 cases (62.6%). Streptococcus pneumoniae (9.3%) was the most prevalent organism in the age group between 0 and 30 years, while Staphylococcus epidermidis (6%) was the most prevalent organism in the age group of 31-60 years. In comparison, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4.1%) was the most abundant organism in the age group >60 years. Interestingly, Aspergillus flavus (13.24%) was the predominant fungal pathogen in all age groups. There was an increasing trend in antibiotic resistance from younger to older age groups and this pattern was observed for almost all drugs tested except vancomycin and amikacin. CONCLUSION: While infection can occur at any age, the etiology also seems to vary. This study helps us understand the demography of endophthalmitis along with choice of empirical antibiotics that would influence treatment outcomes. Although vancomycin currently holds good for the treatment for gram-positive infections, gram-negative infections calls for an immediate need for newer drugs or advanced treatment options.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Mucormycosis is a severe fungal infection caused by species of the order Mucorales. Early and accurate diagnosis is a prerequisite in the management of the disease. In the present study, we evaluated and compared two PCR-based techniques for the diagnosis and identification of mucormycosis in patients with rhino-orbital mucormycosis (ROM) post-COVID-19. METHODS: Diagnosed clinically and radiologically, 25 patients of ROM were included in the study and endoscopically or blind collected nasal swabs or orbital tissues were submitted for microbiological evaluation (direct microscopy + culture) and PCR using primers targeting two different loci (ITS and 28S rDNA region) for diagnosis. All PCR products were further processed for species identification using Sanger sequencing whenever possible. RESULT: Of the 25 samples included in the study, 16 samples were positive for presence of fungal filaments by Smear suggestive of Mucorales sp., but only 7/25 grew in culture. ITS-based PCR was able to identify mucormycosis in 7/25 (28%) samples and 28S rDNA PCR showed positivity for 19/25 (76%) samples. Rhizopus oryzae was found to be the predominant species in our study. The sensitivity and specificity of 28S rDNA PCR compared to culture were found to be 85.71% and 27.78%, respectively, while for ITS-based PCR, they were 42.86% and 77.78%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 28S rDNA-based PCR is a reliable and sensitive method for early diagnosis of mucormycosis. Molecular techniques have shown a promising future to provide quick and effective treatment by accurately identifying the aetiologic agent.