Abiraterone Acetate Versus Enzalutamide Against Chemo-Naïve Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Full-Dose Induction.

Purpose We recently released the multi-institutional real-world analysis about the difference in survival outcomes between abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide against chemo-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in a first-line setting. Although reduced dose induction cases were included in that analysis, induction dose reduction might correlate with reduced efficacy. In this study, we analyzed full-dose induction subgroups from our overall cohort and investigated the true difference in efficacy between these agents. Methods A total of 220 chemotherapy-naïve CRPC cases treated with full-dose induction of first-line androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) were analyzed. Outcome measures were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), treatment failure-free survival (TFF), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results Abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide were administered to 58 and 162 patients, respectively. The median PSA response rate (-65.4% (A) and -81.5% (E), p = 0.0252), PSA decline ≥ 90% (22.4% (A) and 37.0% (E), p = 0.0478), PSA-PFS (median four months (A) and seven months (E), p = 0.00833), TFF (median six months (A) and 15 months (E), p<0.0001), CSS (median 45 months (A) and not reached (E), p < 0.0001), and OS (median 34 months (A) and 80 months (E), p<0.001) were significantly better in the E group. Conclusion This study showed that PSA response, PSA-PFS, TTF, CSS, and OS were better with first-line enzalutamide administration. Direct inhibition of androgen receptor signaling by enzalutamide is associated with better clinical outcomes in the full-dose induction cohort.

Acquired Hemophilia A Diagnosed Based on Gross Hematuria: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is an acquired bleeding disorder caused by neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against Coagulation Factor VIII (FVIII:C), causing sudden hemorrhagic symptoms (i.e., subcutaneous bleeding, intramuscular bleeding, and hematuria). Herein, this study is aimed at presenting a case of AHA diagnosed based on hematuria and reviewing patients who were diagnosed with AHA due to hematuria. A 67-year-old woman was referred to Atsugi City Hospital with painless gross hematuria that began 4 weeks before presentation. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (eCT) revealed an approximately 2 cm mass in the right renal pelvis, and the patient's activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was elevated (61.4 s). The day after the endoscopic biopsy, the patient was in shock due to a large retroperitoneal hematoma. Although her condition stabilized after intravenous radioembolization, she underwent emergency surgeries several times because of rebleeding within the next 3 weeks. At that time, APTT was more prolonged at 106.4 s, and the FVIII:C level was 2%. Mixing tests showed an upwardly convex curve after 2-h incubation, indicating the presence of an inhibitor. Factor VIII inhibitor titer was ≥5.1 Bethesda unit (BU)/mL. A combined product of Plasma-Derived Factors VIIa and X (pd-FVIIa/FX), as second-line hemostatic therapy, as well as cyclophosphamide (CYP), were administered after Recombinant Activated Factor VIIa (rFVIIa) had been ineffective. Following this, the Factor VIII inhibitor titer was undetectable, FVIII:C levels were restored, and APTT decreased to within the normal range. Gross hematuria was significantly alleviated. However, the patient died of cytomegalovirus and fungal infections due to prolonged immunosuppressive therapy. Although AHA diagnosed based on hematuria may have a better prognosis than others, there have been occasional cases with severe outcomes. APTT, detected upon initial hematological testing in patients with hematuria, may be a potential indicator of an existing AHA.

