RESUMEN
Objective: To develop a combined index using cognitive function and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) to discriminate between Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores of 0.5 and 1 in the clinical setting, and to investigate its optimal cutoff values and internal and external validities.Methods: We included outpatients aged 65-89 years with CDR scores of 0.5 or 1. The optimal cutoff values and internal validity were verified using Japanese memory clinic-based datasets between September 2010 and October 2021 [National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (NCGG) datasets]. Cognitive function and IADL were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Lawton Index (LI), respectively. The optimal cutoff values were defined using the Youden Index. To verify internal validity, sensitivity and specificity were calculated using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. To verify external validity, sensitivity and specificity of the optimal cutoff values were assessed in the Organized Registration for the Assessment of dementia on Nationwide General consortium toward Effective treatment (ORANGE) Registry dataset between July 2015 and March 2022, which has multicenter clinical data.Results: A total of 800 (mean age, 77.53 years; men, 50.1%) and 1494 (mean age, 77.97 years; men, 43.3%) participants comprised the NCGG and ORANGE Registry datasets, respectively. The optimum cutoff values for men and women were determined as MMSE < 25 and LI < 5 and MMSE < 25 and LI < 8, respectively; such a combined index showed good discriminative performance in internal (sensitivity/specificity: men, 92.50/73.52; women, 88.57/65.65) and external validities (men, 81.43/77.62; women, 77.64/74.67).Conclusion: The index developed is useful in discriminating between CDR scores of 0.5 and 1 and should be applicable to various settings, such as memory clinics and clinical research.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Demencia , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Demencia/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia/normas , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , JapónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the association between abdominal adiposity and change in cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This longitudinal study included older adults aged ≥60 years without cognitive impairment who participated in the National Institute for Longevity Sciences - Longitudinal Study of Aging. MEASUREMENTS: Cognitive function was evaluated biennially using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) over 10 years. Waist circumference (WC) was measured at the naval level, and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and visceral fat area (VFA) were assessed using baseline computed tomography scans. WC, SFA, and VFA areas were stratified into sex-adjusted tertiles. A linear mixed model was applied separately for men and women. RESULTS: This study included 873 older adults. In men, the groups with the highest levels of WC, SFA, and VFA exhibited a greater decline in MMSE score than the groups with the lowest levels (ß [95% confidence interval]: WC, -0.12 [-0.23 to -0.01]; SFA, -0.13 [-0.24 to -0.02]; VFA, -0.11 [-0.22 to -0.01]). In women, the group with the highest level of WC and SFA showed a greater decline in MMSE score than the group with the lowest level (WC, -0.12 [-0.25 to -0.01]; SFA, -0.18 [-0.30 to -0.06]), but VFA was not associated with cognitive decline. CONCLUSION: Higher WC, SFA, and VFA in men and higher WC and SFA in women were identified as risk factors for cognitive decline in later life, suggesting that abdominal adiposity involved in cognitive decline may differ according to sex.
