Is Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy a Safe and Efficacious Option for Complex Stone Disease?

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the gold standard treatment for large, complex intrarenal stones. Historically, this was performed using a nephrostomy tube (PCN) and/or internalized ureteral stent at the end of the procedure. However, totally tubeless nephrolithotomy (tt-PCNL) is a novel technique where no tubes (no stent nor nephrostomy tube) are left post-operatively. We review the literature on this subject regarding peri-operative outcomes, post-operative outcomes, and potential complications of the procedure, discuss our technique, and make recommendations on implementation for centers not currently utilizing the procedure. Materials and methods: We performed a comprehensive search of the literature on totally tubeless nephrolithotomy using MEDLINE database search. Our search included prior review articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, primary research articles, case reports, and case studies. Results: In comparison to prior approaches where a stent or nephrostomy tube is placed, tt-PCNL has a similar complication rate and better post-operative outcomes. Totally tubeless PCNL has similar operative times and similar changes in hemoglobin. However, it had shorter length of stays across all studies. The mean difference in length of stay in the studies reviewed was 1.96 days. Additionally, tt-PCNL had decreased post-operative analgesic requirements and pain scores. Conclusions: This review highlights totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy as a safe and feasible surgical technique with improved outcomes in properly selected patients.

Evaluation of the Current Status of Artificial Intelligence for Endourology Patient Education: A Blind Comparison of ChatGPT and Google Bard Against Traditional Information Resources.

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) platforms such as ChatGPT and Bard are increasingly utilized to answer patient health care questions. We present the first study to blindly evaluate AI-generated responses to common endourology patient questions against official patient education materials. Methods: Thirty-two questions and answers spanning kidney stones, ureteral stents, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and upper tract urothelial carcinoma were extracted from official Urology Care Foundation (UCF) patient education documents. The same questions were input into ChatGPT 4.0 and Bard, limiting responses to within ±10% of the word count of the corresponding UCF response to ensure fair comparison. Six endourologists blindly evaluated responses from each platform using Likert scales for accuracy, clarity, comprehensiveness, and patient utility. Reviewers identified which response they believed was not AI generated. Finally, Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level formulas assessed the readability of each platform response. Ratings were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests. Results: ChatGPT responses were rated the highest across all categories, including accuracy, comprehensiveness, clarity, and patient utility, while UCF answers were consistently scored the lowest, all p < 0.01. A subanalysis revealed that this trend was consistent across question categories (i.e., kidney stones, BPH, etc.). However, AI-generated responses were more likely to be classified at an advanced reading level, while UCF responses showed improved readability (college or higher reading level: ChatGPT = 100%, Bard = 66%, and UCF = 19%), p < 0.001. When asked to identify which answer was not AI generated, 54.2% of responses indicated ChatGPT, 26.6% indicated Bard, and only 19.3% correctly identified it as the UCF response. Conclusions: In a blind evaluation, AI-generated responses from ChatGPT and Bard surpassed the quality of official patient education materials in endourology, suggesting that current AI platforms are already a reliable resource for basic urologic care information. AI-generated responses do, however, tend to require a higher reading level, which may limit their applicability to a broader audience.

Comparison of metabolic parameters between pure-uric acid and mixed-uric acid kidney stone formers.