First-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of efficacy and safety.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy is a standard systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although differential pharmacologic action between ICI+ICI and ICI+tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations may affect outcomes, comparative studies using real-world data are few. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 447 mRCC patients treated with 1st-line ICI-based combinations at multiple institutions between January 2018 and August 2023, and selected 320 patients diagnosed with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) for further study. Cohorts were matched using one-to-one propensity scores based on IMDC risk classification. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), and treatment-related adverse events (TrAE) were compared. RESULTS: The matching process yielded 228 metastatic ccRCC patients treated with ICI+ICI (n = 114) or ICI+TKI (n = 114). Median OS was 53 months (95%CI: 33-NA) in patients treated with ICI+ICI and was not reached (95%CI: 43-NA) with ICI+TKI (P = 0.24). Median PFS was significantly shorter for ICI+ICI (13 months, 95%CI: 7-25) than for ICI+TKI (25 months, 95%CI: 13-NA) (P = 0.047). There were no differences in second-line PFS for sequential therapy after 1st-line combinations of ICI+ICI or ICI+TKI (6 vs. 8 months, P = 0.6). There were no differences in ORR between the 2 groups (ICI+ICI: 51% vs. ICI+TKI: 55%, P = 0.8); the progressive disease (PD) rate was significantly higher in patients treated with the ICI+ICI combination (24% vs. 11%, P = 0.029). The rate of any grade TrAE was significantly higher in patients treated with ICI+TKI (71% vs. 85%, P = 0.016), but we found no differences in severe TrAE between the 2 groups (39% vs. 36%, P = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: In a matched cohort of real-world data, we confirmed comparable OS benefits between ICI+ICI and ICI+TKI combinations. However, differential clinical behaviors in terms of PFS, PD rates, and TrAE between ICI-based combinations may enrich clinical decision-making.

Real-world evidence of triplet therapy efficacy in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: a Japanese multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Two randomized trials demonstrated that the survival benefits afforded by triplet therapy were greater than those of doublet therapy, thus changing the treatment paradigm for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). This is the first study to assess the real-world use, performance, and safety of triplet therapy in Japanese patients. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included 45 consecutive mCSPC patients who received triplet therapy composed of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), docetaxel, and darolutamide between January 2023 and June 2024. Baseline patient characteristics and their clinical parameters during triplet therapy were collected. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, and imaging responses were evaluated following the RECIST criteria. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir was defined as the lowest PSA value during follow-up, and the PSA decrease was the initial PSA value minus the PSA nadir. RESULTS: The median patient age was 70 years and the median follow-up duration was 10 months. High-volume disease was present in 82.2% of patients. Concurrent administration of docetaxel and darolutamide was scheduled for 22.2% of cases. The incidence of any AE was 86.7%, with 55.5% of patients experiencing grade 3-4 AEs. Neutropenia was common, but prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) significantly reduced the incidence of neutropenia of grade 3 or higher. Febrile neutropenia occurred in four patients (8.9%); these patients had not received prophylactic G-CSF. A decline in PSA of 90% was observed in 95.6% of patients, and an imaging response was seen in 97.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Triplet therapy with ADT, darolutamide, and docetaxel was highly efficacious and tolerable in Japanese mCSPC patients, particularly those with high-volume disease. Prophylactic G-CSF prescription is crucial to manage neutropenia effectively. Further studies with longer follow-ups are needed to confirm these findings and explore the long-term outcomes.

Changes in the treatment landscape of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer following approval of upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitors: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: A multicenter database was utilized to examine the current treatment landscape and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) following approval of upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with mHSPC who commenced treatment between February 2018 and June 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess oncological outcomes, including time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2, duration from initial treatment to tumor progression during second-line treatment), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the impact of treatment choices on oncological outcomes. In addition, the incidence rate of adverse events was assessed. RESULTS: In total, 829 patients were analyzed; 42.5% received ARSIs with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), 44.0% received combined androgen blockade (CAB), and 13.5% received ADT alone. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated higher rates of CRPC and shorter PFS2 in patients treated with CAB versus ARSIs with ADT. By contrast, CSS and OS were not significantly different between the ARSI with ADT group and the CAB group. Grades 3-4 adverse events occurred in 1.9% of patients receiving CAB and 6.0% of those receiving ARSIs with ADT. CONCLUSIONS: Initial treatment with ARSIs in combination with ADT resulted in a longer time to CRPC and longer PFS2 compared to CAB. Although CAB and ADT alone were associated with fewer adverse events, ARSIs with ADT should be considered a first-line treatment option given its superior oncological outcomes.

