Multicenter, 2-dose single-group controlled trial of tacrolimus for the severe infertility patients.

INTRODUCTION: Infertility is estimated to affect 8% to 12% of reproductive-aged couples worldwide. While approximately 85% of infertile couples have an identified cause, the remaining 15% suffer physically and emotionally from unexplained intractable infertility. In recent years, maternal-to-fetal immunological abnormalities have attracted attention as mechanisms that differ from the conventional factors contributing to infertility and pregnancy loss. A T-helper 2 (Th2)-dominant immune state has been proposed as a maternal immune alteration to eliminate rejection and induce tolerance to a semi-allogeneic fetus. An imbalance in Th1 responses would not induce adequate maternal immune tolerance to the fetus or early embryos. Tacrolimus, widely used as an immunosuppressant agent in solid organ transplant recipients, is expected to suppress maternal rejection and promote tolerance to early embryos after assisted reproductive technology by modulating the immunological environment of the preimplantation endometrium. We planned an exploratory clinical trial to determine the efficacy, safety, and dosage of tacrolimus in women with intractable infertility. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicenter, 2-dose, single-group controlled trial in infertile women who failed to achieve a chemical pregnancy despite multiple in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET) treatment cycles. The following 2 key selection criteria were set: no underlying factors of infertility despite appropriate evaluation and presence of Th1-dominant immune state, defined as a Th1/Th2 cell ratio ≥ 10.3 in the peripheral blood. A total of 26 eligible participants are randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) to receive immunosuppressive therapy with oral tacrolimus at a daily dose of 2 mg or 4 mg. Tacrolimus is administered for 16 days starting from 2 days before ET. The primary endpoint is the presence of clinical pregnancy 3 weeks after IVF/ET treatment, and the secondary endpoint is the presence of biochemical pregnancy 2 weeks after IVF/ET treatment. Safety evaluation and biomarker discovery for tacrolimus treatment in infertile women will be conducted simultaneously. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; jRCTs031220235).

iPAPP: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing safety and efficacy of intravenous paracetamol and indomethacin for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants.

INTRODUCTION: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) causes severe morbidity in premature infants. Although the use of indomethacin is the standard therapy for PDA, it is sometimes not applicable because of its adverse effects, such as renal and platelet dysfunctions. Paracetamol has emerged as an alternative to indomethacin owing to its excellent safety profile in infants. Of the recently reported case series and clinical trials on the use of paracetamol for PDA, there are few reports in Japan on paracetamol use in preterm infants. Furthermore, indications for the use of paracetamol for PDA have not been approved for use in PDA. While the safety of intravenous paracetamol therapy in case series of preterm infants treated for haemodynamically significant PDA (hsPDA) has been reported, studies which were conducted to compare paracetamol to indomethacin are limited. We, therefore, intend to investigate the hypothesis that intravenous administration of paracetamol has superior safety over indomethacin. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial for intravenous administration of paracetamol for PDA in preterm infants. The inclusion criteria are (1) hsPDA, (2) gestational age from 24 to 34 weeks and birth weight (BW) from 500 to 2000 g, (3) enrolment between 24 hours and 7 days from birth and (4) obtaining parental consent. The primary outcome is renal dysfunction within 48 hours from the last dose of the study drug. Enrolled patients fulfilling all the inclusion criteria are randomly allocated to either intravenous paracetamol or intravenous indomethacin. This trial requires 110 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The clinical trial would follow Japan's Clinical Trials Act. The trial protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Review Board of Saitama Medical University (approval number: 222001). A written informed consent would be obtained from one of the parents. The results are expected to be published in a scientific journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs031220386. PROTOCOL VERSION: 31 March 2022, version 1.0.

Pilot study to estimate the safety and effectiveness of hydroxyurea and methotrexate recurrent langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH-HU-pilot).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study was a non-blinded, multicenter, single-arm study. Recurrent (relapsed) LCH is defined as the appearance of new lesions or the enlargement of preexisting lesions due to LCH. In this study, all patients received hydroxyurea, and if the treatment response was unsatisfactory, methotrexate was added. The duration of treatment was 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the rate of non-active disease achievement, which was 24 weeks after initiating hydroxyurea administration. No active disease is defined as the resolution of all the signs and symptoms related to LCH.

Impact of the Clinical Trials Act 2018 on clinical trial activity in Japan from 2018 to 2020: a retrospective database study using new and conventional Japanese registries.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the impact of Japan's Clinical Trials Act (CTA), which was enacted in April 2018, on subsequent clinical trial activity through an analysis of Japanese registry data. DESIGN: Retrospective database study. SETTING: We extracted information on clinical intervention studies registered between 1 April 2018 and 30 September 2020 in the conventional University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) and the new Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT). We collected and analysed information on registration dates, intervention types, funding, secondary sponsors and use of designated staff in multidisciplinary roles (research planning support, research administration, data management, statistical analysis, monitoring and auditing). The temporal trends in clinical trial activity after CTA enactment were examined. RESULTS: A total of 577 CTA-compliant specified clinical trials (ie, studies funded by pharmaceutical companies or studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of off-label drugs or devices in humans) were registered in the jRCT. During the same period, 5068 clinical trials were registered in the UMIN-CTR. The number of specific clinical trials increased immediately after the implementation of the CTA and stabilised in late 2019, whereas the number of clinical trials registered in the UMIN-CTR generally declined over time. Specified clinical trials that received industry funding and public grants were more likely to use designated staff in multidisciplinary roles. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the CTA has not reduced the number of specified clinical trials, but has reduced the total number of intervention trials. The use of designated staff in multidisciplinary roles is associated with funding, secondary sponsors and multicentre studies. It was inferred that funding was needed to establish research infrastructure systems that support high-quality research.