PURPOSE: We seek to compare clinical and 24-h urine parameters between pure-uric acid (UA) and UA-CaOx stone formers in our practice and explore how any differences in metabolic profiles could suggest different prevention strategies between the two groups. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with either pure- or mixed-UA nephrolithiasis from 2020 to 2023 at a tertiary care center. We included patients with a 24-h urine collection and a stone analysis detecting any amount of UA. Patients were organized into two cohorts: (1) those with 100% UA stones and (2) < 100% UA stones. Differences in demographic characteristics were compared between pure-UA and UA-CaOx stone formers. Twenty-four hour urine metabolic parameters as well as metabolic abnormalities were compared between the pure-uric acid and mixed-uric acid groups. RESULTS: We identified 33 pure-UA patients and 33 mixed-UA patients. Patient demographics were similar between the groups (Table 1). Pure- and mixed-UA patients had a similar incidence of metabolic syndrome, diabetes, history of stones, and stone burden. Table 1 Demographic and baseline characteristics among pure- and mixed-uric acid stone formers Pure-uric acid stones (n = 33) Mixed-uric acid stones (n = 33) p-value Median age [IQR] 63.00 [58.00-72.50] 63.00 [53.50-68.00] 0.339 Median BMI [IQR] 28.79 [25.81-33.07] 27.96 [25.81-29.55] 0.534 Gender, n (%) 1.000  Male 21 (63.6) 21 (63.6)  Female 12 (36.4) 12 (36.4) Metabolic syndrome, n (%) 17 (51.5) 16 (48.5) 0.806 Diabetes, n (%) 13 (39.4) 12 (36.4) 0.800 History of stones, n (%) 23 (69.7) 22 (66.7) 0.792 Median total stone burden, mm [IQR] 12.00 [6.00-26.50] 13.00 [7.05-20.00] 0.995 Median serum uric acid, mg/dL [IQR] 6.20 [4.80-7.15] 5.90 [4.98-6.89] 0.582 IQR Interquartile range BMI Body Mass Index n number We found the pure-UA cohort to have 24-h lower urine volume (1.53 vs. 1.96 L/day, p = 0.045) and citrate levels (286 vs. 457 mg/day, p = 0.036). UA-CaOx stone formers had higher urinary calcium levels (144 vs. 68 mg/day, p = 0.003), higher urinary oxalate levels (38 vs. 30 mg/day, p = 0.017), and higher median urinary calcium oxalate super-saturation (3.97 vs. 3.06, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Pure-UA kidney stone formers have different urinary metabolic parameters when compared with UA-CaOx stone formers, thus requiring different and tailored medical management.

Review of efficacy and safety of same-day discharge after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

PURPOSE: Prior literature reviews have assessed the efficacy and safety of outpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with "outpatient" defined as discharge within twenty-four hours of surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first literature review analyzing ambulatory PCNLs (aPCNL) defined as hospital discharge on the same day as surgery. This review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of same-day discharge after PCNL. METHODS: We conducted a search in the PubMed database for key search terms including "ambulatory PCNL", "ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy", "outpatient PCNL", "outpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy", and "day surgery percutaneous nephrolithotomy". We reviewed articles defining "ambulatory" as discharge the same day the PCNL was performed. 13 papers were identified in our search. RESULTS: Overall, we found no difference in complication rates, emergency department visits, and postoperative admissions when comparing outpatient PCNL to inpatient PCNL, and to previously published statistics for inpatient PCNL. Some studies even showed lower rates of adverse outcomes in ambulatory cohorts when compared to inpatient cohorts. Additionally, ambulatory PCNL conferred significant healthcare savings over inpatient PCNL. CONCLUSION: This literature review suggests that ambulatory PCNL can be safely performed in both optimal and suboptimal surgical candidates with no significant increase in complications. Additional high-quality studies are warranted to further the evidence surrounding outpatient PCNL and its outcomes.

Comprehensive analysis of factors associated with significant blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to conduct a thorough investigation of the risk factors associated with blood loss during PCNL, within the setting of a US urban tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of our endourology database to identify adult patients who underwent PCNL for stone extraction at our tertiary stone center between October 2014 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the extent of blood loss: significant blood loss (SBL) and no significant blood loss (NSBL). The cut-off value for SBL was determined as the median change in hematocrit levels from preoperative to postoperative among patients who required postoperative transfusions. Several factors were evaluated, including stone dimensions, operative details, the presence of preoperative drains, patient position, type of access, access site, number of accesses, tract size, tract length, stone location, number of stones, operative time, and the S.T.O.N.E. Nephrolithometry Scoring System. RESULTS: Our analysis included a total of 695 procedures performed on 674 distinct patients who met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 102 patients (14.7%) were included in the SBL group. Patients in the SBL group had a higher mean number of accesses (1.57 vs. 1.29, P<0.001), were positioned prone more often (96.0% vs. 88.6%, P = 0.025), and underwent fluoroscopic-guided access more frequently (89.9% vs. 64.8%, P<0.001). Additionally, significant differences were observed in stone morphology, with the SBL group having higher rates of complete staghorn stones (42.2% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.019) and lower rates of partial staghorn stones (27.7% vs. 36.8%, P = 0.019). A larger proportion of patients in the SBL group required a 16 French nephrostomy tube for postoperative drainage (13.3% vs. 10.4%, P = 0.041). Lastly, the SBL group had a longer mean operative time compared to the NSBL group (P<0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified stone volume (P = 0.039), number of accesses (P = 0.047), and operative time (P = 0.006) as independent risk factors associated with SBL status. CONCLUSION: Surgical complexity factors such as stone volume, number of accesses, and operative time are linked to a higher risk of SBL during PCNL. Stone volume and the requirement for multiple accesses can usually be estimated with reasonable accuracy before surgery.

Adjuvant intraluminal therapies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) are often identified and first treated endoscopically. After proper risk stratification, adjuvant treatment may be recommended. Consequently, as adjuvant therapy becomes more common place in the oncological armamentarium, we seek to better characterize its existing and future therapeutic landscape. In this article, we present an overview of the most up-to-date information about intracavitary instillations as an adjuvant therapy in the context of UTUC. We reviewed the current literature on the epidemiology, disease characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of UTUC with a particularly focus on intraluminal adjuvant therapy for UTUC. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the most recent available data regarding adjuvant therapies used for UTUC. Intraluminal therapy plays an increasingly important role in the management of UTUC. Mitomycin C is the most common adjuvant treatment for UTUC with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) being utilized to a lesser extent. UGN-101 is a novel topical gel-based therapy that has shown promising results and thus recently garnered Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for UTUC. Other treatments such as BCG-IFN, gemcitabine, docetaxel, and drug-eluting stents (DES) may play a future role in UTUC treatment given further research. It is important to caveat that current studies on topical adjuvant treatments demonstrate varying degrees of effectiveness. This is largely due to limited research on UTUC, consisting of small sample sizes, and mostly retrospective experiences. Accordingly, further clinical trials are needed to evaluate the true benefit of these treatments.

Drivers of calcium oxalate stone formation in the octogenarian population.

INTRODUCTION: American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines suggest metabolic testing via 24-h urine studies in high-risk, interested first-time stone formers, and recurrent stone formers. If metabolic testing is not available or otherwise not feasible, clinicians may need to utilize empiric therapy. Debility and social barriers, particularly in the elderly population, may limit the practicality of metabolic testing, and therefore, empiric therapy is of particular importance. The aim of this study is to identify whether unique urinary metabolic abnormality profiles exist for octogenarians with calcium oxalate kidney stones, as this may guide empiric stone prevention therapy more precisely in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with calcium oxalate stones from a single academic kidney stone center in New York, NY, were retrospectively identified in our prospectively managed database. Patient data, including demographic, clinical information, and baseline 24-h urine studies, were collected before initiating any treatment. Subjects were stratified by age (≤ 40, 41-59, 60-79, and ≥ 80 years) to compare the metabolic urinary abnormality profiles between octogenarians and other age groups. Subgroup analyses were also performed to compare results by gender and by the presence of underlying kidney dysfunction. Comparative statistical analysis was carried out using Chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and t-tests where appropriate. RESULTS: Hypocitraturia, low urine pH, and low urine volume were most common in older patients, particularly in octogenarians. Hypercalciuria, hypernatriuria, and hyperuricosuria were more apparent in younger groups. CONCLUSION: With increasing age, hypocitraturia, low urine pH, and low urine volume were more prevalent on 24-h urine metabolic testing. We hypothesize increased comorbidity, including medical renal disease, polypharmacy, and dehydration are possible factors contributing to this unique profile. We suggest that empiric therapy targeted towards this profile is important in very elderly stone formers in whom 24-h urine testing may not be possible. Increased hydration, increased fruit and vegetable intake, and low-dose alkali therapy are easy measures to accomplish this.

Opioid-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an initial experience.