PSA doubling time 4.65 months as an optimal cut-off of Japanese nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

A multicenter study of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) was conducted to identify the optimal cut-off value of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (PSADT) that correlated with the prognosis in Japanese nmCRPC. Of the 515 patients diagnosed and treated for nmCRPC at 25 participating Japanese Urological Oncology Group centers, 450 patients with complete clinical information were included. The prognostic values of clinical factors were evaluated with respect to prostate specific antigen progression-free (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). The optimal cutoff value of PSADT was identified using survival tree analysis by Python. The Median PSA and PSADT at diagnosis of nmCRPC were 3.3 ng/ml, and 5.2 months, respectively. Patients treated with novel hormonal therapy (NHT) showed significantly longer PFS (HR: hazard ratio 0.38, p < 0.0001) and PFS2 (HR 0.45, p < 0.0001) than those treated with vintage nonsteroidal antiandrogen agent (Vintage). The survival tree identified 4.65 months as the most prognostic PSADT cutoff point. Among the clinical and pathological factors PSADT of < 4.65 months remained an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 2.96, p = 0.0003) and CSS (HR 3.66, p < 0.0001). Current data represented optimal cut-off of PSADT 4.65 months for a Japanese nmCRPC.

Urethral catheter entrapped in vesicourethral anastomotic sutures after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy successfully removed by transurethral approach.

Introduction: Urethral catheter entrapped in vesicourethral anastomotic sutures after radical prostatectomy is a relatively common complication. We herein present a novel and safe technique to remove urethral catheter. Case presentation: A 64-year-old man was diagnosed with prostate cancer. Subsequently he underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. On postoperative Day 7, the patient experienced difficulty in removing the catheter, and entanglement of the suture with the urinary catheter was suspected. After conservative follow-up, a rigid endoscope was inserted into the urethra beside urethral catheter, identifying suture entanglement with the catheter. Finally, the suture was cut with scissor forceps. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case in which scissor forceps were used to cut the entangled thread in such a complication. This case highlights a novel but simple method for difficult removal of an entrapped catheter.

Prognosis based on postoperative PSA levels and treatment in prostate cancer with lymph node involvement.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer is not established. In clinical practice, PLND is primarily performed in cases of high-risk prostate cancer. The detection of lymph node metastasis plays a crucial role in determining the need for subsequent treatments. This study aims to evaluate the prognosis of prostate cancer patients with lymph node involvement (LNI) by stratifying them based on postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels to identify biomarkers that can guide postoperative treatment strategies. METHODS: Analysis was conducted on 383 patients, selected from 572 initially eligible, who underwent RP with LNI across 33 Japanese Urological Oncology Group institutions from 2006 to 2019. Patients were grouped according to postoperative PSA levels and salvage treatments received. Follow-up focused on castration resistance-free survival (CRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In the persistent PSA group (PSA ≥ 0.1 ng/mL), CRFS and MFS were significantly shorter compared to the non-persistent PSA group (PSA < 0.1 ng/mL), and there was a tendency for shorter OS. In the persistent PSA group, patients with postoperative PSA values above the median (PSA ≥ 0.52 ng/mL) showed shorter CRFS and MFS. Furthermore, in the PSA ≥ 0.52 group, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus radiotherapy (RT) combination had prolonged CRFS and MFS compared with ADT alone. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable insights into stratifying patients based on postoperative PSA levels to tailor postoperative treatment strategies, potentially improving the prognosis of prostate cancer patients with LNI.

Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for patients with non-round cell soft tissue sarcomas: a systematic review for the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 of the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an essential supportive agent for chemotherapy-induced severe myelosuppression. We proposed two clinical questions (CQ): CQ #1, "Does primary prophylaxis with G-CSF benefit chemotherapy for non-round cell soft tissue sarcoma (NRC-STS)?" and CQ #2, "Does G-CSF-based intensified chemotherapy improve NRC-STS treatment outcomes?" for the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 of the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology. METHODS: A literature search was performed on the primary prophylactic use of G-CSF for NRC-STSs. Two reviewers assessed the extracted papers and analyzed overall survival, incidence of febrile neutropenia, infection-related mortality, quality of life, and pain. RESULTS: Eighty-one and 154 articles were extracted from the literature search for CQs #1 and #2, respectively. After the first and second screening, one and two articles were included in the final evaluation, respectively. Only some studies have addressed these two clinical questions through a literature review. CONCLUSION: The clinical questions were converted to future research questions because of insufficient available data. The statements were proposed: "The benefit of primary G-CSF prophylaxis is not clear in NRC-STS" and "The benefit of intensified chemotherapy with primary G-CSF prophylaxis is not clear in NRC-STSs." G-CSF is often administered as primary prophylaxis when chemotherapy with severe myelosuppression is administered. However, its effectiveness and safety are yet to be scientifically proven.

