Clinical outcomes of the post-closure technique for arteriotomy closure with the Impella cardiac power percutaneous left ventricular assist device.

With the increasing utilization of endovascular mechanical circulatory support devices, such as the Impella CP (Abiomed), there is a need for standardized guidelines for its safe removal. Development of the Perclose post-closure technique was facilitated by the introduction of a new Impella repositioning sheath in 2019, which enabled re-access to the sidearm and stylet, rewiring of the access artery, and Impella sheath removal. Our retrospective single-center study included all patients undergoing Perclose post-closure technique for vascular access closure after Impella removal between 2018 and 2024. Forty-six patients, with a mean age of 63.8 years, predominantly male (82.6%), were included in the analysis. Indications for Impella placement included complex percutaneous coronary intervention (34.8%) and cardiogenic shock (CS) (heart failure-CS: 32.6%, myocardial infarction-CS: 21.7%). Clinically relevant complications were encountered in less than 5% of cases. No instances of covered stent placement, fasciotomy, amputation, or access site infections were reported. Our study underscores the safety of the Perclose post-closure technique following Impella removal in a diverse cohort of patients, with an overall clinically significant complication rate of less than 5%. The Perclose post-closure technique is a reliable and well-tolerated method for vascular access closure in patients undergoing Impella support.

Clinical impact of pulmonary artery catheter in patients with cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) for the management of cardiogenic shock (CS) remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the association between PAC use and mortality among patients with CS. METHODS: Published studies of patients with CS treated with or without PAC hemodynamic guidance were retrieved from MEDLINE and PubMed databases from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021. The primary outcome was mortality, which was defined as a combination of in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes assessed 30-day and in-hospital mortality separately. To assess the quality of nonrandomized studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), a well-established scoring system was used. We analyzed outcomes for each study using NOS with a threshold value of >6, indicating high quality. We also performed analyses based on the countries of the studies conducted. RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 930,530 patients with CS were analyzed. Of these, 85,769 patients were in the PAC-treated group, and 844,761 patients did not receive a PAC. PAC use was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality (PAC: 4.6 % to 41.5 % vs control: 18.8 % to 51.0 %) (OR 0.63, 95 % CI: 0.41-0.97, I2 = 0.96). Subgroup analyses demonstrated no difference in the risk of mortality between NOS ≥ 6 studies and NOS < 6 studies (p-interaction = 0.57), 30-day and in-hospital mortality (p-interaction = 0.83), or the country of origin of studies (p-interaction = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The use of PAC in patients with CS may be associated with decreased mortality. These data support the need for a randomized controlled trial testing the utility of PAC use in CS.

Physiologic guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention: State of the evidence.

Physiological assessment to guide the treatment of epicardial coronary stenoses has become a cornerstone of the field of interventional cardiology with an increasingly diverse range of indices available to the clinician. This review describes the evolution and physiologic basis of these functional indices, outlines the evidence base supporting each, and discusses their potential future role in efforts to further improve patient selection and outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Do Patients With Non-Viable Myocardium From Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Benefit From Revascularization? A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial viability assessment is used to select patients who will derive the greatest benefit from revascularization. It remains controversial whether revascularization only benefits patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who have viable myocardium. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare mortality between patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and non-viable myocardium who underwent revascularization and those who underwent medical therapy alone. METHODS: The MEDLINE database was searched using PubMed to retrieve studies published up to December 2021. Inclusion criteria were 1. studies that evaluated the impact of revascularization (revascularization group) versus medical therapy alone (control group) following myocardial viability assessment; 2. patients who had coronary artery disease that was amenable to coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention; and 3. patients who had non-viable myocardium. The main outcome measure was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included, evaluating 1363 patients with non-viable myocardium, of whom 501 patients underwent revascularization and 862 patients received medical therapy alone. There was a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.62-0.93, I2 = 0) in the revascularization group compared to the control group. There was no association between the type of viability imaging modality and the risk of all-cause mortality (P-interaction = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest a benefit from revascularization compared to medical therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy despite the lack of myocardial viability.

Percutaneous Decommissioning of a Left Ventricular Assist Device in a Patient With Myocardial Recovery.