Asunto(s)
Adiposidad , Disfunción Cognitiva , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Longitudinales , Obesidad Abdominal/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Grasa Intraabdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Índice de Masa CorporalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dementia often results in postural control impairment, which could signify central nervous system dysfunction. However, no studies have compared postural control characteristics among various types of dementia. This study aimed to compare static postural control in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and vascular dementia (VaD). METHODS: Cross-sectional relationship between the clinical diagnoses (AD, DLB, VaD, or normal cognition [NC]) of outpatients at a memory clinic and their upright postural control characteristics were examined. In the postural control test, participants were instructed to maintain a static upright standing on a stabilometer for 60 seconds under the eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Forty postural control parameters, including distance, position, and velocity in the anterior-posterior and medio-lateral directions, derived from the trajectory of the center of mass sway, were calculated. The characteristics of each type of dementia were compared to those of NC, and the differences among the 3 types of dementia were evaluated using linear regression models. RESULTS: The study included 1 789 participants (1 206 with AD, 111 with DLB, 49 with VaD, and 423 with NC). Patients with AD exhibited distinct postural control characteristics, particularly in some distance and velocity parameters, only in the eyes-closed condition. Those with DLB exhibited features in the mean position in the anterior-posterior direction. In patients with VaD, significant differences were observed in most parameters, except the power spectrum. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AD, DLB, and VaD display disease-specific postural control characteristics when compared to cognitively normal individuals.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Demencia Vascular , Enfermedad por Cuerpos de Lewy , Humanos , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Enfermedad por Cuerpos de Lewy/diagnóstico , Equilibrio PosturalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We developed a predictive model for all-cause mortality and examined the risk factors for cause-specific mortality among people with cognitive impairment in a Japanese memory clinic-based cohort (2010-2018). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included people aged ≥65 years with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. The survival status was assessed based on the response of participants or their close relatives via a postal survey. Potential predictors including demographic and lifestyle-related factors, functional status, and behavioral and psychological status were assessed at the first visit at the memory clinic. A backward stepwise Cox regression model was used to select predictors, and a predictive model was developed using a regression coefficient-based scoring approach. The discrimination and calibration were assessed via Harrell's C-statistic and a calibration plot, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 2610 patients aged ≥65 years (men, 38.3%) were analyzed. Over a mean follow-up of 4.1 years, 544 patients (20.8%) died. Nine predictors were selected from the sociodemographic and clinical variables: age, sex, body mass index, gait performance, physical activity, and ability for instrumental activities of daily living, cognitive function, and self-reported comorbidities (pulmonary disease and diabetes). The model showed good discrimination and calibration for 1-5-year mortality (Harrell's C-statistic, 0.739-0.779). Some predictors were specifically associated with cause-specific mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This predictive model has good discriminative ability for 1- to 5-year mortality and can be easily implemented for people with mild cognitive impairment and all stages of dementia referred to a memory clinic.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Demencia , Masculino , Humanos , Actividades Cotidianas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Disfunción Cognitiva/psicología , CogniciónRESUMEN
Introduction: Psychological resilience is an indicator of mental health, but there has been no research to date on changes in psychological resilience among older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) during the stress of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic including factors related to those changes. To fill the gap, this study examined the factors and the changes in psychological resilience of older adults with MCI during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: One hundred thirty participants completed the 10-item version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) between December 2020 and June 2021 as a baseline assessment and between December 2021 and February 2022 as a follow-up. Participants also answered questions on sleep quality, depression symptoms, activities in daily living (ADL), instrumental ADL and social participation to explore factors associated with changes. Results: In this cohort, the mean CD-RISC-10 scores were significantly higher than the baseline at follow-up (p < 0.05), indicating the improvement of psychological resilience. In multiple regression analyses, sleep quality was significantly correlated with change in CD-RISC-10 score (coefficient = 3.94, 95% confidence interval = 1.11 to 6.78). Discussion: Psychological resilience could improve even during the stress of the COVID-19 pandemic in older adults with MCI who were at risk of developing dementia. The factor associated with improved psychological resilience was good sleep quality.