Does age impact clinical outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy in the elderly?-results from a multicenter retrospective study.

Background: Few studies have addressed the efficacy of nephroureterectomy for managing upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in very elderly patients (those aged 85 years and older). We aimed to elucidate the association between age and clinical outcomes in patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 847 patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for UTUC. These patients were classified into four age brackets: young (≤64 years, n=177), intermediate (65-74 years, n=300), elderly (75-84 years, n=312), and very elderly (≥85 years, n=58). We applied logistic regression models to ascertain predictors of postoperative complications. Cox's proportional hazards models were used to evaluate key prognostic factors affecting non-urothelial tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results: In all, 56 patients reported postoperative complications. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 was identified as a significant predictor for postoperative complications whereas age did not show a noteworthy correlation. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses indicated that very elderly patients had notably poorer OS than younger groups. Nevertheless, the differences in NUTRFS and CSS across the age brackets were not statistically significant. In multivariable analyses, very elderly age was a substantial independent determinant of OS but not NUTRFS or CSS. Conclusions: The therapeutic benefits of surgical procedures are relatively consistent across age groups. This underscores the potential of considering surgical treatment for UTUC in patients aged 85 and above, provided they are deemed fit to withstand the surgical rigors and associated invasiveness.

Preoperative Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Before Percutaneous Cryoablation for Clinical T1b Renal Tumors.

Purpose To treat renal cell carcinoma, local ablative therapy is a viable alternative treatment option. Traditionally, cryoablation has been used for the treatment of T1a renal tumors. However, recent technological developments have expanded its application to encompass select T1b renal tumors. Here, we present a retrospective study of the utilization of preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to induce tumor shrinkage and achieve favorable outcomes in percutaneous cryoablation (PCA). Methods We retrospectively evaluated the data from nine patients with clinical T1b renal tumors who underwent PCA. Six patients with TKI pretreatment at our institution between 2016 and 2018 were included in the study. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of preoperative TKIs prior to PCA. Results All patients received axitinib with a median treatment duration of 80.5 days (IQR: 49-85). All patients experienced tumor shrinkage (median: 13.5 mm; IQR: 7-16); five experienced downstaging to T1a following tumor shrinkage. There were no severe adverse events (common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3) in TKIs. After the discontinuation of TKIs for two weeks, all PCA procedures were performed successfully without any severe complications. During a median follow-up of 46 months, no local recurrence was observed in any of these cases. Conclusion In cases with large renal tumors, TKI pretreatment prior to PCA had potential benefits in terms of tumor shrinkage and long-term local control rate. Further well-designed studies in larger populations are needed to validate our findings.

The prognostic significance of additional localized treatment to primary lesion in patients undergoing hormone therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the prognostic values of 'localized treatment to the primary lesion (LT) plus hormone therapy (HT)' versus 'HT alone' in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). METHODS: We conducted a systematic search through the databases of PubMed®, Web of Science®, and Cochrane library® in April 2023 based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. A pooled meta-analysis was performed to assess the prognostic differences between LT + HT and HT alone according to randomized and non-randomized controlled studies (RCTs and NRCTs, respectively). RESULTS: The search identified three RCTs and eight NRCTs. In RCTs, LT did not show prognostic benefits regarding biochemical-failure free rate nor overall survival (OS), although in patients with low tumor burdens, the LT + HT group showed better OS (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54-0.86). In the NRCTs, the LT+HT group showed superior progression-free survival (hazard ratio (HR): 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21-0.87), cancer-specific survival (HR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20-0.76), and OS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.57-0.69) to the HT alone group. In addition, better OS was observed in the LT +HT group regardless of the type of treatment modality for LT; radical prostatectomy (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39-0.69), radiotherapy (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.56-0.71) in NRCTs. CONCLUSIONS: LT to the primary lesion in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer may provide prognostic benefits and especially in patients with low tumor burden.

