Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 58(6): 1216-1221, 2020 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33164094

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, a novel coronavirus, affects mainly the pulmonary parenchyma and produces significant morbidity and mortality. During the pandemic, several complications have been shown to be associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our goal was to present a series of patients with COVID-19 who underwent chest tube placements due to the development of pleural complications and to make suggestions for the insertion and follow-up management of the chest tube. METHODS: We retrospectively collected and analysed data on patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in our hospital between 11 March and 15 May 2020. Patients from this patient group who developed pleural complications requiring chest tube insertion were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 542 patients who were suspected of having COVID-19 were hospitalized. The presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was confirmed with laboratory tests in 342 patients between 11 March and 15 May 2020 in our centre. A chest tube was used in 13 (3.8%) of these patients. A high-efficiency particulate air filter mounted double-bottle technique was used to prevent viral transmission. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COVID-19, the chest tube can be applied in cases with disease or treatment-related pleural complications. Our case series comprised a small group of patients, which is one of its limitations. Still, our main goal was to present our experience with patients with pleural complications and describe a new drainage technique to prevent viral transmission during chest tube application and follow-up.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Tubos Torácicos , Drenaje/instrumentación , Control de Infecciones/instrumentación , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Enfermedades Pleurales/terapia , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Drenaje/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Seguridad del Paciente , Enfermedades Pleurales/virología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Turquía/epidemiología
2.
Turk J Med Sci ; 49(6): 1662-1673, 2019 12 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31655511

RESUMEN

Background/aim: The present study aimed to define the clinical and laboratory criteria for predicting patients that will not benefit from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) treatment and determine the prediction of mortality and prognosis of these critical ill patients. Materials and methods: The study was designed as an observational, multicenter, prospective, and cross-sectional clinical study. It was conducted by 75 researchers at 41 centers in intensive care units (ICUs) located in various geographical areas of Turkey. It included a total of 1463 ICU patients who were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) treatment. A total of 158 parameters were examined via logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for mortality; using these data, the IMV Mortality Prediction Score (IMPRES) scoring system was developed. Results: The following cut-off scores were used to indicate mortality risk: <2, low risk; 2­5, moderate risk; 5.1­8, high risk; >8, very high risk. There was a 26.8% mortality rate among the 254 patients who had a total IMPRES score of lower than 2. The mortality rate was 93.3% for patients with total IMPRES scores of greater than 8 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The present study included a large number of patients from various geographical areas of the country who were admitted to various types of ICUs, had diverse diagnoses and comorbidities, were intubated with various indications in either urgent or elective settings, and were followed by physicians from various specialties. Therefore, our data are more general and can be applied to a broader population. This study devised a new scoring system for decision-making for critically ill patients as to whether they need to be intubated or not and presents a rapid and accurate prediction of mortality and prognosis prior to ICU admission using simple clinical data.


Asunto(s)
Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Turquía/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
3.
Turk J Med Sci ; 48(4): 744-749, 2018 Aug 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30119149

RESUMEN

Background/aim: Cancer patients frequently need intensive care support due to respiratory failure. We aimed to evaluate the predictors of mortality in cancer patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Materials and methods: This study was performed in the ICUs of two centers between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2015. Demographic data, cancer type, causes of respiratory failure, comorbidities, APACHE II scores, treatments, and mortality rates were recorded. Results: A total number of 583 cancer patients (477 males) were enrolled from the two centers. Of those, 472 patients had lung cancer (81%), while 111 had extrapulmonary malignancies (19%), having similar mortality rates. Causes of respiratory failure were mostly invasion of the cancer itself in 84% of cases and due to infection in 12%. ICU mortality rate was 53% and the 1-year mortality rate was 80%. APACHE II scores were significantly higher in nonsurvivors (P < 0.001). One-year survival was found to be significantly shorter in females than males (9 days vs. 12 days) in patients with lung cancer. Conclusion: Mortality rates of cancer patients who need ICU support are higher than overall ICU mortality. High APACHE II scores and female sex seem to be related to mortality in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/mortalidad , APACHE , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones/complicaciones , Infecciones/mortalidad , Infecciones/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Sobrevivientes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA