The role of interim FDG PET-CT after induction chemotherapy as a predictor of concurrent chemoradiotherapy efficacy and prognosis for head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: Induction chemotherapy (ICT) with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has the advantages of organ preservation and systemic control in head and neck cancer (HNC). Early prediction of CCRT efficacy may help identify patients who will benefit more from surgery than from CCRT. We investigated the role of interim 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) after ICT to predict the efficacy of CCRT and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Tumor responses were retrospectively reviewed after CCRT based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. FDG PET-CT imaging was performed before and after three cycles of TPF. We examined the associations between the metabolic response (percentage decrease in the maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and total metabolic tumor volume [MTV]) after ICT and complete response (CR) to CCRT, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We studied 43 HNC patients with a median follow-up of 32.7 months. Lymph node (LN) SUVmax and total MTV decreases from baseline after ICT were greater in patients with a CR to CCRT than in non-CR patients (LN SUVmax, 88.8% vs. 62.5%, respectively; total MTV, 99.7% vs. 89.9%, respectively). Decreases in total MTV ≥ 78% and LN SUVmax ≥73% after ICT predicted CR to CCRT and longer OS and PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Using interim FDG PET-CT to measure SUVmax and total MTV after three cycles of ICT may be a useful technique for identifying HNC patients who will benefit from CCRT and predicting survival outcomes.

Role of depth of response and MTHFR genotype as predictors of fluorouracil rechallenge therapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

There is limited data on the clinical and biological parameters that enable the prediction of the benefits derived from additional chemotherapy after disease progression compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study evaluated the role of tumor response as a clinical parameter and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as a biomarker to predict the benefit of additional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) rechallenge chemotherapy in patients with refractory mCRC. Tumor responses were retrospectively reviewed based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DoR) following first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV CRC. Together with these parameters, SNPs known to be associated with the response to chemotherapy were analyzed with survival outcomes. In total, the tumor responses of 242 patients with mCRC were evaluated. Overall response and ETS were identified in 110 (45.4%) and 103 patients (42.6%), respectively, and the median DoR was 38.5±30.08%. ETS and DoR were significantly associated with survival outcomes, including progression-free survival, post-progression survival and overall survival. Among these patients, SNPs were analyzed in 171 patients. X-ray repair cross complementing 1 (XRCC1) (AG/AA) with a DoR >60%, good performance status and the absence of bone lesions were associated with improved overall survival. In patients receiving third-line chemotherapy with 5-FU rechallenge therapy, the methylenetretrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) (C677T) CC genotype and a DoR >60% were significantly associated with a good prognosis in multivariate analysis. XRCC1 (AG/AA) was also associated with a good prognosis in patients with mCRC. Patients with a DoR >60% following first-line chemotherapy and a MTHFR (C677T) CC genotype exhibited a survival benefit from 5-FU retreatment. Therefore, the DoR and MTHFR genotype are potential markers for selecting patients with refractory mCRC that would benefit from 5-FU rechallenge therapy.

Effect of the allelic variants of ABCB1, CYP2D6 and HTR3B on response of ramosetron to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Korean cancer patients.

AIM: Despite appropriate use of antiemetics including 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3 ) receptor antagonists, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is still an unsolved problem in patients with anticancer drugs. We examined whether the variants of ABCB1, CYP2D6 and HTR3B affect efficacy of ramosetron, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist in a dose escalation clinical trial. METHODS: We conducted a clinical trial on patients who underwent FOLFOX combination chemotherapy. The participants were randomized into three groups of ramosetron: 0.3 mg (standard dose), 0.45 mg and 0.6 mg. Rhodes index of nausea, vomiting and retching were measured at 1, 6 h, day 1, day 2 and day 7 after the administration of ramosetron as a clinical parameter of CINV and polymorphism was analyzed from genomic DNA. RESULTS: There was a dose-dependent decrease in the nausea and vomiting scores at day 1 and day 2, not statistically significant. The Rhodes index of nausea, vomiting and retching score at day 1 in participants with HTR3B-100_-102delAAG deletion variants was significantly higher than wild type participants, regardless of dosages. However, the polymorphisms including ABCB1, CYP2D6 and other HTR3B genes did not affect response to ramosetron after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the -AAG deletion variant of the 5-HT3B receptor gene may contribute to variability in response to antiemetic therapy for CINV regardless of dose escalation. These results suggest that carrying a -100_-102delAAG variant of 5-HT3 gene should be supported by alternate or additive antiemetics in addition to 5-HT3 antagonists to control acute emesis.

FGFR4 Arg388 Is Correlated with Poor Survival in Resected Colon Cancer Promoting Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition.

PURPOSE: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) plays an important role in cancer progression during tumor proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. This study evaluated the prognostic role of FGFR4 polymorphism in patients with resected colon cancer, including the underlying mechanism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: FGFR4 polymorphism was characterized in patientswho received curative resection for stage III colon cancer. FGFR4-dependent signal pathways involving cell proliferation, invasion, and migration according to genotypes were also evaluated in transfected colon cancer cell lines. RESULTS: Among a total of 273 patients, the GG of FGFR4 showed significantly better overall survival than the AG or AA, regardless of adjuvant treatment. In the group of AG or AA, combination of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) resulted in better survival than fluorouracil/leucovorin or no adjuvant chemotherapy. However, in GG, there was no difference among treatment regimens. Using multivariate analyses, the Arg388 carriers, together with age, N stage, poor differentiation, absence of a lymphocyte response, and no adjuvant chemotherapy, had a significantly worse OS than patients with the Gly388 allele. In transfected colon cancer cells, overexpression of Arg388 significantly increased cell proliferation and changes in epithelial to mesenchymal transition markers compared with cells overexpressing the Gly388 allele. CONCLUSION: The Arg388 allele of FGFR4 may be a biomarker and a candidate target for adjuvant treatment of patients with resected colon cancer.

A phase II study of adjuvant S-1/cisplatin chemotherapy followed by S-1-based chemoradiotherapy for D2-resected gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Surgery is the only possible curative treatment for gastric cancer. However, the high recurrence rate makes gastric cancer difficult to cure by surgery alone. The present study was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes and toxicity of adjuvant treatment, including S-1/cisplatin chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy with concurrent S-1. METHODS: Patients with radically D2-resected adenocarcinoma of the stomach of stage IB-IV (M0) were eligible. Patients were treated with S-1 (40-60 mg depending on the patient's body surface area) twice daily for 3 weeks and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) intravenously on day 1 every 5 weeks. Patients received CRT (45 Gy of radiation at 1.8 Gy/day, 5 days per week, for 5 weeks with the same dose of S-1 during radiation) followed by two additional cycles of S-1/cisplatin. The primary endpoint was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate; the secondary endpoints were the 3-year overall survival rate and toxicities. RESULTS: Until May 2012, 46 patients were enrolled, and 34 (73.9%) completed the planned treatment. The median age was 53 years (range: 31-69 years), and the numbers of patients with stage IB, II, III and IV disease were 0, 17, 25 and 4, respectively. Main grade 3-4 toxicities were as follows: neutropenia (28.2%), nausea (17.4%), vomiting (8.7%) and anorexia (15.2%). At the time of analysis, after a median follow-up period of 56.5 months (3.03-74.0 months), 16 recurrence events and 15 deaths were reported. The estimated 3-year DFS and survival rates were 65.2 and 76.1%, respectively. The most common site of recurrence was the peritoneum (n = 12). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this phase II study show that intensified adjuvant treatment with S-1/cisplatin chemotherapy and S-1-based chemoradiotherapy was tolerable and effective in reducing disease recurrence. The addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy may be effective in D2-resected gastric cancer. Although the data here are promising, a randomized trial is needed between patients treated with the current regimen and an appropriate comparator arm.

