Ethnic differences in the effects of apolipoprotein E ɛ4 and vascular risk factors on accelerated brain aging.

The frequency of the apolipoprotein E ɛ4 allele and vascular risk factors differs among ethnic groups. We aimed to assess the combined effects of apolipoprotein E ɛ4 and vascular risk factors on brain age in Korean and UK cognitively unimpaired populations. We also aimed to determine the differences in the combined effects between the two populations. We enrolled 2314 cognitively unimpaired individuals aged ≥45 years from Korea and 6942 cognitively unimpaired individuals from the UK, who were matched using propensity scores. Brain age was defined using the brain age index. The apolipoprotein E genotype (ɛ4 carriers, ɛ2 carriers and ɛ3/ɛ3 homozygotes) and vascular risk factors (age, hypertension and diabetes) were considered predictors. Apolipoprotein E ɛ4 carriers in the Korean (ß = 0.511, P = 0.012) and UK (ß = 0.302, P = 0.006) groups had higher brain age index values. The adverse effects of the apolipoprotein E genotype on brain age index values increased with age in the Korean group alone (ɛ2 carriers × age, ß = 0.085, P = 0.009; ɛ4 carriers × age, ß = 0.100, P < 0.001). The apolipoprotein E genotype, age and ethnicity showed a three-way interaction with the brain age index (ɛ2 carriers × age × ethnicity, ß = 0.091, P = 0.022; ɛ4 carriers × age × ethnicity, ß = 0.093, P = 0.003). The effects of apolipoprotein E on the brain age index values were more pronounced in individuals with hypertension in the Korean group alone (ɛ4 carriers × hypertension, ß = 0.777, P = 0.038). The apolipoprotein E genotype, age and ethnicity showed a three-way interaction with the brain age index (ɛ4 carriers × hypertension × ethnicity, ß=1.091, P = 0.014). We highlight the ethnic differences in the combined effects of the apolipoprotein E ɛ4 genotype and vascular risk factors on accelerated brain age. These findings emphasize the need for ethnicity-specific strategies to mitigate apolipoprotein E ɛ4-related brain aging in cognitively unimpaired individuals.

Distinct effects of blood pressure parameters on Alzheimer's and vascular markers in 1,952 Asian individuals without dementia.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for cardiovascular disease, including elevated blood pressure, are known to increase risk of Alzheimer's disease. There has been increasing awareness of the relationship between long-term blood pressure (BP) patterns and their effects on the brain. We aimed to investigate the association of repeated BP measurements with Alzheimer's and vascular disease markers. METHODS: We recruited 1,952 participants without dementia between August 2015 and February 2022. During serial clinic visits, we assessed both systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP), and visit-to-visit BP variability (BPV) was quantified from repeated measurements. In order to investigate the relationship of mean SBP (or DBP) with Alzheimer's and vascular markers and cognition, we performed multiple linear and logistic regression analyses after controlling for potential confounders (Model 1). Next, we investigated the relationship of with variation of SBP (or DBP) with the aforementioned variables by adding it into Model 1 (Model 2). In addition, mediation analyses were conducted to determine mediation effects of Alzheimer's and vascular makers on the relationship between BP parameters and cognitive impairment. RESULTS: High Aß uptake was associated with greater mean SBP (ß = 1.049, 95% confidence interval 1.016-1.083). High vascular burden was positively associated with mean SBP (odds ratio = 1.293, 95% CI 1.015-1.647) and mean DBP (1.390, 1.098-1.757). High tau uptake was related to greater systolic BPV (0.094, 0.001-0.187) and diastolic BPV (0.096, 0.007-0.184). High Aß uptake partially mediated the relationship between mean SBP and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Hippocampal atrophy mediated the relationship between diastolic BPV and MMSE scores. CONCLUSIONS: Each BP parameter affects Alzheimer's and vascular disease markers differently, which in turn leads to cognitive impairment. Therefore, it is necessary to appropriately control specific BP parameters to prevent the development of dementia. Furthermore, a better understanding of pathways from specific BP parameters to cognitive impairments might enable us to select the managements targeting the specific BP parameters to prevent dementia effectively.

Deep learning model for individualized trajectory prediction of clinical outcomes in mild cognitive impairment.

Objectives: Accurately predicting when patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) will progress to dementia is a formidable challenge. This work aims to develop a predictive deep learning model to accurately predict future cognitive decline and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) marker changes over time at the individual level for patients with MCI. Methods: We recruited 657 amnestic patients with MCI from the Samsung Medical Center who underwent cognitive tests, brain MRI scans, and amyloid-ß (Aß) positron emission tomography (PET) scans. We devised a novel deep learning architecture by leveraging an attention mechanism in a recurrent neural network. We trained a predictive model by inputting age, gender, education, apolipoprotein E genotype, neuropsychological test scores, and brain MRI and amyloid PET features. Cognitive outcomes and MRI features of an MCI subject were predicted using the proposed network. Results: The proposed predictive model demonstrated good prediction performance (AUC = 0.814 ± 0.035) in five-fold cross-validation, along with reliable prediction in cognitive decline and MRI markers over time. Faster cognitive decline and brain atrophy in larger regions were forecasted in patients with Aß (+) than with Aß (-). Conclusion: The proposed method provides effective and accurate means for predicting the progression of individuals within a specific period. This model could assist clinicians in identifying subjects at a higher risk of rapid cognitive decline by predicting future cognitive decline and MRI marker changes over time for patients with MCI. Future studies should validate and refine the proposed predictive model further to improve clinical decision-making.