A 37-year-old man was referred for consideration of percutaneous decommissioning of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Following careful hemodynamic monitoring during pump turn-down and temporary outflow graft occlusion, the LVAD was permanently decommissioned by using a vascular plug to induce thrombosis of the outflow graft. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Survival Following Alcohol Septal Ablation or Septal Myectomy for Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: There is little information regarding long-term mortality comparing the 2 most common procedures for septal reduction for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), alcohol septal ablation (ASA), and septal myectomy. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the long-term mortality of patients with obstructive HCM following septal myectomy or ASA. METHODS: We evaluated outcomes of 3,859 patients who underwent ASA or septal myectomy in 3 specialized HCM centers. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint of the study. RESULTS: In the study cohort, 585 (15.2%) patients underwent ASA, and 3,274 (84.8%) underwent septal myectomy. Patients undergoing ASA were significantly older (median age: 63.0 years [IQR: 52.7-72.8 years] vs 53.7 years [IQR: 44.9-62.8 years]; P < 0.001) and had smaller septal thickness (19.0 mm [IQR: 17.0-22.0 mm] vs 20.0 mm [IQR: 17.0-23.0 mm]; P = 0.007). Patients undergoing ASA also had more comorbidities, including renal failure, diabetes, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. There were 4 (0.7%) early deaths in the ASA group and 9 (0.3%) in the myectomy group. Over a median follow-up of 6.4 years (IQR: 3.6-10.2 years), the 10-year all-cause mortality rate was 26.1% in the ASA group and 8.2% in the myectomy group. After adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidities, the mortality remained greater in patients having septal reduction by ASA (HR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.29-2.19; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, ASA is associated with increased long-term all-cause mortality compared with septal myectomy. This impact on survival is independent of other known factors but may be influenced by unmeasured confounding patient characteristics.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile of a Novel Phospholipid Aspirin Formulation.

Aspirin is one of the most widely used medicines. Although aspirin is commonly utilized for the treatment of several medical conditions, its broadest uptake is for the prevention of recurrent ischemic events in patients with atherosclerotic disease. Its mechanism of action of inhibiting platelet activation via blockade of thromboxane A2 production is unique and is not covered by any other antiplatelet agents. While plain, uncoated, immediate-release aspirin is used in acute settings to help assure rapid absorption, enteric-coated aspirin formulations dominate current chronic use, particularly in North America, including for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. The unmet needs with current aspirin formulations include a high risk of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events with plain aspirin, which enteric-coated formulations are not able to overcome, and subject to erratic absorption leading to reduced drug bioavailability. These observations underscore the need for aspirin formulations with a more favorable safety and efficacy profile. Phospholipid-aspirin complex (PL-ASA) is a novel formulation designed to address these needs. It is associated with reduced local acute GI injury compared with plain aspirin, and predictable absorption resulting in more reliable platelet inhibition compared with enteric-coated tablets. This review explores the rationale and pharmacologic profile of PL-ASA intended to address the unmet needs for aspirin therapy.

Intermittent Occlusion of the Superior Vena Cava to Improve Hemodynamics in Patients With Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure: The VENUS-HF Early Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Reducing congestion remains a primary target of therapy for acutely decompensated heart failure. The VENUS-HF EFS (VENUS-Heart Failure Early Feasibility Study) is the first clinical trial testing intermittent occlusion of the superior vena cava with the preCARDIA system, a catheter mounted balloon and pump console, to improve decongestion in acutely decompensated heart failure. METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective, single-arm exploratory safety and feasibility trial, 30 patients with acutely decompensated heart failure were assigned to preCARDIA therapy for 12 or 24 hours. The primary safety outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events through 30 days. Secondary end points included technical success defined as successful preCARDIA placement, treatment, and removal and reduction in right atrial and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Other efficacy measures included urine output and patient-reported symptoms. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled and assigned to receive the preCARDIA system. Freedom from device- or procedure-related major adverse events was observed in 100% (n=30/30) of patients. The system was successfully placed, activated and removed after 12 (n=6) or 24 hours (n=23) in 97% (n=29/30) of patients. Compared with baseline values, right atrial pressure decreased by 34% (17±4 versus 11±5 mm Hg, P<0.001) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased by 27% (31±8 versus 22±9 mm Hg, P<0.001). Compared with pretreatment values, urine output and net fluid balance increased by 130% and 156%, respectively, with up to 24 hours of treatment (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We report the first-in-human experience of intermittent superior vena cava occlusion using the preCARDIA system to reduce congestion in acutely decompensated heart failure. PreCARDIA treatment for up to 24 hours was well tolerated without device- or procedure-related serious or major adverse events and associated with reduced filling pressures and increased urine output. These results support future studies characterizing the clinical utility of the preCARDIA system. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03836079.