INTRODUCTION: The opioid epidemic in the United States is an ongoing public health crisis that is in part fueled by excessive prescribing by physicians. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a procedure that conventionally involves opioid prescriptions for adequate post-operative pain control. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a non-opioid pain regimen by evaluating post-operative outcomes in PCNL patients discharged without opioids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As a quality improvement measure to reduce opioid consumption our department began routinely prescribing oral ketorolac instead of oxycodone-acetaminophen for pain control after PCNL. We retrospectively compared patients undergoing PCNL who had received ketorolac prescriptions (NSAID) to those who received oxycodone-acetaminophen prescriptions (NARC). Demographic, operative, and post-operative factors were obtained and compared in both groups. Peri-operative factors and demographics were compared using either Chi-squared tests, Mann-Whitney U tests. Surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups using Chi-squared tests and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether ketorolac use was an independent predictor of post-surgical pain-related encounters. Primary outcome was unplanned pain-related healthcare encounters inclusive of office phone calls, unscheduled office visits, and emergency department (ED) visits. Secondary outcome measures were non-pain-related healthcare encounters, hospital readmissions, pain-related rescue medications prescribed, and post-op complications. RESULTS: There were similar demographics and peri-operative characteristics amongst patients in both cohorts. There was no significant difference identified between NSAID and NARC regarding unplanned pain-related encounters (8/70, 11.4% vs. 10/70, 14.3%, p = 0.614). However, NARC experienced more unplanned phone calls (42, 60% vs. 24, 34.3%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed only prior stone surgery was predictive of pain-related encounters after PCNL (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Our results show that there were no significant differences in pain-related encounters between those who received ketorolac and oxycodone-acetaminophen following PCNL. A non-opioid pathway may mitigate the potential risk associated with opioid prescription without compromising analgesia. Prospective comparative studies are warranted to confirm feasibility.

Selecting an Endourology Society Fellowship Program: The Candidates' Perspectives.

Introduction: Understanding the factors that influence the decision of urology residents to pursue an Endourology Society (ES) fellowship and the criteria used by applicants to rank programs may help residents and program directors (PDs) optimize the match process. In the present study, we surveyed current ES fellows to gain better insight surrounding their decision-making process. Materials and Methods: A survey was emailed to all ES fellows, comprising Endourology and Stone Disease (ESD), Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery (MIS), and combination of ESD/MIS (COM) programs. A Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 was used. The survey captured demographics such as geographic region, program type, duration, applicants' reasons for pursuing fellowship, criteria for ranking programs, and perceived improvements in surgical comfort levels at the end of their training. Results: Out of the 60 fellows who were surveyed, 40 (66.7%) responded. Among the respondents, 9 (22.5%) pursued ESD, 10 (25%) pursued MIS, and 21 (52.5%) pursued COM programs. The primary reason for seeking a fellowship was to improve surgical skills while increasing earning potential and enhancing research opportunities were deemed the least important. Fellows enrolled in 1-year programs were less likely to pursue fellowships for academic reasons. The two most significant factors in selecting a program were both related to gaining operative experience. Lastly, there was an increase in the level of comfort performing all endourological surgeries independently after fellowship. Conclusions: ES fellowship is seen as an opportunity to hone surgical skills and increase job competitiveness. When selecting a program, operative experience is the most important factor, and fellowship improves operative confidence. The information obtained from this study may mutually help guide future applicants and PDs in the decision process of the Endourology Match.

The effects of continuing aspirin on blood loss and postoperative outcomes in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective surgery for complex kidney stones yet with inherent bleeding risks. It remains unclear whether aspirin should be discontinued prior to PCNL. We aimed to further substantiate the safety of continuing aspirin during PCNL surgery and to determine whether aspirin status affects postoperative outcomes following PCNL. METHODS: We retrospectively queried our endourology database for patients who underwent PCNL from October 2017 to December 2022 at our high-volume tertiary referral center. The three groups were based on aspirin status at the time of PCNL: no aspirin (NA), discontinued aspirin (DA), and continued aspirin (CA). Data collected included demographics, preoperative characteristics, operative parameters, pre and postoperative lab values, transfusions, and complications. RESULTS: A total 648 patients were divided into these study groups: 525 NA patients (81.0%), 55 DA (8.5%), and 68 CA (10.5%). The DA and CA groups were of similar comorbidities, and both were more comorbid at baseline than NA. Postoperative change in lab values and complications did not differ significantly. Rates of postoperative blood transfusion were higher in the CA and DA groups compared to NA and approached statistical significance. There were no significant differences in any postoperative outcomes between the DA and CA groups alone. CONCLUSIONS: In patients on chronic aspirin therapy, continuing aspirin appears equally safe to discontinuing aspirin prior to PCNL. Most patients should not forego the benefits of continuous aspirin for the theoretical risk of bleeding. Patients on prolonged aspirin therapy may be more likely than those who are not on chronic aspirin therapy to require blood transfusions. However, regardless of whether aspirin use is stopped, this may be caused by patient comorbidities rather than higher rates of blood loss.