A phase I/IIa double blind single institute trial of low dose sirolimus for Pendred syndrome/DFNB4.

INTRODUCTION: Pendred syndrome (PDS)/DFNB 4 is a disorder with fluctuating and progressive hearing loss, vertigo, and thyroid goiter. We identified pathophysiology of a neurodegenerative disorder in PDS patient derived cochlear cells that were induced via induced pluripotent stem cells and found sirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, as an inhibitor of cell death with the minimum effective concentration less than 1/10 of the approved dose for other diseases. Given that there is no rational standard therapy for PDS, we planned a study to examine effects of low dose oral administration of sirolimus for the fluctuating and progressive hearing loss, and the balance disorder of PDS by daily monitor of their audio-vestibular symptoms. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a phase I/IIa double blind parallel-group single institute trial in patient with PDS/DFNB4. Sixteen of outpatients with fluctuating hearing diagnosed as PDS in SLC26A4 genetic testing aged in between 7 and 50 years old at the time of consent are given either placebo or sirolimus tablet (NPC-12T). In NPC-12T placebo arm, placebo will be given for 36 weeks; in active substance arm, placebo will be given for 12 weeks and the NPC-12T for 24 weeks. Primary endpoints are safety and tolerability. The number of occurrences and types of adverse events and of side effects will be sorted by clinical symptoms and by abnormal change of clinical test results. A 2-sided 95% confidence interval of the incidence rate by respective dosing arms will be calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Clinical effects on audio-vestibular tests performed daily and precise physiological test at each visit will also be examined as secondary and expiratory endpoints. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: JMA-IIA00361; Pre-results.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in Japanese patients with relapsed chronic immune thrombocytopenia refractory to conventional therapy.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease mediated by the production of autoantibody against platelets. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, is reported to be useful for treatment of ITP. In Japan, however, robust evidence on this treatment has not been accumulated. Hence, we conducted this open-label phase III clinical trial to confirm the efficacy and safety of rituximab, administered at 375 mg/m² once per week at weekly intervals for 4 consecutive weeks in Japanese patients with chronic ITP, who had relapsed and were refractory to conventional therapy. The primary endpoint was defined as the percentage of patients with a platelet count above 50 × 109/L at week 24 after the first dose of rituximab, which was 30.8% of 26 patients (95% confidence interval 14.3-51.8%). Although the lower confidence limit of primary endpoint failed to meet the pre-specified threshold of 20%, the clinical efficacy of rituximab is substantial in consideration of the 2% response rate in the placebo arm in other clinical studies in patients with chronic ITP. We conclude that rituximab is clinically useful and safe in the treatment of Japanese patients with chronic ITP, achieving the goal of maintaining platelet count and reducing risk of bleeding while minimizing treatment-related toxicity.

Cost-effectiveness of adding rituximab to splenectomy and romiplostim for treating steroid-resistant idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in adults.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune disease in which the platelet count falls to <100 × 10(9)/L. Corticosteroids are recommended as the first-line treatment, splenectomy is recommended as the second-line treatment, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) and rituximab are recommended as the third-line treatments for ITP in Japanese ITP treatment guidelines. However, in Japan, rituximab is not eligible for reimbursement for the treatment of ITP. The cost-effectiveness of ITP treatment has not been investigated in Japan. Therefore, in this study, the cost-effectiveness of adding rituximab treatment to the existing treatments indicated for ITP in Japan, namely splenectomy and the TPO-RA romiplostim, was investigated based on the scenario that rituximab is eligible for reimbursement in Japan as a treatment for ITP. METHODS: The efficacy endpoint was set as the number of years with a platelet count ≥30 × 10(9)/L. The analysis was conducted from the healthcare payer's perspective. If the first treatment is ineffective or relapse occurs, then the patient is given the following treatment. The analyzed treatment order consisted of three patterns: splenectomy-romiplostim (sequence 1), splenectomy-romiplostim-rituximab (sequence 2), and splenectomy-rituximab-romiplostim (sequence 3). A Markov model was built for ITP, and the analysis period was set as 2 years. The discount rate was an annual rate of 2%. Sensitivity analyses of the efficacy of splenectomy, romiplostim, and rituximab; treatment cost; and romiplostim dose were performed. RESULTS: The expected costs per patient over a 2-year period for sequences 1, 2, and 3 were USD 40,980, USD 39,822, and USD 33,551, respectively. The expected years with a platelet count ≥30 × 10(9)/L for the three sequences were 1.75, 1.79, and 1.78 years, respectively. The sensitivity analyses illustrated that the results of the base case analysis were robust. CONCLUSIONS: Adding rituximab to standard treatment for ITP (sequences 2-3) is less costly and marginally more effective than standard therapy in adults. According to the study results, if rituximab is reimbursed for the treatment of ITP in Japan, medical expenses are expected to decline.