A Randomized, Double-Blind Pilot Study of Dose Comparison of Ramosetron to Prevent Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the optimal dose titration of ramosetron to prevent the Rhodes Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching (RINVR). METHODS: Patients treated with folic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin were randomized into three groups (0.3 mg, 0.45 mg, and 0.6 mg ramosetron before chemotherapy). The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics using RINVR were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventeen, 15, and 18 patients received ramosetron at doses of 0.3 mg, 0.45 mg, and 0.6 mg, respectively. T max (h), C max (ng/mL), and AUClast (ng·h/mL) were associated with dose escalation significantly, showing a reverse correlation with the RINVR during chemotherapy. Acute CINV was observed in four patients (22.2%), two patients (14.3%), and one (5.6%) patient and a delayed CINV on day 7 was found in eight (47%), three (21.4%), and five (27.8%) patients in each group. The complete response rate was increased with dose escalation (35.3%, 50.0%, and 72.2% in each group) and also showed the tendency for decreasing moderate-to-severe CINV. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a trend regarding the dose-response relationship for ramosetron to prevent CINV, including delayed emesis. It suggested that dose escalation should be considered in patients with CINV in a subsequent cycle of chemotherapy, and an individual approach using RINVR could be useful to monitor CINV.

Can proton pump inhibitors reduce rebleeding following Histoacryl sclerotherapy for gastric variceal hemorrhage?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in reducing rebleeding and bleeding-related death rates after endoscopic gastric variceal obliteration (GVO) using N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBC). METHODS: This study enrolled 341 patients who were consecutively diagnosed with and treated for bleeding gastric varices. The patients were divided into PPI and non-PPI groups, and their endoscopic findings, initial hemostasis outcomes, rebleeding and bleeding-related death rates, and treatment-related complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The rate of initial hemostasis was 97.1%. rebleeding occurred in 2.2% of patients within 2 weeks, 3.9% of patients within 4 weeks, 18.9% of patients within 6 months, and 27.6% of patients within 12 months of the GVO procedure. A previous history of variceal bleeding (relative risk [RR], 1.955; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.263 to 3.028; p = 0.003) and use of PPIs (RR, 0.554; 95% CI, 0.352 to 0.873; p = 0.011) were associated with rebleeding. Child-Pugh class C (RR, 10.914; 95% CI, 4.032 to 29.541; p < 0.001), failure of initial hemostasis (RR, 13.329; 95% CI, 2.795 to 63.556; p = 0.001), and the presence of red-colored concomitant esophageal varices (RR, 4.096; 95% CI, 1.320 to 12.713; p = 0.015) were associated with bleeding-related death. CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic use of PPIs reduces rebleeding after GVO using NBC in patients with gastric variceal hemorrhage. However, prophylactic use of PPIs does not reduce bleeding-related death.

Clinical outcomes of gastric variceal obliteration using N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate in patients with acute gastric variceal hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic injection of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBC; Histoacryl) for treatment of bleeding gastric varices. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 455 patients with gastric variceal hemorrhage (GVH) who were consecutively treated with NBC from January 2004 to July 2013, with a mean follow-up period of 582 days. The patients' endoscopic findings, initial hemostasis, complications, rebleeding rates, and bleeding-related death rates were reviewed. RESULTS: Hemostasis was achieved initially in 96.9% (441/455) of patients; rebleeding occurred in 35.2% (160/455), and the bleeding-related death rate was 6.8% (31/455) during follow-up. Complications included fever (6.8%), abdominal pain (3.7%), diarrhea (1.3%), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (0.7%), bacteremia (0.4%), and embolism (0.2%). A red-color sign on concomitant esophageal varices (EVs) (p = 0.002) and previous history of variceal bleeding (p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for rebleeding within 1 year. The Child-Pugh score (p < 0.001), presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (p = 0.001), and failure of initial hemostasis (p < 0.001) were the risk factors most closely associated with bleeding-related death. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with GVH. The results may help in the selection of effective treatment strategies for patients with GVH.