Docetaxel versus androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) against chemo-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): propensity score matched analysis in real world.

PURPOSE: Although docetaxel and ARSI are picked up as treatment options against chemo-naïve metastatic CRPC in clinical guidelines for prostate cancer, there is no clear evidence which agent should be introduced as first line treatment. Therefore, we investigated our CRPC cohort treated with docetaxel or ARSI as first-line agent against chemo-naïve CRPC to solve these clinical questions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 345 chemotherapy-naïve CRPC patients introduced to first-line docetaxel or ARSI (abiraterone or enzalutamide) between March 2006 and April 2017 at Jikei University Hospital and its affiliated institutions were included in this study. Propensity score matching method was used to minimize the patients' background. The outcome measures were PSA response rate, PSA decline ≥ 90%, cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: PSA decline correlated OS and CSS (p = 0.027, < 0.001, respectively) and median PSA decline rate was 60.4% in docetaxel group and 85.7% in ARSI group (p = 0.0311). Median OS was 33 m (95%CI: 27-53) in docetaxel group and 61 m (95%CI: 47-NA) in ARSI group (p = 0.0246). Median CSS was 34 m (95%CI: 27-53) in docetaxel group and NR (not reached) (95%CI: 61-NA) in ARSI group (p = 0.000133) in propensity score matching cohort. In multivariate analysis, ARSI induction first showed significantly better for OS and CSS (p = 0.0033 and < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this study, better survival outcome with ARSI induction first than docetaxel against chemo-naïve CRPC. And the candidates who had survival benefit by induction docetaxel first could not be found in this study.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022.

INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy for breast cancer can cause neutropenia, increasing the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) and serious infections. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) as primary prophylaxis has been explored to mitigate these risks. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of primary G-CSF prophylaxis in patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted according to the "Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development" using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies assessing using G-CSF as primary prophylaxis in invasive breast cancer were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and FN incidence. Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes with sufficient data. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were included in the qualitative analysis, and five RCTs were meta-analyzed for FN incidence. The meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in FN incidence with primary G-CSF prophylaxis (risk difference [RD] = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.01-0.43, p = 0.04). Evidence for improvement in OS with G-CSF was inconclusive. Four RCTs suggested a tendency for increased pain with G-CSF, but statistical significance was not reported. CONCLUSIONS: Primary prophylactic use of G-CSF is strongly recommended for breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, as it has been shown to reduce the incidence of FN. While the impact on OS is unclear, the benefits of reducing FN are considered to outweigh the potential harm of increased pain.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for patients with Ewing sarcomas: a systematic review for the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 of the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma can lead to severe myelosuppression. We proposed two clinical questions (CQ): CQ #1, "Does primary prophylaxis with G-CSF benefit chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma?" and CQ #2, "Does G-CSF-based intensified chemotherapy improve Ewing sarcoma treatment outcomes?". METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi web databases, including English and Japanese articles published from 1990 to 2019. Two reviewers assessed the extracted papers and analyzed overall survival (OS), febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence, infection-related mortality, quality of life (QOL), and pain. RESULTS: Twenty-five English and five Japanese articles were identified for CQ #1. After screening, a cohort study of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide chemotherapy with 851 patients was selected. Incidence of FN was 60.8% with G-CSF and 65.8% without; statistical tests were not conducted. Data on OS, infection-related mortality, QOL, or pain was unavailable. Consequently, CQ #1 was redefined as a future research question. As for CQ #2, we found two English and five Japanese papers, of which one high-quality randomized controlled trial on G-CSF use in intensified chemotherapy was included. This trial showed trends toward lower mortality and a significant increase in event-free survival for 2-week interval regimen with the G-CSF primary prophylactic use compared with 3-week interval. CONCLUSION: This review indicated that G-CSF's efficacy as primary prophylaxis in Ewing sarcoma, except in children, is uncertain despite its common use. This review tentatively endorses intensified chemotherapy with G-CSF primary prophylaxis for Ewing sarcoma.