RESUMEN
AIM: To examine the association between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived metrics and cognitive performance in older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 outpatients with T2D aged 70 years or older were analysed. Participants underwent CGM for 14 days. As CGM-derived metrics, mean sensor glucose (SG), glucose coefficient of variation (CV), time in range (TIR; 70-180 mg/dl), time above range (TAR; > 180 mg/dl) and time below range (TBR; < 70 mg/dl), were calculated. Participants underwent cognitive tests, including the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-J), a delayed word-recall test from the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale, a digit symbol substitution test, a letter word fluency test, a trail-making test (TMT) and digit span test (DSP). RESULTS: In multiple regression analyses adjusted for confounders, a higher mean SG was associated with a lower performance in MoCA-J and TMT part B (TMT-B) (P < .05). A higher TAR was associated with a lower performance in TMT-B and DSP-backward (P < .05). By contrast, a higher TIR was associated with better function in TMT-B and DSP-backward (P < .05). Furthermore, CV and TBR were not associated with any cognitive function. CONCLUSION: Hyperglycaemia metrics and TIR derived from CGM are associated with cognitive functions, especially with executive function and working memory, in older adults with T2D.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Estudios Transversales , Glucemia , CogniciónRESUMEN
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To investigate the changes in the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and the relative status of the glycemic control related to the new glycemic targets recommended by the Japan Diabetes Society/Japan Geriatrics Society Joint Committee in 2016 in patients with diabetes mellitus visiting a memory clinic from 2012 to 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 1,436 patients aged ≥65 years with diabetes. Patients were categorized into three categories as follows: category I, intact cognitive function and activities of daily living (ADL); category II, mild cognitive deficits or impaired instrumental ADL; and category III, moderate to severe cognitive impairment or impaired basic ADL. Trends in HbA1c levels, glycemic control status (optimally/poorly/excessively controlled) and proportion of individuals receiving drugs potentially associated with severe hypoglycemia among all patients and categories (I, II or III) from 2012 to 2020 were examined using linear, logistic and multinominal logistic regression models adjusted for confounding factors. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2020, the HbA1c levels, as well as the proportion of patients with poor glycemic control, increased, whereas the proportion of patients with excessive glycemic control and those receiving drugs potentially associated with severe hypoglycemia decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Increased levels of HbA1c and decreased proportions of individuals under excessive glycemic control might reflect recent treatment strategies that avoid hypoglycemia in older patients. Given the adverse complications associated with hyperglycemia, more flexible and individualized glycemic targets based on comprehensive assessments, including vascular complications and comorbidities, might be necessary.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Mellitus , Geriatría , Hiperglucemia , Hipoglucemia , Anciano , Humanos , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Actividades Cotidianas , Estudios Transversales , Japón/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucemia , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemia/prevención & control , Hiperglucemia/prevención & control , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
(1) Background: Preventive measures to control the spread of COVID-19 are essential, but they often cause social isolation and diminish the physical and mental health of older adults. In cognitively impaired individuals, the pandemic has worsened behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Here, we explored the factors contributing to the worsening of BPSD during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2) Methods: Potential patients were identified at a memory clinic in Japan between June 2017 and June 2021. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia during the study period. The outcome was BPSD, as assessed by using the Dementia Behavioral Disorders Scale. Information on patients' lifestyle habits and use of care services was obtained for use as primary explanatory variables; multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between BPSD and care services use or lifestyle habits. The model was adjusted for sociodemographic factors, and the interaction terms of the pandemic period with lifestyle and service use were included to evaluate the effects of COVID-19. (3) Results: We identified 977 participants with MCI and 1380 with dementia (MCI group: 69.8% age 75 years or older, 54.2% female; dementia group: 79.8% age 75 years or older, 64.8% female). After adjustment for possible confounders, significantly worse BPSD was demonstrated in those who used daycare services during COVID-19 (both MCI and dementia patients; p = 0.007 and p = 0.025 respectively) and in those with poor nutritional function (dementia patients; p = 0.040). (4) Conclusions and Implications: During COVID-19, poor nutritional status and use of daycare services were associated with BPSD in those with cognitive decline. These findings indicate the need to fully examine the quantity and quality of care services for people with cognitive decline during emergencies and to continue to provide effective services.