Displacement of Lower Pole Stones During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Improves Stone-free Status: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Lower pole renal stones are associated with the lowest stone-free status of any location in the urinary tract during retrograde intrarenal surgery. Prior work has suggested displacing lower pole stones to a more accessible part of the kidney to improve stone-free status. We sought to prospectively compare the efficacy of laser lithotripsy in situ vs after displacement during retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2017 and May 2022 patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole stones were randomized into an in situ or displacement group. Demographics, comorbidities, and operative parameters were documented. Primary outcome was stone-free status, determined by combination of abdominal x-ray and renal ultrasound at 30-day follow-up. Secondary outcomes included operative time, 30-day complications, emergency department visits, and readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients (69 per group) were enrolled and analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Stone-free status significantly favored the displacement group over the in situ group (95% vs 74%, P = .003, n=62 in each group). Operative time, total laser energy usage, 30-day complications, and 30-day emergency department visits or hospital readmissions were similar between groups. On multivariate analysis only study group allocation was significantly associated with stone-free status (P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Basket displacement of lower pole stones results in a significantly higher stone-free status compared to in situ lithotripsy. The technique is simple, atraumatic, and requires no additional equipment costs and little additional operative time, making it a practical tool in the treatment of lower pole stones.

Racial Differences in Incident Genitourinary Cancer Cases Captured in the National Cancer Database.

Background and Objectives: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) captures nearly 70% of all new cancer diagnoses in the United States, but there exists significant variation in this capture rate based on primary tumor location and other patient demographic factors. Prostate cancer has the lowest coverage rate of all major cancers, and other genitourinary malignancies likewise fall below the average NCDB case coverage rate. We aimed to explore NCDB coverage rates for patients with genitourinary cancers as a function of race. Materials and Methods: We compared the incidence of cancer cases in the NCDB with contemporary United States Cancer Statistics data. Results: Across all malignancies, American Indian/Alaskan Natives subjects demonstrated the lowest capture rates, and Asian/Pacific Islander subjects exhibited the second-lowest capture rates. Between White and Black subjects, capture rates were significantly higher for White subjects overall and for prostate cancer and kidney cancer in White males, but significantly higher for bladder cancer in Black versus White females. No significant differences were observed in coverage rates for kidney cancer in females, bladder cancer in males, penile cancer, or testicular cancer in White versus Black patients. Conclusions: Differential access to Commission on Cancer-accredited treatment facilities for racial minorities with genitourinary cancer constitutes a unique avenue for health equity research.

Thulium fiber laser utilization in urological surgery: A narrative review.

The thulium fiber laser (TFL) is a novel technology under active investigation as an conceivable alternative to the Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser, which is currently the gold standard for an array of urologic procedures. The purpose of this review is to discuss the existing literature on the functionality and effectiveness of TFL in urological practice. We conducted a search of the PubMed, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, SCOPUS, Embase (OVID), and Cochrane Databases for all full articles and systematic reviews on the TFL. We found a total of 35 relevant pieces of literature. The early research findings pertaining to the TFL exhibit numerous potential advantages over the Ho:YAG laser. In vitro and ex vivo studies have highlighted the TFL's ability to utilize smaller laser fibers, obtain faster stone ablation rates, and achieve less retropulsion when tested against the Ho:YAG laser in lithotripsy. Currently, there is limited in vivo research that investigates the utilization of the TFL. The in vivo results that are available, however, look promising both for laser lithotripsy and soft tissue ablation. Indeed, the existing literature suggests that the TFL has great potential and may possess numerous technological advantages over the Ho:YAG laser, especially in laser lithotripsy. Although these early studies are promising, randomized control trials are needed to assess the full applicability of the TFL in urology.