Early Experience with the HeartMate Percutaneous Heart Pump from the SHIELD II Trial.

The HeartMate Percutaneous Heart Pump (PHP) is a novel circulatory support catheter delivering a self-expanding 24 French impeller across the aortic valve. The SHIELD II trial compares outcomes among heart failure patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) with the PHP versus Impella systems. The trial was halted in 2017 due to device malfunctions. We aimed to describe procedural, hemodynamic, and clinical outcomes among HR-PCI patients treated with PHP as part of the SHIELD II trial roll-in phase. Procedural, hemodynamic, and 90 day outcomes were assessed among patients undergoing HR-PCI with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and last patent coronary conduit, unprotected left main disease, or significant three vessel disease. The primary endpoint was the 90 day composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization, major bleeding, new/worsening aortic regurgitation, and severe hypotension. Among 75 roll-in phase patients, PHP support duration was 101 ± 53 minutes with 2.5 ± 1.4 coronary lesions treated per patient. Compared with predevice values, the PHP system increased cardiac power and mean arterial pressure. Maximum recorded device flows were 0.4-6.2 L/minute with 26% (n = 19/73) and 9.6% (n = 7/73) of patients achieving peak flows above 3.5 or 5.0 L/minute, respectively. Five PHP device malfunction events (6.7%) were observed. At 90 days, the composite endpoint occurred in 24.3% (18/74) of patients. Early PHP experience demonstrated successful device performance in the majority of enrolled patients; however, unexpected malfunctions led to device revision. Completion of the SHIELD II trial will be required to confirm the safety and efficacy of this iteration of the PHP system in HR-PCI.

Left Ventricular Unloading Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular unloading with Impella may improve survival outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). However, the optimal timing to initiate left ventricular unloading has yet to be established. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare survival in patients with AMI-CS who were supported with Impella prior to PCI (pre-PCI) to those in whom support was initiated following PCI (post-PCI). METHODS: All studies that evaluated the impact of pre-PCI versus post-PCI Impella placement in patients with AMI-CS were included. Primary endpoints included in-hospital, 30-day, and 6-month survival rates. RESULTS: We identified five observational studies comparing outcomes in 432 patients with AMI-CS, of which 173 patients were treated with Impella pre-PCI and 259 patients post-PCI. Patients in the pre-PCI group had lower in-hospital mortality compared to patients in the post-PCI group (RR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50-0.76, I2 = 0%). The lower mortality rate in the pre-PCI group remained evident at 30 days (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.47-0.78, I2 = 0%) and at 6 months (HR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44-0.97, I2 = 0%). There was no difference in the risk of adverse events including reinfarction, stroke, major bleeding, acute ischemic limb, access site bleeding, and hemolysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis of studies evaluating survival among AMI-CS patients with left ventricular unloading initiated pre- versus post-PCI, Impella placement prior to PCI was associated with improved survival.

Comorbidity Burden and Adverse Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the preferred treatment for symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis and elevated procedural risk. Many deaths following TAVR are because of noncardiac causes and comorbid disease burden may be a major determinant of postprocedure outcomes. The prevalence of comorbid conditions and associations with outcomes after TAVR has not been studied. Methods and Results This was a retrospective single-center study of patients treated with TAVR from January 2015 to October 2018. The association between 21 chronic conditions and short- and medium-term outcomes was assessed. A total of 341 patients underwent TAVR and had 1-year follow-up. The mean age was 81.4 (SD 8.0) years with a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality score of 6.7% (SD 4.8). Two hundred twenty (65%) patients had ≥4 chronic conditions present at the time of TAVR. There was modest correlation between Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality and comorbid disease burden (r=0.32, P<0.001). After adjusting for Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality, age, and vascular access, each additional comorbid condition was associated with increased rates of 30-day rehospitalizations (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.44), a composite of 30-day rehospitalization and 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02-1.42), and 1-year mortality (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05-1.59). Conclusions Comorbid disease burden is associated with worse clinical outcomes in high-risk patients treated with TAVR. The risks associated with comorbid disease burden are not adequately captured by standard risk assessment. A systematic assessment of comorbid conditions may improve risk stratification efforts.