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Disfunción Cognitiva , Demencia , Anciano , Síntomas Conductuales , COVID-19/epidemiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/psicología , Demencia/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , PandemiasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: While cross-sectional studies report associations between behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and nutritional status as a modifiable factor, their causal relationship remains unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the impact of nutritional status on BPSD. METHODS: This study included women with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD) from Memory Clinic, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology. The participants were assessed for nutritional status and BPSD using the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF) and the Dementia Behavior Disturbance Scale (DBD), respectively. Based on their MNA-SF scores, the subjects were classified as well-nourished, at risk of malnutrition, or malnourished. Nutritional status and change in BPSD was examined for association by univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses. RESULTS: This study analyzed 181 women (79 with MCI and 102 with early-stage AD). The multivariate analysis showed that the malnourished subjects or those at risk of malnutrition (54.1%) were significantly associated with increased DBD scores (ß = 0.255, P = 0.003) during follow-up. In addition, multivariate regression analysis incorporating change in DBD sub-score as a dependent variable showed that the malnourished subjects or those at risk of malnutrition were associated with increased DBD sub-scores for "verbal aggressiveness/emotional disinhibition" (ß = 0.247, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Poor nutritional status increased BPSD, especially verbal aggressiveness/emotional disinhibition, in those with MCI and early-stage AD during 2.5-year follow-up. Patients with MCI and early-stage AD may need to be assessed for nutritional status from early on, at the onset of mild cognitive decline, and require intervention to prevent worsening of BPSD. Further intervention studies in large prospective cohorts are needed to establish nutritional measures to prevent progression of BPSD in older adults with cognitive impairment.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Disfunción Cognitiva , Desnutrición , Anciano , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/psicología , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Desnutrición/complicaciones , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Estado Nutricional , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Psychological resilience refers to the ability to cope with adversities, and deficits in resilience might lead to mental illness. The COVID-19 pandemic has had impact on psychological resilience for older adults, but there are as yet no data on its impacts on the mental health of older adults who were living with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological resilience in older adults with MCI and to explore associated physical and psychosocial factors. In this cross-sectional study of 268 older adults aged 65-85, we defined MCI as age- and education-adjusted cognitive decline with a standard deviation of 1.0 or more from the reference threshold. During December 2020 to April 2021, we carried out to all participants the 10-item version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) to measure psychological resilience. We also conducted a comprehensive geriatric assessment including sleep quality and depressive symptoms (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, respectively). To identify factors associated with CD-RISC-10 scores (mean: 23.3 ± 0.4), multiple regression analysis revealed that older age [coefficient = 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.06-0.39] was significantly correlated with higher scores, whereas poor sleep quality (coefficient = -2.06, 95% CI = -3.93 to -0.19) and depressive symptoms (coefficient = -2.95, 95% CI = -5.70 to -0.21) were significantly correlated with lower scores. In this study, older adults with MCI showed low psychological resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, and people with low psychological resilience indicated poor sleep quality and depressive symptoms. Our findings suggest directions for devising interventions to maintain mental health and psychological resilience among the vulnerable population of older adults with MCI living under the socially isolated conditions of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. Our recommendation includes continuous assessment of this population and appropriate care for poor sleep quality and depressive symptoms.
RESUMEN
Objective: Preventive measures to limit the spread of COVID-19 are essential, but often cause social isolation, affecting the physical and mental health of older adults. Patients with dementia are likely to have worsening behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) owing to pandemic restrictions. To examine this, we described BPSD before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We identified patients at a memory clinic in Japan between October 2018 and December 2019 (15 months before the pandemic began, n = 1,384) and between April 2020 and June 2021 (15 months after the State of Emergency was declared; n = 675 patients). A propensity score was used to match 576 patients from each group. The Mini-Mental State Exam was used to classify cognitive function into mild and moderate/severe. Dementia Behavioral Disturbance Scale was used to evaluate BPSD. The association between BPSD before and during the pandemic was evaluated using binomial logistic regression models. Results: The levels of frequent night waking were higher in individuals before the pandemic than in those evaluated during the pandemic in both the mild group [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.82, 95% CI 1.02-3.23] and the moderate/severe group (AOR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.19-3.23). During the pandemic, physical attacks were higher in the mild group (AOR = 4.25, 95% CI 1.12-16.07), while night wandering was higher in the moderate/severe group (AOR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.03-4.81). Conclusion: In patients with cognitive impairment, some BPSD were more prevalent during the pandemic, depending on dementia severity. The findings pertaining to the higher frequency of sleep disturbance and aggressiveness during COVID-19 should be used to guide BPSD screening in patients with dementia and to provide evidence-based interventions.