Associations between early changes in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after radical nephroureterectomy and treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study explored the impacts of peri-operative changes in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on the survival rate after radical nephroureterectomy. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included a multicentric cohort of patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who had undergone radical nephroureterectomy from 2012 to 2021. We assessed the preoperative NLR, postoperative NLR, delta-NLR (difference between postoperative and preoperative NLRs), and NLR change (ratio of postoperative to preoperative NLR). Additionally, patients were categorized according to increases in their preoperative and/or postoperative NLRs. Associations of survival with peri-operative changes in the NLR were investigated using Cox multivariate regression models. RESULTS: A total of 488 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 73 years. Among the patients, 105 (21.5%) exhibited elevated preoperative and postoperative NLRs, 88 (18.0%) exhibited elevated preoperative NLR only, 53 (10.9%) exhibited elevated postoperative NLR only, and 242 (49.6%) exhibited normal NLRs. Multivariate analysis indicated significant negative correlations between both preoperative and postoperative increased NLRs and oncological outcomes, including nonurothelial tract recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.65, P = 0.017; HR: 2.12, P = 0.014, respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the association between peri-operative changes in the NLR and the outcomes of patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Patients with elevated NLRs at both time points experienced considerably worse outcomes. Further research should explore whether increases in the NLR during long-term follow-up could indicate impending disease recurrence.

Oncological outcomes of prophylactic urethrectomy at the time of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A nationwide multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of prophylactic urethrectomy (PU) on oncological and perioperative outcomes in patients with bladder cancer (BC) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data on 1976 evaluable patients with BC who underwent RC. Patients were drawn from 36 institutions within the Japanese Urological Oncology Group. Oncological outcomes were compared using restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) based on inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves for non-urinary tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Interaction terms within IPTW-adjusted Cox regression models were examined to assess the heterogeneity of treatment effect based on the risk of urethral recurrence (UR). The association between PU, estimated blood loss (EBL), and the incidence of severe postoperative surgical complications (SPSCs) (Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher) was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 1976 patients, 1448 (73.3%) received PU. IPTW adjustment was used to balance baseline characteristics between the treatment groups. Within the 107-month window of patient monitoring, PU showed no survival benefits (NUTRFS difference: 0.2 months [95% confidence interval: -6.8 to 7.3]; CSS, 1.2 [-4.9 to 7.3]; OS, 0 [-6.5 to 6.5]). No significant interactions were observed with factors associated with UR, and PU was associated with unfavorable perioperative outcomes (EBL, 1179 mL vs. 983 mL; SPSC, 14.6% vs. 7.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that (1) PU was not associated with survival in patients with BC undergoing RC, regardless of UR-associated factors, and (2) PU was associated with unfavorable perioperative outcomes.

Current issues and management consensus of advanced prostate cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference-JAPAN 2023.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the voting results of Japanese urologists with the global panel at the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2022. METHODS: Among the 198 questions discussed at the APCCC 2022, the APCCC-JAPAN 2023 focused on 14 key questions related to the management of advanced prostate cancer with insufficient high-level evidence based on their relevance to the Japanese cohort. A panel of six prostate cancer experts addressed these 14 questions and presented the latest evidence to Japanese urologists who voted on-site using a web-based system. The results were compared with those of APCCC 2022. RESULTS: This study found significant differences in the voting results between Japanese urologists and the global panel regarding several crucial issues related to advanced prostate cancer management. These differences were those observed in treatment preferences, monitoring strategies, and treatment choices in specific clinical scenarios. These findings highlight the need for a nuanced approach tailored to the unique challenges with considerations of the Japanese healthcare environment. CONCLUSIONS: APCCC-JAPAN 2023 provides valuable insights into the current clinical issues surrounding the management of advanced prostate cancer in Japan. The partial divergence in the consensus between Japanese urologists and the global panel underscores the importance of a context-specific approach. The results of this study provide practical guidance for physicians facing complex challenges and should be used to inform decision-making in the management of advanced prostate cancer.