RESUMEN
The management of patients with prolonged viral shedding and coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms remains unclear. Combining antivirals, as practiced in other infections, is theoretically advantageous. We present a case of persistent, symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and associated organizing pneumonia that was successfully treated with an extended course of combination antiviral therapy.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neumonía Organizada , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Huésped InmunocomprometidoRESUMEN
Background: Overnight, physicians in training receive less direct supervision. Decreased direct supervision requires trainees to appropriately assess patients at risk of clinical deterioration and escalate to supervising physicians. Failure of trainees to escalate contributes to adverse patient safety events. Objective: To standardize the evaluation of patients at risk of deterioration overnight by internal medicine residents, increase communication between residents and supervising physicians, and improve perceptions of patient safety at a tertiary academic medical center. Methods: A multidisciplinary stakeholder team developed an overnight escalation-of-care protocol for residents. The protocol was implemented with badge buddies and an educational campaign targeted at residents, supervising physicians, and nursing staff. Residents and supervising physicians completed anonymous surveys to assess the use of the protocol; the frequency of overnight communication between residents and supervising physicians; and perceptions of escalation and patient safety before, immediately after ("early postintervention"), and 8 months after ("delayed postintervention") the intervention. Results: Seventy-five (100%) residents participated in the intervention, and 57-89% of those invited to complete surveys at the various time points responded. After the intervention, 82% of residents reported using the protocol, though no change was observed in the frequency of communication between residents and supervising physicians. After the implementation, residents perceived that patient care was safer (early postintervention, 47%; delayed postintervention, 72%; P = 0.02), and interns expressed decreased fear of waking and being criticized by supervising physicians. Conclusion: An escalation-of-care protocol was developed and successfully implemented using a multimodal approach. The implementation and dissemination of the protocol standardized resident escalation overnight and improved resident-perceived patient safety and interns' comfort with escalation.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Etnicidad , Asma/terapia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Hospitalización , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Médicos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Pandemias , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
Racial/ethnic disparities in glycemic control-a key diabetes outcome measure-continue to widen, even though the overall prevalence of glycemic control in the US has improved. Health insurance coverage may be associated with improved glycemic control, but few studies examine effects during a period of policy change. We assessed changes in glycemic control by racial/ethnic groups following the Massachusetts Health Insurance Reform for patients at two urban safety-net academic health systems between January 2005 and December 2013. We analyzed outcomes for three measures of poor glycemic control: 1) lack of a hemoglobin A1C (A1C) measure during a 6-month period; 2) A1C >8%; 3) A1C >9% before, during, and after implementation of insurance reform. We did not find increased rates of A1C monitoring or control following insurance reform overall or for specific racial/ethnic groups. We found evidence of worsened, not improved, glycemic control in some racial/ethnic groups in the post-reform period. The expansion of affordable insurance coverage was not associated with improved glycemic control in vulnerable populations.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Hemoglobina Glucada , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Massachusetts , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Objective: This study examined whether health insurance stability was associated with improved type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) control and reduced racial/ethnic health disparities. Methods: We utilized electronic medical record data (2005-2013) from two large, urban academic health systems with a racially/ethnically diverse patient population to examine insurance coverage, and three DM outcomes (poor diabetes control, A1c ≥8.0%; very poor diabetes control A1c >9.0%; and poor BP control, ≥ 130/80 mm Hg) and one DM management outcome (A1c monitoring). We used generalized estimating equations adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, site of care, education, and income. Additional analysis examined if insurance stability (stable