Successful treatment through staged laparoscopic transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for postoperative bile leakage: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic laparoscopic-assisted transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (LA-ERCP) is a safe and effective technique for patient who are unable to receive endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic treatment. This procedure shows a high overall success rate in managing pancreaticobiliary complications, comparable to that of ERCP. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 51-year-old man had abdominal pain for 2 days. The patient showed acute calculous cholecystitis and acute cholangitis with distal common bile duct (CBD) stones. We performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy and removed the distal CBD stones through CBD exploration.On the fourth day after the surgery, bile leakage was observed through the surgical drain. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with postoperative bile leakage based on clinical findings. INTERVENTIONS: The patient could not receive ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage because he had severe trismus and limb stiffness after suffering from poliomyelitis. So, we performed LA-ERCP, sphincterotomy, and biliary stent insertion. The fully covered self-expanding metal stent was implanted within the percutaneous gastrostomy site around, and 4 weeks later, the stent was removed during re-ERCP. OUTCOMES: The patient was discharged without any complications. There were no long-term complications noted during the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION/LESSONS: Staged LA-ERCP represents a practical strategy for managing bile leakage and offers a novel solution for patients for whom transoral and transhepatic approaches are unsuitable. As a result, clinicians must know techniques for gaining access to the biliary system, such as LA-ERCP.

Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery for T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis.

Although laparoscopic treatment for T1 gallbladder cancer (GBC) has been described previously, the differences in oncologic outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional open surgery for T2 GBC have not been investigated. We aimed to assess the role of laparoscopic surgery using retrospectively collected data for 81 patients with T2 GBC who underwent surgical resection between January 2010 and December 2017. Eligible patients were classified into "laparoscopic" and "open" groups. Propensity-score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The effects of surgery type on surgical and oncological outcomes were investigated. After propensity-score matching, 19 patients were included in the open and laparoscopic surgery groups. The median follow-up durations were 70 and 26 months in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. The operative time (316.8 ± 80.3 vs. 218.9 ± 145.0 min, p = 0.016) and length of postoperative hospital stay (14.4 ± 6.0 vs. 8.4 ± 5.9 days, p = 0.004) were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group. The three-year overall (86.3% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.660) and disease-free (76.4% vs. 60.2%, p = 0.448) survival rates were similar between the groups. Propensity-score matching showed that laparoscopic surgery for T2 GBC yielded similar long-term oncological outcomes and favorable short-term outcomes in comparison with open surgery. Laparoscopic treatment should be considered in patients with T2 GBC.

Clinicopathological characteristics of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: a Japan-Korea collaborative study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalent location and incidence of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) and invasive carcinoma associated with them have varied markedly among studies due to differences in diagnostic criteria and tumor location. METHODS: IPNBs were classified into two types: Type 1 IPNB, being histologically similar to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas, and Type 2 IPNB, having a more complex histological architecture with irregular papillary branching or foci of solid-tubular components. Medical data were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 694 IPNB patients, 520 and 174 had Type 1 and Type 2, respectively. The levels of AST, ALT, ALP, T. Bil, and CEA were significantly higher in patients with Type 2 than in those with Type 1. Type 1 IPNB was more frequently located in the intrahepatic bile duct than Type 2, whereas Type 2 was more frequently located in the distal bile duct than Type 1 IPNB (P < 0.001). There were significant differences in 5-year cumulative survival rates (75.2% vs 50.9%; P < 0.0001) and 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rates (64.1% vs 35.3%; P < 0.0001) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Type 1 and Type 2 IPNBs differ in their clinicopathological features and prognosis. This classification may help to further understand IPNB.

Is the New T1 Category as Defined in the Eighth Edition of the AJCC Pancreatic Cancer Staging System an Improvement?

BACKGROUND: The new T1 pancreatic cancer by the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system discards the concept of "extension beyond the pancreas" and focuses on size only. Furthermore, the new T1 is divided into T1a, T1b, and T1c based on size. The evidence pertaining to these changes has not been evaluated. This is to evaluate the feasibility of the new T1 definition in the pancreas head cancer cohort. METHODS: Data from 540 patients with T1 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma as defined by the eighth edition were collected from Korea, Japan, and the USA. Invasive IPMNs were excluded. Survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 540 patients, 181 patients were T1 according to the seventh edition and 359 were down-staged to T1 from the former T3 because the concept of "extension beyond the pancreas" was discarded. The 5-year survival rate and the median survival of T1 patients were 30.6% and 27 months, respectively. Comparing tumors that extend beyond the pancreas (new T1) and those confined within the pancreas (original T1), the latter showed significantly longer median survival (43 vs. 24 months, p < 0.001). In terms of T1a/b/c, there were no significant differences in survival. Using MaxStat, subdividing into two groups using 1.1 cm as the cut-off value, yielded significantly discrete prognostic groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The new T1 definition may be more practical, but the implications of the concept of "extension beyond the pancreas" should be re-investigated. Further, the subcategorization of T1a/b/c may not be adequate and may require revision or deletion.

Multinational validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition pancreatic cancer staging system in a pancreas head cancer cohort.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pancreas head cancer and to validate the 8th edition using three multinational tertiary center data. METHODS: Data of 2,864 patients with pancreas head cancer were collected from Korea (571), Japan (824), and the USA (1,469). Survival analysis was performed to compare the 7th and 8th editions. Validation was performed by log-rank tests and test for trend repeated 1,000 times with random sets. RESULTS: In the 7th edition, 4.1%, 3.1%, 18.6%, 67.5%, 3.6%, and 3.1% were stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III, and IV. In the 8th edition, 8.8%, 13.9%, 3.1%, 38.2%, 32.9%, and 3.1% were stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III, and IV, respectively. The change in T category downstaged 459 patients from IIA to the new IA and IB. The new N2 category upstaged 856 patients from the former IIB to III. The 7th edition reversely stratified IA and IB. The 8th edition corrected this mis-stratification of the 7th edition, but lacked discriminatory power between IB and IIA (P = 0.271). Validation using the log-rank showed that the 8th edition provided better discrimination in 6.387 test sets among 10 tests. The test for trend validated the 8th edition to stratify stages in correct order more often (7.815/10). CONCLUSION: The 8th edition provides more even distribution with more powerful discrimination compared to the 7th edition.