Distinct spatiotemporal patterns of cortical thinning in Alzheimer's disease-type cognitive impairment and subcortical vascular cognitive impairment.

Previous studies on Alzheimer's disease-type cognitive impairment (ADCI) and subcortical vascular cognitive impairment (SVCI) has rarely explored spatiotemporal heterogeneity. This study aims to identify distinct spatiotemporal cortical atrophy patterns in ADCI and SVCI. 1,338 participants (713 ADCI, 208 SVCI, and 417 cognitively unimpaired elders) underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), amyloid positron emission tomography, and neuropsychological tests. Using MRI, this study measures cortical thickness in five brain regions (medial temporal, inferior temporal, posterior medial parietal, lateral parietal, and frontal areas) and utilizes the Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn) model to predict the most probable subtype and stage for each participant. SuStaIn identifies two distinct cortical thinning patterns in ADCI (medial temporal: 65.8%, diffuse: 34.2%) and SVCI (frontotemporal: 47.1%, parietal: 52.9%) patients. The medial temporal subtype of ADCI shows a faster decline in attention, visuospatial, visual memory, and frontal/executive domains than the diffuse subtype (p-value < 0.01). However, there are no significant differences in longitudinal cognitive outcomes between the two subtypes of SVCI. Our study provides valuable insights into the distinct spatiotemporal patterns of cortical thinning in patients with ADCI and SVCI, suggesting the potential for individualized therapeutic and preventive strategies to improve clinical outcomes.

Association of Glycemic Variability With Imaging Markers of Vascular Burden, ß-Amyloid, Brain Atrophy, and Cognitive Impairment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the association between glycemic variability (GV) and neuroimaging markers of white matter hyperintensities (WMH), beta-amyloid (Aß), brain atrophy, and cognitive impairment. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included participants without dementia from a memory clinic. They all had Aß PET, brain MRI, and standardized neuropsychological tests and had fasting glucose (FG) levels tested more than twice during the study period. We defined GV as the intraindividual visit-to-visit variability in FG levels. Multivariable linear regression and logistic regression were used to identify whether GV was associated with the presence of severe WMH and Aß uptake with DM, mean FG levels, age, sex, hypertension, and presence of APOE4 allele as covariates. Mediation analyses were used to investigate the mediating effect of WMH and Aß uptake on the relationship between GV and brain atrophy and cognition. RESULTS: Among the 688 participants, the mean age was 72.2 years, and the proportion of female participants was 51.9%. Increase in GV was predictive of the presence of severe WMH (coefficient [95% CI] 1.032 [1.012-1.054]; p = 0.002) and increased Aß uptake (1.005 [1.001-1.008]; p = 0.007). Both WMH and increased Aß uptake partially mediated the relationship between GV and frontal-executive dysfunction (GV → WMH → frontal-executive; direct effect, -0.319 [-0.557 to -0.080]; indirect effect, -0.050 [-0.091 to -0.008]) and memory dysfunction (GV → Aß â†’ memory; direct effect, -0.182 [-0.338 to -0.026]; indirect effect, -0.067 [-0.119 to -0.015]), respectively. In addition, increased Aß uptake completely mediated the relationship between GV and hippocampal volume (indirect effect, -1.091 [-2.078 to -0.103]) and partially mediated the relationship between GV and parietal thickness (direct effect, -0.00101 [-0.00185 to -0.00016]; indirect effect, -0.00016 [-0.00032 to -0.000002]). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that increased GV is related to vascular and Alzheimer risk factors and neurodegenerative markers, which in turn leads to subsequent cognitive impairment. Furthermore, GV can be considered a potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia prevention.

Clinical and Pathological Validation of CT-Based Regional Harmonization Methods of Amyloid PET.

PURPOSE: The CT-based regional direct comparison Centiloid (dcCL) method was developed to harmonize and quantify regional ß-amyloid (Aß) burden. In the present study, we aimed to investigate correlations between the CT-based regional dcCL scales and Aß pathological burdens and to validate the clinical utility using thresholds derived from pathological assessment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included a pathological cohort of 63 cases and a clinical cohort of 4062 participants, and obtained modified Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease criteria (mCERAD) scores by assessment of neuritic plaque burdens in multiple areas of each cortical region. PET and CT images were processed using the CT-based regional dcCL method to calculate scales in 6 distinct regions. RESULTS: The CT-based regional dcCL scales were correlated with neuritic plaque burdens represented by mCERAD scores, globally and regionally ( r = 0.56~0.76). In addition, striatum dcCL scales reflected Aß involvement in the striatum ( P < 0.001). The regional dcCL scales could predict significant Aß deposition in specific brain regions with high accuracy: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81-0.97 with an mCERAD cutoff of 1.5 and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88-0.93 with an mCERAD cutoff of 0.5. When applying the dcCL thresholds of 1.5 mCERAD scores, the G(-)R(+) group showed lower performances in memory and global cognitive functions and had less hippocampal volume compared with the G(-)R(-) group ( P < 0.001). However, when applying the dcCL thresholds of 0.5 mCERAD scores, there were no differences in the global cognitive functions between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The thresholds of regional dcCL scales derived from pathological assessments might provide clinicians with a better understanding of biomarker-guided diagnosis and distinguishable clinical phenotypes, which are particularly useful when harmonizing different PET ligands with only PET/CT.