Deficiency of MMP1a (Matrix Metalloprotease 1a) Collagenase Suppresses Development of Atherosclerosis in Mice: Translational Implications for Human Coronary Artery Disease.

[Figure: see text].

Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Assist Device Outflow Velocity During Percutaneous Decommissioning.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been used as an effective therapeutic option in patients with advanced heart failure, either as a bridge to transplantation or, in some patients, as a bridge to recovery. LVAD withdrawal with ventricular recovery represents the optimal outcome for patients previously implanted with an LVAD. In this E-Challenge, the authors present a case of percutaneous decommissioning of an LVAD, in which TEE provided critical, real-time perioperative evaluation. The authors also review the current perspectives on LVAD decommissioning in terms of patient selection and surgical techniques.

Incidence and clinical outcomes of stroke in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to evaluate 10-year national trends, incidence and clinical outcomes of stroke in CS-STEMI. BACKGROUND: Stroke is a devastating complication among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Concomitant cardiogenic shock (CS) may further increase the risk of stroke. Use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) devices may further increase stroke risk in CS-STEMI. No studies have evaluated the risk of stroke in contemporary CS-STEMI. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of CS-STEMI patients from a large U.S. national database between 2005 and 2014. Previously validated codes for stroke were used to identify events of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. They were then divided into different groups: without MCS, with intra-aortic balloon pump, percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD, includes Impella or TandemHeart devices), or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. RESULTS: In 172,491 admissions, stroke was noted in 5,613 (3.2%). Between 2005 and 2014, we observed an increase in the events of overall stroke from 3.1% in 2005 to 5.0% in 2014 (p for the trend <.001). The number of ischemic stroke events (2.4%) was higher than hemorrhagic stroke (0.1%) during the study period. Presence of stroke was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (40.6 vs. 29.8%, 95% CI adjusted odds ratio: 1.57, 1.44-1.67; p < .0001 among stroke vs. without stroke). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of stroke events in CS-STEMI patients increased between 2005 and 2014, and is associated with higher in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost of hospitalization. The incidence of both hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke was higher with pMCS device use. Stroke prevention is a priority for CS-STEMI patients.

Incidence and clinical outcomes of bleeding complications and acute limb ischemia in STEMI and cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding complications and acute limb ischemia (ALI) are devastating vascular complications in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Cardiogenic shock (CS) can further increase this risk due to multiorgan failure. In the contemporary era, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support is commonly used for management of CS. We hypothesized that vascular complications may be an important determinant of clinical outcomes for CS due to STEMI (CS-STEMI). OBJECTIVE: We evaluated 10-year national trends, resource utilization and outcomes of bleeding complications, and ALI in CS-STEMI. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of CS-STEMI patients from a large U.S. national database (National Inpatient Sample) between 2005 and 2014. Events were then divided into four different groups: no MCS, with intra-aortic balloon pump, percutaneous ventricular assist device includes Impella or Tandem Heart or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. RESULTS: Bleeding complications and ALI were observed in 31,389 (18.2%) and 1,628 (0.9%) out of 172,491 admissions with CS-STEMI, respectively. Between 2005 and 2014, overall trends increased for ALI; however, the number of bleeding events decreased. ALI was associated with increased in-hospital mortality in comparison to those without any ALI. However, bleeding complications were not associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Compared to patients without complications, both bleeding and ALI were associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization costs. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding and ALI are common complications associated with CS-STEMI in the contemporary era. Both complications are associated with increased hospital costs and LOS. These findings highlight the need to develop algorithms focused on vascular safety in CS-STEMI.