public or private insurance over the six-month internal) moderates the impact of race/ethnicity on DM outcomes. Results: Nearly 50% of non-Hispanic (NH) Whites had private insurance coverage, compared with 33.5% of NH Blacks, 31.5% of Asians, and 31.1% of Hispanics. Overall, and within most racial/ ethnic groups, insurance stability was associated with better glycemic control compared with those with insurance switches or always being uninsured, with uninsured NH Blacks having significantly worse BP control. More NH Black and Hispanic patients had poorly controlled (A1c≥8%) and very poorly controlled (A1c>9%) diabetes across all insurance stability types than NH Whites or Asians. The interaction between insurance instability and race/ethnic groups was statistically significant for A1c monitoring and BP control, but not for glycemic control. Conclusion: Stable insurance coverage was associated with improved DM outcomes for all racial / ethnic groups, but did not eliminate racial ethnic disparities.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Etnicidad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Pacientes no Asegurados , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Inhaler technique education among non-English speaking patients in the United States is understudied, with communication barriers and language differences serving as important challenges to education. A previous needs assessment at our institution identified an opportunity to improve inhaler education for our Mandarin-speaking population. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility of a multimodal intervention to identify errors in inhaler technique. METHODS: Adult Mandarin-speaking subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma participated in a hospital outpatient clinic inhaler training session that utilized multimedia education. Pre-intervention information on demographics, confidence, and disease control was gathered. Post-intervention, subjects were asked if they would change their inhaler technique and what they found useful. RESULTS: On pre-intervention survey, eight of eleven (73%) subjects reported being very or completely confident in their inhaler technique. Following the intervention, seven (88%) of those 8 subjects self-identified errors in their technique. Video and handout were reported to be the most useful materials. CONCLUSION: A multimodality inhaler technique education intervention helped self-identify errors in inhaler technique among non-English speaking subjects. Implementation and use of language-targeted educational interventions is feasible in an outpatient clinic setting.
Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Barreras de Comunicación , Lenguaje , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , China/etnología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Factores Sociodemográficos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Measure effect of late-afternoon communication and patient planning (CAPP) rounds to increase early electronic discharge orders (EDO). METHODS: We enrolled 4485 patients discharged from six subspecialty medical services. We implemented late-afternoon CAPP rounds to identify patients who could have morning discharge the subsequent day. After an initial successful implementation of the intervention, we identified lack of sustainability. We made changes with sustained implementation of the intervention. This is a before-after study of a quality improvement intervention. PROGRAM EVALUATION: Primary measures of intervention effectiveness were percentage of patients who received EDO by 11 am and patients discharged by noon. Additional measure of effectiveness were percent of patients admitted to the correct ward, emergency department (ED)-to-ward transfer time compared between intervention and nonintervention periods. We compared the overall expected LOS and the average weekly discharges to assess for comparability across the control and intervention time periods. We used the readmission rate as balancing measure to ensure that the intervention was not have unintended negative patients consequences. RESULTS: Expected length of stay based upon discharge diagnosis/comorbidities and readmission rates were similar across the intervention and control time periods. The average weekly discharges were not statistically significant. Percentage of EDO by 11 am was higher in the first intervention period, second intervention period and combined intervention periods (28.9% vs. 21.8%, P < 0.001) compared with the respective control periods. Percent discharged before noon increased in the first intervention period, second intervention period and for the combined intervention periods (17 vs. 11.8%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in the percent admitted to the correct ward and ED-to-ward transfer time. CONCLUSION: Afternoon CAPP rounds to identify early patient discharges the following day led to increase in EDO entered by 11 am and discharges by noon without an adverse change in readmission rates and LOS.
