Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(5): 920-924, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31337599

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The CHOKAI and STONE scores are clinical prediction rules to predict ureteral stones in patients presenting with renal colic. Both systems contribute to reducing diagnostic radiation exposure; however, few studies have compared the two scoring systems. Therefore, we aimed to compare these systems and assess their diagnostic accuracy for ureteral stones. METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective observational study performed between 2017 and 2018, including patients aged >15 years with renal colic and suspected with ureteral stones. We calculated the CHOKAI and STONE scores of each patient based on their medical interviews and physical and laboratory findings. Primary outcome was differences in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in each model, and secondary outcome was diagnostic accuracy at the optimal cut-off point. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients included, 84 were diagnosed with ureteral stones. The area under the curve of the CHOKAI score was 0.95, showing a sensitivity of 0.93, specificity of 0.90, positive likelihood ratio of 9.3, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.079, at an optimal cut-off point of 6. The area under the curve of the STONE score was 0.88, showing a sensitivity of 0.68, specificity of 0.90, positive likelihood ratio of 6.8, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.36, at an optimal cut-off point of 9. Thus, the area under the curve was significantly higher for the CHOKAI score than for the STONE score (p = 0.0028). CONCLUSIONS: The CHOKAI score has a diagnostic performance superior to that of the STONE score in this population.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Ureterales/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Cólico Renal/etiología , Cálculos Ureterales/complicaciones , Adulto Joven
2.
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi ; 108(4): 225-228, 2017.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30333447

RESUMEN

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVT) is rare but sometimes develops in association with malignant neoplasm. We report two cases of CVT that occurred during cisplatin-based chemotherapy for testicular cancer. A 46-year-old man with stage IIA non-seminomatous germ cell tumour was treated with conventional doses of etoposide and cisplatin (EP). On day 11 of the third treatment course, he developed a systemic seizure. Brain computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging could not detect the cause. Enhanced chest-pelvic CT revealed pelvic thrombosis. Administration of phenytoin for epilepsy of unknown cause and heparin for thrombosis was started. He had completed 4 courses of EP therapy without seizure recurrence. After re-evaluating the brain CT images retrospectively, we found high density of superior sagittal sinus (SSS) and strongly suspected CVT. Another patient was a 47-year-old man with stage IIIB seminomatous germ cell tumour treated with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) therapy. On day 11 of the second treatment course, he developed a systemic seizure. Brain CT revealed subarachnoid haemorrhage localised in the right parietal lobe. CT venography revealed a filling defect in the superior sagittal sinus (SSS). MR venography revealed a SSS stenosis. We diagnosed the cause of the seizure as CVT and started administration of anticoagulant therapy. After the thrombus had diminished, chemotherapy was restarted and another 2 courses of BEP therapy was completed.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...