Asunto(s)
Planificación de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Comunicación , Comorbilidad , Eficiencia Organizacional , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Failure to complete recommended diagnostic tests may increase the risk of diagnostic errors. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate an electronic monitoring tool that notifies the responsible clinician of incomplete imaging tests for their ambulatory patients. METHODS: A results notification workflow engine was created at an academic medical center. It identified future appointments for imaging studies and notified the ordering physician of incomplete tests by secure email. To assess the impact of the intervention, the project team surveyed participating physicians and measured test completion rates within 90 days of the scheduled appointment. Analyses compared test completion rates among patients of intervention and usual care clinicians at baseline and follow-up. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to control for secular trends and differences between cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 725 patients of 16 intervention physicians had 1,016 delayed imaging studies; 2,023 patients of 42 usual care clinicians had 2,697 delayed studies. In the first month, physicians indicated in 23/30 cases that they were unaware of the missed test prior to notification. The 90-day test completion rate was lower in the usual care than intervention group in the 6-month baseline period (18.8 vs. 22.1%, p = 0.119). During the 12-month follow-up period, there was a significant improvement favoring the intervention group (20.9 vs. 25.5%, p = 0.027). The change was driven by improved completion rates among patients referred for mammography (21.0 vs. 30.1%, p = 0.003). Multivariate analyses showed no significant impact of the intervention. CONCLUSION: There was a temporal association between email alerts to physicians about missed imaging tests and improved test completion at 90 days, although baseline differences in intervention and usual care groups limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Research is needed to understand the potential benefits and limitations of missed test notifications to reduce the risk of delayed diagnoses, particularly in vulnerable patient populations.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Errores Diagnósticos/prevención & control , Correo Electrónico , Radiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stable health insurance is often associated with better chronic disease care and outcomes. Racial/ethnic health disparities in outcomes are prevalent and may be associated with insurance instability, particularly in the context of health insurance reform. METHODS: We examined whether insurance instability was associated with uncontrolled blood pressure (UBP) and whether this association varied by race/ethnicity. We used a retrospective longitudinal observational cohort study of patients diagnosed with hypertension who obtained care within two health systems in Massachusetts. We measured the UBP, insurance instability, and race of 43,785 adult primary care patients, age 21-64 with visits from 1/2005-12/2013. RESULTS: We found higher rates of UBP for blacks and Hispanics at each time point over the entire 9 years. Insurance instability was associated with greater rates of UBP. Always uninsured black patients fared worst, while white and Hispanic patients with consistent public insurance fared best. CONCLUSIONS: Stable insurance of any type was associated with better hypertension control than no or unstable insurance.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipertensión/etnología , Hipertensión/terapia , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Massachusetts , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Histiocitosis/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Pulmón/patología , Linfoma de Células B/patología , Anciano , Cristalización , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Pertussis is a commonly underdiagnosed infection with incidence that has been steadily rising in adolescents and adults over the last three decades. Some reports suggested cyclical pattern of pertussis infection occurrence with peaks every two to five years. The complications of pertussis can be infectious or mechanical in the setting of persistent cough. We report an unusual case of a 67-year-old woman who presented with combined lung and liver extrusion in the setting of pertussis infection. This article will review the systematic approach of diagnosis and management of pertussis infections in adults.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: One of the potential benefits of insurance reform is greater stability of insurance and reduced coverage disparities by race and ethnicity. OBJECTIVES: We examined the temporal trends in insurance coverage by racial/ethnic group before and after Massachusetts Insurance Reform by abstracting records across 2 urban safety net hospital systems. RESEARCH DESIGN: We examined adjusted odds of being uninsured and incident rate ratios of gaining and losing insurance over time by race and ethnicity. We used billing records to capture the payer for each episode of care. SUBJECTS: We included data from January 2005 through December 2013 on patients with hypertension between the ages of 21 and 64 years. We compared 4 racial and ethnic groups: non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic. MEASURES: We examined individual patients' insurance coverage status in 6-month intervals. We compared odds of being uninsured in the transition and postinsurance reform period to the prereform period, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities practice location and education, and income by Census tract. RESULTS: Among 48,291 patients with hypertension, reduction in rates of uninsurance with insurance reform was greater for Hispanic (29.7%), non-Hispanic Black (24.8%), and non-Hispanic Asian (26.8%) than non-Hispanic white (14.9%) patients. The odds of becoming uninsured were reduced in all racial and ethnic groups (odds ratio, 0.27-0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Massachusetts Insurance Reform resulted in stable insurance coverage and a reduction in disparities in insurance instability by race and ethnicity.